A volunteer running with straight (L) and bent (R) arms. Photo credit: Andrew Yegian.
Wandering through the Harvard campus one day in 2015, graduate student Andrew Yegian recalls how something unusual caught his eye. ‘I noticed a person running with straight arms’, he explains. This really stood out for Yegian, as runners usually bend the elbow while walkers keep their arms straight, which made him wonder: ‘If straight arms are better for walking, why aren't they better for running, and vice versa?’ he puzzled. Was there a trade-off between the cost of keeping the elbow bent and swinging the arm at the shoulder that could benefit runners? Could walkers conserve energy by keeping their swinging arms straight? Intrigued, Yegian and his thesis advisor, Dan Lieberman, decided to film athletes walking and running with straight and bent arms to find out why runners keep their arms bent while walkers let them swing loose.
Selecting eight undergraduate and graduate students – ranging from runners who dabbled twice a week to serious marathon competitors – to walk and run on a treadmill, Yegian says, ‘We wanted to study that kind of variation because bent arm running seems to be an almost universal behaviour, regardless of how much a person runs’. Together with undergraduates Yanish Tucker and Stephen Gillinov, Yegian placed reflective markers on the athletes’ shoulders, elbows and wrists before asking the runners to walk at ∼1.4 m s−1 and run at ∼3 m s−1 with straight and bent arms while they filmed the volunteers’ movements in 3D. ‘The hardest thing was running with straight arms’, recalls Yegian, adding that all of the athletes found the movement strange. Then, Yegian and his undergraduate colleagues invited the volunteers to return 2 weeks later, so they could repeat the running and walking trials, but this time the athletes breathed through a mask to measure their oxygen consumption, allowing the scientists to calculate the athletes’ energy consumption as they moved with their arms in different positions.
Comparing the energy costs, the team was impressed that holding the arms bent while walking increases the walkers’ cost by 11%. And when they calculated the amount of effort required to keep the arm crooked, it was clear that bending the elbow came at a cost, although this was slightly offset by the lower cost of swinging the relatively short arm. So, walking with straight arms is by far the most efficient option.
However, when the team compared the runners’ energy costs, the outcome was less clear. ‘We didn't find any evidence that the energy cost was different between arm postures when running’, says Yegian, who had suspected that running with bent arms would be more efficient, ‘since that's what almost everyone does’, he says.
So the jury is still out as to why runners bend their arms, although Yegian suspects that there must be some benefit that bears no relation to energetic costs, which keeps runners’ arms pumping when pounding the streets.
- © 2019. Published by The Company of Biologists Ltd
References
Article navigation
Related articles
Cited by...
More in this TOC section
Similar articles
Other journals from The Company of Biologists
Editor’s choice – A cognitive map in a poison frog
For more than 20 years, frogs and lizards were considered to lack place memory. Now, however, Sabrina Burmeister and her team use a modification of the classic Morris water maze to demonstrate the presence of a cognitive map in green-and-black poison dart frogs.
“Getting the JEB Fellowship was really important early on in my career.”
Cosima Porteus is a Postdoctoral Fellow at the University of Exeter, UK, where she studies how fish sense, interact with and respond to their environment. In this interview, Cosima talks about what motivated her to become a scientist, the people that influenced her career, and her opinion on improving the peer-review system for early career researchers.
Path integration is a navigational strategy that gives an animal an estimate of its position relative to some starting point. In his Review, Thomas Collett details the features of path integration in foraging desert ants and honeybees and explains how, in some cases, well-ordered behaviour might substitute for complex neural circuitry.
The Peter Baker Fellowship is for post-doctoral scientists interested in marine biology research, especially physiological research. It will provide living and travel expenses (up to £3,000) to spend approximately two months working at the Laboratory of the Marine Biological Association, Plymouth, at any time of the year. Bench fees will be waived and a small sum may be available to assist with research expenses. This fund is held in trust by the Physiological Society, The Company of Biologists and the Marine Biological Association. Application deadline: 31 January 2020.
If you’re going to the ICCPB meeting in Ottawa from 5 to 9 August, you can meet some of our Monitoring Editors, chat to JEB Reviews Editor Charlotte Rutledge and pick up free JEB goodies from the Plenary Room!
The Company of Biologists provides grants to fund scientific meetings, workshops and conferences in the fields covered by our journals. Typically, meetings with fewer than 100 people may be granted up to £2,000, increasing up to £6,000 for about 400 people. The next deadline to apply is 02 September 2019.
Rasmus Ern highlights a preprint from Josefin Sundin and colleagues, who found that reducing brain temperature of Atlantic cod by mounting cooling plates on their head only marginally increases the fish’s maximum thermal tolerance.