Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Accepted manuscripts
    • Issue in progress
    • Latest complete issue
    • Issue archive
    • Archive by article type
    • Special issues
    • Subject collections
    • Interviews
    • Sign up for alerts
  • About us
    • About JEB
    • Editors and Board
    • Editor biographies
    • Travelling Fellowships
    • Grants and funding
    • Journal Meetings
    • Workshops
    • The Company of Biologists
    • Journal news
  • For authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Aims and scope
    • Presubmission enquiries
    • Article types
    • Manuscript preparation
    • Cover suggestions
    • Editorial process
    • Promoting your paper
    • Open Access
    • Outstanding paper prize
    • Biology Open transfer
  • Journal info
    • Journal policies
    • Rights and permissions
    • Media policies
    • Reviewer guide
    • Sign up for alerts
  • Contacts
    • Contact JEB
    • Subscriptions
    • Advertising
    • Feedback
  • COB
    • About The Company of Biologists
    • Development
    • Journal of Cell Science
    • Journal of Experimental Biology
    • Disease Models & Mechanisms
    • Biology Open

User menu

  • Log in
  • Log out

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Experimental Biology
  • COB
    • About The Company of Biologists
    • Development
    • Journal of Cell Science
    • Journal of Experimental Biology
    • Disease Models & Mechanisms
    • Biology Open

supporting biologistsinspiring biology

Journal of Experimental Biology

  • Log in
Advanced search

RSS  Twitter  Facebook  YouTube  

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Accepted manuscripts
    • Issue in progress
    • Latest complete issue
    • Issue archive
    • Archive by article type
    • Special issues
    • Subject collections
    • Interviews
    • Sign up for alerts
  • About us
    • About JEB
    • Editors and Board
    • Editor biographies
    • Travelling Fellowships
    • Grants and funding
    • Journal Meetings
    • Workshops
    • The Company of Biologists
    • Journal news
  • For authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Aims and scope
    • Presubmission enquiries
    • Article types
    • Manuscript preparation
    • Cover suggestions
    • Editorial process
    • Promoting your paper
    • Open Access
    • Outstanding paper prize
    • Biology Open transfer
  • Journal info
    • Journal policies
    • Rights and permissions
    • Media policies
    • Reviewer guide
    • Sign up for alerts
  • Contacts
    • Contact JEB
    • Subscriptions
    • Advertising
    • Feedback
SHORT COMMUNICATION
Behavioural effects of juvenile hormone and their influence on division of labour in leaf-cutting ant societies
Victoria C. Norman, William O. H. Hughes
Journal of Experimental Biology 2016 219: 8-11; doi: 10.1242/jeb.132803
Victoria C. Norman
School of Life Sciences, University of Sussex, Brighton, East Sussex BN1 9QG, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: V.Norman@sussex.ac.uk
William O. H. Hughes
School of Life Sciences, University of Sussex, Brighton, East Sussex BN1 9QG, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & tables
  • Info & metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

Division of labour in social insects represents a major evolutionary transition, but the physiological mechanisms that regulate this are still little understood. Experimental work with honey bees, and correlational analyses in other social insects, have implicated juvenile hormone (JH) as a regulatory factor, but direct experimental evidence of behavioural effects of JH in social insects is generally lacking. Here, we used experimental manipulation of JH to show that raised JH levels in leaf-cutting ants results in workers becoming more active, phototactic and threat responsive, and engaging in more extranidal activity – behavioural changes that we show are all characteristic of the transition from intranidal work to foraging. These behavioural effects on division of labour suggest that the JH mediation of behaviour occurs across multiple independent evolutions of eusociality, and may be a key endocrine regulator of the division of labour which has produced the remarkable ecological and evolutionary success of social insects.

INTRODUCTION

Division of labour is characteristic of all social groups and is key to the advantages of sociality (Krause and Ruxton, 2002). Division of labour can be transient in some species with simple sociality, or can involve behavioural or morphological specialisation for tasks in other species with more complex sociality. The social insects provide classic examples of such division of labour, with division of labour between reproductive individuals and workers being one of their defining characteristics, and with workers also showing division of labour amongst themselves (Oster and Wilson, 1979). The division of labour within social insect colonies is key to their ecological success and results in them being considered a major transition in evolution (Smith and Szathmary, 1997). In some taxa, primarily some ants and termites, division of labour amongst workers is based on morphological castes, while in all social insects it involves behavioural specialisation, often based on age, but often also including division of labour within age classes (Hölldobler and Wilson, 1990). Understanding the proximate mechanisms that produce the behavioural and morphological division of labour seen in insect societies is therefore one of the key questions in social insect biology, and evolutionary biology in general.

The environmental and physiological mechanisms involved in division of labour have been extensively studied in the honey bee model organism, in which larvae fed an amino acid-rich diet of royal jelly are stimulated to continue on a queen developmental pathway while larvae receiving a diet lacking in royal jelly instead switch to a worker developmental pathway (Corona et al., 2007; Kamakura, 2011). The physiological effect of diet on morphological caste determination in honey bees is mediated by juvenile hormone (JH) levels, with JH also mediating the age polyethism and behavioural task propensity of adult workers (Amsalem and Malka, 2014; Schulz et al., 2002; Sullivan et al., 2000). JH has wide-ranging effects in insects (Flatt et al., 2005; Hartfelder, 2000; Nijhout and Wheeler, 1982; Sullivan et al., 2000), and a number of correlational studies have found JH levels to be higher in foragers compared with in-nest workers for several ant, bee and wasp species (Dolezal et al., 2012; Giray et al., 2005; Lengyel et al., 2007; Penick et al., 2011; Shorter and Tibbetts, 2009), suggesting that JH may have a general regulatory function in the division of labour in insect societies. However, it is unclear what behavioural changes produce this age-related switch, and direct experimental evidence for the influence of JH outside of the honey bee model system is lacking. Here, we investigated experimentally the behavioural effects of JH in leaf-cutting ants (which have evolved eusociality independently of bees), by manipulating JH levels. We examined how an increase in JH affects the activity, phototaxis and threat responsiveness of workers, and whether it induces workers to engage in precocious extranidal activity, using similar assays to those which have been used in honey bee studies (e.g. Erber et al., 2006). We then examined whether the behavioural effects of raised JH levels match those for the key switch in division of labour from intranidal to extranidal work.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The experiment used five colonies of Acromyrmex octospinosus (Reich 1793) leaf-cutting ants, a species with large, complex societies of polymorphic workers, in which medium-sized workers care for the brood and mutualistic fungal crop when young, and switch to extranidal foraging and waste management when old (Camargo et al., 2007; Waddington and Hughes, 2010). Colonies were collected in Gamboa, Panama, and kept at 80±5% relative humidity, 26±2°C, and a 12 h:12 h light:dark cycle on a diet of privet leaves (Ligustrum spp.), with water provided ad libitum. Brood-tending workers of medium size (1.71±0.019 mm head width) and young age from within the fungus gardens were collected and treated topically on the pronotum with either 1 µl of the JH III analogue methoprene (3.3 µg methoprene in 1 µl acetone – ca. 0.223 µg mg−1 insect mass) or 1 µl acetone control, three times a week for 2 weeks. During the application period, ants were housed in individual pots. This methoprene dose was similar to, or lower than, that used previously to produce naturally realistic changes in JH for other social insects (ca. 0.06–0.625 µg mg−1 insect mass per application; Cahan et al., 2011; Shorter and Tibbetts, 2009; Tibbetts et al., 2013). Two hours after the last application, ants were tested using the behavioural assays detailed below, with different ants being used for each assay. In order to confirm that ants from the two treatment groups were of similar age, a subset of workers (N=41 for control, N=37 for JH) were photographed dorsally and the cuticular darkness (which correlates with age, reliably distinguishing young workers from old; Armitage and Boomsma, 2010) of the middle third of the rear femur quantified using ImageJ software.

Behavioural assays

To test whether methoprene made ants more active, ants were placed individually in a 90 mm Petri dish lined with filter paper, allowed to acclimatise for 5 min, and then filmed for 10 min using a Logitech c920 webcam (methoprene treatment N=37, control N=35; 5–6 ants per colony per treatment). Speed of movement was quantified using AntTrak path analysis software (Tranter et al., 2014).

To test whether methoprene affected phototaxis, individual ants were placed in a 90 mm Petri dish, with one half blackened out with tape. After 5 min acclimatisation, ants were filmed for 10 min and the proportion of time spent in the light half of the Petri dish recorded (N=40 for both methoprene and control treatments; 8 ants from each colony per treatment).

To test whether methoprene increased the threat responsiveness of ants, we used a mandible opening response (MOR) assay (Norman et al., 2014). Ants were harnessed and their response to a freshly freeze-killed nestmate or non-nestmate (Acromyrmex echinatior) worker was tested in a random order. The stimulus was placed in contact with the focal ant's antennae for 10 s, and its responses were recorded as either mandible gaping for a period of >1 s (thereby displaying a threat response) or showing no such response during the 10 s (methoprene N=37, control N=35; 7–8 ants per colony per treatment).

To test whether methoprene increased extranidal behaviour in a more natural environment, individuals were observed in a mini-nest set-up, consisting of a small piece of fungus in a 60 mm Petri dish, 15 attendant small, young workers to aid fungus care and one larva from the natal colony. The Petri dish was covered to keep the nest environment humid and dark, and placed in a larger box (240×190×75 mm). One focal ant from each treatment was placed in each mini-nest and left overnight to acclimatise. The locations of each focal ant were then recorded at 30 min intervals for 8 h (methoprene N=38, control N=34; 6–8 ants per colony per treatment). All assays were then subsequently repeated on ‘natural’ foragers and nest workers that were observed either within the nest tending to the fungus or outside of the nest collecting leaves, respectively (N=30 for both castes, with 6 ants taken from each of the same five colonies of A. octospinosus).

Statistical analyses

All data were analysed in IBM SPSS 20.0 (Chicago, IL, USA) using generalized linear mixed models (GLMM) with treatment (methoprene or control) as a fixed factor and colony of origin as a random factor. Model fit was determined using AIC values, with non-significant interaction terms removed to obtain minimum adequate models. The activity (speed of movement), phototaxis (proportion of time spent in the light half of the Petri dish) and behaviour in mini-nests (proportion of time spent engaged in extranidal activity) were analysed with gamma distributions and log link functions, and threat responsiveness of ants (positive MOR or no response) with a binomial distribution and log link function. Post hoc pairwise comparisons of treatments were made using the sequential Bonferroni method to control for multiple comparisons.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Ants treated with methoprene were significantly more active than control ants (F1,70=8.77, P=0.004; Fig. 1A), and spent significantly more time in the lighter half of the Petri dish instead of the darkened half (F1,78=5.87, P=0.018; Fig. 1B). Methoprene-treated ants were also significantly more threat responsive than control ants, exhibiting almost twice as many positive threat responses to both nestmate and non-nestmate stimuli as the control ants (F1,249=12.7, P<0.001; Fig. 1C). Ants from both treatment groups were also more responsive to a stimulus of a non-nestmate compared with a nestmate (F1,249=26.3, P<0.001). In the mini-nest experiment, young workers treated with methoprene spent on average twice as much time outside the nest environment as control ants (F1,70=5.22; P=0.025; Fig. 1D). No abnormal behaviours were observed from either control or methoprene-treated individuals. Treatment and control ants did not differ in their cuticular coloration and therefore age (F1,76=0.275, P=0.601). The effects of methoprene mirror the change seen in leaf-cutting ants when they transition from brood-tending workers to foragers (Fig. 2). Foraging workers were significantly more active (F1,58=21.2, P<0.001), more phototactic (F1,58=48.9, P<0.001) and more threat responsive (F1,117=9.94, P=0.002), and spent significantly more time outside of the nest in a mini-nest set-up (F1,1018=100.8, P<0.001) compared with within-nest nurse workers.

Fig. 1
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 1

. The effect of increased juvenile hormone (JH) level on ant behaviour. The mean±s.e.m. of behavioural variables measured for young leaf-cutting ant workers from five Acromyrmex octospinosus colonies that had been treated for 2 weeks with either the JH analogue methoprene or solvent control. Ants treated with methoprene (A) were significantly more active than control ants (GLMM: F1,70=8.77, P=0.004, N=37 for methoprene, N=35 for control), (B) were more phototactic and spent significantly more time in the lighter half of the Petri dish instead of the darkened half (GLMM: F1,78=5.87, P=0.018, N=40 for both methoprene and control), (C) were significantly more threat responsive to both a nestmate (white bars) and a non-nestmate (grey bars) than control ants (GLMM: F1,249=12.7, P<0.001, N=37 for methoprene treatment, N=35 for control) and (D) spent significantly more time exhibiting extranidal activity than control ants (GLMM: F1,70=5.22, P=0.025, N=38 for methoprene, N=34 for control), illustrated by the yellow marked ant. Intranidal activity is represented by the blue marked ant within the fungus chamber. MOR, mandible opening response.

Fig. 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 2.

The behavioural profiles of leaf-cutting ant foragers and nest workers, for comparison with the effects of JH manipulation. The mean±s.e.m. activity for leaf-cutting ant workers that were either foragers (N=30) or in-nest workers (N=30) from five A. octospinosus colonies. Foragers were significantly more (A) active (GLMM: F1,58=21.2, P<0.001), (B) phototactic (spent significantly more time in the light half of the Petri dish) (GLMM: F1,58=48.9, P<0.001) and (C) threat responsive to both a nestmate (white bars) and a non-nestmate (grey bars) (GLMM: F1,117=9.94, P=0.002), and (D) showed significantly more extranidal activity compared with in-nest workers (GLMM: F1,1018=100.8, P<0.001) (illustrated by the yellow marked ant, compared with a within-nest worker illustrated with a blue mark).

The results show that JH level can strongly affect the behavioural profiles of ant workers, and induce them to engage in precocious extranidal activity. Treatment with the JH analogue methoprene caused a significant increase in activity, phototaxis and threat responsiveness of leaf-cutting ant workers, all of which are behavioural characteristics of foraging in the study species, as well as social insects in general (Chapman et al., 2011; Pamminger et al., 2014). Furthermore, there was a doubling in the amount of time that methoprene-treated workers spent engaging in extranidal activities in a mini-nest setting compared with control ants. JH therefore affects the switch between intranidal and extranidal work that is a key part of the division of labour in ant societies, and it does this by making ants more active, phototactic and threat responsive. This therefore provides evidence for a ‘toolkit’ situation involving JH, as ants have evolved eusociality independently of bees, indicating that JH regulation of behaviour either is ancestral in eusocial Hymenoptera or has evolved multiple times.

The results are, to our knowledge, the first direct experimental evidence of the effect of JH on division of labour in ant societies, and of the behavioural mechanisms by which this effect is produced. The effects of JH observed on leaf-cutting ants have remarkable similarities with those seen in the best-studied social insect, the honey bee Apis mellifera, in which experimentally elevated JH levels lead to precocious foraging (Sullivan et al., 2000), possibly due to the same behavioural mechanisms as we show here in leaf-cutting ants. The results also fit with a number of correlational studies in which JH levels have been found to be higher in foragers of several different ant species, as well as wasps, bees and termites (Dolezal et al., 2009; Giray et al., 2005; Lengyel et al., 2007; Penick et al., 2011). This suggests that JH may have a highly conserved role as a key endocrine mediator of division of labour within eusocial insect societies that has been key to their ecological and evolutionary success.

Acknowledgements

We thank Allen Herre and the Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute (STRI) for facilities in Panama, ANAM (subsequently Ministerio de Ambiente de Panamá) for permission to collect and export the ants, the two anonymous reviwers and members of the Hughes Lab and Mark Hoppé for comments on the manuscript.

FOOTNOTES

  • Competing interests

    The authors declare no competing or financial interests.

  • Author contributions

    V.C.N. and W.O.H.H. conceived and designed the study, V.C.N. carried out the experiments and analysed the data, V.C.N. and W.O.H.H. wrote the manuscript.

  • Funding

    This research was funded by the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council and Syngenta (BB/J011339/1).

  • © 2016. Published by The Company of Biologists Ltd

References

  1. ↵
    1. Amsalem, E. and
    2. Malka, O.
    (2014). Exploring the role of juvenile hormone and vitellogenin in reproduction and social behavior in bumble bees. BMC Evol. Biol. 14, 45. doi:10.1186/1471-2148-14-45
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Armitage, S. A. O. and
    2. Boomsma, J. J.
    (2010). The effects of age and social interactions on innate immunity in a leaf-cutting ant. J. Insect Physiol. 56, 780-787. doi:10.1016/j.jinsphys.2010.01.009
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  3. ↵
    1. Cahan, S. H.,
    2. Graves, C. J. and
    3. Brent, C. S.
    (2011). Intergenerational effect of juvenile hormone on offspring in Pogonomyrmex harvester ants. J. Comp. Physiol. B. 181, 991-999. doi:10.1007/s00360-011-0587-x
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  4. ↵
    1. Camargo, R. S.,
    2. Forti, L. C.,
    3. Lopes, J. F. S.,
    4. Andrade, A. P. P. and
    5. Ottati, A. L. T.
    (2007). Age polyethism in the leaf-cutting ant Acromyrmex subterraneus brunneus Forel, 1911 (Hym., Formicidae). J. Appl. Entomol. 131, 139-145. doi:10.1111/j.1439-0418.2006.01129.x
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  5. ↵
    1. Chapman, B. B.,
    2. Thain, H.,
    3. Coughlin, J. and
    4. Hughes, W. O. H.
    (2011). Behavioural syndromes at multiple scales in Myrmica ants. Anim. Behav. 82, 391-397. doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2011.05.019
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  6. ↵
    1. Corona, M.,
    2. Velarde, R. A.,
    3. Remolina, S.,
    4. Moran-Lauter, A.,
    5. Wang, Y.,
    6. Hughes, K. A. and
    7. Robinson, G. E.
    (2007). Vitellogenin, juvenile hormone, insulin signaling, and queen honey bee longevity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 104, 7128-7133. doi:10.1073/pnas.0701909104
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. ↵
    1. Dolezal, A. G.,
    2. Brent, C. S.,
    3. Gadau, J.,
    4. Hölldobler, B. and
    5. Amdam, G. V.
    (2009). Endocrine physiology of the division of labour in Pogonomyrmex californicus founding queens. Anim. Behav. 77, 1005-1010. doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2009.01.010
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  8. ↵
    1. Dolezal, A. G.,
    2. Brent, C. S.,
    3. Hölldobler, B. and
    4. Amdam, G. V.
    (2012). Worker division of labor and endocrine physiology are associated in the harvester ant, Pogonomyrmex californicus. J. Exp. Biol. 215, 454-460. doi:10.1242/jeb.060822
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. ↵
    1. Erber, J.,
    2. Hoorman, J. and
    3. Scheiner, R.
    (2006). Phototactic behaviour correlates with gustatory responsiveness in honey bees (Apis mellifera L.). Behav. Brain Res. 174, 174-180. doi:10.1016/j.bbr.2006.07.023
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    1. Flatt, T.,
    2. Tu, M.-P. and
    3. Tatar, M.
    (2005). Hormonal pleiotropy and the juvenile hormone regulation of Drosophila development and life history. Bioessays 27, 999-1010. doi:10.1002/bies.20290
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  11. ↵
    1. Giray, T.,
    2. Giovanetti, M. and
    3. West-Eberhard, M. J.
    (2005). Juvenile hormone, reproduction, and worker behavior in the neotropical social wasp Polistes canadensis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102, 3330-3335. doi:10.1073/pnas.0409560102
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. ↵
    1. Hartfelder, K.
    (2000). Insect juvenile hormone: from “status quo” to high society. Brazilian J. Med. Biol. Res. 33, 157-177. doi:10.1590/S0100-879X2000000200003
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  13. ↵
    1. Hölldobler, B. and
    2. Wilson, E.
    (1990). The Ants. Berlin: Harvard University Press.
  14. ↵
    1. Kamakura, M.
    (2011). Royalactin induces queen differentiation in honeybees. Nature 473, 478-483. doi:10.1038/nature10093
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  15. ↵
    1. Krause, J. and
    2. Ruxton, G. D.
    (2002). Living in Groups. Oxford: OUP.
  16. ↵
    1. Lengyel, F.,
    2. Westerlund, S. A. and
    3. Kaib, M.
    (2007). Juvenile hormone III influences task-specific cuticular hydrocarbon profile changes in the ant Myrmicaria eumenoides. J. Chem. Ecol. 33, 167-181. doi:10.1007/s10886-006-9185-x
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  17. ↵
    1. Nijhout, H. F. and
    2. Wheeler, D. E.
    (1982). Juvenile hormone and the physiological basis of insect polymorphisms. Q. Rev. Biol. 57, 109-133. doi:10.1086/412671
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  18. ↵
    1. Norman, V. C.,
    2. Hoppé, M. and
    3. Hughes, W. O. H.
    (2014). Old and wise but not size: factors affecting threat response behaviour and nestmate recognition in Acromyrmex echinatior leaf-cutting ants. Insect. Soc. 61, 289-296. doi:10.1007/s00040-014-0355-5
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  19. ↵
    1. Oster, G. F. and
    2. Wilson, E. O.
    (1979). Caste and Ecology in the Social Insects. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  20. ↵
    1. Pamminger, T.,
    2. Foitzik, S.,
    3. Kaufmann, K. C.,
    4. Schützler, N. and
    5. Menzel, F.
    (2014). Worker personality and its association with spatially structured division of labor. PLoS ONE 9, e79616. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0079616
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. ↵
    1. Penick, C. A.,
    2. Liebig, J. and
    3. Brent, C. S.
    (2011). Reproduction, dominance, and caste: endocrine profiles of queens and workers of the ant Harpegnathos saltator. J. Comp. Physiol. A. 197, 1063-1071. doi:10.1007/s00359-011-0667-0
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. ↵
    1. Schulz, D. J.,
    2. Sullivan, J. P. and
    3. Robinson, G. E.
    (2002). Juvenile hormone and octopamine in the regulation of division of labor in honey bee colonies. Horm. Behav. 42, 222-231. doi:10.1006/hbeh.2002.1806
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. ↵
    1. Shorter, J. R. and
    2. Tibbetts, E. A.
    (2009). The effect of juvenile hormone on temporal polyethism in the paper wasp Polistes dominulus. Insect. Soc. 56, 7-13. doi:10.1007/s00040-008-1026-1
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  24. ↵
    1. Smith, J. M. and
    2. Szathmary, E.
    (1997). The Major Transitions in Evolution. Oxford: OUP.
  25. ↵
    1. Sullivan, J. P.,
    2. Jassim, O.,
    3. Fahrbach, S. E. and
    4. Robinson, G. E.
    (2000). Juvenile hormone paces behavioral development in the adult worker honey bee. Horm. Behav. 37, 1-14. doi:10.1006/hbeh.1999.1552
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  26. ↵
    1. Tibbetts, E. A.,
    2. Vernier, C. and
    3. Jinn, J.
    (2013). Juvenile hormone influences precontest assessment behaviour in Polistes dominulus paper wasps. Anim. Behav. 85, 1177-1181. doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2013.03.003
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  27. ↵
    1. Tranter, C.,
    2. LeFevre, L.,
    3. Evison, S. E. F. and
    4. Hughes, W. O. H.
    (2014). Threat detection: contextual recognition and response to parasites by ants. Behav. Ecol. 26, 396-405. doi:10.1093/beheco/aru203
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  28. ↵
    1. Waddington, S. J. and
    2. Hughes, W. O. H.
    (2010). Waste management in the leaf-cutting ant Acromyrmex echinatior: the role of worker size, age and plasticity. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 64, 1219-1228. doi:10.1007/s00265-010-0936-x
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
View Abstract
Previous ArticleNext Article
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

This Issue

Keywords

  • Animal behaviour
  • Endocrine
  • Behavioural development
  • Social insect

 Download PDF

Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Experimental Biology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Behavioural effects of juvenile hormone and their influence on division of labour in leaf-cutting ant societies
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Experimental Biology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Experimental Biology web site.
Share
SHORT COMMUNICATION
Behavioural effects of juvenile hormone and their influence on division of labour in leaf-cutting ant societies
Victoria C. Norman, William O. H. Hughes
Journal of Experimental Biology 2016 219: 8-11; doi: 10.1242/jeb.132803
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
SHORT COMMUNICATION
Behavioural effects of juvenile hormone and their influence on division of labour in leaf-cutting ant societies
Victoria C. Norman, William O. H. Hughes
Journal of Experimental Biology 2016 219: 8-11; doi: 10.1242/jeb.132803

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Alerts

Please log in to add an alert for this article.

Sign in to email alerts with your email address

Article navigation

  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • INTRODUCTION
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
    • Acknowledgements
    • FOOTNOTES
    • References
  • Figures & tables
  • Info & metrics
  • PDF

Related articles

Cited by...

More in this TOC section

  • Why do muscles lose torque potential when activated within their agonistic group?
  • Reduced telomere length in embryos exposed to predator cues
  • Configural learning in freshly collected, smart, wild Lymnaea
Show more SHORT COMMUNICATION

Similar articles

Subject collections

  • Neuroethology

Other journals from The Company of Biologists

Development

Journal of Cell Science

Disease Models & Mechanisms

Biology Open

Advertisement

Editorial – The changing of the guard

In his Editorial, Hans Hoppeler announces that he will be stepping down as Editor-in-Chief of JEB in July 2020. He reflects on the history of JEB, why he has enjoyed his tenure as JEB’s Editor-in-Chief and the recent developments in the publishing world.


Big Biology podcast

JEB is partnering with the Big Biology podcast and in this sponsored episode, JEB Editor Michael Dickinson talks to the Big Biology team about the aerodynamic mechanisms of insect flight, how insects control flight with their tiny 100k neuron brain and his recent JEB paper showing how fruit flies navigate using the sun and polarized light as a compass.


Editors’ choice – An appetite for invasion: digestive physiology, thermal performance and food intake in lionfish (Pterois spp.)

A lionfish

Invasive lionfish are a colossal problem in the Mediterranean Sea and western Atlantic Ocean. Now it turns out that they are successful invaders because they invest more energy in digestion than moving about.


Travelling Fellowship – Anti-ageing in the Greenland Shark

Group photo of Pierre Delaroche and the team in Greenland

Find out how Pierre Delaroche’s Travelling Fellowship grant from the Journal of Experimental Biology took him to Greenland, where he gathered data to further understand the ageing process in the longest-living vertebrate known to science. Don’t miss the next application deadline for 2020 travel, coming up on 29 November. Where will your research take you?


Commentary – Yank: the time derivative of force is an important biomechanical variable in sensorimotor systems

A diagram showing the multi-scale anatomical structures and processes that determine the magnitude of yank

The derivative of force with respect to time does not have a standard term in physics. In their new Commentary, David C. Lin and his colleagues propose that the term ‘yank’ should be used to denote the time derivative of force.


Inside JEB – Springy ankle tether saves runners

Time-lapse photographs of a runner using the exotendon.

Runners waste energy every time their legs stop swinging, but now a team of scientists from the US and Canada have shown that a springy ankle tether can reduce runners’ energy costs by 6.4%, which is nearly the entire cost of swinging the limbs. Read the full research article here.


JEB partners with Publons!

Journal of Experimental Biology is pleased to announce a new partnership with Publons! This allows reviewers to easily track and verify every review by choosing to add the review to their Publons profile when completing the review submission form. Publons also makes it simple for reviewers to showcase their peer review contributions in a format that can be included in job and funding applications (without breaking reviewer anonymity). Read the official announcement here!


preLights – Oxygenation properties of hemoglobin and the evolutionary origins of isoform multiplicity in an amphibious air-breathing fish, the blue-spotted mudskipper (Boleophthalmus pectinirostris)

Charlotte Nelson

Charlotte Nelson highlights work in mudskippers suggesting that a diversity in expressed hemoglobin isoforms is not required for the switch between aquatic and aerial respiration.

Articles

  • Accepted manuscripts
  • Issue in progress
  • Latest complete issue
  • Issue archive
  • Archive by article type
  • Special issues
  • Subject collections
  • Interviews
  • Sign up for alerts

About us

  • About JEB
  • Editors and Board
  • Editor biographies
  • Travelling Fellowships
  • Grants and funding
  • Journal Meetings
  • Workshops
  • The Company of Biologists
  • Journal news

For Authors

  • Submit a manuscript
  • Aims and scope
  • Presubmission enquiries
  • Article types
  • Manuscript preparation
  • Cover suggestions
  • Editorial process
  • Promoting your paper
  • Open Access
  • Outstanding paper prize
  • Biology Open transfer

Journal Info

  • Journal policies
  • Rights and permissions
  • Media policies
  • Reviewer guide
  • Sign up for alerts

Contact

  • Contact JEB
  • Subscriptions
  • Advertising
  • Feedback

 Twitter   YouTube   LinkedIn

© 2019   The Company of Biologists Ltd   Registered Charity 277992