Table 3.

Summary table showing on which factors significant food type effects could be demonstrated for the different individuals and the results of Bonferroni post-hoc tests to determine which food types differed from one another

LizardFactorFPBonferroni post-hoc testsP
Individual 6Factor 156.18<0.001AntCricket<0.001
AntIsopod<0.001
Factor 230.32<0.001AntCricket<0.001
AntIsopod0.001
CricketIsopod0.001
Factor 45.200.010CricketIsopod0.008
Individual 7Factor 123.95<0.001AntCricket<0.001
AntIsopod<0.001
AntEndive<0.001
CricketEndive0.030
Factor 26.230.001CricketIsopod0.026
CricketEndive0.001
Factor 45.300.003AntCricket0.039
AntIsopod0.002
Individual 9Factor 139.66<0.001AntCricket<0.001
AntIsopod<0.001
AntEndive<0.001
Factor 23.170.032
Factor 32.850.046CricketIsopod0.049
Individual 10Factor 135.14<0.001AntCricket<0.001
AntIsopod<0.001
AntEndive<0.001
Factor 29.50<0.001AntCricket0.005
CricketEndive<0.001
IsopodEndive0.002
Factor 33.530.020IsopodEndive0.015
  • Only results for those factors that remained significant after sequential Bonferroni correction are shown