Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Accepted manuscripts
    • Issue in progress
    • Latest complete issue
    • Issue archive
    • Archive by article type
    • Special issues
    • Subject collections
    • Interviews
    • Sign up for alerts
  • About us
    • About JEB
    • Editors and Board
    • Editor biographies
    • Travelling Fellowships
    • Grants and funding
    • Journal Meetings
    • Workshops
    • The Company of Biologists
    • Journal news
  • For authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Aims and scope
    • Presubmission enquiries
    • Article types
    • Manuscript preparation
    • Cover suggestions
    • Editorial process
    • Promoting your paper
    • Open Access
    • Outstanding paper prize
    • Biology Open transfer
  • Journal info
    • Journal policies
    • Rights and permissions
    • Media policies
    • Reviewer guide
    • Sign up for alerts
  • Contacts
    • Contact JEB
    • Subscriptions
    • Advertising
    • Feedback
    • For library administrators
  • COB
    • About The Company of Biologists
    • Development
    • Journal of Cell Science
    • Journal of Experimental Biology
    • Disease Models & Mechanisms
    • Biology Open

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Experimental Biology
  • COB
    • About The Company of Biologists
    • Development
    • Journal of Cell Science
    • Journal of Experimental Biology
    • Disease Models & Mechanisms
    • Biology Open

supporting biologistsinspiring biology

Journal of Experimental Biology

  • Log in
Advanced search

RSS  Twitter  Facebook  YouTube  

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Accepted manuscripts
    • Issue in progress
    • Latest complete issue
    • Issue archive
    • Archive by article type
    • Special issues
    • Subject collections
    • Interviews
    • Sign up for alerts
  • About us
    • About JEB
    • Editors and Board
    • Editor biographies
    • Travelling Fellowships
    • Grants and funding
    • Journal Meetings
    • Workshops
    • The Company of Biologists
    • Journal news
  • For authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Aims and scope
    • Presubmission enquiries
    • Article types
    • Manuscript preparation
    • Cover suggestions
    • Editorial process
    • Promoting your paper
    • Open Access
    • Outstanding paper prize
    • Biology Open transfer
  • Journal info
    • Journal policies
    • Rights and permissions
    • Media policies
    • Reviewer guide
    • Sign up for alerts
  • Contacts
    • Contact JEB
    • Subscriptions
    • Advertising
    • Feedback
    • For library administrators
Research Article
Upper lethal temperatures in three cold-tolerant insects are higher in winter than in summer
Henry M. Vu, John G. Duman
Journal of Experimental Biology 2017 220: 2726-2732; doi: 10.1242/jeb.161331
Henry M. Vu
Department of Biological Sciences, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN 46556, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Henry M. Vu
  • For correspondence: hvu@nd.edu
John G. Duman
Department of Biological Sciences, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN 46556, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & tables
  • Info & metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

Upper lethal temperatures (ULTs) of cold-adapted insect species in winter have not been previously examined. We anticipated that as the lower lethal temperatures (LLTs) decreased (by 20–30°C) with the onset of winter, the ULTs would also decrease accordingly. Consequently, given the recent increases in winter freeze–thaw cycles and warmer winters due to climate change, it became of interest to determine whether ambient temperatures during thaws were approaching ULTs during the cold seasons. However, beetle Dendroides canadensis (Coleoptera: Pyrochroidae) larvae had higher 24 and 48 h ULT50 (the temperature at which 50% mortality occurred) in winter than in summer. The 24 and 48 h ULT50 for D. canadensis in winter were 40.9 and 38.7°C, respectively. For D. canadensis in summer, the 24 and 48 h ULT50 were 36.7 and 36.4°C. During the transition periods of spring and autumn, the 24 h ULT50 was 37.3 and 38.5°C, respectively. While D. canadensis in winter had a 24 h LT50 range between LLT and ULT of 64°C, the summer range was only 41°C. Additionally, larvae of the beetle Cucujus clavipes clavipes (Coleoptera: Cucujidae) and the cranefly Tipula trivittata (Diptera: Tipulidae) also had higher ULTs in winter than in summer. This unexpected phenomenon of increased temperature survivorship at both lower and higher temperatures in the winter compared with that in the summer has not been previously documented. With the decreased high temperature tolerance as the season progresses from winter to summer, it was observed that environmental temperatures are closest to upper lethal temperatures in spring.

INTRODUCTION

The lethal temperatures of poikilotherms normally correlate directly with laboratory acclimation and natural seasonal acclimatization temperatures (Brett, 1971; Somero, 2010). Thus, upper and lower lethal temperatures for an organism tend to increase with higher environmental temperatures associated with the summer season. Conversely, colder environmental temperatures during the winter tend to induce a decrease in both upper and lower lethal temperatures. At least part of the reason for this is that some low temperature survival mechanisms used by poikilotherms are not compatible with high summer temperatures. For example, the increased percentage of unsaturated fatty acids in membrane phospholipids in the winter lowers the functional temperature range of the membranes (Hazel and Williams, 1990; Hazel, 1995; Koštál, et al., 2003).

Overwintering adaptations of larvae of the non-diapausing, freeze-avoiding beetle Dendroides canadensis Latreille 1810 have been investigated for over 40 years, mainly in the region around South Bend, IN, USA. Mechanisms to lower their supercooling points (SCPs) and thereby depress their lower lethal temperatures (LLTs) in winter include the production of antifreeze proteins (AFPs) and antifreeze glycolipids (AFGLs), clearance of ice-nucleating microorganisms from the gut, reduction of ice-nucleating proteins in the hemolymph, and accumulation of high concentrations of glycerol (Wu et al., 1991; Olsen and Duman, 1997a,b; Olsen et al., 1998; Duman, 1980, 2001, 2002, 2015; Duman et al., 1998; Duman and Serianni, 2002; Walters et al., 2011; Nickell et al., 2013). These overwintering adaptations assist D. canadensis in supercooling to temperatures below −20°C (Duman, 2002, 2015). Winter supercooling points in D. canadensis are also their winter LLTs. In the summer, D. canadensis supercooling points range from −2 to −7°C, but LLTs are often higher (Olsen and Duman, 1997a).

Cucujus clavipes clavipes Fabricius 1781 and Tipula trivittata Say 1823 are two other insect larvae that have been studied to examine their subzero winter adaptations, once again in the area around South Bend, IN, USA. Cucujus clavipes clavipes is a freeze-avoiding beetle that uses polyols, AFPs and AFGLs to lower its SCPs and increase its winter cold tolerance (Bennett et al., 2005; Walters et al., 2011; Duman, 2015). Tipula trivittata is a freeze-tolerant cranefly that employs sorbitol, protein and lipoprotein ice nucleators, and AFGLs to survive subzero temperatures as larvae in the winter (Duman et al., 1985; Neven et al., 1989; Walters et al., 2011; Duman, 2015).

With recent general increases in the frequency of winter freeze–thaw cycles and overall warmer winters due to climate change, including locally in the state of Indiana (Sinha and Cherkauer, 2008), it became of interest to identify upper lethal temperatures (ULTs) for D. canadensis, C. clavipes clavipes and T. trivittata and determine whether in situ temperatures in their log microhabitats during winter warm spells approached their ULTs. It was expected that the insect larvae would have lower ULTs in winter than in summer. More specifically for D. canadensis, based on our previous knowledge of their LLTs throughout the year, we predicted their monthly ULTs using the following reasoning (Fig. 1). The mean ULT in a review of 119 insect species was 39.3°C (Hoffman et al., 2013). We felt that this value was a reasonable approximation for D. canadensis as most of the data used by Hoffman et al. (2013) were based on insects from temperate latitudes. Therefore, we set that temperature as our predicted summer ULT where 50% mortality would occur within 24 h (ULT50). Based on this predicted summer ULT and our known summer LLTs (approximately −4°C based on past research), we predicted that D. canadensis would have a 24 h lethal temperature range of about 43°C in mid-summer (ULT=39.3°C and LLT= −4°C). We then extrapolated the ability of the insect larvae to survive over the course of the year within this approximate temperature range of 43°C. Therefore, in the winter months, with a known LLT of approximately −23°C, we anticipated that they should have an ULT of approximately 20°C (Fig. 1). Because this predicted value is only slightly higher than occasional winter ambient high temperatures in recent years, we proceeded to determine the actual ULTs of these insects.

Fig. 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 1.

Predicted upper lethal temperatures of Dendroides canadensis over the course of a year. Predictions of upper lethal temperatures (ULTs) were based on our previously determined lower lethal temperatures (LLTs), the mid-summer ULT of numerous insects of 39.3°C (Hoffman et al., 2013), and a predicted temperature range of 43°C. (See Materials and methods for details.)

Here, we show that the 24 h ULTs for all three insects, D. canadensis, C. clavipes clavipes and T. trivittata, were actually higher in the winter than in the summer, contrary to previous thoughts about temperature tolerance and our predicted ULTs shown in Fig. 1. We are unaware of any other documented higher ULTs for organisms in winter compared with summer, with the exception of some anhydrobiotic organisms (Crowe et al., 1992; Watanabe et al., 2004). ULTs have not been previously measured in cold-adapted insects in the winter.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Field collection of D. canadensis, C. clavipes clavipes and T. trivittata larvae

Larvae of D. canadensis, C. clavipes clavipes and T. trivittata were collected from underneath the bark of decaying trees, generally on the ground, multiple times a month over the course of 4 years from woodlots in the vicinity of South Bend, IN, USA (latitude ∼41.76°N, longitude ∼86.25°W) in northern Indiana and southwestern Michigan. The insect larvae were transported in an insulated container to maintain temperature close to that at the time of collection.

ULT50 testing

In the laboratory, the larvae were placed in containers lined with a moist paper towel and the containers were put into temperature-controlled chambers ranging from 33 to 41°C to determine their ULT. The chambers were set at a specific temperature prior to introduction of the larvae. The chamber temperature was not increased incrementally because the insects' heat tolerance may increase if they are given time to adapt to gradual increases in temperature. Insect larvae were scored for survival after 24 and 48 h. Between 10 and 42 larvae were tested at each temperature on a given date. The temperature at which 50% mortality occurred was identified as the ULT for that time period (24 and 48 h ULT50).

The insects were grouped seasonally into four categories. The autumn months were considered to be October and November. The winter months were classified as the beginning of December until the time when we observed feeding by the larvae (generally sometime in March when they had food in their guts). Feeding is an indicator of a decrease in cold tolerance ability in C. clavipes clavipes and D. canadensis as SCPs rise (Nickell et al., 2013). The spring months were considered as the period between when we first observed food in the gut and May. The summer months were designated as June to September.

LLT50 testing

The autumn, winter and spring LLTs were determined by measuring the SCPs as the 24 h LLT of these insects is the same as the SCP in these seasons (note this is not the case in the summer). The average SCP of a month was determined to be the LLT of the insects. To determine the SCPs, the larvae were individually placed in 1.5 ml centrifuge tubes. A thermocouple was placed on the larva and foam was stuffed into the tube to hold the thermocouple and insect in contact with each other. The centrifuge tubes were individually placed into glass test tubes and submerged in an ethanol bath at −1°C. The thermocouple was attached to a multichannel thermometer (Iso-thermex, Columbus Instruments, Columbus, OH, USA). The temperature of the bath was lowered at 0.2°C min−1. The computer recorded temperature readings every 5 s. A SCP was identified as the temperature when an exotherm representing the release of the latent heat of fusion from the insect freezing was observed. In summer, groups of larvae were placed at different temperatures from 4°C to −8°C for 24 h to determine LLTs. The LLT50 was calculated to be the temperature at which 50% of the population died.

Desiccation testing

To examine whether mortality of the insect larvae was due to temperature or to desiccation, we placed D. canadensis into individual containers at 40°C, after each insect was weighed. Some containers were lined with paper towels dampened with water while others had dry paper towels. These individual containers were then placed into a desiccator filled with desiccant, sealed with vacuum grease and placed at 40°C. The insects were quickly brought out of the 40°C chamber every hour and weighed at 1 h intervals for 12 h and again after 24 h to determine whether changes in mass occurred. Survivorship was also determined.

Microhabitat and air temperature measurement

A Hobo Pro series data logger (H08-031-08; Onset Computer Corporation, Bourne, MA, USA) was used to measure the microhabitat temperature of insects under the bark of logs comparable in size and location to those from which the insects were collected, as well as the air temperature around the logs over a 3 year period from September 2011 to July 2014. The external temperature sensor of the logger was placed beneath the bark of the tree while the data logger itself was placed above the log to record air temperature. BoxCar Par 4 software (Onset Computer Corporation) was used to display the different temperature readings from the data logger.

Statistical analysis

Tukey's/Holm–Šídák multiple comparisons test was used to analyze the data for statistical significance. Statistical analysis was done by using Graphpad Prism and in R using RStudio with an alpha value of 0.05. To determine the ULT50, a regression analysis was performed in R using RStudio.

RESULTS

Microhabitat and air temperature measurement

The temperatures recorded by the data logger from 2011 to 2014 revealed that the temperature underneath the bark in the winter months reached a high of 13°C (Fig. 2). The temperature of the logs reached the highest annual readings of 30°C in the spring months of March, April and May in 2012, 2013 and 2014 (Fig. 2). Leaves do not typically appear before to mid to late April. Therefore, the logs are not shaded prior to this time, and direct solar radiation warms the log, especially during warm and sunny days. After the leaves fall in the autumn, the logs are likewise exposed to solar radiation.

Fig. 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 2.

Data logger temperature readings from September 2011 to July 2014 from a log in Michigan. The black line represents ambient temperature outside the tree. The red line represents the temperature underneath the tree bark.

Winter and summer larvae 24 h survivorship at different temperatures

Dendroides canadensis larvae were tested for survival at numerous temperatures ranging from 30 to 43°C over the course of the first year of the study. Based on these data (not shown), subsequent, more directed, experiments were conducted. The following data are taken from these studies. When placed at 38, 39 and 40°C for 24 h, winter-collected D. canadensis had higher survivorship than summer-collected larvae (Fig. 3).

Fig. 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 3.

Dendroides canadensis 24 h survivorship at different temperatures for larvae collected in winter and summer. Larvae were collected from 2011 to 2014 during January–February (winter) and June–August (summer) and immediately placed at various temperatures in the laboratory. The winter-collected larvae demonstrated higher survival than the summer-collected larvae (P<0.0001 at 38, 39 and 40°C with Tukey's multiple comparisons test). Values shown are means+1 s.d. Asterisks indicate a significant difference between the winter and summer values for a given temperature.

Survivorship at a constant temperature of 39°C for larvae collected over 13 months

The survivorship of D. canadensis collected over a period of 13 months and placed at a constant temperature of 39°C for 24 h is shown in Fig. 4. Larvae from the colder months of November–March had increased survivorship compared with those from the warmer months of May–September.

Fig. 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 4.

Dendroides canadensis 24 h survivorship at 39°C for larvae collected over 13 months. n=40–100 larvae tested per month. Different letters above the error bars indicate statistical significance (P<0.05), using Tukey's multiple comparisons test. Data are means+s.d. *0% survivorship.

Autumn and spring 24 h survivorship at different temperatures

As seen in Fig. 4, but contrary to expectation, during the seasonal temperature transition periods of autumn and spring, D. canadensis showed increased heat tolerance for 24 h in the autumn as the days grew generally colder moving from October to November (Fig. 5A) and decreased heat tolerance in the spring as days generally warmed from March to April (Fig. 5B).

Fig. 5.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 5.

Dendroides canadensis 24 h survivorship for larvae collected in the autumn and spring transition months. (A) Autumn transition: October and November. (B) Spring transition: March and April. n=40–142 larvae tested per month. Data are means+s.d. Comparison of data for larvae collected in the traditionally warmer months of October and April with those of larvae collected in the generally colder months of November and March, respectively, revealed the former had significantly decreased survivorship (*P<0.0001 from Holm–Šídák multiple comparisons test).

24 h ULT50 calculation for each season

We plotted the D. canadensis survivorship for each 24 h test conducted during the different seasons over 3 years. For each season, we performed a logistic regression via RStudio and calculated the 24 h ULT50 of the population. The calculated 24 h ULT50 was 40.9±0.3°C for winter larvae, 36.7±0.1°C for summer larvae, 37.3±0.3°C for spring larvae and 38.5±0.2°C for autumn larvae (Fig. 6 and Table 1).

Fig. 6.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 6.

Dendroides canadensis 24 h survivorship for larvae collected in different seasons over a 3 year period. (A) Summer and winter, (B) spring and (C) autumn. Data are means±s.e.m. The line represents the logistic curve fit for the data. The 24 h ULT50 (the temperature at which 50% mortality occurred) was calculated to be 36.7±0.1°C for summer, 40.9±0.3°C for winter, 37.3±0.3°C for spring and 38.5±0.2°C for autumn larvae. Each season's ULT50 is significantly different from that of every other season (P<0.05).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table 1.

The calculated seasonal 24 and 48 h ULT50 of Dendroides canadensis

24 h ULT50 and LLT50 (and temperature range) for each month

We sorted the measured 24 h ULT and LLT survivorship by month (Fig. 7), and thereby determined the monthly 24 h lethal temperature range of D. canadensis larvae. The measured 24 h ULTs in winter (Fig. 7) were much higher than our predicted ULTs (Fig. 1). Consequently, the measured 24 h lethal temperature range was 64°C in the winter, rather than the predicted 43°C; however, the actual 40°C range in May to September (Fig. 7) was close to the 43°C predicted summer value.

Fig. 7.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 7.

Measured mean monthly 24 h ULTs and LLTs. Data are means±s.e.m.

Winter and summer 48 h ULT50

When placed for 48 h at high temperatures, D. canadensis larvae collected in winter revealed an increased survivorship compared with those collected in summer as the winter 48 h ULT50 was 38.7°C compared with the summer ULT50 of 36.4°C (Table 1). While the summer 24 h and 48 h ULT50 were approximately equal (36.7 and 36.4°C, respectively), the winter 24 h ULT50 (40.9°C) was 2.2°C higher than the winter 48 h ULT50 (38.7°C).

Cucujus clavipes clavipes and T. trivittata high temperature survivorship over a year

To determine whether the ability to survive higher temperatures in winter relative to summer is unique to D. canadensis, we examined two other insects in which we had previously investigated cold tolerance ability and mechanisms. When tested at 39°C for 24 h, the freeze-avoiding larvae of the beetle C. clavipes clavipes had over 75% survivorship in the colder months from January to mid-March, but 0% survivorship from late March into May (Fig. 8). Likewise, when tested at 35°C for 24 h, the freeze-tolerant larvae of the tipulid T. trivittata showed increased heat tolerance in the winter months (Fig. 9), and survivorship began to taper off as the seasons progressed from winter to spring. While the level of testing in these two species was not as exhaustive as that with D. canadensis, clearly D. canadensis larvae are not unique in their unexpected ability to better survive high temperatures in winter than in summer.

Fig. 8.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 8.

Cucujus clavipes clavipes 24 h survivorship at 39°C for larvae collected periodically from January to May 2013. n=8–20 for each date. *0% survivorship.

Fig. 9.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 9.

Tipula trivittata 24 h survivorship at 35°C for larvae collected periodically between late April 2014 and late April 2015. n=8–20 for each date. *0% survivorship at 35°C.

Desiccation experiment

The following experiments were done to determine whether the mortality of D. canadensis larvae at high temperatures in the previously described experiments was due to temperature or to desiccation. During our experiments at 40°C with dry, rather than wet, paper towels in the container with the larvae, the insects decreased in mass every hour and died after a few hours. In contrast, when a moist paper towel was placed with the larvae at various temperatures, D. canadensis did not change mass over 24 h. (Recall that the moist paper towel was part of the normal protocol in all of the previously described experiments.) The survivorship of the insects in this experiment at 40°C after 24 h with hourly mass checks was similar to the results of our other 24 h, 40°C experiments with no hourly mass checks. Consequently, temperature, not desiccation, was the cause of mortality in our normal ULT experiments.

DISCUSSION

This is the first study to document higher ULTs of insects in winter than in summer. Winter D. canadensis larvae showed increased survivorship compared with summer larvae when tested for 24 and 48 h at higher temperatures. We expected D. canadensis to have a temperature range of approximately 43°C between the insect's 24 h ULT and LLT through the four seasons. However, we found that winter D. canadensis both lower their LLT and raise their ULT, resulting in a 64°C range between their 24 h ULT and LLT, while this range shrinks in May through the summer to ∼40°C as the LLT increases and the ULT decreases. In addition, C. clavipes clavipes and T. trivittata had increased survivorship at higher temperatures in the colder months compared with the warmer months.

Underneath the bark of decaying logs where these three insects live, the microhabitat temperature was highest in the spring, with maximum temperatures of approximately 30°C over the 3 years of this study. Consequently, the closest the insects came to their ULT was in spring, when D. canadensis larvae were occasionally within 5–6°C of their ULT. The logs were at their warmest temperature in the early spring months as a result of the rising air temperatures combined with the absence of leaves to block the sunlight from reaching the logs prior to leaf development on the trees. Also, by late March, the larvae have begun to feed and have lost some of their winter adaptations, and their ULTs have begun to decrease. In addition, the microhabitat temperatures (Fig. 2) were measured in large logs that, because of their size, have significant thermal inertia. This can be seen in the difference between microhabitat and air temperatures (Fig. 2). This is noteworthy because larvae are sometimes found off the ground in the smaller branches of dead trees. These less thermally buffered sites more closely track air temperature and therefore on warm days they are often warmer than the main log temperatures presented in Fig. 2. Also, it is quite possible that during especially warm summers microhabitat temperatures may be higher than those measured in this study, thereby placing the insects at risk.

The mechanism(s) whereby the insects' tolerance for high temperature increases in the winter relative to summer is unknown at this time. It is probable that multiple physiological and biochemical processes suffer at the extreme upper end of the temperature range, any one of which could result in mortality if it was to malfunction. Also, it is likely that the ‘weak link’ varies with time of year and with temperature. Consequently, it is likely that multiple factors are required to overcome these potentially lethal problems. However, at least a partial answer may involve the cold tolerance mechanisms of the insects: AFPs in D. canadensis and C. clavipes clavipes, AFGLs and polyols in all three species. Also, heat shock proteins are typically produced constitutively by insects in winter (Denlinger, 2002; Rinehart et al., 2007). Dendroides canadensis produces HSP-70 throughout the winter (J.G.D., unpublished).

One obvious problem resulting from the expansion of the temperature range of these insects in winter concerns membranes. It is well established that the functional ranges of membranes of poikilotherms change seasonally, shifting to lower temperatures in winter, generally by increasing the percentage of unsaturated fatty acids and shorter fatty acids incorporated into membrane phospholipids and increasing the level of membrane cholesterol (Hazel, 1995; Hazel and Williams, 1990; Somero et al., 2017). Likewise, seasonal lipid restructuring is well established in insects (Koštál et al., 2004; Tomcala et al., 2006), without which disruption of inorganic ion homeostasis can result in mortality (Koštál et al., 2003, 2006). While these membrane changes lower the lower temperature at which the membranes are functional in winter, they should also lower the upper end of the functional temperature range as well. Yet, in the case of D. canadensis larvae, the temperature range increases from 41°C in summer to 64°C in winter. How might this be explained? The answer is unknown, but certain fish AFPs have been shown to stabilize cell membranes at low temperature (Tomczak et al., 2002). Is it possible that some AFPs may also stabilize membranes at high temperature? In the desert beetle Microdera punctipennis, two AFP isomers, slightly different from the winter isomers, are naturally expressed in the rigorous desert summer (Qiu et al., 2013). Expression of one of the summer isomers as a fusion protein in yeast and bacteria increased the heat tolerance of these organisms, and the protein stabilized lactate dehydrogenase at high temperatures. AFP transcripts were upregulated by high temperature exposure in the laboratory in both M. punctipennis and the darkling beetle, Tenebrio molitor (Li et al., 2016). The AFPs of both of these beetles are structurally similar to those of D. canadensis. Although D. canadensis hemolymph thermal hysteresis activity decreases from ∼4–6°C in winter to ∼0.3°C in mid-summer, a few of the 30+ D. canadensis AFP (DAFP) isomers continue to be synthesized during the summer months, albeit at lower levels (Andorfer and Duman, 2000). Also, AFGLs are present mainly in the cellular membrane, but only in winter in all three of the insect species included in this study (Walters et al., 2009; Walters et al., 2011). Might the AFGLs function to stabilize the cell membrane from temperature stresses and contribute to the increased heat tolerance, along with cold tolerance, in winter? In addition, polyols such as sorbitol and glycerol are known to stabilize proteins and membranes at both high and low temperature extremes (Back et al., 1979; Gekko and Morikawa, 1981; Gekko, 1983). Sorbitol accumulates in silverleaf whiteflies during heat stress (Salvucci et al., 2000). Hemolymph glycerol concentrations in D. canadensis are typically 0.5–1.0 mol l−1 in winter, but are extremely low in summer (Duman, 1980; Duman and Serianni, 2002).

This study reveals the paradoxical and previously undescribed phenomenon of increased heat tolerance of insects in the winter months. For biomedical and research applications, understanding the mechanisms that permit increased survivorship at both high and low temperatures may be beneficial to the freeze–thaw processes of cryopreservation of human cells, tissues and organs for transplantation purposes, for example. With the drastic changes in temperature from 37°C to −135°C and back to 37°C in the process of cryopreservation, the cells, tissues and organs undergo extreme temperature stress. If the mechanisms underlying the insects' winter phenomenon of increased heat tolerance can be understood, the compounds driving the insects' winter survivorship could be used to increase the yield and success in cryopreservation and mitigate the damage resulting from temperature stress.

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge the assistance of Sandy Sass, Dawn Verleye, James Pennoyer, Jamie Pfaff, Molly Marous and Johnathan Vidovich in collecting some of the insects involved in this study.

FOOTNOTES

  • Competing interests

    The authors declare no competing or financial interests.

  • Author contributions

    Conceptualization: H.M.V., J.G.D.; Methodology: H.M.V., J.G.D.; Validation: H.M.V., J.G.D.; Formal analysis: H.M.V., J.G.D.; Investigation: H.M.V., J.G.D.; Resources: H.M.V., J.G.D.; Data curation: H.M.V., J.G.D.; Writing - original draft: H.M.V., J.G.D.; Writing - review & editing: H.M.V., J.G.D.; Visualization: H.M.V., J.G.D.; Supervision: J.G.D.

  • Funding

    This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors

  • Received April 18, 2017.
  • Accepted May 8, 2017.
  • © 2017. Published by The Company of Biologists Ltd
http://www.biologists.com/user-licence-1-1/

References

  1. ↵
    1. Andorfer, C. A. and
    2. Duman, J. G.
    (2000). Isolation and characterization of cDNA clones encoding antifreeze proteins of the Pyrochroid beetle Dendroides canadensis. J. Insect Physiol. 46, 365-372. doi:10.1016/S0022-1910(99)00189-4
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Back, J. F.,
    2. Oakenfull, D. and
    3. Smith, M. B.
    (1979). Increased thermal stability of proteins in the presence of sugars and polyols. Biochemistry 18, 5191-5196. doi:10.1021/bi00590a025
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Bennett, V. A.,
    2. Sformo, T.,
    3. Walters, K.,
    4. Toien, O.,
    5. Jeannet, K.,
    6. Hochstrasser, R.,
    7. Pan, Q.,
    8. Serianni, A. S.,
    9. Barnes, B. M. and
    10. Duman, J. G.
    (2005). Comparative overwintering physiology of Alaska and Indiana populations of the beetle Cucujus clavipes (Fabricus): roles of antifreeze proteins, polyols, dehydration and diapause. J. Exp. Biol. 208, 4467-4477. doi:10.1242/jeb.01892
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. ↵
    1. Brett, J. R.
    (1971). Energetic responses of salmon to temperature. A study of some thermal relations in the physiology and freshwater ecology of sockeye salmon (Oncorhynchus nerka). Am. Zool. 91, 99-113. doi:10.1093/icb/11.1.99
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  5. ↵
    1. Crowe, J. H.,
    2. Hoekstra, F. A. and
    3. Crowe, L. M.
    (1992). Anhydrobiosis. Annu. Rev. of Physiol. 54, 579-599. doi:10.1146/annurev.ph.54.030192.003051
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  6. ↵
    1. Denlinger, D. L.
    (2002). Regulation of diapause. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 47, 93-122. doi:10.1146/annurev.ento.47.091201.145137
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  7. ↵
    1. Duman, J. G.
    (1980). Factors involved in overwintering survival of the freeze tolerant beetle, Dendroides canadensis. J. Comp. Physiol. B 136, 53-59. doi:10.1007/BF00688622
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  8. ↵
    1. Duman, J. G.
    (2001). Antifreeze and ice nucleator proteins in terrestrial arthropods. Annu. Rev. Physiol. 63, 327-357. doi:10.1146/annurev.physiol.63.1.327
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  9. ↵
    1. Duman, J. G.
    (2002). The inhibition of ice nucleators by insect antifreeze proteins is enhanced by glycerol and citrate. J. Comp. Physiol. B 172, 163-168. doi:10.1007/s00360-001-0239-7
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  10. ↵
    1. Duman, J. G.
    (2015). Animal ice-binding (antifreeze) proteins and glycolipids: an overview with emphasis on physiological function. J Exp. Biol. 218, 1846-1855. doi:10.1242/jeb.116905
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. ↵
    1. Duman, J. G. and
    2. Serianni, A. S.
    (2002). The role of endogenous antifreeze protein enhancers in the hemolymph thermal hysteresis activity of the beetle Dendroides canadensis. J. Insect Physiol. 48, 103-111. doi:10.1016/S0022-1910(01)00150-0
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    1. Duman, J. G.,
    2. Neven, L. G.,
    3. Beals, J. M.,
    4. Olson, K. R. and
    5. Castellino, F. J.
    (1985). Freeze-tolerance adaptations, including haemolymph protein and lipoprotein nucleators, in the larvae of the cranefly Tipula trivittata. J. Insect Physiol. 31, 1-8. doi:10.1007/s003600050140
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  13. ↵
    1. Duman, J. G.,
    2. Parmalee, D.,
    3. Goetz, F. W.,
    4. Li, N.,
    5. Wu, D. W. and
    6. Benjamin, T.
    (1998). Molecular characterization and sequencing of antifreeze proteins from larvae of the beetle Dendroides canadensis. J. Comp. Physiol. B 168, 225-232. doi:10.1007/s003600050140
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  14. ↵
    1. Gekko, K.
    (1983). Increased thermal stability of collagen in the presence of sugars and polyols. J. Biochem. 94, 199-205. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.jbchem.a134330
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  15. ↵
    1. Gekko, K. and
    2. Morikawa, T.
    (1981). Thermodynamics of polyol-induced thermal stabilization of chymotrypsinogen1. J. Biochem. 90, 51-60. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.jbchem.a133469
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  16. ↵
    1. Hazel, J. R.
    (1995). Thermal adaptation in biological membranes: Is homeoviscous adaptation the explanation? Annu. Rev. of Physiol. 57, 19-42. doi:10.1146/annurev.ph.57.030195.000315
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  17. ↵
    1. Hazel, J. R. and
    2. Williams, E. E.
    (1990). The role of alterations in membrane lipid composition in enabling physiological adaptation of organisms to their physical environment. Prog. Lipid Res. 29, 167-227. doi:10.1016/0163-7827(90)90002-3
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  18. ↵
    1. Hoffman, A. A.,
    2. Chown, S. L. and
    3. Clusella-Trullas, S.
    (2013). Upper thermal limits in terrestrial ectotherms: how constrained are they? Funct. Ecol. 27, 939-949. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2435.2012.02036.x
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  19. ↵
    1. Koštál, V.,
    2. Vambera, J. and
    3. Bastyl, J.
    (2003). Remodeling of membrane phospholipids during transition to diapause and cold-acclimation in larvae of Chymomyza costata (Drosophilidae) Comp. Biochem. Physiol. B 135, 407-419. doi:10.1016/S1096-4959(03)00117-9
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  20. ↵
    1. Koštál, V.,
    2. Vambera, J. and
    3. Bastl, J.
    (2004). On the nature of pre-freeze mortality in insects: water balance, ion homeostasis and energy charge in adults of Pyrrocoris apterus. J. Exp. Biol. 207, 1509-1521. doi:10.1242/jeb.00923
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  21. ↵
    1. Koštál, V.,
    2. Yanagimoto, M. and
    3. Bastl, J.
    (2006). Chilling injury and disturbance of ion homeostasis in the coxal muscle of the tropical cockroach (Nauphoeta cinera). Comp. Biochem. Physiol. B 143, 171-179. doi:10.1016/j.cbpb.2005.11.005
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  22. ↵
    1. Li, J.,
    2. Ma, W. and
    3. Ma, J.
    (2016). Heat inducible expression of antifreeze protein genes from the beetles Tenebrio molitor and Microdera punctipennis. Cryo. Lett. 37, 10-18.
    OpenUrl
  23. ↵
    1. Neven, L.-G.,
    2. Duman, J. G.,
    3. Low, M. G.,
    4. Sehl, L. C. and
    5. Castellino, F. J.
    (1989). Purification and characterization of an insect hemolymph lipoprotein ice nucleator: evidence for the importance of phosphatidylinositol and apolipoprotein in the ice nucleator activity. J. Comp. Physiol. B 159, 71-82. doi:10.1007/BF00692685
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  24. ↵
    1. Nickell, P. K.,
    2. Sass, S.,
    3. Verleye, D.,
    4. Blumenthall, E. M. and
    5. Duman, J. G.
    (2013). Antifreeze proteins in the primary urine of larvae of the beetle Dendroides canadensis (Latreille). J Exp. Biol. 216, 1695-1703. doi:10.1242/jeb.082461
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  25. ↵
    1. Olsen, T. M. and
    2. Duman, J. G.
    (1997a). Maintenance of the supercooled state in overwintering pyrochroid beetle larvae Dendroides canadensis: role of hemolymph ice nucleators and antifreeze proteins. J. Comp. Physiol. B 167, 105-113. doi:10.1007/s003600050053
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  26. ↵
    1. Olsen, T. M. and
    2. Duman, J. G.
    (1997b). Maintenance of the supercooled state in the gut of overwintering pyrochroid beetle larvae, Dendroides canadensis: role of gut ice nucleators and antifreeze proteins. J. Comp. Physiol. B 167, 114-122. doi:10.1007/s003600050054
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  27. ↵
    1. Olsen, T. M.,
    2. Sass, S. J. and
    3. Duman, J. G.
    (1998). Factors contributing to increases in inoculative freezing resistance in overwintering fire-colored beetle larvae Dendroides canadensis (Pyrochroidae). J. Exp. Biol. 201, 1585-1594.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  28. ↵
    1. Qiu, L.,
    2. Mao, X.,
    3. Hou, F. and
    4. Ma, J.
    (2013). A novel function – thermal protective properties of an antifreeze protein from the summer desert beetle Microdera punctipennis. Cryobiology 66, 60-68. doi:10.1016/j.cryobiol.2012.11.005
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  29. ↵
    1. Rinehart, J. P.,
    2. Li, A.,
    3. Yocum, G. D.,
    4. Robich, R. M.,
    5. Hayward, S. A. L. and
    6. Denlinger, D. L.
    (2007). Up-regulation of heat shock proteins is essential for cold survival during insect diapause. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 104, 11130-11137. doi:10.1073/pnas.0703538104
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  30. ↵
    1. Salvucci, M. E.,
    2. Stecher, D. S. and
    3. Henneberry, T. J.
    (2000). Heat shock proteins in whiteflies, an insect that accumulates sorbitol in response to heat stress. J. Thermal Biol. 25, 363-371. doi:10.1016/S0306-4565(99)00108-4
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  31. ↵
    1. Sinha, T. and
    2. Cherkauer, K. A.
    (2008). Time series analysis of soil freeze and thaw processes in Indiana. J. Hydrometeorology 9, 936-950. doi:10.1175/2008JHM934.1
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  32. ↵
    1. Somero, G. N.
    (2010). The physiology of climate change: how potentials for acclimatization and genetic adaptation will determine ‘winners’ and ‘losers’. J. Exp Biol. 213, 912-920. doi:10.1242/jeb.037473
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  33. ↵
    1. Somero, G. N.,
    2. Lockwood, B. L. and
    3. Tomanek, L.
    (2017). Biochemical Adaptation: Response to Environmental Challenges from Life's Origins to the Anthropocene. Sunderland, MA, USA: Sinauer Associates INC.
  34. ↵
    1. Tomcala, A.,
    2. Tollarova, M.,
    3. Overgard, J.,
    4. Simek, P. and
    5. Kostal, V.
    (2006). Seasonal acquisition of chill tolerance and restructuring of membrane glycerophospholipids in an overwintering insect: triggering by low temperature, desiccation and diapause progression. J. Exp. Biol. 209, 4102-4113. doi:10.1242/jeb.02484
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  35. ↵
    1. Tomczak, M. M.,
    2. Hincha, D. K.,
    3. Estrada, S. D.,
    4. Wolkers, W. F.,
    5. Crowe, L. M.,
    6. Feeney, R. E.,
    7. Tablin, F. and
    8. Crowe, J. H.
    (2002). A mechanism for stabilization of membranes at low temperatures by an antifreeze protein. Biophys. J. 82, 874-881. doi:10.1016/S0006-3495(02)75449-0
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  36. ↵
    1. Walters, K. R.,
    2. Serianni, A. S.,
    3. Sformo, T.,
    4. Barnes, B. M. and
    5. Duman, J. G.
    (2009). A nonprotein thermal hysteresis-producing xylomannan antifreeze in the freeze-tolerant Alaskan beetle Upis ceramboides. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 106, 20210-20215. doi:10.1073/pnas.0909872106
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  37. ↵
    1. Walters, K. R., Jr.,
    2. Serianni, A. S.,
    3. Voituron, Y.,
    4. Sformo, T.,
    5. Barnes, B. M. and
    6. Duman, J. G.
    (2011). A thermal hysteresis-producing xylomannan glycolipid antifreeze associated with cold tolerance is found in diverse taxa. J. Comp. Physiol. B 181, 631-640. doi:10.1007/s00360-011-0552-8
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  38. ↵
    1. Watanabe, M.,
    2. Kikawada, T.,
    3. Fujita, A.,
    4. Forczek, E.,
    5. Adati, T. and
    6. Okuda, T.
    (2004). Physiological traits of invertebrates entering cryptobiosis in a post-embryonic stage. Eur. J. Entomol. 101, 439-444. doi:10.14411/eje.2004.063
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  39. ↵
    1. Wu, D. W.,
    2. Duman, J. G.,
    3. Cheng, C.-H. C. and
    4. Castellino, F. J.
    (1991). Purification and characterization of antifreeze proteins from larvae of the beetle Dendroides canadensis. J. Comp. Physiol. B 161, 271-278. doi:10.1007/BF00262308
    OpenUrlCrossRef
Previous ArticleNext Article
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

This Issue

Keywords

  • Insect temperature tolerance
  • Upper lethal temperature
  • Insect plasticity
  • Climate change
  • Dendroides canadensis

 Download PDF

Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Experimental Biology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Upper lethal temperatures in three cold-tolerant insects are higher in winter than in summer
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Experimental Biology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Experimental Biology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Research Article
Upper lethal temperatures in three cold-tolerant insects are higher in winter than in summer
Henry M. Vu, John G. Duman
Journal of Experimental Biology 2017 220: 2726-2732; doi: 10.1242/jeb.161331
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Research Article
Upper lethal temperatures in three cold-tolerant insects are higher in winter than in summer
Henry M. Vu, John G. Duman
Journal of Experimental Biology 2017 220: 2726-2732; doi: 10.1242/jeb.161331

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Alerts

Please log in to add an alert for this article.

Sign in to email alerts with your email address

Article navigation

  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • INTRODUCTION
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • Acknowledgements
    • FOOTNOTES
    • References
  • Figures & tables
  • Info & metrics
  • PDF

Related articles

Cited by...

More in this TOC section

  • Unexpected lack of specialisation in the flow properties of spitting cobra venom
  • Responses of Manduca sexta larvae to heat waves
  • Heat hardening in a pair of Anolis lizards: constraints, dynamics and ecological consequences
Show more RESEARCH ARTICLE

Similar articles

Subject collections

  • Ecophysiology: responses to environmental stressors and change

Other journals from The Company of Biologists

Development

Journal of Cell Science

Disease Models & Mechanisms

Biology Open

Advertisement

Predicting the Future: Species Survival in a Changing World

Read our new special issue exploring the significant role of experimental biology in assessing and predicting the susceptibility or resilience of species to future, human-induced environmental change.


Big Biology Podcast - Hollie Putnam and coral bleaching

Catch the next JEB-sponsored episode of the Big Biology Podcast where Art and Marty talk to Hollie Putnam about the causes of coral bleaching and the basic biology of corals in the hope of selectively breeding corals that can better tolerate future ocean conditions.

Read Hollie's Review on the subject, which is featured in our current special issue. 


Stark trade-offs and elegant solutions in arthropod visual systems

Many elegant eye specializations that evolved in response to visual challenges continue to be discovered. A new Review by Meece et al. summarises exciting solutions evolved by insects and other arthropods in response to specific visual challenges.


Head bobbing gives pigeons a sense of perspective

Pigeons might look goofy with their head-bobbing walk, but it turns out that the ungainly head manoeuvre allows the birds to judge distance.

Articles

  • Accepted manuscripts
  • Issue in progress
  • Latest complete issue
  • Issue archive
  • Archive by article type
  • Special issues
  • Subject collections
  • Interviews
  • Sign up for alerts

About us

  • About JEB
  • Editors and Board
  • Editor biographies
  • Travelling Fellowships
  • Grants and funding
  • Journal Meetings
  • Workshops
  • The Company of Biologists
  • Journal news

For Authors

  • Submit a manuscript
  • Aims and scope
  • Presubmission enquiries
  • Article types
  • Manuscript preparation
  • Cover suggestions
  • Editorial process
  • Promoting your paper
  • Open Access
  • Outstanding paper prize
  • Biology Open transfer

Journal Info

  • Journal policies
  • Rights and permissions
  • Media policies
  • Reviewer guide
  • Sign up for alerts

Contact

  • Contact JEB
  • Subscriptions
  • Advertising
  • Feedback

 Twitter   YouTube   LinkedIn

© 2021   The Company of Biologists Ltd   Registered Charity 277992