ABSTRACT
Temperature is an important factor determining distribution and abundance of organisms. Predicting the impact of warming climate on ectotherm populations requires information about species' thermal requirements, i.e. their so-called ‘thermal niche’. The characterization of thermal niche remains a complicated task. We compared the applicability of two indirect approaches, based on reaction norm (aerobic scope curve) and optimality (preferred body temperature) concepts, for indirect estimation of thermal niche while using newts, Ichthyosaura alpestris, as a study system. If the two approaches are linked, then digesting newts should keep their body temperatures close to values maximizing aerobic scope for digestion. After feeding, newts maintained their body temperatures within a narrower range than did hungry individuals. The range of preferred body temperatures was well below the temperature maximizing aerobic scope for digestion. Optimal temperatures for factorial aerobic scope fell within the preferred body temperature range of digesting individuals. We conclude that digesting newts prefer body temperatures that are optimal for the maximum aerobic performance but relative to the maintenance costs. What might be termed the ‘economic’ thermoregulatory response explains the mismatch between thermal physiology and behaviour in this system.
INTRODUCTION
A warming world poses challenges for many organisms. Hundreds of recent studies have demonstrated that the fast pace of current climate change has impacted organisms in various and complex ways (Parmesan and Yohe, 2003; Pounds et al., 2006; Chen et al., 2011). Together with human-induced factors, climate change threatens populations of many taxa. Indeed, species are disappearing at an unprecedented rate (Stuart et al., 2004; Alroy, 2015). Predicting the impact of climate change on species distribution and abundance is a main issue of global change research. The assessment of species' vulnerability to climate change depends on the interplay among ecological, behavioural, physiological and genetic traits (Williams et al., 2008; Huey et al., 2012). The key species characteristic in this respect is the estimate of a species' thermal requirements enabling positive population growth, commonly termed its ‘thermal niche’. Despite its importance and past research efforts, quantification of thermal niche remains a complicated task.
According to the current theory of ecological niche (Chase and Leibold, 2003; Holt, 2009), the direct approach to quantifying thermal niche is to measure the influence of body temperature on population growth. Although this is the most straightforward way, its use in practice is restricted to species with short generation times (Birch, 1953; Siddiqui and Barlow, 1972; Anderson et al., 2011). In addition, because temperature varies spatially and temporally in most habitats, the laboratory conditions should simulate the effect of not only mean but also variation in environmental temperatures, and that further complicates measurements (Angilletta and Sears, 2011). Another problem of artificial rearing is the absence of allocation and acquisition trade-offs among fitness components, which may produce outcomes disparate from those in natural conditions (Irschick and Reznick, 2009). Hence, the ecological relevance of these results is sometimes questionable.
To overcome these issues, two indirect approaches have been proposed (Chase and Leibold, 2003). The first, so-called ‘reaction norm’, approach is based on measuring the acute thermal dependence of a trait which is associated with fitness. Although simple in theory, selecting the best proxy for fitness among various performance traits is a difficult task. Because an organism's fitness depends on the rate at which the organism acquires and converts energy into reproduction (Brown et al., 1993), the thermal dependence of net respiratory capacity, known as aerobic scope (AS), seems a suitable candidate to be the representative performance trait (but see Clark et al., 2013; Schulte, 2015). The early AS concept (Fry, 1947) has today been elaborated into the oxygen- and capacity-limited thermal tolerance hypothesis (Pörtner, 2001; Pörtner and Knust, 2007; Claireaux and Lefrançois, 2007; Pörtner and Farrell, 2008), which predicts that species distribution is delimited by body temperatures allowing a positive AS. However, recent studies have provided only mixed support for this hypothesis (Clark et al., 2011; Healy and Schulte, 2012; Norin et al., 2014; Gräns et al., 2014), and thus the ecological relevance of the shape of the AS curve needs further research.
The second method of estimating a species' thermal niche is based on the optimality paradigm (MacArthur and Pianka, 1966; Schoener, 1971; Stephens and Krebs, 1986). It assumes that an organism is able to discriminate among body temperatures with various fitness consequences. Accordingly, under the absence of environmental limitations, it chooses body temperatures maximizing its lifetime reproductive success (Magnuson et al., 1979). For decades, these temperatures have been well known to thermal ecologists as preferred body temperatures (Tpref) (Fry, 1958; Licht et al., 1966; Hutchison and Hill, 1976; Dillon et al., 2009). Indeed, some studies have demonstrated that Tpref maximize population growth (Martin and Huey, 2008). Because fitness-related traits are aerobically fuelled, there has been speculation that mean Tpref matches optimal temperature for the maximum AS. Although empirical findings provide some support for this notion (Fry, 1947; Brett, 1971; Kelsch, 1996), the thermal niche estimate requires a focus not upon the mean Tpref but upon the range of Tpref. Moreover, the AS should be estimated based upon the ecologically relevant measure of maximum aerobic capacity. In sedentary taxa, this should be based upon food processing and digestion or post-exercise recovery rather than upon the maximum sustainable speed (Clark et al., 2013). If the two indirect estimates of thermal niche are linked, then ectotherms performing some aerobically fuelled activity (e.g. food digestion) should more closely maintain their body temperatures around values maximizing AS than would individuals in some other physiological state.
- AS
- aerobic scope
- MMR
- maximum metabolic rate measured as the maximum oxygen consumption rate during digestion
- SMR
- standard metabolic rate measured as the minimum oxygen consumption rate
- Tpref
- preferred body temperature
To test this prediction, we measured Tpref before and after food consumption in alpine newts, Ichthyosaura alpestris (Laurenti 1768). This species is suitable for this task because of its known thermal ecology (Hadamová and Gvoždík, 2011; Balogová and Gvoždík, 2015), which allows the simulation of ecologically realistic experimental conditions. Newts have a very low AS for locomotion (Bennett and Licht, 1973; Harlow, 1978), and thus AS for digestion seems a better measure of their aerobic performance. In a study of another newt species, fed individuals had chosen body temperatures approximately 3°C higher than did their hungry counterparts (Gvoždík, 2003), perhaps to improve their digestive performance. If the prediction holds, then digesting newts should maintain their body temperatures closer to thermal optima for the maximum AS than do hungry individuals. Accordingly, we measured thermal dependence of AS for digestion, which can be expressed as the difference (absolute AS) or ratio (factorial AS) between the maximum oxygen consumption during specific dynamic action and minimum respiratory demands.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Ethics statement
This study was performed in accordance with the laws of the Czech Republic. All experimental procedures were approved by the Expert Committee for Animal Conservation of the Institute of Vertebrate Biology AS CR (research protocol no. 14/2013). The Environment Department of the Regional Authority of Vysočina, Czech Republic, issued the permission to capture newts (KUJI 224/2013).
Study animals and maintenance
Alpine newts, I. alpestris, are amphibians up to 12 cm in total length and are widely distributed across Europe. The newts usually have a biphasic lifestyle. An aquatic (reproductive) phase lasts from April to June (in Central Europe) and newts spend the rest of the season on land. Alpine newts are strict ectotherms and have proven their behavioural thermoregulatory abilities under both laboratory and semi-natural conditions (Hadamová and Gvoždík, 2011; Marek and Gvoždík, 2012; Balogová and Gvoždík, 2015). Their diet consists of diverse invertebrates, such as insect larvae, worms and planktonic crustaceans.
Adult alpine newts (25 males and 25 females; body mass=2.41±0.64 g, mean±s.d.) were collected from a population near Jihlava, Czech Republic, in April 2015. Newts (1 male and 1 female) were placed in plastic aquaria (50×30×18 cm high) filled with 15 litres of non-chlorinated well water. Each aquarium was supplied with water weeds (Egeria densa) and a piece of polystyrene foam to allow newts to leave the water. Aquaria were placed in a temperature- and light-controlled room at 12–22°C and a natural light:dark cycle (12–14 h:12–10 h light:dark). Newts were fed with live food [Tubifex worms, earthworms (Eisenia foetida) and chironomid larvae] once or twice per week unless stated otherwise (see below). Water was changed once per week.
Preferred body temperatures
We measured Tpref in a stainless steel tank (240×60×60 cm high), which was longitudinally divided into three lanes. Each lane was partially divided into 12 compartments. The tank was filled with well water up to 4 cm. The tank's heating and cooling system (see Gvoždík, 2003, for details) was programmed to maintain an aquatic thermal gradient from 8 to 30°C in 2°C steps per compartment. Six thermistor probes connected to data loggers (resolution 0.1°C; HOBO, Onset Computer, Bourne, MA, USA) recorded minimum and maximum water temperatures in each lane at 10 min intervals to assure that thermal gradient conditions were stable during trials. The tank was placed in an air-conditioned room at 18±2°C and uniform illumination (300 lux at water surface).
Newts (n=48) were starved for 1 week before the beginning of experiments. This period is sufficient for them to digest all food and empty their guts under the given temperature conditions (P.K. and L.G., unpublished results). Three randomly chosen newts were individually placed at 18°C in each lane of the tank for 12 h before the beginning of a trial (10:00 h). At 9:00 h, randomly chosen newts (n=21) were fed with an earthworm with mass equalling 10% of their body mass. Newt behaviour was continuously video recorded (5 frames s−1) between 10:00 and 16:00 h. This period equals the time when natural thermal conditions allow newts to behaviourally thermoregulate in the field (Hadamová and Gvoždík, 2011).
Preferred body temperatures were obtained by interpolating horizontal positions (10 min intervals) with known water temperatures. Because body temperature quickly equilibrates with surrounding water temperature in small organisms (Lutterschmidt and Hutchison, 1997), we regard this non-invasive approach to be a sufficiently reliable indirect method for obtaining newt body temperatures. From the individual distributions of body temperatures, we calculated mean Tpref and the boundaries of the Tpref range, which were calculated as the 10th and 90th percentiles. Previous studies had confirmed that these values reliably characterize the Tpref range in newts (Hadamová and Gvoždík, 2011; Gvoždík, 2015). Group identity was unknown to investigator (P.K.) during video analyses.
Respirometry and aerobic scope
We measured metabolic rates indirectly as oxygen consumption rates using a flow-through intermittent respirometry system (Kristín and Gvoždík, 2012). In short, constant flow (120±1 ml min−1) of CO2-free and water vapour-saturated air was automatically switched among eight glass chambers (100 ml) and a baseline channel using a multiplexer (RM-8, Sable Systems, Las Vegas, NV, USA). Expired air was passed through a Nafion™ desiccator, CO2 analyser, scrubber and O2 analyser (FoxBox-C, Sable Systems). Calibration and verification details of the respirometry system used are provided elsewhere (Kristín and Gvoždík, 2012).
Newts were not fed for 5 days before the respirometry trials. After weighing (to precision 0.01 g), they were individually placed into respirometry chambers (60 ml). To measure oxygen consumption, each chamber was flushed twice per hour (enclosure time=1679 s) between 9:00 and 14:00 h. A previous study had shown this period to be sufficient within this system for obtaining the minimum oxygen consumption (standard metabolic rates, SMR) using intermittent respirometry (Kristín and Gvoždík, 2012). The change in fractional concentration of oxygen during the chamber enclosure time was less than 0.005 in all cases. Newt activity inside chambers was continuously monitored using a motion activity detection system to assure that newt activity was negligible during the measured time interval. Respirometry trials were carried out at 10, 15, 20 and 25°C. Temperatures were selected to include temperatures both inside (15 and 20°C) and outside (10 and 25°C) the known Tpref range for the studied species (Hadamová and Gvoždík, 2011).
After 8 h, newts were fed with earthworms (10% of newt body mass) and respirometry measurements continued until specific dynamic action reached the descending phase. The duration of postprandial trials was set according to pilot measurements (P.K. and L.G., unpublished data) from 57 h at 25°C to 105 h at 10°C. Given the duration of respirometry trials, each individual (n=48) was measured at only one temperature in order to avoid the confounding effect of thermal acclimation. Each chamber was equipped with a piece of agar jelly (2 g) to allow the newts' water uptake via skin diffusion. The chambers were regularly checked twice per day during trials. In case of defecation, the chamber was thoroughly cleaned and the corresponding period was discarded from further analyses.
Oxygen consumption (ml h−1) was calculated using an equation presented elsewhere (Kristín and Gvoždík, 2012). Peak oxygen consumption during specific dynamic action (Fig. 1) was estimated as the maximum value (maximum metabolic rates, MMR) without excessive motor activity by the newt (<5% of enclosure time). The absolute AS for digestion was calculated as MMR–SMR and factorial AS as MMR/SMR for each individual.
Time course of oxygen consumption before and after feeding in newts, Ichthyosaura alpestris, at four temperatures (n=12 per temperature). Arrow denotes feeding (10% of body mass). Values are 2-h means of non-active individuals. Error bars are omitted for clarity. Note that oxygen consumption values were divided by body mass to allow visual comparison among temperatures only.
Statistical analyses
The effect of food consumption on the Tpref boundaries was examined using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA). Because the mean and range of Tpref are strongly associated in newts (Hadamová and Gvoždík, 2011), each characteristic was used as a covariate in the analysis of the other. ANCOVA was also applied to test the influence of temperature on SMR, MMR, AS and factorial AS for digestion with body mass as the covariate. The temperature factor was modelled as orthogonal polynomial contrasts. The first contrast tested for the linear effect and the second for the quadratic effect of temperature, which allows for comparison of trait values between body temperatures within (15 and 20°C) and outside (10 and 25°C) the Tpref range. The effects of sex and factor interactions were considered in all models. The minimum adequate model (i.e. with the best explanatory power relative to the number of parameters) was selected according to the minimum value of Akaike's information criterion. Least squares means corrected for the effect of body mass were obtained from an ordinary ANCOVA. Given the relatively small sample sizes, statistical inference was made using results of permutation ANCOVA (9999 permutations). Although ordinary and permutation models produced qualitatively the same results, we present only conservative statistics of the randomization approach in all analyses. It should be noted that because of the unknown F distribution in permutation models, the reported statistics refer to pseudo-F values. Statistical analyses were performed in R (https://www.r-project.org/) using the ‘MASS’ and ‘lsmeans’ packages, and in Primer 6 (version 6; Primer E, Plymouth, UK), using the ‘PERMANOVA’ package.
RESULTS
Postprandial thermoregulatory response was measured in 21 individuals. The remaining newts were used as controls. Satiated newts maintained their lower Tpref boundaries approximately 1.5°C higher and upper Tpref boundaries 1.5°C lower than did hungry individuals (lower boundary: F1,45=4.22, P=0.047; upper boundary: F1,45=6.22, P=0.015; Fig. 2). Food consumption and digestion had a non-detectable influence on mean Tpref (F1,45=1.57, P=0.21). Newts maintained similar activity levels in both groups (F1,45=0.48, P=0.49).
The effect of feeding on preferred body temperatures (Tpref) in newts, I. alpestris (nfed=21 and nunfed=27). Lower and upper Tpref boundaries were calculated as 10th and 90th percentile of individual body temperature distribution. Values are means±s.e.m. (*P<0.05; n.s., not significant).
Mass-corrected values of SMR, MMR during digestion and absolute AS for digestion increased with body temperature (linear contrasts: SMR: F1,45=60.35, P<0.001; MMR: F1,45=97.46, P<0.001; AS: F1,45=75.20, P<0.001; Fig. 3A,B). MMR during food processing and digestion was 1.8–2.4 times higher than corresponding SMR values (Fig. 3C). The factorial AS for digestion attained higher values at body temperatures within than outside the Tpref range (quadratic contrast: F1,45=10.10, P=0.003; Fig. 3C).
Temperature dependence of respirometry traits in alpine newts, I. alpestris. (A) Oxygen consumption; (B) aerobic scope for digestion; (C) factorial aerobic scope. Minimum oxygen consumption (SMR) values were measured in hungry individuals while maximum values (MMR) were obtained in digesting newts (n=12 per temperature). All values are body-mass-corrected means±s.e.m. Vertical dashed lines denote lower and upper boundaries of preferred body temperature (Tpref) range. Arrows indicate the shift in newt Tpref boundaries after food consumption (see Fig. 1). Statistical results show quadratic contrasts of temperature, i.e. rates at body temperatures within the Tpref range (15 and 20°C) differ from rates at body temperatures outside the range (10 and 25°C) (**P<0.01; n.s., not significant).
DISCUSSION
Although thermal optima for AS and Tpref have been studied for decades as indirect estimates of species' thermal requirements (see Introduction), their interrelationship remains only partially understood. Available theory implicitly predicts that absolute AS should drop at body temperatures outside the Tpref range. In this study, digesting newts maintained their body temperatures within a narrower range than did hungry individuals. Contrary to the prediction, absolute AS for digestion increased above the Tpref range. However, the factorial AS moved its thermal optimum to below the upper Tpref boundary. These results demonstrate that digesting newts prefer body temperatures that maximize metabolic capacity for digestion not in absolute terms but relative to SMR. From this viewpoint, indirect physiological and behavioural estimates of thermal niche produced similar results.
Our results suggest that satiated newts aim to maximize not absolute but factorial AS for digestion. Optimizing MMR relative to SMR appears beneficial from at least two viewpoints. First, it is a more economical strategy than simply to attain the maximum value at any cost. For example, the shift in newt body temperatures from 15 to 20°C (i.e. within the Tpref range) increased MMR by 50% at the expense of a 31% increase in SMR. However, the 20–25°C shift (i.e. above the Tpref range) increased MMR by 42% at the expense of a 71% increase in SMR (Fig. 3). Under limited availability of food resources, the energy-saving thermoregulatory behaviour is clearly beneficial, because more energy can be invested in fitness components, i.e. growth, reproduction and survival. Hence, these findings conform to the optimal energy allocation theory (Levins, 1968; Stearns, 1992) in general and the very economic lifestyle of caudate amphibians in particular (Pough, 1980). Second, it reduces the risk of oxygen toxicity from excessive respiration (Beckman and Ames, 1998). Although some ectotherm taxa maintain their body temperatures close to the temperature optimal for absolute AS (Fry, 1947; Brett, 1971; Kelsch, 1996), others commonly occur at temperatures well below this value but close to that corresponding to the maximum factorial AS (Clark et al., 2011). In addition, optimal temperatures for AS negatively influence somatic growth and reproduction in some taxa (Healy and Schulte, 2012; Overgaard et al., 2012; Gräns et al., 2014; Norin et al., 2014). This suggests that the importance of thermal optimum for the factorial AS rather than absolute AS will be more widespread than is currently thought. Re-examination of published results will be highly informative.
In their recent review, Clark et al. (2013) argue that absolute AS is biologically more relevant than factorial AS. Our study suggests that the relevance of both measures depends on the point of view (see also Nespolo et al., 2017). From a respiratory view, aerobically fuelled functions clearly require a specific amount of oxygen rather than multiples of SMR. However, the absolute AS, contrary to factorial AS, ignores the SMR level at a given temperature. This is a serious limitation, because maintenance costs make up an important part of the energy budget (Spotila and Standora, 1985), they have priority over other energy-demanding processes (Sousa et al., 2010) and they are linked with behaviour (Careau and Garland, 2012). Accordingly, from an energy allocation view, factorial AS appears more informative than the absolute measure.
In this study, we estimated the Tpref range to be the central 80% of individual body temperatures, i.e. between the 10th and 90th percentiles, maintained within the thermal gradient. In other thermoregulatory studies, however, the Tpref range is commonly estimated as the central 50% of body temperatures. Because the calculation method is rather subjective, the two approaches are used interchangeably and this complicates comparisons among studies. Importantly, our results provide physiological support for the 80% approach in newts. The Tpref range is much more informative overall than is mean Tpref, and thus we urge researchers to report Tpref ranges for their thermoregulatory studies. If the physiological support is lacking, the use of 80% of central body temperatures seems to provide a more realistic estimate of Tpref range than does the more restricted approach, which may introduce artificial variation into the thermoregulatory indices (Gvoždík, 2002). Given that behavioural thermoregulation is currently regarded as an effective mechanism buffering the impact of climatic changes (Kearney et al., 2009; Huey et al., 2012; Buckley et al., 2015), this methodological issue requires more attention than it has received in the past.
Although the two indirect estimates of thermal niche produced similar results, it remains unknown how they correspond to the species' thermal requirements for positive population growth. Recent research on thermal ecology in newts has revealed that preferred body temperatures provide optimal temperatures for various performance, reproductive and life history traits (Šámajová and Gvoždík, 2009; Kurdíková et al., 2011), and this suggests some link between this trait and fitness. Available data from other systems suggest that the optimal temperature for the intrinsic rate of increase is usually 2–3°C above mean Tpref (Martin and Huey, 2008), which may correspond with the optimal temperature for factorial AS in newts. Although the relationship between AS and fitness is considered problematic, it must be noted that previous estimates were largely based on measurements of maximum sustainable oxygen consumption during locomotion. The adaptive significance of AS for locomotion is disputable in taxa with low aerobic support for this activity, such as ambush predators (Fu et al., 2009; Clark et al., 2013). In this study, we estimated AS from specific dynamic action, which is a highly integrative measure of energetic demands for food processing and digestion (McCue, 2006; Secor, 2009). Because these processes are tightly linked to energy acquisition, the link of AS for digestion with individual fitness seems more straightforward than in previous cases.
Because AS for digestion may not represent the maximum aerobic capacity, it may be argued that our results are confounded by ‘saved’ extra capacity for locomotion. Locomotion in digesting individuals increases AS in some species but not in others (Alsop and Wood, 1997; Bennett and Hicks, 2001; Thorarensen and Farrell, 2006). The priority of aerobic capacity for digestion over locomotion is especially evident in ambush foragers (Fu et al., 2009). Newts are known for their very low aerobic capacity for locomotion (Bennett and Licht, 1973; Harlow, 1978), which suggests that the contribution of aerobic locomotion to their AS will be minor. In addition, because aerobic demands for digestion and locomotion are covered by the same cardio-respiratory capacity, thermal dependence of AS should be identical for both activities. Hence, unmeasured AS for locomotion appears to have a negligible influence on the results of this study.
In conclusion, our results provide much needed support for the correspondence between physiological and behavioural approaches in estimating species' thermal requirements. The fact that newts prefer body temperatures maximizing not absolute but factorial AS for digestion provides a likely explanation for the mismatch between natural thermal conditions and optimal temperature for AS in other taxa (see Introduction). Although we found congruence between the two indirect approaches to estimating thermal niche, they markedly differ in their applicability. While the estimation of the Tpref range took a few days, measuring the thermal dependence of AS for digestion requires several weeks. Moreover, it is impossible without additional information to determine whether an ectotherm aims to maximize absolute or factorial AS. Hence, the estimation of the Tpref range seems the superior approach for characterizing species' thermal requirements. Although the usefulness of Tpref for this task was established several decades ago (Magnuson et al., 1979), one should keep in mind that a species' thermal niche cannot be simplified to a single trait. Thermal ecology of focal species should be carefully considered across ontogenetic stages to find the most relevant trait limiting population growth within a given area (Kingsolver et al., 2011; Levy et al., 2015). In addition to thermal requirements during their active season, behavioural and physiological responses to cold are critical for survival during winter in arctic, temperate and alpine ectotherms (Williams et al., 2015). Moreover, other abiotic temperature correlates, such as hydric conditions on land and oxygen availability in water, should be taken into account (Verberk et al., 2015). Finally, Tpref estimates are sensitive to diverse factors (Clusella-Trullas and Chown, 2014), and these should be carefully considered prior to their measurements. Despite these limitations, the range of Tpref provides a key measure of species' thermal requirements in behaviourally thermoregulating ectotherms.
Acknowledgements
We thank two anonymous reviewers for their comments on the previous version of this paper.
FOOTNOTES
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing or financial interests.
Author contributions
L.G. conceived design of the study, carried out some experimental work, analyzed data and drafted the manuscript; P.K. participated in the design of the study, carried out most of the experimental work and helped with data analysis. Both authors contributed substantially to revisions and gave final approval for publication.
Funding
This research was supported by the Czech Science Foundation (Grantová Agentura České Republiky) (15-07140S) and institutional support (RVO: 68081766).
Data availability
Data are available from the Dryad Digital Repository (Gvoždík and Kristín, 2017): http://dx.doi.org/10.5061/dryad.860ks
- Received June 30, 2016.
- Accepted January 4, 2017.
- © 2017. Published by The Company of Biologists Ltd
References
Keywords
Article navigation
Related articles
Cited by...
More in this TOC section
Similar articles
Other journals from The Company of Biologists
Announcing JEB's 2019 Outstanding Paper Prize
Congratulations to all of the authors whose papers were shortlisted for the 2019 JEB Outstanding Paper Prize. This year we had a great selection of papers and the final winners were Kephra Beckett and Anne Roberts, from the University of British Columbia, Canada, for their work on spittlebug breathing in xylem sap foam.
How to turn an organism into a model organism in 10 ‘easy’ steps
Many of the major biological discoveries of the 20th century were made using ‘the big 6’ model organisms. Based on their own experience with the Aedes aegypti mosquito, Benjamin Matthews and Leslie Vosshall provide a checklist showing how other new species can be added to this roster. All articles in the new Special Issue are now online and free to read.
Travelling Fellowship deadline: 6 March
The next Travelling Fellowship deadline is approaching! Apply by 6 March to take your research abroad. In 2014, Sridhar Ravi did exactly that and earlier this year published a paper about the mechanics of hummingbird flight using data gathered on the trip. Read his full story to find out more.
JEB appoints new Editor-in-Chief
We are delighted to announce that Craig Franklin (University of Queensland, Australia) has been appointed as the next EiC of JEB, starting on 1 August. With research interests in animal ecophysiology and conservation physiology, Craig is already familiar with the journal, having been a Monitoring Editor since 2011. We are looking forward to welcoming him in his new role.
The lowdown on Read & Publish
The Company of Biologists is embracing Open Access with a series of pilot Transitional Agreements, known as Read & Publish deals. But, what exactly are they and what are the benefits? Read the full story to find out more.