Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Accepted manuscripts
    • Issue in progress
    • Latest complete issue
    • Issue archive
    • Archive by article type
    • Special issues
    • Subject collections
    • Interviews
    • Sign up for alerts
  • About us
    • About JEB
    • Editors and Board
    • Editor biographies
    • Travelling Fellowships
    • Grants and funding
    • Journal Meetings
    • Workshops
    • The Company of Biologists
    • Journal news
  • For authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Aims and scope
    • Presubmission enquiries
    • Article types
    • Manuscript preparation
    • Cover suggestions
    • Editorial process
    • Promoting your paper
    • Open Access
    • Outstanding paper prize
    • Biology Open transfer
  • Journal info
    • Journal policies
    • Rights and permissions
    • Media policies
    • Reviewer guide
    • Sign up for alerts
  • Contacts
    • Contact JEB
    • Subscriptions
    • Advertising
    • Feedback
    • For library administrators
  • COB
    • About The Company of Biologists
    • Development
    • Journal of Cell Science
    • Journal of Experimental Biology
    • Disease Models & Mechanisms
    • Biology Open

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Experimental Biology
  • COB
    • About The Company of Biologists
    • Development
    • Journal of Cell Science
    • Journal of Experimental Biology
    • Disease Models & Mechanisms
    • Biology Open

supporting biologistsinspiring biology

Journal of Experimental Biology

  • Log in
Advanced search

RSS  Twitter  Facebook  YouTube  

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Accepted manuscripts
    • Issue in progress
    • Latest complete issue
    • Issue archive
    • Archive by article type
    • Special issues
    • Subject collections
    • Interviews
    • Sign up for alerts
  • About us
    • About JEB
    • Editors and Board
    • Editor biographies
    • Travelling Fellowships
    • Grants and funding
    • Journal Meetings
    • Workshops
    • The Company of Biologists
    • Journal news
  • For authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Aims and scope
    • Presubmission enquiries
    • Article types
    • Manuscript preparation
    • Cover suggestions
    • Editorial process
    • Promoting your paper
    • Open Access
    • Outstanding paper prize
    • Biology Open transfer
  • Journal info
    • Journal policies
    • Rights and permissions
    • Media policies
    • Reviewer guide
    • Sign up for alerts
  • Contacts
    • Contact JEB
    • Subscriptions
    • Advertising
    • Feedback
    • For library administrators
Research Article
In situ quantification of individual mRNA transcripts in melanocytes discloses gene regulation of relevance to speciation
Chi-Chih Wu, Axel Klaesson, Julia Buskas, Petter Ranefall, Reza Mirzazadeh, Ola Söderberg, Jochen B. W. Wolf
Journal of Experimental Biology 2019 222: jeb194431 doi: 10.1242/jeb.194431 Published 8 March 2019
Chi-Chih Wu
1Science of Life Laboratories and Department of Evolutionary Biology, Uppsala University, SE-752 36 Uppsala, Sweden
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Chi-Chih Wu
  • For correspondence: j.wolf@biologie.uni-muenchen.de macchih@gmail.com
Axel Klaesson
2Department of Pharmaceutical Biosciences, Uppsala University, SE-752 36 Uppsala, Sweden
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Julia Buskas
1Science of Life Laboratories and Department of Evolutionary Biology, Uppsala University, SE-752 36 Uppsala, Sweden
3Department of Physics, Chemistry and Biology (IFM), Linköping University, SE-581 83 Linköping, Sweden
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Petter Ranefall
4Science of Life Laboratories and Department of Information Technology, Uppsala University, SE-752 36 Uppsala, Sweden
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Reza Mirzazadeh
5Science for Life Laboratory, Department of Medical Biochemistry and Biophysics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm SE-17165, Sweden
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ola Söderberg
2Department of Pharmaceutical Biosciences, Uppsala University, SE-752 36 Uppsala, Sweden
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jochen B. W. Wolf
1Science of Life Laboratories and Department of Evolutionary Biology, Uppsala University, SE-752 36 Uppsala, Sweden
6Division of Evolutionary Biology, Faculty of Biology, LMU Munich, D-82152 Planegg-Martinsried, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Jochen B. W. Wolf
  • For correspondence: j.wolf@biologie.uni-muenchen.de macchih@gmail.com
  • Article
  • Figures & tables
  • Supp info
  • Info & metrics
  • PDF + SI
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Tables

Figures

  • Fig. 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 1.

    Schematic diagram and terminology of feather follicle morphology. The feather is a complex epidermal organ of cellular origin. Its basic bauplan follows a hierarchical structure of ramification into barbs and barbules. It develops within follicles, an epidermal modification derived from invagination into the dermis (Chen et al., 2015; d'Ischia et al., 2013). Cells fulfilling different functions in the mature barbs are derived from stem cells at the collar bulge of the basal layer (Yue et al., 2005). Developing progenitors of these cells migrate and gradually differentiate to form mature cells in barbs, including basal cells, marginal plate cells, axial plate cells and barbulous plate cells (Prum, 1999). Development of the main feather progresses along the proximal–distal axis with helical displacement of barb loci. Barb loci emerge on the posterior midline and are gradually displaced towards the anterior midline, where they fuse with the rachis. For more information on the feather morphology and development, consult Lucas and Stettenheim (1972) and Yu et al. (2004). Colors define homologous structures in the respective panels; arrowheads indicating the rachis facilitate orientation in the remaining figures. (A) Left: schematic, three-dimensional representation of a growing pennaceous feather with the afterfeather shown in front. Right: partial section of a feather follicle. The cutting plane in grey shows the position of cross-sections in B. (B) Left: schematic cross-section of a feather follicle with three-dimensional axes for orientation. Right: example of a cross-section from a growing, ensheathed carrion crow feather displaying two barb ridges.

  • Fig. 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 2.

    Experimental setup and phenotypic classification. (A) Melanin-based plumage pigmentation differs between all-black carrion crows (CC) and grey-coated hooded crows (HC). Growing feather follicles were sampled in the head region (circle) and on the ventral part of the torso (rectangle). Photographs adjacent to the schematic representation of birds show an example of semiplume, pennaceous body feathers (scale bar=1 cm) from the torso or head for each taxon. Squares define the area of the mature feather represented by the ensheathed feather follicle (scale bar=2 mm), which forms the raw material of the experiment. Lighter pigmentation of mature feathers of HC torso is already visible in ensheathed feather follicles. Symbol color imitates the pigmentation of mature feather tips. Bird drawings courtesy of Dan Zetterström. (B) Bright-field images from sections of ensheathed feather follicles. The dashed square on the longitudinal sections defines the corresponding position of the cross-section at 1000 μm above the dermal papilla. The arrowhead in blue indicates the location of the rachis (see Fig. 1). Dark areas represent regions where light-absorbing eumelanin is accumulated. Follicles from black-fathered regions show relatively higher eumelanin content in barb ridges than those sampled from the grey torso of hooded crows (scale bar=0.5 mm).

  • Table 1.
  • Fig. 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 3.

    Melanocyte characterization. The schematic of the proximal end of a feather follicle on the left side depicts the cutting planes for the images to the right. Melanocytes are visualized by immunostaining against the TYRP1 protein (in green); nuclei were stained with Hoechst 33342 (in blue). (A) The longitudinal section represented by the area of the dashed square illustrates the emergence of melanocytes in the collared bulge (CB) and their subsequent maturation in the ramogenic zone (RGZ) with increasing accumulation of the TYRP1 protein; scale bar=50 μm. (B) Cross-section showing barb ridges at an early developmental stage at 500 μm above the dermal papilla. The TYRP1 protein begins accumulating in a tubular cell body located in the ventral growth zone; scale bar=20 μm. (C) Protein immunostaining combined with in situ mRNA padlock probe detection on a cross-section at 1000 μm above the dermal papilla. At this developmental stage, melanocytes appear fully mature; the TYRP1 protein (in green) is predominantly accumulated in a spherical cell body sending dendritic cytoplasm into barbule plates (white arrow). Signals of rolling circle amplification (RCA) of in situ mRNA padlock probing tagging individual TYRP1 mRNA transcripts (shown in red) are confined to the cell body. In contrast to melanocyte-specific gene expression of TYRP1, mRNA of the internal control gene ACTB (in white) is ubiquitously expressed across other cell types; scale bar=20 μm.

  • Fig. 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 4.

    Longitudinal gene expression patterns of targeted mRNA transcripts in feathers from torso. Histogram summarizing mRNA transcript abundance along the proximal–distal axis of feather follicles sampled from black torso of carrion crows (CC, left column) and grey torso of hooded crows (HC, right column). Each bin represents the raw counts of targeted RCA signals from mRNA transcripts of each candidate gene. Grey and black arrows indicate the position of cross-sections at 500 and 1000 μm above the dermal papilla, respectively.

  • Fig. 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 5.

    Five-way in situ gene expression in an explicit histological context. Illustration of in situ stained mRNA transcripts of five genes on the same histological cross-section of carrion crow (CC black) and hooded crow (HC grey) follicles sampled from torso at 1000 μm above the dermal papilla. For orientation, these cross-sections reflect the schematic shown in Fig. 1B. Bright-field images are superimposed for orientation and direct comparison among genes. The images represent one of five serial sections used for statistical analyses. ACTB and MITF (left column) are ubiquitously expressed in all cell types of a follicle. In contrast, HPGDS, SLC45A2 and TYRP1 (right column) are restricted to melanocyte cell bodies. Scale bar=50 μm.

  • Fig. 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 6.

    Specificity of gene expression and differentiation by taxon and pigmentation intensity. (A) Boxplot of the specificity index of targeted genes. TYRP1, HPGDS and SLC45A2 are near-exclusively expressed in melanocytes and do not differ in specificity (post hoc Tukey test, P>0.05 for all comparisons). MITF transcripts are significantly less specific to melanocytes, but include a variety of other cell types. The ACTB control is ubiquitously expressed. Highly significant comparisons (P<0.001, post hoc Tukey test) are indicated among groups of genes with a triple asterisk (n=8). (B) Notched boxplot of raw counts (ACTB gene) or normalized in situ RCA signals of targeted mRNA transcripts (HPGDS, SLC45A2, TYRP1 and MITF) in melanocytes at 1000 μm above the dermal papilla of carrion crow (CC) and hooded crow (HC) torso feathers (n=30). Gene expression of all four genes is significantly higher in melanocytes of carrion crow (CC black) compared with hooded crows (HC grey) (see Table 2). For gene expression of the head, see Fig. S5.

  • Table 2.
Previous ArticleNext Article
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

This Issue

Keywords

  • Feather
  • Melanogenesis
  • Speciation genetics
  • Single-cell gene expression
  • MITF
  • HPGDS

 Download PDF

Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Experimental Biology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
In situ quantification of individual mRNA transcripts in melanocytes discloses gene regulation of relevance to speciation
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Experimental Biology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Experimental Biology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Research Article
In situ quantification of individual mRNA transcripts in melanocytes discloses gene regulation of relevance to speciation
Chi-Chih Wu, Axel Klaesson, Julia Buskas, Petter Ranefall, Reza Mirzazadeh, Ola Söderberg, Jochen B. W. Wolf
Journal of Experimental Biology 2019 222: jeb194431 doi: 10.1242/jeb.194431 Published 8 March 2019
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Research Article
In situ quantification of individual mRNA transcripts in melanocytes discloses gene regulation of relevance to speciation
Chi-Chih Wu, Axel Klaesson, Julia Buskas, Petter Ranefall, Reza Mirzazadeh, Ola Söderberg, Jochen B. W. Wolf
Journal of Experimental Biology 2019 222: jeb194431 doi: 10.1242/jeb.194431 Published 8 March 2019

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Alerts

Please log in to add an alert for this article.

Sign in to email alerts with your email address

Article navigation

  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • INTRODUCTION
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • Acknowledgements
    • FOOTNOTES
    • References
  • Figures & tables
  • Supp info
  • Info & metrics
  • PDF + SI
  • PDF

Related articles

Cited by...

More in this TOC section

  • Jaw kinematics and tongue protraction-retraction during Chewing and drinking in the pig
  • Nest substrate and tool shape significantly affect the mechanics and energy requirements of avian eggshell puncture
  • Early developmental stages of native populations of Ciona intestinalis under increased temperature are affected by local habitat history
Show more RESEARCH ARTICLE

Similar articles

Other journals from The Company of Biologists

Development

Journal of Cell Science

Disease Models & Mechanisms

Biology Open

Advertisement

Predicting the Future: Species Survival in a Changing World

Read our new special issue exploring the significant role of experimental biology in assessing and predicting the susceptibility or resilience of species to future, human-induced environmental change.


Adam Hardy wins the 2020 Journal of Experimental Biology Outstanding Paper Prize

Congratulations to winner Adam Hardy for his work showing that goby fins are as touch sensitive as primate fingertips. Read Adam’s paper and find out more about the 12 papers nominated for the award.


Stark trade-offs and elegant solutions in arthropod visual systems

Many elegant eye specializations that evolved in response to visual challenges continue to be discovered. A new Review by Meece et al. summarises exciting solutions evolved by insects and other arthropods in response to specific visual challenges.


Head bobbing gives pigeons a sense of perspective

Pigeons might look goofy with their head-bobbing walk, but it turns out that the ungainly head manoeuvre allows the birds to judge distance.

Articles

  • Accepted manuscripts
  • Issue in progress
  • Latest complete issue
  • Issue archive
  • Archive by article type
  • Special issues
  • Subject collections
  • Interviews
  • Sign up for alerts

About us

  • About JEB
  • Editors and Board
  • Editor biographies
  • Travelling Fellowships
  • Grants and funding
  • Journal Meetings
  • Workshops
  • The Company of Biologists
  • Journal news

For Authors

  • Submit a manuscript
  • Aims and scope
  • Presubmission enquiries
  • Article types
  • Manuscript preparation
  • Cover suggestions
  • Editorial process
  • Promoting your paper
  • Open Access
  • Outstanding paper prize
  • Biology Open transfer

Journal Info

  • Journal policies
  • Rights and permissions
  • Media policies
  • Reviewer guide
  • Sign up for alerts

Contact

  • Contact JEB
  • Subscriptions
  • Advertising
  • Feedback

 Twitter   YouTube   LinkedIn

© 2021   The Company of Biologists Ltd   Registered Charity 277992