Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Accepted manuscripts
    • Issue in progress
    • Latest complete issue
    • Issue archive
    • Archive by article type
    • Special issues
    • Subject collections
    • Interviews
    • Sign up for alerts
  • About us
    • About JEB
    • Editors and Board
    • Editor biographies
    • Travelling Fellowships
    • Grants and funding
    • Journal Meetings
    • Workshops
    • The Company of Biologists
    • Journal news
  • For authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Aims and scope
    • Presubmission enquiries
    • Article types
    • Manuscript preparation
    • Cover suggestions
    • Editorial process
    • Promoting your paper
    • Open Access
    • Outstanding paper prize
    • Biology Open transfer
  • Journal info
    • Journal policies
    • Rights and permissions
    • Media policies
    • Reviewer guide
    • Sign up for alerts
  • Contacts
    • Contact JEB
    • Subscriptions
    • Advertising
    • Feedback
  • COB
    • About The Company of Biologists
    • Development
    • Journal of Cell Science
    • Journal of Experimental Biology
    • Disease Models & Mechanisms
    • Biology Open

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Experimental Biology
  • COB
    • About The Company of Biologists
    • Development
    • Journal of Cell Science
    • Journal of Experimental Biology
    • Disease Models & Mechanisms
    • Biology Open

supporting biologistsinspiring biology

Journal of Experimental Biology

  • Log in
Advanced search

RSS  Twitter  Facebook  YouTube  

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Accepted manuscripts
    • Issue in progress
    • Latest complete issue
    • Issue archive
    • Archive by article type
    • Special issues
    • Subject collections
    • Interviews
    • Sign up for alerts
  • About us
    • About JEB
    • Editors and Board
    • Editor biographies
    • Travelling Fellowships
    • Grants and funding
    • Journal Meetings
    • Workshops
    • The Company of Biologists
    • Journal news
  • For authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Aims and scope
    • Presubmission enquiries
    • Article types
    • Manuscript preparation
    • Cover suggestions
    • Editorial process
    • Promoting your paper
    • Open Access
    • Outstanding paper prize
    • Biology Open transfer
  • Journal info
    • Journal policies
    • Rights and permissions
    • Media policies
    • Reviewer guide
    • Sign up for alerts
  • Contacts
    • Contact JEB
    • Subscriptions
    • Advertising
    • Feedback
Research Article
High-speed locomotion in the Saharan silver ant, Cataglyphis bombycina
Sarah Elisabeth Pfeffer, Verena Luisa Wahl, Matthias Wittlinger, Harald Wolf
Journal of Experimental Biology 2019 222: jeb198705 doi: 10.1242/jeb.198705 Published 16 October 2019
Sarah Elisabeth Pfeffer
1Institute of Neurobiology, Ulm University, Albert-Einstein-Allee 11, 89081 Ulm, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Sarah Elisabeth Pfeffer
  • For correspondence: sarah.pfeffer@alumni.uni-ulm.de matthias.wittlinger@biologie.uni-freiburg.de harald.wolf@uni-ulm.de
Verena Luisa Wahl
1Institute of Neurobiology, Ulm University, Albert-Einstein-Allee 11, 89081 Ulm, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Verena Luisa Wahl
Matthias Wittlinger
1Institute of Neurobiology, Ulm University, Albert-Einstein-Allee 11, 89081 Ulm, Germany
2Institute of Biology I, University of Freiburg, Hauptstrasse 1, 79104 Freiburg, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: sarah.pfeffer@alumni.uni-ulm.de matthias.wittlinger@biologie.uni-freiburg.de harald.wolf@uni-ulm.de
Harald Wolf
1Institute of Neurobiology, Ulm University, Albert-Einstein-Allee 11, 89081 Ulm, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: sarah.pfeffer@alumni.uni-ulm.de matthias.wittlinger@biologie.uni-freiburg.de harald.wolf@uni-ulm.de
  • Article
  • Figures & tables
  • Supp info
  • Info & metrics
  • PDF + SI
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Tables

Figures

  • Fig. 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 1.

    Study species and high-speed video recording. (A) Cataglyphis bombycina in the sand dune habitat of the Saharan desert near Douz, Tunisia. The ant is shown in typical cooling posture on an elevated structure – here, a small succulent plant. The violet frame marks data obtained in C. bombycina in subsequent figures. (B) Cataglyphis fortis in a salt pan near Menzel Chaker, Tunisia. The homing forager is carrying a food crumb in its mandibles. The grey frame marks data obtained in C. fortis in subsequent figures. (C) Tripod gait in C. bombycina. A frame from a high-speed video showing an ant during walking at a speed of v=561.4 mm s−1. Several consecutive step cycles were recorded for each leg in the corresponding video sequence (sampling rate 500 Hz). Tripods formed by the left front (L1), hind (L3) and right middle (R2) legs are in blue; tripods formed by the opposite set of legs (R1, L2, R3) are in orange. Stride length (SL) is indicated for the right middle leg, as determined by the distance between two successive footfalls. Stride amplitude can be estimated by subtracting body displacement (BD) from stride length (SL) for the respective swing phase (stride amplitude=SL−BD).

  • Fig. 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 2.

    Morphometric comparison of C. bombycina and C. fortis alitrunk and leg pair (Lp) lengths. Cataglyphis bombycina is significantly smaller than C. fortis with respect to mean alitrunk length (11% smaller; t-test, ***P<0.001) and mean leg length (first leg pair, 19% shorter, t-test, ***P<0.001; second leg pair, 18% shorter, U-test, ***P<0.001; third leg pair, 18% shorter, U-test, ***P<0.001). Morphometry data of C. fortis were kindly provided by S. Sommer and R. Wehner.

  • Fig. 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 3.

    Footfall geometry. (A) Average footfall positions of the six legs with respect to the petiole [origin of the plot (0/0)]; x- and y-axes were normalized to the body size of the animals (alitrunk length). For each footfall position, 10 videos with three step cycles each were evaluated, with walking speeds of 490–600 mm s−1 for C. bombycina and 490–580 mm s−1 for C. fortis. Anterior extreme positions (AEP) are shown for the left body side (L1, left front leg; L2, left middle leg; L3, left hind leg); posterior extreme positions (PEP) are shown for the right body side (R1, right front leg; R2, right middle leg, R3 right hind leg). (B) The spread of footprints was quantified by calculating standard deviations the of footprint clusters shown in A. Footprint positions show similar spreads in C. bombycina and C. fortis [Levene's-test, F–value AEP=1.3<1.5 (critical value) and F-value PEP=1.4<1.5 (critical value)].

  • Fig. 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 4.

    Walking parameters. The most significant walking parameters are plotted as functions of walking speed. (A–D) Each data point represents the mean value of all three leg pairs in one video sequence (n=134 for C. bombycina; n=305 for C. fortis). (A) Stride length (linear regressions: C. bombycina, y=0.02x+4.72, R2=0.91; C. fortis, y=0.02x+6.04, R2=0.92); (B) stride frequency (power functions: C. bombycina, y=1.43x0.52, R2=0.90, C. fortis, y=0.81x0.59, R2=0.95); (C) swing phase duration (power functions: C. bombycina, y=0.14x−0.32, R2=0.69; C. fortis, y=0.16x−0.33, R2=0.74); (D) stance phase duration (power functions: C. bombycina, y=1.22x−0.80, R2=0.89; C. fortis, y=1.58x−0.78, R2=0.94). (E–H) Individual values for the three leg pairs (Lp1, front legs; Lp2, middle legs; Lp3, hind legs). (E) Stride amplitude in C. bombycina (linear regressions: Lp1, y=0.0048x+3.02, R2=0.67; Lp2, y=0.0054x+2.91, R2=0.73; Lp3, y=0.0051x+2.94, R2=0.70); (F) stride amplitude in C. fortis (linear regressions: Lp1: y=0.0035x+4.42, R2=0.30; Lp2: y=0.0067x+4.75, R2=0.63; Lp3: y=0.0027x+4.30, R2=0.18); (G) swing speed in C. bombycina (linear regressions: Lp1, y=1.27x+75.47, R2=0.95; Lp2, y=1.44x+79.60, R2=0.94; Lp3, y=1.34x+69.19, R2=0.95) – table below provides angular velocities during slow (79–82 mm s−1), medium (335–367 mm s−1) and fast (701–855 mm s−1) walking; (H) swing speed in C. fortis (linear regressions: Lp1, y=1.48x+71.68, R2=0.95; Lp2, y=1.80x+86.43, R2=0.93; Lp3, y=1.40x+69.01, R2=0.94) – table below provides respective angular velocities during slow (75–81 mm s−1), medium (340–380 mm s−1) and fast (590–620 mm s−1) walking.

  • Fig. 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 5.

    Leg coordination parameters. (A) Mean tripod coordination strength (TCS, see Materials and Methods) plotted as a function of walking speed (logarithmic regression: C. bombycina, y=−0.015lnx+0.85, R2=0.02; C. fortis, y=0.097lnx+0.18, R2=0.46). (B) Phase relationships of the six legs analysed for C. bombycina (violet; circle represents 30.3 ms) and C. fortis (grey; circle represents 35.6 ms) with regard to swing phase onset (Bi) and stance phase onset (Bii). Cycle phase rotates counter-clockwise. The left hind leg (L3) served as reference (phase 0). For each species, 20 videos (60 step cycles) were analysed at speeds from 300 to 400 mm s−1. Each data point represents the onset of swing or stance with respect to L3. The length of the mean phase vector indicates the variance of data points. Statistically significant differences between the two species emerged during swing onset (Bi) for L2 (Kuiper two-sample test, P=0.002) and R2 (Kuiper two-sample test, P=0.001) with a time shift of around 3.3 ms, as well as during stance phase onset (Bii) for L1 and R1 (Kuiper two-sample test, both with P=0.05) with a time shift of about 2.6 ms. (C,D) Duty factor plotted as a function of walking speed for the three leg pairs in (C) C. bombycina (linear regressions: Lp1, y=−0.0004x+0.49, R2=0.61; Lp2, y=−0.0004x+0.54, R2=0.56; Lp3, y=−0.0003x+0.49, R2=0.54) and (D) C. fortis (linear regressions: Lp1: y=−0.0005x+0.59, R2=0.66; Lp2: y=−0.0004x+0.66, R2=0.61; Lp3: y=−0.0006x+0.57, R2=0.73).

  • Fig. 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 6.

    Podograms and quantification of gait patterns. (A,C) Sample podograms (top) recorded in C. bombycina (A) and C. fortis (C) at similar walking speeds (about 350–360 mm s−1), and the corresponding colour (middle) and number indices (bottom) plotted along the same time axis. Podograms illustrate the footfall patterns of the six legs; black bars indicate swing and white bars indicate stance phases (L, left; R, right body side; 1, 2 and 3, front, middle and hind legs). Each frame in the video was assigned a colour (middle) and a number index (bottom) according to leg coordination in the particular frame (see colour and number code keys at the bottom of the figure). (B,D) Quantitative analyses according to walking speed class (<50 to >750 mm s−1) for C. bombycina (B; n=71) and C. fortis (D; n=70). No data were available for the <50 mm s−1 speed class in C. bombycina, and for the 650 to <750 mm s−1 and ≥750 mm s−1 speed classes in C. fortis. Colour index analyses (Bi,Di) are shown as normalized frequency plots, and number index data (Bii,Dii) as averaged index numbers (ordinates) for the respective walking speed bins (abscissae). Cataglyphis bombycina reaches its maximum gait index beyond about 250 to <350 mm s−1; there were no statistically significant differences (of neighbouring speed bins) as indicated by the results of an ANOVA on ranks. Cataglyphis fortis shows a gradual increase in the number indices over the entire walking speed range; there were statistically significant differences between neighbouring speed bins (one-way ANOVA): <50 mm s−1 and 50 to <150 mm s−1 (***P≤0.001); 50 to <150 mm s−1 and 150 to <250 mm s−1 (*P≤0.017); 150 to <250 mm s−1 and 250 to <350 mm s−1 (**P=0.010); 350 to <450 mm s−1 and 450 to <550 mm s−1 (*P=0.025); 450 to <550 mm s−1 and 550 to <650 mm s−1 (*P=0.013).

Previous ArticleNext Article
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

This Issue

Keywords

  • Stride frequency
  • High walking speed
  • Insect
  • Inter-leg coordination
  • Aerial phases

 Download PDF

Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Experimental Biology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
High-speed locomotion in the Saharan silver ant, Cataglyphis bombycina
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Experimental Biology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Experimental Biology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Research Article
High-speed locomotion in the Saharan silver ant, Cataglyphis bombycina
Sarah Elisabeth Pfeffer, Verena Luisa Wahl, Matthias Wittlinger, Harald Wolf
Journal of Experimental Biology 2019 222: jeb198705 doi: 10.1242/jeb.198705 Published 16 October 2019
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Research Article
High-speed locomotion in the Saharan silver ant, Cataglyphis bombycina
Sarah Elisabeth Pfeffer, Verena Luisa Wahl, Matthias Wittlinger, Harald Wolf
Journal of Experimental Biology 2019 222: jeb198705 doi: 10.1242/jeb.198705 Published 16 October 2019

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Alerts

Please log in to add an alert for this article.

Sign in to email alerts with your email address

Article navigation

  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • INTRODUCTION
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • Acknowledgements
    • FOOTNOTES
    • References
  • Figures & tables
  • Supp info
  • Info & metrics
  • PDF + SI
  • PDF

Related articles

Cited by...

More in this TOC section

  • Different fuel regulation in two types of myofiber results in different antioxidant strategies in Daurian ground squirrels (Spermophilus dauricus) during hibernation
  • Departures from isotropy: the kinematics of a larval snail in response to food
  • Trunk and leg kinematics of grounded and aerial running in bipedal macaques
Show more RESEARCH ARTICLE

Similar articles

Subject collections

  • Comparative biomechanics of movement

Other journals from The Company of Biologists

Development

Journal of Cell Science

Disease Models & Mechanisms

Biology Open

Advertisement

Meet the Editors at SICB Virtual 2021

Reserve your place to join some of the journal editors, including Editor-in-Chief Craig Franklin, at our Meet the Editor session on 17 February at 2pm (EST). Don’t forget to view our SICB Subject Collection, featuring relevant JEB papers relating to some of the symposia sessions.


2020 at The Company of Biologists

Despite 2020's challenges, we were able to bring a number of long-term projects and new ventures to fruition. As we enter a new year, join us as we reflect on the triumphs of the last 12 months.


Critical temperature window sends migratory black-headed buntings on their travels

The spring rise in temperature at black-headed bunting overwintering sites is essential for triggering the physical changes that they undergo before embarking on their spring migration – read more.


Developmental and reproductive physiology of small mammals at high altitude

Cayleih Robertson and Kathryn Wilsterman focus on high-altitude populations of the North American deer mouse in their review of the challenges and evolutionary innovations of pregnant and nursing small mammals at high altitude.


Read & Publish participation extends worldwide

“Being able to publish Open Access articles free of charge means that my article gets maximum exposure and has maximum impact, and that all my peers can read it regardless of the agreements that their universities have with publishers.”

Professor Roi Holzman (Tel Aviv University) shares his experience of publishing Open Access as part of our growing Read & Publish initiative. We now have over 60 institutions in 12 countries taking part – find out more and view our full list of participating institutions.

Articles

  • Accepted manuscripts
  • Issue in progress
  • Latest complete issue
  • Issue archive
  • Archive by article type
  • Special issues
  • Subject collections
  • Interviews
  • Sign up for alerts

About us

  • About JEB
  • Editors and Board
  • Editor biographies
  • Travelling Fellowships
  • Grants and funding
  • Journal Meetings
  • Workshops
  • The Company of Biologists
  • Journal news

For Authors

  • Submit a manuscript
  • Aims and scope
  • Presubmission enquiries
  • Article types
  • Manuscript preparation
  • Cover suggestions
  • Editorial process
  • Promoting your paper
  • Open Access
  • Outstanding paper prize
  • Biology Open transfer

Journal Info

  • Journal policies
  • Rights and permissions
  • Media policies
  • Reviewer guide
  • Sign up for alerts

Contact

  • Contact JEB
  • Subscriptions
  • Advertising
  • Feedback

 Twitter   YouTube   LinkedIn

© 2021   The Company of Biologists Ltd   Registered Charity 277992