Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Accepted manuscripts
    • Issue in progress
    • Latest complete issue
    • Issue archive
    • Archive by article type
    • Special issues
    • Subject collections
    • Interviews
    • Sign up for alerts
  • About us
    • About JEB
    • Editors and Board
    • Editor biographies
    • Travelling Fellowships
    • Grants and funding
    • Journal Meetings
    • Workshops
    • The Company of Biologists
    • Journal news
  • For authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Aims and scope
    • Presubmission enquiries
    • Article types
    • Manuscript preparation
    • Cover suggestions
    • Editorial process
    • Promoting your paper
    • Open Access
    • Outstanding paper prize
    • Biology Open transfer
  • Journal info
    • Journal policies
    • Rights and permissions
    • Media policies
    • Reviewer guide
    • Sign up for alerts
  • Contacts
    • Contact JEB
    • Subscriptions
    • Advertising
    • Feedback
  • COB
    • About The Company of Biologists
    • Development
    • Journal of Cell Science
    • Journal of Experimental Biology
    • Disease Models & Mechanisms
    • Biology Open

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Experimental Biology
  • COB
    • About The Company of Biologists
    • Development
    • Journal of Cell Science
    • Journal of Experimental Biology
    • Disease Models & Mechanisms
    • Biology Open

supporting biologistsinspiring biology

Journal of Experimental Biology

  • Log in
Advanced search

RSS  Twitter  Facebook  YouTube  

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Accepted manuscripts
    • Issue in progress
    • Latest complete issue
    • Issue archive
    • Archive by article type
    • Special issues
    • Subject collections
    • Interviews
    • Sign up for alerts
  • About us
    • About JEB
    • Editors and Board
    • Editor biographies
    • Travelling Fellowships
    • Grants and funding
    • Journal Meetings
    • Workshops
    • The Company of Biologists
    • Journal news
  • For authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Aims and scope
    • Presubmission enquiries
    • Article types
    • Manuscript preparation
    • Cover suggestions
    • Editorial process
    • Promoting your paper
    • Open Access
    • Outstanding paper prize
    • Biology Open transfer
  • Journal info
    • Journal policies
    • Rights and permissions
    • Media policies
    • Reviewer guide
    • Sign up for alerts
  • Contacts
    • Contact JEB
    • Subscriptions
    • Advertising
    • Feedback
INSIDE JEB
Cabbage whites have a unique take on polarized light
Kathryn Knight
Journal of Experimental Biology 2020 223: jeb230441 doi: 10.1242/jeb.230441 Published 7 July 2020
Kathryn Knight
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: kathryn.knight@biologists.com
  • Article
  • Figures & tables
  • Info & metrics
  • PDF
Loading
Figure1
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint

A cabbage white butterfly (Pireis rapae). Photo credit: Adam Blake.

Cabbage white butterfly females are choosy. They aren't happy to deposit their eggs on any old bit of foliage; for them, it's members of the Brassicaceae family or nothing. And, when Adam Blake and colleagues from Simon Fraser University, Canada, tried to interest the picky insects in other pieces of vegetation, it turned out that the degree of polarized light reflected by leaves played a large part in the choices of the butterfly mums-to-be. The selective females prefer to settle on leaves that reflected 25–35% of linearly polarized light, like tasty cabbage leaves, but turn up their noses at potato plants that reflect 45–55% linearly polarized light. But how were the keen insects’ eyes able to distinguish between the degree of linearly polarized light reflected by cabbage leaves and that reflected by the verdant foliage of potato plants? Intrigued by the pernickety females, Blake and PI Gerhard Gries set the insects a TV quiz to get to the bottom of how they perceive the difference between potato leaves and cabbages.

Having already discovered that cabbage white butterflies prefer pictures of cabbage-shaped plants, Gina Hahn, Hayley Grey, Shelby Kwok, Deby McIntosh and Blake set about adjusting the colours and degree of linear polarization present in the light emitted from a TV screen showing a shot of a cabbage plant to find out how the changes affected the insects’ preferences. However, Blake explains, ‘Despite using identical monitors controlled by the same hardware and software, it took a great deal of effort to get both monitors to output similar colours (as measured by their spectra) when showing identical images’. Eventually, after months of painstakingly tinkering to synchronize the screens’ colours, the team was able to offer the butterflies a choice between two cabbage images – one with colours that had been tweaked – to begin to understand how light polarization affects their perception of colour.

The team removed red or blue shades from the cabbage images, in addition to altering the degree of light polarization, and, as the cabbages’ colours changed, the butterflies’ preferences began shifting all over the place. In one case, the butterflies consistently preferred bluer cabbages (lacking a hint of red) with 51% polarization over bluer cabbages with 31% polarization, while they preferred yellower cabbages (with no blue in their spectrum) when the light was horizontally polarized with 31% polarization, but switched preference to 51% polarization when the light was vertically polarized. The team realised that instead of depending on one, or a combination of two, types of light receptors in their retina – tuned to either red, green or blue light – to detect polarized light, the cabbage whites must be using all three colour-tuned photoreceptors. In addition, the insects were perceiving the polarized light differently, depending on the shade and brightness of the colour.

And when the team compared the cabbage white's colour preferences with those of other butterflies, it was apparent that the impact of polarization on the cabbage white's perception of colour is unique. Blake explains that horizontal polarization makes shades of green brighter for swallowtail butterflies; however, the cabbage white's preferences revealed that the effects of light polarization did not make any particular colour brighter in their eyes. ‘Cabbage white butterflies respond to polarized light differently from not just other butterflies, but from all of the other polarization-sensitive animals studied thus far’, he says.

References

    1. Blake, A. J.,
    2. Hahn, G. S.,
    3. Grey, H.,
    4. Kwok, S. A.,
    5. McIntosh, D. and
    6. Gries, G.
    (2020). Polarized light sensitivity in Pieris rapae is dependent on both color and intensity. J. Exp. Biol. 223, jeb220350. doi:10.1242/jeb.220350
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
Previous ArticleNext Article
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

This Issue

 Download PDF

Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Experimental Biology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Cabbage whites have a unique take on polarized light
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Experimental Biology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Experimental Biology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
INSIDE JEB
Cabbage whites have a unique take on polarized light
Kathryn Knight
Journal of Experimental Biology 2020 223: jeb230441 doi: 10.1242/jeb.230441 Published 7 July 2020
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
INSIDE JEB
Cabbage whites have a unique take on polarized light
Kathryn Knight
Journal of Experimental Biology 2020 223: jeb230441 doi: 10.1242/jeb.230441 Published 7 July 2020

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Alerts

Please log in to add an alert for this article.

Sign in to email alerts with your email address

Article navigation

  • Top
  • Article
    • References
  • Figures & tables
  • Info & metrics
  • PDF

Related articles

Cited by...

More in this TOC section

  • Making a difference: the role of comparative biology in tackling climate change
  • Lifestyle difference gives female yellow-billed hornbills the edge
  • High-voltage catfish immune to their own shocks
Show more INSIDE JEB

Similar articles

Other journals from The Company of Biologists

Development

Journal of Cell Science

Disease Models & Mechanisms

Biology Open

Advertisement

Welcome to JEB’s new Editor Monica Daley

We are pleased to welcome Monica Daley to JEB’s Editorial team. Monica has had a long association with JEB before taking up her new role, overseeing peer review of neuromuscular physiology, terrestrial biomechanics and integrative physiology of locomotion.


In the field with Robyn Hetem

Continuing our fieldwork series, Robyn Hetem reflects on working with species ranging from aardvark to zebra, and the impact COVID-19 has had on fieldwork.


Read & Publish participation continues to grow

“It is particularly encouraging for early career researchers, as it allows them to display their research globally without the need to find costs to cover the open access option.”

Professor Fernando Montealegre-Z (University of Lincoln) shares his experience of publishing Open Access as part of our growing Read & Publish initiative. We now have over 150 institutions in 15 countries and four library consortia taking part – find out more and view our full list of participating institutions.


Nocturnal reef residents have deep-sea-like eyes

Fanny de Busserolles and colleagues from The University of Queensland have discovered that the eyes of nocturnal reef fish have multibank retinas, layers of photoreceptors, similar to the eyes of deep-sea fish that live in dim light conditions.


Mechanisms underlying gut microbiota–host interactions in insects

In their Review, Konstantin Schmidt and Philipp Engel summarise recent findings about the mechanisms involved in gut colonisation and the provisioning of beneficial effects in gut microbiota–insect symbiosis.

Articles

  • Accepted manuscripts
  • Issue in progress
  • Latest complete issue
  • Issue archive
  • Archive by article type
  • Special issues
  • Subject collections
  • Interviews
  • Sign up for alerts

About us

  • About JEB
  • Editors and Board
  • Editor biographies
  • Travelling Fellowships
  • Grants and funding
  • Journal Meetings
  • Workshops
  • The Company of Biologists
  • Journal news

For Authors

  • Submit a manuscript
  • Aims and scope
  • Presubmission enquiries
  • Article types
  • Manuscript preparation
  • Cover suggestions
  • Editorial process
  • Promoting your paper
  • Open Access
  • Outstanding paper prize
  • Biology Open transfer

Journal Info

  • Journal policies
  • Rights and permissions
  • Media policies
  • Reviewer guide
  • Sign up for alerts

Contact

  • Contact JEB
  • Subscriptions
  • Advertising
  • Feedback

 Twitter   YouTube   LinkedIn

© 2021   The Company of Biologists Ltd   Registered Charity 277992