Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Accepted manuscripts
    • Issue in progress
    • Latest complete issue
    • Issue archive
    • Archive by article type
    • Special issues
    • Subject collections
    • Interviews
    • Sign up for alerts
  • About us
    • About JEB
    • Editors and Board
    • Editor biographies
    • Travelling Fellowships
    • Grants and funding
    • Journal Meetings
    • Workshops
    • The Company of Biologists
    • Journal news
  • For authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Aims and scope
    • Presubmission enquiries
    • Article types
    • Manuscript preparation
    • Cover suggestions
    • Editorial process
    • Promoting your paper
    • Open Access
    • Outstanding paper prize
    • Biology Open transfer
  • Journal info
    • Journal policies
    • Rights and permissions
    • Media policies
    • Reviewer guide
    • Sign up for alerts
  • Contacts
    • Contact JEB
    • Subscriptions
    • Advertising
    • Feedback
  • COB
    • About The Company of Biologists
    • Development
    • Journal of Cell Science
    • Journal of Experimental Biology
    • Disease Models & Mechanisms
    • Biology Open

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Experimental Biology
  • COB
    • About The Company of Biologists
    • Development
    • Journal of Cell Science
    • Journal of Experimental Biology
    • Disease Models & Mechanisms
    • Biology Open

supporting biologistsinspiring biology

Journal of Experimental Biology

  • Log in
Advanced search

RSS  Twitter  Facebook  YouTube  

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Accepted manuscripts
    • Issue in progress
    • Latest complete issue
    • Issue archive
    • Archive by article type
    • Special issues
    • Subject collections
    • Interviews
    • Sign up for alerts
  • About us
    • About JEB
    • Editors and Board
    • Editor biographies
    • Travelling Fellowships
    • Grants and funding
    • Journal Meetings
    • Workshops
    • The Company of Biologists
    • Journal news
  • For authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Aims and scope
    • Presubmission enquiries
    • Article types
    • Manuscript preparation
    • Cover suggestions
    • Editorial process
    • Promoting your paper
    • Open Access
    • Outstanding paper prize
    • Biology Open transfer
  • Journal info
    • Journal policies
    • Rights and permissions
    • Media policies
    • Reviewer guide
    • Sign up for alerts
  • Contacts
    • Contact JEB
    • Subscriptions
    • Advertising
    • Feedback
OUTSIDE JEB
Birds ruffled by big-city lights
Lauren Nadler
Journal of Experimental Biology 2020 223: jeb214668 doi: 10.1242/jeb.214668 Published 2 December 2020
Lauren Nadler
Nova Southeastern University
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Lauren Nadler
  • For correspondence: lnadler@nova.edu
  • Article
  • Info & metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Embedded Image

The blazing lights of Times Square in New York City may be impressive for tourists, yet this blindingly bright attraction can cause problems for urban wildlife. Artificial light at night, typical of cities and suburban areas around the globe, can cause problems for the animals that we share space with, although the impact on local wildlife is often disregarded. Given the current global COVID-19 pandemic, understanding how stressors, such as artificial nocturnal light, alter infectious disease transmission is now even more pressing. So, Daniel Becker and colleagues from Indiana University in the USA delved into this question, looking at how persistent artificial light at night alters immunity and infection risk in wild animal communities.

Becker and colleagues suspected that migratory species may be especially vulnerable to artificial nocturnal light, as they frequently migrate at night and use urban and suburban habitats as resting spots along their route. To test this theory, the team chose to study the dark-eyed junco (Junco hyemalis), a songbird which has populations that migrate and others that stay put to breed. Both of these population types are susceptible to blood-borne parasites during their summer breeding season that are transmitted by blood-sucking insects (such as mosquitoes), that initially cause a short infection, but can then remain dormant for months before rearing their ugly head when the host is either stressed or busy with other tasks, such as reproduction. The researchers suspected that the stress associated with artificial nocturnal light could make the birds more vulnerable to infection relapses, and that these effects would be stronger in the migratory birds than in their stay-at-home counterparts, as migration can suppress the immune system.

To test these ideas, the researchers rounded up resident and migratory juncos from their summer-time roosts in the Appalachian Mountains, USA, before transporting them back to an indoor aviary at Indiana University. For over 6 months, half of the migrants and stay-at-home birds were exposed to artificial light at night, while the remaining birds experienced a natural light cycle. Throughout this time, the researchers looked for signs of changes in the birds’ immunity (by looking at the number of white blood cells in their blood) as well as the risk of infection relapse, by keeping track of the number of parasites in the birds’ blood over time.

Becker and colleagues found that nocturnal artificial light increased the total number of white blood cells in both resident and migratory birds, indicating that their immune systems were surging, and when the researchers looked at the birds’ parasite numbers, these spikes weren't surprising. Following exposure to man-made nocturnal light, the number of parasites in the birds’ blood also boomed. This effect could be due to changes in the hormone melatonin, which is secreted when it is dark and boosts the immune system. Artificial light at night may suppress melatonin production, thus supressing the immune system and increasing susceptibility to infections.

The negative impacts of artificial light at night on wildlife in urban and suburban areas could be minimized by urban planners devising alterations to city lights in collaboration with physiologists. Possibilities include shifting street lighting to a yellower or redder tone, reorienting lighting structures to project light down, rather than up, and restricting the use of bright lighting at night during key times of year – such as those coinciding with annual migrations – to reduce the impacts of man-made light on nocturnal wildlife in and around our cities.

References

    1. Becker, D. J.,
    2. Singh, D.,
    3. Pan, Q.,
    4. Montoure, J. D.,
    5. Talbott, K. M.,
    6. Wanamaker, S. M., and
    7. Ketterson E. D.
    (2020). Artificial light at night amplifies seasonal relapse of haemosporidian parasites in a widespread songbird. Proc. R. Soc. B 287. doi:10.1098/rspb.2020.1831
    OpenUrlCrossRef
Previous ArticleNext Article
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

This Issue

 Download PDF

Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Experimental Biology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Birds ruffled by big-city lights
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Experimental Biology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Experimental Biology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
OUTSIDE JEB
Birds ruffled by big-city lights
Lauren Nadler
Journal of Experimental Biology 2020 223: jeb214668 doi: 10.1242/jeb.214668 Published 2 December 2020
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
OUTSIDE JEB
Birds ruffled by big-city lights
Lauren Nadler
Journal of Experimental Biology 2020 223: jeb214668 doi: 10.1242/jeb.214668 Published 2 December 2020

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Alerts

Please log in to add an alert for this article.

Sign in to email alerts with your email address

Article navigation

  • Top
  • Article
    • References
  • Info & metrics
  • PDF

Related articles

Cited by...

More in this TOC section

  • Mole-rats play evolution by ear
  • Gusty winds, flappy wings
  • Synthetic sunflower scent trains bees for better pollination
Show more OUTSIDE JEB

Similar articles

Other journals from The Company of Biologists

Development

Journal of Cell Science

Disease Models & Mechanisms

Biology Open

Advertisement

Welcome to JEB’s new Editor Monica Daley

We are pleased to welcome Monica Daley to JEB’s Editorial team. Monica has had a long association with JEB before taking up her new role, overseeing peer review of neuromuscular physiology, terrestrial biomechanics and integrative physiology of locomotion.


In the field with Robyn Hetem

Continuing our fieldwork series, Robyn Hetem reflects on working with species ranging from aardvark to zebra, and the impact COVID-19 has had on fieldwork.


Read & Publish participation continues to grow

“It is particularly encouraging for early career researchers, as it allows them to display their research globally without the need to find costs to cover the open access option.”

Professor Fernando Montealegre-Z (University of Lincoln) shares his experience of publishing Open Access as part of our growing Read & Publish initiative. We now have over 150 institutions in 15 countries and four library consortia taking part – find out more and view our full list of participating institutions.


Nocturnal reef residents have deep-sea-like eyes

Fanny de Busserolles and colleagues from The University of Queensland have discovered that the eyes of nocturnal reef fish have multibank retinas, layers of photoreceptors, similar to the eyes of deep-sea fish that live in dim light conditions.


Mechanisms underlying gut microbiota–host interactions in insects

In their Review, Konstantin Schmidt and Philipp Engel summarise recent findings about the mechanisms involved in gut colonisation and the provisioning of beneficial effects in gut microbiota–insect symbiosis.

Articles

  • Accepted manuscripts
  • Issue in progress
  • Latest complete issue
  • Issue archive
  • Archive by article type
  • Special issues
  • Subject collections
  • Interviews
  • Sign up for alerts

About us

  • About JEB
  • Editors and Board
  • Editor biographies
  • Travelling Fellowships
  • Grants and funding
  • Journal Meetings
  • Workshops
  • The Company of Biologists
  • Journal news

For Authors

  • Submit a manuscript
  • Aims and scope
  • Presubmission enquiries
  • Article types
  • Manuscript preparation
  • Cover suggestions
  • Editorial process
  • Promoting your paper
  • Open Access
  • Outstanding paper prize
  • Biology Open transfer

Journal Info

  • Journal policies
  • Rights and permissions
  • Media policies
  • Reviewer guide
  • Sign up for alerts

Contact

  • Contact JEB
  • Subscriptions
  • Advertising
  • Feedback

 Twitter   YouTube   LinkedIn

© 2021   The Company of Biologists Ltd   Registered Charity 277992