ABSTRACT
Avian eggs contain a large number of molecules deposited by the mother that provide the embryo with energy but also potentially influence its development via the effects of maternally derived hormones and antibodies: the avian egg is thus ‘multivariate’. Multivariate effects on offspring phenotype were evaluated in a study on captive zebra finches, by simultaneously manipulating maternally derived antibodies (MAb) by lipopolysaccharide (LPS) treatment of mothers and injection of testosterone into the egg yolk. LPS treatment had a positive effect on body mass growth at 30 days after hatching and immune response at sexual maturity, while egg testosterone treatment positively influenced immune response at fledging and courtship behaviour in sexually mature male offspring. Maternal effects are known to modulate offspring telomere length (TL). However, the multivariate effects of egg-derived maternal components on offspring telomere dynamics from hatching to sexual maturity are undefined. Here, we tested: (1) the effects of LPS and testosterone treatments on TL from hatching to sexual maturity (day 82); (2) how LPS treatment modulated TL over reproduction in adult females; and (3) the relationship between maternal and offspring TL. We predicted that TL would be shorter in LPS fledglings (as a cost of faster growth) and that TL would be longer in sexually mature adults after yolk testosterone treatment (as a proxy of individual quality). In adult females, there was an overall negative relationship between laying and rearing investments and TL, this relationship was weaker in LPS-treated females. In chicks, there was an overall negative effect of LPS treatment on TL measured at fledging and sexual maturity (day 25–82). In addition, at fledging, there was a Sex×LPS×Testosterone interaction, suggesting the existence of antagonistic effects of our treatments. Our data partially support the hypothesis that telomeres are proxies of individual quality and that individual differences in TL are established very early in life.
Footnotes
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing or financial interests.
Author contributions
Conceptualization: R.T., T.D.W.; Methodology: F.C., R.T., S.Z., T.D.W.; Formal analysis: F.C.; Resources: T.D.W.; Data curation: T.D.W.; Writing - original draft: F.C., T.D.W.; Writing - review & editing: F.C., R.T., T.D.W.; Project administration: R.T., T.D.W.; Funding acquisition: F.C., R.T., T.D.W.
Funding
The present study was supported by a Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS) grant for international collaborations (TALISMAN, PICS 231662) to F.C. and T.D.W., and Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council Discovery (155395-2012) and Accelerator (429387-2012) grants to T.D.W. R.T. was supported by the Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (DGAPA-PASPA) and the Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología to spend a sabbatical year at Simon Fraser University.
Supplementary information
Supplementary information available online at https://jeb.biologists.org/lookup/doi/10.1242/jeb.232496.supplemental
Data availability
Data are available in Figshare at: https://figshare.com/s/47cc7823d5d998794644.
- Received July 1, 2020.
- Accepted October 26, 2020.
- © 2020. Published by The Company of Biologists Ltd
Log in using your username and password
Log in through your institution
Pay Per Article - You may access this article (from the computer you are currently using) for 1 day for US$30.00 .
Regain Access - You can regain access to a recent Pay per Article purchase if your access period has not yet expired.