Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Accepted manuscripts
    • Issue in progress
    • Latest complete issue
    • Issue archive
    • Archive by article type
    • Special issues
    • Subject collections
    • Interviews
    • Sign up for alerts
  • About us
    • About JEB
    • Editors and Board
    • Editor biographies
    • Travelling Fellowships
    • Grants and funding
    • Journal Meetings
    • Workshops
    • The Company of Biologists
    • Journal news
  • For authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Aims and scope
    • Presubmission enquiries
    • Article types
    • Manuscript preparation
    • Cover suggestions
    • Editorial process
    • Promoting your paper
    • Open Access
    • Outstanding paper prize
    • Biology Open transfer
  • Journal info
    • Journal policies
    • Rights and permissions
    • Media policies
    • Reviewer guide
    • Sign up for alerts
  • Contacts
    • Contact JEB
    • Subscriptions
    • Advertising
    • Feedback
  • COB
    • About The Company of Biologists
    • Development
    • Journal of Cell Science
    • Journal of Experimental Biology
    • Disease Models & Mechanisms
    • Biology Open

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Experimental Biology
  • COB
    • About The Company of Biologists
    • Development
    • Journal of Cell Science
    • Journal of Experimental Biology
    • Disease Models & Mechanisms
    • Biology Open

supporting biologistsinspiring biology

Journal of Experimental Biology

  • Log in
Advanced search

RSS  Twitter  Facebook  YouTube  

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Accepted manuscripts
    • Issue in progress
    • Latest complete issue
    • Issue archive
    • Archive by article type
    • Special issues
    • Subject collections
    • Interviews
    • Sign up for alerts
  • About us
    • About JEB
    • Editors and Board
    • Editor biographies
    • Travelling Fellowships
    • Grants and funding
    • Journal Meetings
    • Workshops
    • The Company of Biologists
    • Journal news
  • For authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Aims and scope
    • Presubmission enquiries
    • Article types
    • Manuscript preparation
    • Cover suggestions
    • Editorial process
    • Promoting your paper
    • Open Access
    • Outstanding paper prize
    • Biology Open transfer
  • Journal info
    • Journal policies
    • Rights and permissions
    • Media policies
    • Reviewer guide
    • Sign up for alerts
  • Contacts
    • Contact JEB
    • Subscriptions
    • Advertising
    • Feedback
INSIDE JEB
Fleas don't cope in burrowing host's stale air
Kathryn Knight
Journal of Experimental Biology 2015 218: 3529-3530; doi: 10.1242/jeb.133611
Kathryn Knight
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: kathryn@biologists.com
  • Article
  • Figures & tables
  • Info & metrics
  • PDF
Loading
Figure1
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint

A female Xenopsylla ramesis. Photo credit: Michael W. Hastriter.

Most fleas have it made. Riding around on their hapless hosts, the parasites are safe and warm with an almost limitless supply of food on tap. But not all parasites are quite so lucky. Cynthia Downs from Hamilton College, USA, explains that the surroundings may be less wholesome for fleas that hitch a ride on species that live in burrows where the carbon dioxide levels can rocket. ‘I was interested in how environmental conditions affect host–parasite interactions’, explains Downs, remembering how her interest in the effects of carbon dioxide was triggered while working in Berry Pinshow's lab in Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Israel. ‘They were investigating how burrow geometry affects concentrations of CO2 in burrows and the physiology of rodents’, says Downs. Learning that high concentrations of CO2 in air can affect the immune response of mammals, Downs wondered how parasitic hitchhikers may be affected by the stale subterranean air produced by their hosts.

‘I wanted to determine how concentrations of CO2 that mimic those found in some burrows where fleas reside affected how fleas interacted with their hosts,’ says Downs. Working with Irina Khokhlova, Downs carefully mixed CO2 with air to reproduce the atmospheric conditions that have been measured in the tunnels of some burrowing species and then pumped the modified air into the airtight plastic cages of burrowing Sundevall's jirds to simulate the atmosphere below ground. ‘Overall, the jirds are fairly docile and very easy to work with’, recalls Downs, but she admits that she had to overcome her natural squeamishness about plunging her hand into a box of Xenopsylla ramesis fleas before transferring them to the rodents – even though the fleas do not bite humans.

Explaining that the fleas spend only a fraction of their lives riding on their hosts – only hopping onto a passing rodent for 3- to 6-day periods when they need to feed and reproduce – Downs and Khojhlova replaced the rodents’ population of 150 fleas every 3–6 days, counting the survivors to calculate the survival rate. And when they compared the fleas’ death rate with that of fleas from jirds in a normal atmosphere, they found that it rocketed, with 27% more fleas dying in the stale air. The simulated-burrow fleas also produced 0.3 eggs per female less than the fleas that were basking in fresh air. And when the duo tested how well the fleas coped after abandoning the host and hunkering down in the improvised burrow's sand for several days, they found a similar increase in the death rate. The high-CO2 fleas were also less keen on escaping. ‘Fleas don't tolerate living in a high fractional concentration of CO2 used in this experiment very well,’ says Downs. ‘I expected to see a small decrease in survival…but I didn't expect to see a decrease in reproductive success’, she adds.

So instead of being prepared for their subterranean existence, Xenopsylla ramesis fleas are significantly compromised by their high-CO2 lifestyle. Downs suggests that the burrow fleas may hold their breathing tubes (spiracles) open for longer than fleas in a normal atmosphere, causing them to dry out faster and die. She also says, ‘They probably experience many CO2 conditions in their natural environment’, explaining that the fleas are happy to infest many other rodent species, which has probably prevented them from adapting to the burrow's stale atmosphere, while possibly providing a little relief for the burrowing rodents from scratching at their uninvited guests.

  • © 2015. Published by The Company of Biologists Ltd

References

    1. Downs, C. J.,
    2. Pinshow, B.,
    3. Khokhlova, I. S. and
    4. Krasnov, B. R.
    (2015). Flea fitness is reduced by high fractional concentrations of CO2 that simulate levels found in their hosts’ burrows. J. Exp. Biol. 218, 3596-3603.doi:10.1242/jeb.122812
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
Previous ArticleNext Article
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

This Issue

 Download PDF

Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Experimental Biology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Fleas don't cope in burrowing host's stale air
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Experimental Biology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Experimental Biology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
INSIDE JEB
Fleas don't cope in burrowing host's stale air
Kathryn Knight
Journal of Experimental Biology 2015 218: 3529-3530; doi: 10.1242/jeb.133611
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
INSIDE JEB
Fleas don't cope in burrowing host's stale air
Kathryn Knight
Journal of Experimental Biology 2015 218: 3529-3530; doi: 10.1242/jeb.133611

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Alerts

Please log in to add an alert for this article.

Sign in to email alerts with your email address

Article navigation

  • Top
  • Article
    • References
  • Figures & tables
  • Info & metrics
  • PDF

Related articles

Cited by...

More in this TOC section

  • Making a difference: the role of comparative biology in tackling climate change
  • Lifestyle difference gives female yellow-billed hornbills the edge
  • High-voltage catfish immune to their own shocks
Show more INSIDE JEB

Similar articles

Other journals from The Company of Biologists

Development

Journal of Cell Science

Disease Models & Mechanisms

Biology Open

Advertisement

Welcome to JEB’s new Editor Monica Daley

We are pleased to welcome Monica Daley to JEB’s Editorial team. Monica has had a long association with JEB before taking up her new role, overseeing peer review of neuromuscular physiology, terrestrial biomechanics and integrative physiology of locomotion.


In the field with Robyn Hetem

Continuing our fieldwork series, Robyn Hetem reflects on working with species ranging from aardvark to zebra, and the impact COVID-19 has had on fieldwork.


Read & Publish participation continues to grow

“It is particularly encouraging for early career researchers, as it allows them to display their research globally without the need to find costs to cover the open access option.”

Professor Fernando Montealegre-Z (University of Lincoln) shares his experience of publishing Open Access as part of our growing Read & Publish initiative. We now have over 150 institutions in 15 countries and four library consortia taking part – find out more and view our full list of participating institutions.


Nocturnal reef residents have deep-sea-like eyes

Fanny de Busserolles and colleagues from The University of Queensland have discovered that the eyes of nocturnal reef fish have multibank retinas, layers of photoreceptors, similar to the eyes of deep-sea fish that live in dim light conditions.


Mechanisms underlying gut microbiota–host interactions in insects

In their Review, Konstantin Schmidt and Philipp Engel summarise recent findings about the mechanisms involved in gut colonisation and the provisioning of beneficial effects in gut microbiota–insect symbiosis.

Articles

  • Accepted manuscripts
  • Issue in progress
  • Latest complete issue
  • Issue archive
  • Archive by article type
  • Special issues
  • Subject collections
  • Interviews
  • Sign up for alerts

About us

  • About JEB
  • Editors and Board
  • Editor biographies
  • Travelling Fellowships
  • Grants and funding
  • Journal Meetings
  • Workshops
  • The Company of Biologists
  • Journal news

For Authors

  • Submit a manuscript
  • Aims and scope
  • Presubmission enquiries
  • Article types
  • Manuscript preparation
  • Cover suggestions
  • Editorial process
  • Promoting your paper
  • Open Access
  • Outstanding paper prize
  • Biology Open transfer

Journal Info

  • Journal policies
  • Rights and permissions
  • Media policies
  • Reviewer guide
  • Sign up for alerts

Contact

  • Contact JEB
  • Subscriptions
  • Advertising
  • Feedback

 Twitter   YouTube   LinkedIn

© 2021   The Company of Biologists Ltd   Registered Charity 277992