Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Accepted manuscripts
    • Issue in progress
    • Latest complete issue
    • Issue archive
    • Archive by article type
    • Special issues
    • Subject collections
    • Interviews
    • Sign up for alerts
  • About us
    • About JEB
    • Editors and Board
    • Editor biographies
    • Travelling Fellowships
    • Grants and funding
    • Journal Meetings
    • Workshops
    • The Company of Biologists
    • Journal news
  • For authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Aims and scope
    • Presubmission enquiries
    • Article types
    • Manuscript preparation
    • Cover suggestions
    • Editorial process
    • Promoting your paper
    • Open Access
    • Outstanding paper prize
    • Biology Open transfer
  • Journal info
    • Journal policies
    • Rights and permissions
    • Media policies
    • Reviewer guide
    • Sign up for alerts
  • Contacts
    • Contact JEB
    • Subscriptions
    • Advertising
    • Feedback
    • Institutional usage stats (logged-in users only)
  • COB
    • About The Company of Biologists
    • Development
    • Journal of Cell Science
    • Journal of Experimental Biology
    • Disease Models & Mechanisms
    • Biology Open

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Experimental Biology
  • COB
    • About The Company of Biologists
    • Development
    • Journal of Cell Science
    • Journal of Experimental Biology
    • Disease Models & Mechanisms
    • Biology Open

supporting biologistsinspiring biology

Journal of Experimental Biology

  • Log in
Advanced search

RSS  Twitter  Facebook  YouTube  

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Accepted manuscripts
    • Issue in progress
    • Latest complete issue
    • Issue archive
    • Archive by article type
    • Special issues
    • Subject collections
    • Interviews
    • Sign up for alerts
  • About us
    • About JEB
    • Editors and Board
    • Editor biographies
    • Travelling Fellowships
    • Grants and funding
    • Journal Meetings
    • Workshops
    • The Company of Biologists
    • Journal news
  • For authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Aims and scope
    • Presubmission enquiries
    • Article types
    • Manuscript preparation
    • Cover suggestions
    • Editorial process
    • Promoting your paper
    • Open Access
    • Outstanding paper prize
    • Biology Open transfer
  • Journal info
    • Journal policies
    • Rights and permissions
    • Media policies
    • Reviewer guide
    • Sign up for alerts
  • Contacts
    • Contact JEB
    • Subscriptions
    • Advertising
    • Feedback
    • Institutional usage stats (logged-in users only)
INSIDE JEB
Mouse mums consider their futures
Casey Gilman
Journal of Experimental Biology 2018 221: jeb177139 doi: 10.1242/jeb.177139 Published 13 March 2018
Casey Gilman
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: casey.a.gilman@gmail.com
  • Article
  • Figures & tables
  • Info & metrics
  • PDF
Loading
Figure1
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint

Mouse mother with her litter. Photo credit: Creative Commons by Seweryn Olkowicz CC-BY-SA-3.0.

How do you tell if a mouse could eat more than what it actually eats, and why would it choose to eat less? These are the questions that John Speakman, from the University of Aberdeen, UK, has been running up against in his decades-long quest to understand the limits on how much an animal eats to fuel its activities. Speakman and his group have been using lactating mice to try to answer these questions, as new mothers require the endurance of extreme athletes. Given the high energy demands of feeding a bunch of growing hungry babies, one might expect that mouse mothers would eat as much as they can to raise their kids up big and strong. But, there appear to be limits to how much these mums eat, and figuring out whether the limits are physiological – i.e. the mice simply can't eat any more – or are a choice isn't easy. Speakman explains, ‘It's a really hard question to answer. A somewhat easier question to answer is whether there is a credible reason for why a female might choose to restrain herself by eating less than she is physically or physiologically capable of.’ One possibility is that mums might choose to eat less now because there's a benefit either for her future offspring or for her own future reproductive attempts.

To test this idea, Speakman's team took mice that had recently given birth and either increased or decreased their litter sizes. Half the mothers were given 16 pups, and half were given five. They found that mums who raised larger litters ate more food, but raised smaller pups; some even killed pups, reducing the size of their litter by about two. So, the mums with large litters were unable to keep up with the demands of the pups, even though they ate more than the other mums.

To see whether these differences in initial litter size had an effect on subsequent litters, the team allowed the mothers to mate again after the first pups were weaned, but this time, they didn't interfere with the sizes of the new litters. On average, the mums produced litters of the same size; however, the mothers that had previously produced large litters ate less than the mothers that had previously given birth to smaller litters, produced less milk and, again, raised smaller pups. The mothers that had had a lot of pups the first time around reduced their efforts the second time.

Then, when the team raised the first set of pups from both groups and bred them, they found that the new mums from the burdened, large litters had smaller offspring themselves. The toll taken on the mice who couldn't keep up with their kids’ demands extended into the next generation.

Speakman says their results show that mice may not be pushing themselves to the limit every time they reproduce. The mice may eat less and, consequently, have fewer or smaller babies so that they can be sure to have more babies later: they perform a long-term energetic balancing act.

While these results may seem exciting considering the questions that have captivated Speakman for years, he says, ‘Actually, it's more annoying than exciting. Most of our previous 26 papers have rested on the assumption that the female is not choosing her investment level. Now we have evidence that there is at least a reason why she might be. That doesn't mean that she is choosing – just a reason for her to do so.’

Speakman's team is currently testing whether mouse mums choose to energetically pump the brakes in anticipation of the future, but he suggests the implications of their completed study are much broader: ‘Never assume you understand anything. We have worked on this system for over 20 years and it still throws up surprises.’

  • © 2018. Published by The Company of Biologists Ltd

References

    1. Vaanholt, L. M.,
    2. Duah, O. A.,
    3. Balduci, S.,
    4. Mitchell, S. E.,
    5. Hambly, C. and
    6. Speakman, J. R.
    (2018). Limits to sustained energy intake. XXVII. Trade-offs between first and second litters in lactating mice support the ecological context hypothesis. J. Exp. Biol. 221, 10.1242/jeb.170902.
Previous ArticleNext Article
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

This Issue

 Download PDF

Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Experimental Biology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Mouse mums consider their futures
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Experimental Biology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Experimental Biology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
INSIDE JEB
Mouse mums consider their futures
Casey Gilman
Journal of Experimental Biology 2018 221: jeb177139 doi: 10.1242/jeb.177139 Published 13 March 2018
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
INSIDE JEB
Mouse mums consider their futures
Casey Gilman
Journal of Experimental Biology 2018 221: jeb177139 doi: 10.1242/jeb.177139 Published 13 March 2018

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Alerts

Please log in to add an alert for this article.

Sign in to email alerts with your email address

Article navigation

  • Top
  • Article
    • References
  • Figures & tables
  • Info & metrics
  • PDF

Related articles

Cited by...

More in this TOC section

  • Wing damage no obstacle for hummingbird hawkmoths
  • Making a difference: the role of comparative biology in tackling climate change
  • Lifestyle difference gives female yellow-billed hornbills the edge
Show more INSIDE JEB

Similar articles

Other journals from The Company of Biologists

Development

Journal of Cell Science

Disease Models & Mechanisms

Biology Open

Advertisement

Welcome to JEB’s new Editor Monica Daley

We are pleased to welcome Monica Daley to JEB’s Editorial team. Monica has had a long association with JEB before taking up her new role, overseeing peer review of neuromuscular physiology, terrestrial biomechanics and integrative physiology of locomotion.


In the field with Robyn Hetem

Continuing our fieldwork series, Robyn Hetem reflects on working with species ranging from aardvark to zebra, and the impact COVID-19 has had on fieldwork.


Read & Publish participation continues to grow

“It is particularly encouraging for early career researchers, as it allows them to display their research globally without the need to find costs to cover the open access option.”

Professor Fernando Montealegre-Z (University of Lincoln) shares his experience of publishing Open Access as part of our growing Read & Publish initiative. We now have over 150 institutions in 15 countries and four library consortia taking part – find out more and view our full list of participating institutions.


Nocturnal reef residents have deep-sea-like eyes

Fanny de Busserolles and colleagues from The University of Queensland have discovered that the eyes of nocturnal reef fish have multibank retinas, layers of photoreceptors, similar to the eyes of deep-sea fish that live in dim light conditions.


Mechanisms underlying gut microbiota–host interactions in insects

In their Review, Konstantin Schmidt and Philipp Engel summarise recent findings about the mechanisms involved in gut colonisation and the provisioning of beneficial effects in gut microbiota–insect symbiosis.

Articles

  • Accepted manuscripts
  • Issue in progress
  • Latest complete issue
  • Issue archive
  • Archive by article type
  • Special issues
  • Subject collections
  • Interviews
  • Sign up for alerts

About us

  • About JEB
  • Editors and Board
  • Editor biographies
  • Travelling Fellowships
  • Grants and funding
  • Journal Meetings
  • Workshops
  • The Company of Biologists
  • Journal news

For Authors

  • Submit a manuscript
  • Aims and scope
  • Presubmission enquiries
  • Article types
  • Manuscript preparation
  • Cover suggestions
  • Editorial process
  • Promoting your paper
  • Open Access
  • Outstanding paper prize
  • Biology Open transfer

Journal Info

  • Journal policies
  • Rights and permissions
  • Media policies
  • Reviewer guide
  • Sign up for alerts

Contact

  • Contact JEB
  • Subscriptions
  • Advertising
  • Feedback

 Twitter   YouTube   LinkedIn

© 2021   The Company of Biologists Ltd   Registered Charity 277992