Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Accepted manuscripts
    • Issue in progress
    • Latest complete issue
    • Issue archive
    • Archive by article type
    • Special issues
    • Subject collections
    • Interviews
    • Sign up for alerts
  • About us
    • About JEB
    • Editors and Board
    • Editor biographies
    • Travelling Fellowships
    • Grants and funding
    • Journal Meetings
    • Workshops
    • The Company of Biologists
    • Journal news
  • For authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Aims and scope
    • Presubmission enquiries
    • Article types
    • Manuscript preparation
    • Cover suggestions
    • Editorial process
    • Promoting your paper
    • Open Access
    • Outstanding paper prize
    • Biology Open transfer
  • Journal info
    • Journal policies
    • Rights and permissions
    • Media policies
    • Reviewer guide
    • Sign up for alerts
  • Contacts
    • Contact JEB
    • Subscriptions
    • Advertising
    • Feedback
    • Institutional usage stats (logged-in users only)
  • COB
    • About The Company of Biologists
    • Development
    • Journal of Cell Science
    • Journal of Experimental Biology
    • Disease Models & Mechanisms
    • Biology Open

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Experimental Biology
  • COB
    • About The Company of Biologists
    • Development
    • Journal of Cell Science
    • Journal of Experimental Biology
    • Disease Models & Mechanisms
    • Biology Open

supporting biologistsinspiring biology

Journal of Experimental Biology

  • Log in
Advanced search

RSS  Twitter  Facebook  YouTube  

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Accepted manuscripts
    • Issue in progress
    • Latest complete issue
    • Issue archive
    • Archive by article type
    • Special issues
    • Subject collections
    • Interviews
    • Sign up for alerts
  • About us
    • About JEB
    • Editors and Board
    • Editor biographies
    • Travelling Fellowships
    • Grants and funding
    • Journal Meetings
    • Workshops
    • The Company of Biologists
    • Journal news
  • For authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Aims and scope
    • Presubmission enquiries
    • Article types
    • Manuscript preparation
    • Cover suggestions
    • Editorial process
    • Promoting your paper
    • Open Access
    • Outstanding paper prize
    • Biology Open transfer
  • Journal info
    • Journal policies
    • Rights and permissions
    • Media policies
    • Reviewer guide
    • Sign up for alerts
  • Contacts
    • Contact JEB
    • Subscriptions
    • Advertising
    • Feedback
    • Institutional usage stats (logged-in users only)
INSIDE JEB
Swallow mums push metabolic limits when they can keep cool
Kathryn Knight
Journal of Experimental Biology 2020 223: jeb227082 doi: 10.1242/jeb.227082 Published 22 May 2020
Kathryn Knight
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: kathryn.knight@biologists.com
  • Article
  • Figures & tables
  • Info & metrics
  • PDF
Loading
Figure1
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint

Male tree swallow (Tachycineta bicolor) sitting on a birdhouse. Photo credit: Mykola Swarnyk [CC BY-SA (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/)]

Parenting is not for the faint hearted. Dedicated tree swallow mums and dads commit themselves to 16 h of exertion each day, snapping up insects for their ravenous offspring. And they maintain this herculean effort for up to 22 days until their young are ready to leave the nest. It seems there are no limits to the lengths these parents will go. But Simon Tapper and Gary Burness from Trent University, Canada, with Joseph Nocera from the University of New Brunswick, Canada, weren't so sure. Tapper explains that the amount of energy a warm-blooded animal can invest in rearing its young – which is the most energetically demanding time of any animal's life – seems to be restricted by the amount of heat it can dispose of. However, most of the evidence supporting the idea is based on the experiences of new mouse mothers. Also, it wasn't clear how much of an effect lifestyle might have on an animal's ability to remain cool. Thinking about parent tree swallows, Tapper and colleagues wondered whether the industrious mothers might be able to labour even harder while raising their young if they were able to lose more heat through a bald patch in their feathers.

Staking out nesting boxes in two nearby nature reserves, Tapper waited until clutches of tree swallow eggs hatched before briefly capturing the new mothers and gently snipping off the feathers covering the patch of warm skin that they use to incubate their eggs. He also inserted a minute tag into the necks of both parents to record when they returned to feed their demanding brood, in addition to keeping track of the weather conditions and monitoring the hatchlings as they grew.

Initially, it looked as though the trimmed mothers weren't working any harder than females with an intact plumage; both visited their offspring roughly every 5.2 min. It was only when the team factored in the effect of the weather that the trimmed mums seemed to have an advantage. They were able to push themselves 25% harder than the untrimmed females on hot days, making an average of 43 more foraging trips per day to feed their young, although the trimmed mothers struggled to keep up with the untrimmed mothers’ feeding rate on chillier days. In addition, the trimmed mums were able to make ∼3 more visits per hour to their nests than the untrimmed females when feeding large broods of 7 nestlings. Most impressively, the offspring of the trimmed mums piled on the grams faster than the hatchlings of untrimmed mothers, weighing 1.82 g more when they departed, and they had better chances of survival after leaving the nest.

It seems that the exertions of tree swallow mothers are restricted by the amount of heat that they can lose from their bodies, explaining why mothers that had had feathers removed were able to forage more on hot days than those with a full set of feathers that could overheat. However, the team suspects that the boosted growth of the trimmed mothers’ chicks could have more to do with the extra warmth available through their mother's bald patch. They are also concerned that rising temperatures caused by climate change could place chicks at greater risk, as their frenetic parents may be unable to meet their relentless demands as a consequence of heat exhaustion, making it harder for the chicks to grow swiftly to join their parents on the wing.

References

    1. Tapper, S.,
    2. Nocera, J. J. and
    3. Burness, G.
    (2020). Heat dissipation capacity influences reproductive performance in an aerial insectivore. J. Exp. Biol. 223, jeb222232. doi:10.1242/jeb.222232
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
Previous ArticleNext Article
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

This Issue

 Download PDF

Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Experimental Biology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Swallow mums push metabolic limits when they can keep cool
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Experimental Biology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Experimental Biology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
INSIDE JEB
Swallow mums push metabolic limits when they can keep cool
Kathryn Knight
Journal of Experimental Biology 2020 223: jeb227082 doi: 10.1242/jeb.227082 Published 22 May 2020
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
INSIDE JEB
Swallow mums push metabolic limits when they can keep cool
Kathryn Knight
Journal of Experimental Biology 2020 223: jeb227082 doi: 10.1242/jeb.227082 Published 22 May 2020

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Alerts

Please log in to add an alert for this article.

Sign in to email alerts with your email address

Article navigation

  • Top
  • Article
    • References
  • Figures & tables
  • Info & metrics
  • PDF

Related articles

Cited by...

More in this TOC section

  • Making a difference: the role of comparative biology in tackling climate change
  • Lifestyle difference gives female yellow-billed hornbills the edge
  • High-voltage catfish immune to their own shocks
Show more INSIDE JEB

Similar articles

Other journals from The Company of Biologists

Development

Journal of Cell Science

Disease Models & Mechanisms

Biology Open

Advertisement

Welcome to JEB’s new Editor Monica Daley

We are pleased to welcome Monica Daley to JEB’s Editorial team. Monica has had a long association with JEB before taking up her new role, overseeing peer review of neuromuscular physiology, terrestrial biomechanics and integrative physiology of locomotion.


In the field with Robyn Hetem

Continuing our fieldwork series, Robyn Hetem reflects on working with species ranging from aardvark to zebra, and the impact COVID-19 has had on fieldwork.


Read & Publish participation continues to grow

“It is particularly encouraging for early career researchers, as it allows them to display their research globally without the need to find costs to cover the open access option.”

Professor Fernando Montealegre-Z (University of Lincoln) shares his experience of publishing Open Access as part of our growing Read & Publish initiative. We now have over 150 institutions in 15 countries and four library consortia taking part – find out more and view our full list of participating institutions.


Nocturnal reef residents have deep-sea-like eyes

Fanny de Busserolles and colleagues from The University of Queensland have discovered that the eyes of nocturnal reef fish have multibank retinas, layers of photoreceptors, similar to the eyes of deep-sea fish that live in dim light conditions.


Mechanisms underlying gut microbiota–host interactions in insects

In their Review, Konstantin Schmidt and Philipp Engel summarise recent findings about the mechanisms involved in gut colonisation and the provisioning of beneficial effects in gut microbiota–insect symbiosis.

Articles

  • Accepted manuscripts
  • Issue in progress
  • Latest complete issue
  • Issue archive
  • Archive by article type
  • Special issues
  • Subject collections
  • Interviews
  • Sign up for alerts

About us

  • About JEB
  • Editors and Board
  • Editor biographies
  • Travelling Fellowships
  • Grants and funding
  • Journal Meetings
  • Workshops
  • The Company of Biologists
  • Journal news

For Authors

  • Submit a manuscript
  • Aims and scope
  • Presubmission enquiries
  • Article types
  • Manuscript preparation
  • Cover suggestions
  • Editorial process
  • Promoting your paper
  • Open Access
  • Outstanding paper prize
  • Biology Open transfer

Journal Info

  • Journal policies
  • Rights and permissions
  • Media policies
  • Reviewer guide
  • Sign up for alerts

Contact

  • Contact JEB
  • Subscriptions
  • Advertising
  • Feedback

 Twitter   YouTube   LinkedIn

© 2021   The Company of Biologists Ltd   Registered Charity 277992