ABSTRACT
Mass regulation in birds is well documented. For example, birds can increase body mass in response to lower availability and/or predictability of food and decrease body mass in response to increased predation danger. Birds also demonstrate an ability to maintain body mass across a range of food qualities. Although the adaptive significance of mass regulation has received a great deal of theoretical and empirical attention, the mechanisms by which birds achieve this have not. Several non-exclusive mechanisms could facilitate mass regulation in birds. Birds could regulate body mass by adjusting food intake (dieting), activity, baseline energetic requirements (basal metabolic rate), mitochondrial efficiency or assimilation efficiency. Here, we present the results of two experiments in captive red knots (Calidris canutus islandica) that assess three of these proposed mechanisms: dieting, activity and up- and down-regulation of metabolic rate. In the first experiment, knots were exposed to cues of predation risk that led them to exhibit presumably adaptive mass loss. In the second experiment, knots maintained constant body mass despite being fed alternating high- and low-quality diets. In both experiments, regulation of body mass was achieved through a combination of changes in food intake and activity. Both experiments also provide some evidence for a role of metabolic adjustments. Taken together, these two experiments demonstrate that fine-scale management of body mass in knots is achieved through multiple mechanisms acting simultaneously.
Footnotes
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing or financial interests.
Author contributions
Conceptualization: K.J.M., E.M.A.K., P.v.d.H., A.D., T.P.; Methodology: K.J.M., E.M.A.K., P.v.d.H., A.D., T.P.; Formal analysis: K.J.M.; Investigation: K.J.M., E.M.A.K., P.v.d.H., A.D.; Resources: T.P.; Data curation: K.J.M., E.M.A.K., P.v.d.H.; Writing - original draft: K.J.M.; Writing - review & editing: E.M.A.K., P.v.d.H., A.D., T.P.; Visualization: K.J.M.; Supervision: K.J.M., E.M.A.K., P.v.d.H., T.P.; Project administration: K.J.M., E.M.A.K., P.v.d.H.; Funding acquisition: K.J.M., T.P.
Funding
The work of experiment 2 was supported by a Veni fellowship from the Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (NWO grant no. 863.14.021) to K.J.M. The field work, A.D. and T.P. were supported by grants to T.P. from NWO-ALW (TOP-grant ‘Shorebirds in space’, no. 854.11.004) and Waddenfonds (project ‘Metawad’, WF 209925). K.J.M. was supported by a Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) Discovery Grant (RGPIN-2018-04358).
Data availability
All data and R scripts required to reproduce the analyses presented in this manuscript are available from the Open Science Framework digital repository (https://osf.io/uswk7/).
Supplementary information
Supplementary information available online at https://jeb.biologists.org/lookup/doi/10.1242/jeb.231993.supplemental
- Received June 25, 2020.
- Accepted September 14, 2020.
- © 2020. Published by The Company of Biologists Ltd
Log in using your username and password
Log in through your institution
Pay Per Article - You may access this article (from the computer you are currently using) for 1 day for US$30.00 .
Regain Access - You can regain access to a recent Pay per Article purchase if your access period has not yet expired.