Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Accepted manuscripts
    • Issue in progress
    • Latest complete issue
    • Issue archive
    • Archive by article type
    • Special issues
    • Subject collections
    • Interviews
    • Sign up for alerts
  • About us
    • About JEB
    • Editors and Board
    • Editor biographies
    • Travelling Fellowships
    • Grants and funding
    • Journal Meetings
    • Workshops
    • The Company of Biologists
    • Journal news
  • For authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Aims and scope
    • Presubmission enquiries
    • Article types
    • Manuscript preparation
    • Cover suggestions
    • Editorial process
    • Promoting your paper
    • Open Access
    • Outstanding paper prize
    • Biology Open transfer
  • Journal info
    • Journal policies
    • Rights and permissions
    • Media policies
    • Reviewer guide
    • Sign up for alerts
  • Contacts
    • Contact JEB
    • Subscriptions
    • Advertising
    • Feedback
    • For library administrators
  • COB
    • About The Company of Biologists
    • Development
    • Journal of Cell Science
    • Journal of Experimental Biology
    • Disease Models & Mechanisms
    • Biology Open

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Experimental Biology
  • COB
    • About The Company of Biologists
    • Development
    • Journal of Cell Science
    • Journal of Experimental Biology
    • Disease Models & Mechanisms
    • Biology Open

supporting biologistsinspiring biology

Journal of Experimental Biology

  • Log in
Advanced search

RSS  Twitter  Facebook  YouTube  

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Accepted manuscripts
    • Issue in progress
    • Latest complete issue
    • Issue archive
    • Archive by article type
    • Special issues
    • Subject collections
    • Interviews
    • Sign up for alerts
  • About us
    • About JEB
    • Editors and Board
    • Editor biographies
    • Travelling Fellowships
    • Grants and funding
    • Journal Meetings
    • Workshops
    • The Company of Biologists
    • Journal news
  • For authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Aims and scope
    • Presubmission enquiries
    • Article types
    • Manuscript preparation
    • Cover suggestions
    • Editorial process
    • Promoting your paper
    • Open Access
    • Outstanding paper prize
    • Biology Open transfer
  • Journal info
    • Journal policies
    • Rights and permissions
    • Media policies
    • Reviewer guide
    • Sign up for alerts
  • Contacts
    • Contact JEB
    • Subscriptions
    • Advertising
    • Feedback
    • For library administrators
OUTSIDE JEB
A radical cost to thermal flexibility
Andy Turko
Journal of Experimental Biology 2020 223: jeb214395 doi: 10.1242/jeb.214395 Published 30 June 2020
Andy Turko
University of Windsor and McMaster University
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Andy Turko
  • For correspondence: ajturko@gmail.com
  • Article
  • Info & metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Embedded Image

Understanding how animals cope with environmental change is a central goal of eco-physiology. One common strategy, known as acclimation, is the adjustment of an animal's physiological systems to suit the prevailing conditions. The benefits of acclimation are obvious, as this process allows an animal to maintain performance under a range of environmental conditions. The capacity for acclimation is not universal among animals, however, suggesting that this process may be costly and not always advantageous. However, these theoretical costs have been hard to identify in practice.

To understand these costs, Isabella Loughland and Frank Seebacher, at the University of Sydney, Australia, turned to the mosquitofish Gambusia holbrooki. These tiny tropical fish live in habitats that can change dramatically in temperature, sometimes subjecting the fish to stressfully cold conditions. First, the authors simply asked how well mosquitofish could acclimate to a 10°C temperature change. They raised more than 400 fish under either warm or cold conditions, then put each one in a swim flume (a ‘fish treadmill’) and measured how fast they could swim. Each fish was then exposed to the opposite (warm or cold) temperature, allowed to acclimate for a few weeks, and then their swimming performance was retested at the new temperature.

The capacity to acclimate varied dramatically among individuals. Some fish perfectly acclimated to the temperature change – the maximum swimming speed was the same at the two temperatures – while others could hardly adjust and thus performed much better at one temperature than the other. To understand why this variation exists, the authors first examined the possibility that acclimation ability negatively impacts maximum performance – the idea that a jack-of-all-trades is a master of none. For fish raised in warm water, the fastest swimmers were indeed those that had the lowest capacity to acclimate to cold conditions. Thus, the ability to adjust swimming physiology to changes in temperature comes at the expense of peak performance.

Next, the authors wanted to understand the mechanistic basis of this trade-off. They were particularly intrigued by the role of oxidative stress, which occurs when potentially damaging reactive oxygen species (sometimes called free radicals) form in the mitochondria as a by-product of energy production. Successful thermal acclimation depends on mitochondrial adjustments that often increase oxidative stress, and building cellular defence mechanisms to mitigate this stress is energetically costly. It is also well known that there are huge innate differences in the amount of oxidative stress experienced by individuals within a population. The authors thus reasoned that innately oxidatively stressed individuals might have less energy available for acclimation to changing temperatures. Consistent with this idea, mosquitofish with the smallest capacity for swim-performance acclimation also faced the highest levels of oxidative stress. Furthermore, this relationship between acclimation capacity and oxidative stress disappeared in mosquitofish that were experimentally administered the anti-oxidant drug N-acetylcysteine, suggesting a causal relationship between these variables.

Conventional wisdom states that the best way to cope with environmental change is to physiologically adjust in response. However, we now know that this is an energetically expensive solution that can limit maximum performance. To avoid this problem, mosquitofish seem to have evolved another solution to thrive in variable environments. These fish produce offspring that vary in the temperature at which they excel, ensuring that at least some individuals in the next generation will have the physiological tools required to do well in whatever the environment throws their way. And while this bet-hedging strategy may work well for mosquitofish, I'm sure glad my own parents took a different approach.

References

    1. Loughland, I. and
    2. Seebacher, F.
    (2020). Differences in oxidative status explain variation in thermal acclimation capacity between individual mosquitofish (Gambusia holbrooki). Funct. Ecol. doi:10.1111/1365-2435.13563
    OpenUrlCrossRef
Previous ArticleNext Article
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

This Issue

 Download PDF

Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Experimental Biology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
A radical cost to thermal flexibility
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Experimental Biology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Experimental Biology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
OUTSIDE JEB
A radical cost to thermal flexibility
Andy Turko
Journal of Experimental Biology 2020 223: jeb214395 doi: 10.1242/jeb.214395 Published 30 June 2020
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
OUTSIDE JEB
A radical cost to thermal flexibility
Andy Turko
Journal of Experimental Biology 2020 223: jeb214395 doi: 10.1242/jeb.214395 Published 30 June 2020

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Alerts

Please log in to add an alert for this article.

Sign in to email alerts with your email address

Article navigation

  • Top
  • Article
    • References
  • Info & metrics
  • PDF

Related articles

Cited by...

More in this TOC section

  • Born to be fit? GPS-tracking reveals links between early-life behaviour and survival
  • The ultimate defense against piranhas
  • Seeing the height at the end of the (wind) tunnel
Show more OUTSIDE JEB

Similar articles

Other journals from The Company of Biologists

Development

Journal of Cell Science

Disease Models & Mechanisms

Biology Open

Advertisement

Predicting the Future: Species Survival in a Changing World

Read our new special issue exploring the significant role of experimental biology in assessing and predicting the susceptibility or resilience of species to future, human-induced environmental change.


Big Biology Podcast - Hollie Putnam and coral bleaching

Catch the next JEB-sponsored episode of the Big Biology Podcast where Art and Marty talk to Hollie Putnam about the causes of coral bleaching and the basic biology of corals in the hope of selectively breeding corals that can better tolerate future ocean conditions.

Read Hollie's Review on the subject, which is featured in our current special issue. 


Stark trade-offs and elegant solutions in arthropod visual systems

Many elegant eye specializations that evolved in response to visual challenges continue to be discovered. A new Review by Meece et al. summarises exciting solutions evolved by insects and other arthropods in response to specific visual challenges.


Head bobbing gives pigeons a sense of perspective

Pigeons might look goofy with their head-bobbing walk, but it turns out that the ungainly head manoeuvre allows the birds to judge distance.

Articles

  • Accepted manuscripts
  • Issue in progress
  • Latest complete issue
  • Issue archive
  • Archive by article type
  • Special issues
  • Subject collections
  • Interviews
  • Sign up for alerts

About us

  • About JEB
  • Editors and Board
  • Editor biographies
  • Travelling Fellowships
  • Grants and funding
  • Journal Meetings
  • Workshops
  • The Company of Biologists
  • Journal news

For Authors

  • Submit a manuscript
  • Aims and scope
  • Presubmission enquiries
  • Article types
  • Manuscript preparation
  • Cover suggestions
  • Editorial process
  • Promoting your paper
  • Open Access
  • Outstanding paper prize
  • Biology Open transfer

Journal Info

  • Journal policies
  • Rights and permissions
  • Media policies
  • Reviewer guide
  • Sign up for alerts

Contact

  • Contact JEB
  • Subscriptions
  • Advertising
  • Feedback

 Twitter   YouTube   LinkedIn

© 2021   The Company of Biologists Ltd   Registered Charity 277992