Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Accepted manuscripts
    • Issue in progress
    • Latest complete issue
    • Issue archive
    • Archive by article type
    • Special issues
    • Subject collections
    • Interviews
    • Sign up for alerts
  • About us
    • About JEB
    • Editors and Board
    • Editor biographies
    • Travelling Fellowships
    • Grants and funding
    • Journal Meetings
    • Workshops
    • The Company of Biologists
    • Journal news
  • For authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Aims and scope
    • Presubmission enquiries
    • Article types
    • Manuscript preparation
    • Cover suggestions
    • Editorial process
    • Promoting your paper
    • Open Access
    • Outstanding paper prize
    • Biology Open transfer
  • Journal info
    • Journal policies
    • Rights and permissions
    • Media policies
    • Reviewer guide
    • Sign up for alerts
  • Contacts
    • Contact JEB
    • Subscriptions
    • Advertising
    • Feedback
  • COB
    • About The Company of Biologists
    • Development
    • Journal of Cell Science
    • Journal of Experimental Biology
    • Disease Models & Mechanisms
    • Biology Open

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Experimental Biology
  • COB
    • About The Company of Biologists
    • Development
    • Journal of Cell Science
    • Journal of Experimental Biology
    • Disease Models & Mechanisms
    • Biology Open

supporting biologistsinspiring biology

Journal of Experimental Biology

  • Log in
Advanced search

RSS  Twitter  Facebook  YouTube  

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Accepted manuscripts
    • Issue in progress
    • Latest complete issue
    • Issue archive
    • Archive by article type
    • Special issues
    • Subject collections
    • Interviews
    • Sign up for alerts
  • About us
    • About JEB
    • Editors and Board
    • Editor biographies
    • Travelling Fellowships
    • Grants and funding
    • Journal Meetings
    • Workshops
    • The Company of Biologists
    • Journal news
  • For authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Aims and scope
    • Presubmission enquiries
    • Article types
    • Manuscript preparation
    • Cover suggestions
    • Editorial process
    • Promoting your paper
    • Open Access
    • Outstanding paper prize
    • Biology Open transfer
  • Journal info
    • Journal policies
    • Rights and permissions
    • Media policies
    • Reviewer guide
    • Sign up for alerts
  • Contacts
    • Contact JEB
    • Subscriptions
    • Advertising
    • Feedback
INSIDE JEB
How wind pattern change could impact albatrosses
Kathryn Knight
Journal of Experimental Biology 2020 223: jeb239764 doi: 10.1242/jeb.239764 Published 2 December 2020
Kathryn Knight
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: kathryn.knight@biologists.com
  • Article
  • Figures & tables
  • Info & metrics
  • PDF
Loading
Figure1
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint

Campbell albatrosses on Campbell Island. Photo credit: Caitlin Kroeger.

Rumoured to be the souls of lost sailors, albatrosses cruise the southern oceans effortlessly, borne aloft by the strong winds circling Antarctica in search of squid and fish dinners. Yet, the bird's nomadic lifestyle could be at risk. ‘Wind patterns over the Southern Ocean are expected to change over the next century’, says Caitlin Kroeger from the University of California at Santa Cruz (UCSC), possibly making it harder for the vagrant animals to reach their foraging grounds. So, when Kroeger had the opportunity to visit Campbell Island – 700 km south of New Zealand – to study the birds, she jumped at the opportunity to find out how they cope in the harsh environment. Most intriguingly, Kroeger and Scott Shaffer, from San Jose State University, USA, knew that one resident, the Campbell albatross (Thalassarche impavida), breeds every year, while its neighbour, the grey-headed albatross (Thalassarche chrysostoma) only breeds in alternate seasons. ‘I wanted to understand the costs of different foraging strategies between species of albatross that depend on wind to forage’, says Kroeger.

Sailing from New Zealand, Kroeger, Rachael Orben (Oregon State University, USA) and Lisa Sztukowski (Plymouth University, UK) took everything that they would need for the 4 month stay, storing the majority of their provisions at an automated meteorological station before hiking 10 km to the small hut close to the albatross colonies that would be their base. ‘We drank rainwater from the roof, cooked on a camping stove and set up a solar panel to power our research device and satellite phone. It was pretty rugged’, chuckles Kroeger. Fortunately, the birds were completely unperturbed by their human visitors: ‘You can walk right up to them and pick them up’, says Kroeger, who, together with Orben and Sztukowski, measured the birds’ vital statistics, before injecting them with ‘heavy’ water – made from heavy oxygen and tritium, to determine their energy use during their odysseys – and collecting a blood sample. In addition, the trio attached a GPS tracker to the birds to track their manoeuvres while away from the nest. When the birds returned after days of foraging, Kroeger took a second blood sample, which she later analysed with Dan Crocker, from Sonoma State University, USA, to calculate how much heavy water had been exhaled as carbon dioxide, to calculate the birds’ daily energy expenditure.

After years of patient work by Kroeger and Dan Costa at UCSC, it was apparent that the two species had dramatically different foraging patterns, with grey-headed albatrosses covering distances of up to 1066 km in a day, while Campbell albatrosses only roamed over ranges of up to 768 km per day. Yet, the two species used similar amounts of energy, ∼2000 kJ day–1, despite their different lifestyles and breeding patterns. When Kroeger compared the birds’ physical condition, she found a possible explanation for the grey-headed albatross's biannual breeding pattern: ‘They had lower reserves during early chick rearing, which might contribute to their need to recover between breeding events and breed every other year’, she says. In addition, satellite records of the winds transporting the birds on their voyages showed that wind speed impacts the grey-headed albatrosses more. ‘Higher proportions of strong head winds were costlier for them, probably because they experienced higher wind speeds than Campbell albatrosses in general’, says Kroeger, although both species struggled to take off when the wind speed was low.

Looking to the future, Kroeger suspects that grey-headed albatrosses will be more at risk from higher winds when foraging while their Campbell neighbours may struggle in areas where wind speeds are predicted to fall, ‘Which could have negative population-level consequences’, she says, with concern.

References

    1. Kroeger, C. E.,
    2. Crocker, D. E.,
    3. Orben, R. A.,
    4. Thompson, D. R.,
    5. Torres, L. G.,
    6. Sagar, P. M.,
    7. Sztukowski, L. A.,
    8. Andriese, T.,
    9. Costa, D. P. and
    10. Shaffer, S. A.
    (2020). Similar foraging energetics of two sympatric albatrosses despite contrasting life histories and wind-mediated foraging strategies. J. Exp. Biol. 223, jeb228585. doi:10.1242/jeb.228585
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
Previous ArticleNext Article
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

This Issue

 Download PDF

Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Experimental Biology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
How wind pattern change could impact albatrosses
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Experimental Biology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Experimental Biology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
INSIDE JEB
How wind pattern change could impact albatrosses
Kathryn Knight
Journal of Experimental Biology 2020 223: jeb239764 doi: 10.1242/jeb.239764 Published 2 December 2020
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
INSIDE JEB
How wind pattern change could impact albatrosses
Kathryn Knight
Journal of Experimental Biology 2020 223: jeb239764 doi: 10.1242/jeb.239764 Published 2 December 2020

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Alerts

Please log in to add an alert for this article.

Sign in to email alerts with your email address

Article navigation

  • Top
  • Article
    • References
  • Figures & tables
  • Info & metrics
  • PDF

Related articles

Cited by...

More in this TOC section

  • Making a difference: the role of comparative biology in tackling climate change
  • Lifestyle difference gives female yellow-billed hornbills the edge
  • High-voltage catfish immune to their own shocks
Show more INSIDE JEB

Similar articles

Other journals from The Company of Biologists

Development

Journal of Cell Science

Disease Models & Mechanisms

Biology Open

Advertisement

Welcome to JEB’s new Editor Monica Daley

We are pleased to welcome Monica Daley to JEB’s Editorial team. Monica has had a long association with JEB before taking up her new role, overseeing peer review of neuromuscular physiology, terrestrial biomechanics and integrative physiology of locomotion.


In the field with Robyn Hetem

Continuing our fieldwork series, Robyn Hetem reflects on working with species ranging from aardvark to zebra, and the impact COVID-19 has had on fieldwork.


Read & Publish participation continues to grow

“It is particularly encouraging for early career researchers, as it allows them to display their research globally without the need to find costs to cover the open access option.”

Professor Fernando Montealegre-Z (University of Lincoln) shares his experience of publishing Open Access as part of our growing Read & Publish initiative. We now have over 150 institutions in 15 countries and four library consortia taking part – find out more and view our full list of participating institutions.


Nocturnal reef residents have deep-sea-like eyes

Fanny de Busserolles and colleagues from The University of Queensland have discovered that the eyes of nocturnal reef fish have multibank retinas, layers of photoreceptors, similar to the eyes of deep-sea fish that live in dim light conditions.


Mechanisms underlying gut microbiota–host interactions in insects

In their Review, Konstantin Schmidt and Philipp Engel summarise recent findings about the mechanisms involved in gut colonisation and the provisioning of beneficial effects in gut microbiota–insect symbiosis.

Articles

  • Accepted manuscripts
  • Issue in progress
  • Latest complete issue
  • Issue archive
  • Archive by article type
  • Special issues
  • Subject collections
  • Interviews
  • Sign up for alerts

About us

  • About JEB
  • Editors and Board
  • Editor biographies
  • Travelling Fellowships
  • Grants and funding
  • Journal Meetings
  • Workshops
  • The Company of Biologists
  • Journal news

For Authors

  • Submit a manuscript
  • Aims and scope
  • Presubmission enquiries
  • Article types
  • Manuscript preparation
  • Cover suggestions
  • Editorial process
  • Promoting your paper
  • Open Access
  • Outstanding paper prize
  • Biology Open transfer

Journal Info

  • Journal policies
  • Rights and permissions
  • Media policies
  • Reviewer guide
  • Sign up for alerts

Contact

  • Contact JEB
  • Subscriptions
  • Advertising
  • Feedback

 Twitter   YouTube   LinkedIn

© 2021   The Company of Biologists Ltd   Registered Charity 277992