ABSTRACT
Sea urchins native to the nearshore open coast experience periods of high, repeated wave forces that can result in dislodgement. To remain attached while clinging and locomoting across rocky substrates, sea urchins use adhesive tube feet. Purple sea urchins (Strongylocentrotus purpuratus) adhere to a variety of rock substrates (e.g. sandstone, mudstone, granite), and display morphological plasticity (skeletal morphology) to native substrate. We tested the hypothesis that their adhesive system is also plastic and varies as a function of native population and substrate. The results of our study support our hypothesis. Sea urchins from sandstone adhere less strongly to most substrates than those native to mudstone and granite rock. Sandstone produced the lowest whole animal adhesive force values across all populations, suggesting that this rock type is particularly challenging for sea urchins to adhere to. The number of adhesive tube feet that failed during experimental trials and the area used by sea urchins to attach, matches closely with whole animal adhesive force values: higher forces resulted in more tube foot failure and larger attachment area. On artificial substrates (glass and Plexiglass), differences in adhesion among populations was consistent with differences in adhesion on rock substrates except on glass, where sea urchins native to sandstone adhered more strongly to glass than any other substrate tested. To our knowledge, this study is the first to describe population-level plasticity in a biological adhesive system related to native substrate, and has significant implications for sea urchin ecology, behavior and functional morphology.
Footnotes
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing or financial interests.
Author contributions
Conceptualization: A.Y.S., C.A.N., M.P.R.; Methodology: A.Y.S., C.A.N., M.P.R.; Formal analysis: C.A.N.; Investigation: A.Y.S., C.A.N., M.P.R.; Resources: M.P.R.; Data curation: C.A.N.; Writing - original draft: A.Y.S.; Writing - review & editing: A.Y.S., C.A.N., M.P.R.; Supervision: A.Y.S., C.A.N., M.P.R.; Project administration: A.Y.S., C.A.N.; Funding acquisition: M.P.R.
Funding
This research was supported by the Department of Biology, Villanova University. Costs of some laboratory and field supplies were offset by a grant from the National Science Foundation (0623934 to M.P.R.). Gougeon Brothers Inc. discounted the cost of epoxy resin.
Supplementary information
Supplementary information available online at https://jeb.biologists.org/lookup/doi/10.1242/jeb.228544.supplemental
- Received May 6, 2020.
- Accepted June 19, 2020.
- © 2020. Published by The Company of Biologists Ltd
Log in using your username and password
Log in through your institution
Pay Per Article - You may access this article (from the computer you are currently using) for 1 day for US$30.00 .
Regain Access - You can regain access to a recent Pay per Article purchase if your access period has not yet expired.