ABSTRACT
Stereotypically, walking and running gaits in humans exhibit different arm swing behavior: during walking, the arm is kept mostly straight, while during running, the arm is bent at the elbow. The mechanism for this behavioral difference has not been explored before. We hypothesized that a mechanical tradeoff exists between the shoulder joint and the elbow joint. Bending the elbow reduces the radius of gyration of the arm and reduces shoulder muscle torque, but at the price of increasing elbow torque. We predicted that the mechanical tradeoff would result in energetics that favored straight arms during walking and bent arms during running. The hypothesis was tested experimentally by having eight subjects walk and run with both straight arms and bent arms while recording arm swing mechanics, and oxygen consumption in a subset of six subjects. The mechanical tradeoff hypothesis was confirmed, with bent arms reducing normalized shoulder muscle torque in both gaits (walking: −33%, running: −32%) and increasing normalized elbow muscle torque in both gaits (walking: +110%, running: +30%). Bent arms increased oxygen consumption by 11% when walking, supporting our prediction that energetics favor straight arms during walking. However, oxygen consumption was equivalent for the straight and bent arm running conditions, and did not support our running prediction. We conclude that straight arms are stereotyped in walking as a result of optimal energetics, while the mechanism leading to bent arms during running remains unknown.
FOOTNOTES
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing or financial interests.
Author contributions
Conceptualization: A.K.Y., D.E.L.; Methodology: A.K.Y., Y.T., S.G.; Software: A.K.Y.; Validation: A.K.Y.; Formal analysis: A.K.Y., Y.T., D.E.L.; Investigation: A.K.Y., Y.T., S.G.; Resources: D.E.L.; Data curation: A.K.Y., Y.T., S.G.; Writing - original draft: A.K.Y.; Writing - review & editing: A.K.Y., Y.T., S.G., D.E.L.; Supervision: D.E.L.; Project administration: D.E.L.; Funding acquisition: D.E.L.
Funding
Funding was provided by the Robert A. Chapman Memorial Scholarship for Vertebrate Locomotion (A.K.Y., Harvard University), and the American School of Prehistoric Research (D.E.L., Harvard University).
- Received November 26, 2018.
- Accepted May 5, 2019.
- © 2019. Published by The Company of Biologists Ltd
Log in using your username and password
Log in through your institution
Pay Per Article - You may access this article (from the computer you are currently using) for 1 day for US$30.00 .
Regain Access - You can regain access to a recent Pay per Article purchase if your access period has not yet expired.
Keywords
Article navigation
Related articles
Cited by...
More in this TOC section
Similar articles
Subject collections
Other journals from The Company of Biologists
Editor’s choice – A cognitive map in a poison frog
For more than 20 years, frogs and lizards were considered to lack place memory. Now, however, Sabrina Burmeister and her team use a modification of the classic Morris water maze to demonstrate the presence of a cognitive map in green-and-black poison dart frogs.
“Getting the JEB Fellowship was really important early on in my career.”
Cosima Porteus is a Postdoctoral Fellow at the University of Exeter, UK, where she studies how fish sense, interact with and respond to their environment. In this interview, Cosima talks about what motivated her to become a scientist, the people that influenced her career, and her opinion on improving the peer-review system for early career researchers.
Path integration is a navigational strategy that gives an animal an estimate of its position relative to some starting point. In his Review, Thomas Collett details the features of path integration in foraging desert ants and honeybees and explains how, in some cases, well-ordered behaviour might substitute for complex neural circuitry.
The Peter Baker Fellowship is for post-doctoral scientists interested in marine biology research, especially physiological research. It will provide living and travel expenses (up to £3,000) to spend approximately two months working at the Laboratory of the Marine Biological Association, Plymouth, at any time of the year. Bench fees will be waived and a small sum may be available to assist with research expenses. This fund is held in trust by the Physiological Society, The Company of Biologists and the Marine Biological Association. Application deadline: 31 January 2020.
If you’re going to the ICCPB meeting in Ottawa from 5 to 9 August, you can meet some of our Monitoring Editors, chat to JEB Reviews Editor Charlotte Rutledge and pick up free JEB goodies from the Plenary Room!
The Company of Biologists provides grants to fund scientific meetings, workshops and conferences in the fields covered by our journals. Typically, meetings with fewer than 100 people may be granted up to £2,000, increasing up to £6,000 for about 400 people. The next deadline to apply is 02 September 2019.
Rasmus Ern highlights a preprint from Josefin Sundin and colleagues, who found that reducing brain temperature of Atlantic cod by mounting cooling plates on their head only marginally increases the fish’s maximum thermal tolerance.