Advertisement
Research Article
Transcranial light affects plasma monoamine levels and expression of brain encephalopsin in the mouse
Antti Flyktman, Satu Mänttäri, Juuso Nissilä, Markku Timonen, Seppo Saarela
Journal of Experimental Biology 2015 218: 1521-1526; doi: 10.1242/jeb.111864

ABSTRACT

Encephalopsin (OPN3) belongs to the light-sensitive transmembrane receptor family mainly expressed in the brain and retina. It is believed that light affects mammalian circadian rhythmicity only through the retinohypothalamic tract, which transmits light information to the suprachiasmatic nucleus in the hypothalamus. However, it has been shown that light penetrates the skull. Here, we present the effect of transcranial light treatment on OPN3 expression and monoamine concentrations in mouse brain and other tissues. Mice were randomly assigned to control group, morning-light group and evening-light group, and animals were illuminated transcranially five times a week for 8 min for a total of 4 weeks. The concentrations of OPN3 and monoamines were analysed using western blotting and HPLC, respectively. We report that transcranial light treatment affects OPN3 expression in different brain areas and plasma/adrenal gland monoamine concentrations. In addition, when light was administered at a different time of the day, the response varied in different tissues. These results provide new information on the effects of light on transmitters mediating mammalian rhythmicity.

INTRODUCTION

Encephalopsin (OPN3) is a part of the opsin superfamily. Opsins are light-sensitive heptahelical G-protein-coupled transmembrane receptors, which are mostly expressed in the retina. Opsin function can generally be divided into two parts: light absorption and G-protein activation (Terakita, 2005). Absorption of photons by the retinal-binding pocket of opsin protein causes the photoisomerisation from 11-cis to all-trans conformation. This change allows G-protein binding and activation of the phototransduction cascade (Bellingham and Foster, 2002). Different wavelengths stimulate different opsins (Kumbalasiri and Provencio, 2005).What is more, in the retina, opsins are located in various tissues and in a variety of cell types (Porter et al., 2012). These proteins are stimulated by light in both visual and non-visual systems, regulating events such as circadian rhythms (Kumbalasiri and Provencio, 2005).

Rhodopsin has been identified in the avian brain (Wada et al., 1998). OPN3 was the first opsin found to be expressed in mammalian brain; OPN3 was highly expressed in the paraventricular nucleus (PVN) of the hypothalamus and in the medial preoptic area, both of which involve encephalic phototransduction in nonmammalian vertebrates (Blackshaw and Snyder, 1999). Apart from these mRNA findings by Blackshaw and Snyder (1999), we have recently found OPN3 existing at the protein level in the paraventricular area (hypothalamus), cerebral cortex and cerebellum in the adult mouse brain (Nissilä et al., 2012).

Light is the key factor in mammalian rhythmicity, because it entrains the circadian system according to the solar day (Bellingham and Foster, 2002). Based on a generally accepted paradigm, in mammals a light signal reaches the hypothalamus via the retinohypothalamic tract (RHT); more specifically, until now it had been thought that non-visual phototransduction would occur only in intrinsically photosensitive ganglion cells (ipRGCs) in the retina (Bailes and Lucas, 2010; Provencio et al., 1998). The suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN), as a target for the RHT is located in the anterior part of the hypothalamus. The SCN is the circadian pacemaker in higher vertebrates and controls molecular and physiological rhythms, including sleep and alertness, physical activity, hormone levels and body temperature (Ralph et al., 1990; Toh, 2008).

Monoamines are a group of neurotransmitters that are secreted mainly in the brain and adrenal gland. The catecholamines adrenaline, noradrenaline (NA) and dopamine (DA) are synthesized from tyrosine to form DOPA. Serotonin (5-HT) is synthesized from tryptophan to form 5-hydroxytryptophan (5-HTP). After these first steps, both catecholamines and 5-HT are hydroxylated and decarboxylated to form functional molecules (Folk and Long, 1988; Fuller, 1980; Iverson, 1967; Siegel et al., 1999). After their synthesis, monoamines are stored in vesicles, whereas DA is hydroxylated into NA when necessary, and released to the synaptic cleft with calcium-dependent exocytosis when action potential reaches monoamine nerve terminals (Siegel et al., 1999). In the rodent brain, monoamines mediate various central nervous system functions and dysfunctions, including disturbances of the circadian rhythm and several other neurological disorders (Libersat and Pflueger, 2004; Penev et al., 1993). Monoamines are also released from the adrenal gland during stress (Sanchez et al., 2003).

Albeit largely forgotten in the scientific community, it has long been known that a significant amount of light penetrates the skull and reaches the brain in mammals (Brunt et al., 1964; Campbell et al., 2001; Persinger et al., 2013). Studies in rodents show that hooded or enucleated animals conduct light information through extraretinal routes (Wetterberg et al., 1970; Zweig et al., 1966). Similar characteristics of extraretinal photoreception are found in humans. When light is administered transcranially, the functional connectivity in the lateral visual network of the brain increases (Starck et al., 2012). What is more, the circadian system has been shown to be functional, even without external light cues (Rao and Diwan, 1995). We have recently shown that OPN3 protein is widely distributed in the mouse brain (Nissilä et al., 2012) and it has also been shown that brain monoamine production can be enhanced by external stimulus (Hampp et al., 2008; Sudo and Miki, 1995). Consequently, in this study, we investigate whether transcranial light affects the expression of brain OPN3 and plasma monoamines in mice.

RESULTS

We illuminated mice under anaesthesia, either just after the beginning of the light period (morning-light group, ML) or just after the beginning of the dark period (evening-light group, EL) for 4 weeks, five times a week and for 8 min per mouse per treatment. Controls were also anaesthesized and light rods were inserted in their ears, but no light was given. The mice were weighed three times a week. After 4 weeks of light treatment, mice were killed and samples of hypothalamus, cerebellum, retina, adrenal glands, plasma and liver were collected. Expression of OPN3 in the hypothalamus and cerebellum was analysed by western blot and the concentrations of monoamines in adrenal gland and plasma were analysed by HPLC.

Body mass and length

The body masses of the animals increased significantly during the study within the groups; no significant differences between groups were seen at the beginning of the study (Table 1). At the end of the study, the mass of mice in the EL group was significantly lower (P<0.05) compared with animals in the control group. The length of the EL group mice was also significantly lower (P<0.05). No changes were seen in BMI between groups at the end of the study.

View this table:
Table 1.

Mouse body mass, length and BMI

OPN3 protein abundance in the mouse hypothalamus and cerebellum

Western blotting was used to analyse the abundance of OPN3 protein in the mouse hypothalamus. The antibody detected a single band of approximately 45 kDa, consistent with the predicted protein size for OPN3. In general, significant differences were observed between the control and experimental groups in the OPN3 content of the hypothalamus samples; compared with the control group, the amount of OPN3 was 2.70 times higher in the ML group (P<0.001) and 0.52 times lower in the EL group (P<0.05) (Fig. 1A). In the cerebellum, OPN3 content was 0.14 times (P<0.001) and 0.63 times (P<0.05) lower in the ML and EL groups, respectively (Fig. 1B). There were no differences in OPN3 expression between groups in the retina, although the molecular mass of retinal OPN3 appeared to be larger than in brain samples, which implies that the molecular mass of retinal OPN3 is slightly larger than brain OPN3.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.

Expression of OPN3 in the hypothalamus and cerebellum of mouse brain. (A) A bar graph summarizing results from western blot analysis showing mean optical density (OD) in hypothalamus. (N=9–10 samples per group). (B) Bar graph summarizing results from western blot analysis showing mean optical density in cerebellum (N=10 samples per group). ML, morning-light group; EL, evening-light group. Error bars indicate s.e. *P<0.05, ***P<0.001. (C) Representative western blot membrane showing expression of OPN3 with molecular mass of 45 kDa. β-tubulin was used as a loading control.

Monoamines in plasma and adrenal gland

The amount of adrenaline, NA, DA and 5-HT was analysed by HPLC in plasma and the adrenal gland of the mice. Cortisol concentrations were measured from serum. Plasma DA concentration was significantly higher in the ML group than in the control group (P<0.01), but no difference was found between the EL group and the control group. There was no detectable DA in the control group plasma. Adrenaline concentration in EL group plasma was 0.44 times lower (P<0.05), but no difference was seen in the ML group compared with controls (Fig. 2A). 5-HT and NA showed no significant differences in either of the test groups compared with controls in plasma samples. In the adrenal gland, NA and DA concentrations were 3.70 times and 4.29 times higher, respectively, in the ML group (P<0.001) and 3.05-fold and 3.48-fold higher, respectively, in the EL group compared with controls. Adrenaline concentration in the ML and in the EL groups was 0.39 times and 0.35 times lower (P<0.001), respectively, compared with controls (Fig. 2B). Cortisol concentrations were similar in all of the experimental groups. To control the effects of anaesthesia, we used mice housed under similar conditions, which were unanaesthesized. As a result, we found that anaesthesia does not have an effect on OPN3 expression, but monoamine concentrations were altered (data not shown). Anaesthesia affected the results, especially in adrenaline samples, where it increased the adrenaline concentration compared with unanaesthesized controls. We believe that this difference is caused by the stress the animals suffered during the treatment.

Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.

Monoamine concentrations in mouse plasma and adrenal gland. (A) Bar graph summarizing results from HPLC analysis showing mean concentration of monoamine in plasma (N=4–10 samples per group). (B) Bar graph summarizing results from HPLC analysis showing mean concentration of monoamine in adrenal gland (N=10 samples per group). ML, morning-light group; EL, evening-light group; 5-HT, serotonin; DA, dopamine; NA, noradrenaline; A, adrenaline. Error bars indicate s.e. *P<0.05, **P<0.05, ***P<0.001.

DISCUSSION

To the best of our knowledge, our study was the first to investigate whether transcranial light affects the protein expression of brain OPN3. Our data showed that, when compared with controls, the amount of OPN3 differed significantly in transcranially illuminated mice. Moreover, the results were significant, even if the absorption maximum of our light source (approximately 450 nm) and the absorption maximum of OPN3 (approximately 485 or 500 nm depending on the lighting conditions) differed considerably (Koyanagi et al., 2013). Furthermore, as seen in Fig. 3, the absorption maximum of the light source used declines rapidly towards 500 nm. Nevertheless, the production of OPN3 was regulated by transcranial light illumination.

Fig. 3.
Fig. 3.

Spectrum of the light source used for transcranial illumination. Light spectrum of the Valkee NPT 1000 device.

In general, it is well known that opsins are photosensitive compounds (Max et al., 1995; Panda et al., 2003; Ruby et al., 2002) acting as brain photoreceptors in vertebrates (Nakane et al., 2010; Wada et al., 1998). Furthermore, OPN3 is found in the mouse brain both at the mRNA and protein level (Blackshaw and Snyder, 1999; Nissilä et al., 2012), and it could act as signal transmitter for light (Fischer et al., 2013; Koyanagi et al., 2013). We do not know of any previous studies investigating whether transcranially administered light has an effect on the amount of OPN3 in the mammalian brain. Interestingly, when light was administered at a different time of day, the response varied in different parts of the brain.

Based on the findings of our study, it is reasonable to hypothesize that light-activated molecules can also be stimulated transcranially, not only through the retina. Until now, the best known route for light-mediated information is thought to be through the RHT (Bailes and Lucas, 2010; Provencio et al., 1998), where melatonin is the key molecule responsible for entraining circadian rhythms (Cassone, 1990). However, it is possible that there is an alternative target for regulating circadian rhythm, which is, as yet, unknown. The target could be opsins, which have been shown to receive light information in the avian brain (Nakane et al., 2010), and here we find that transcranial light has effects on OPN3 expression in the mammalian brain. Moreover, it is documented that light entrains mammalian rhythmicity (Zubidat et al., 2010), partly by affecting the structure of opsins (Blasic et al., 2012). Variation in OPN3 expression is also dependent on the illuminated tissue and on the timing of light exposure. Since opsins have a long evolutionary history and appear in almost all animal groups (Porter et al., 2012), they might play a similar role to that of the third eye of lizards, possibly partly regulating circadian melatonin production (Eakin, 1973).

Interestingly, the amount of OPN3 in the hypothalamus of transcranially illuminated mice was higher when light exposure occurred in the morning. It is already known that opsins act as deep brain photoreceptors in vertebrates (Nakane et al., 2010) and that light penetrates the skull in mammals (Campbell et al., 2001). It has also been shown that light directly stimulates neurons in the rodent hypothalamus (Lisk and Kannwischer, 1964). Therefore, in our opinion, brain OPN3 expression could also be stimulated directly by transcranial light. It seems, however, that the stimulation has variable effects depending on the time of the light treatment, because the amount of OPN3 was reduced in the EL group compared with the controls. Since melatonin levels are high during the night, and given that melatonin changes neurohypophysial hormone release in the hypothalamus (Yasin et al., 1996), OPN3 expression might also be driven by this melatonin rhythmicity. Melatonin may inhibit the effects of transcranial light and OPN3 production when light illumination occurs late. However, there is no evidence that melatonin is the only molecule entraining the circadian system (Bromundt et al., 2014; Jurvelin et al., 2014; Yamazaki et al., 1999) and therefore there could also be other pathways for OPN3 deactivation. One of these may be γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA), which could be a target molecule to inhibit OPN3 action. Leszkiewicz and Aizenman (2003) found that when light was administered to retinal and cortical cells, the activity levels of GABAA receptors were enhanced. GABA is an inhibiting molecule, so it may also decrease OPN3 expression. If it is true that GABA has a role in OPN3 deactivation, our results would indicate that the activation of GABA by light and deduction of OPN3 production is dependent on the time the light is given, because the amount of OPN3 increased in the ML group. In this context, we must remember that mice are a nocturnal species and that their circadian rhythm is reversed in comparison to diurnal species. Therefore, the effects of rhythm-entraining factors might be reversed when compared with diurnal species.

The time of day when light was administrated also affected OPN3 expression in the cerebellum. We found that transcranial light reduced the amount of OPN3 in both the ML group and EL group. OPN3 has been found in the cerebellum in previous studies at the protein level (Nissilä et al., 2012) but, as in the hypothalamus, it has not been known whether light has an effect on its concentration. Again, GABA could be a potential signalling neurotransmitter, which also alters OPN3 levels in the cerebellum. Wade et al. (1988) showed that light causes a response in the cerebral cortical tissue. They found that, when dissected rat brain was exposed to white light, GABA was released from the cerebral cortex. This could inhibit brain OPN3 production. Furthermore, Calver et al. (2003) imply that GABAB receptors act through a G-protein-coupled system. If this is true, GABA might compete with opsins for the same binding sites in the G-protein-coupled receptor. Furthermore, the cerebellum is considered to be the centre of motor control (D'Angelo et al., 2011), and the reduced amount of OPN3 in the ML group might indicate that the control of motor coordination is also reduced.

DA and NA concentrations increased and adrenaline concentrations decreased significantly in the plasma and adrenal gland of both test groups. Other metabolites (5-HT, cortisol) studied showed no differences when compared with the control group. According to our results and previous studies (Enrico et al., 1998; Feenstra et al., 2000; Nieoullon and Coquerel, 2003; Tanaka et al., 2000), the increased amount of NA and DA in the ML group may be linked to stress caused by the experiment. Transcranial light treatment caused a delay in the beginning of the resting state of the mice, which may have stressed the animals. However, Gordon and Bains (2005) have been able to enhance NA release by stimulating the hypothalamus, so transcranial light could be a similar enhancing factor stimulating NA release at least. Furthermore, both behaviour and monoamine oxidase A activity are altered by disturbing the SCN, which implies that light may have direct effects on the activity of monoamines by altering the circadian rhythm and mood (Hampp et al., 2008). The findings of Sudo and Miki (1995) emphasize the importance of light. They find that levels of adrenaline in urine were significantly higher during the dark period than during the light period. The results of this study support that finding; the levels of adrenaline were significantly higher in the control group than in the transcranially illuminated test groups. Additionally, although anaesthesia itself increased the concentration of adrenaline in control mice, transcranial illumination reduced adrenaline expression in both test groups. Furthermore, DA and NA transporters are inhibited under isoflurane anaesthesia, leading to lower levels of DA and NA (Shahani et al., 2002). Since all groups were anaesthetized, our results show that light possibly restores DA and NA levels.

Because of our study design, we do not know the causal relationship between monoamine and OPN3 expression. However, in the tiger salamander, endogenous dopamine has been shown to boost opsin expression when light is administered during the daily dark phase (Alfinito and Townes-Anderson, 2001). Furthermore, in the zebrafish, dopamine increased opsin production just after the beginning of the light period (Li et al., 2005). According to the results of this study, light might increase the OPN3 production through dopamine stimulation also in mammals, in addition to the direct effect of transcranial light on OPN3 expression. Similarly, lower adrenaline concentration may reduce the OPN3 production also. However, the causal relationships between catecholamine and OPN3 expression in the context of light exposure remain to be investigated further.

In conclusion, our study is the first to show that transcranial light has a significant effect on OPN3 expression in the mouse brain. We also were able to show that OPN3 expression varies depending on the time of day when the transcranial light was administered. In future, it will be important to study whether different wavelengths and intensities of light, or the length of light treatment, cause different responses in opsin expression. In addition, it would be interesting to investigate whether the increase in the concentration of OPN3 results from increased levels of OPN3 production by OPN3-expressing cells or from an increase in the number of OPN3-expressing cells in the brain. Furthermore, as we investigated the effects of transcranial light in OPN3 expression only at the protein level, it would be interesting to also study changes in the expression of OPN3 mRNA.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Animals

Thirty adult C3H/HeNHsd rd/rd male mice (Mus musculus; Harlan Laboratories, Venray, The Netherlands) were used in this study, which was approved by the Finnish national committee for animal experimentation (licence number ESAVI/567/04.10.03/2012). The animals were 8–10 weeks old at the beginning of the study. The mice used in the study were blind. Their rods had degenerated in the 5th week after birth and their cones secondarily, which leads to image-forming blindness as an adult (Cavusoglu et al., 2003).

Experimental procedure

All the mice were kept under a 12 h:12 h light:dark cycle. Mice were randomly assigned to three different groups: a control group, a morning-light group (ML) and an evening-light group (EL). The animals were weighed three times a week. Transcranial light was given via ear canals for 4 weeks, five times a week. Light treatment was given under anaesthesia (isofluran, anaesthesia 3%, maintenance 1.5%) for 8 min per mouse. The ML group was exposed to light just after the beginning of the light period (treatment time 7:30 h–9:30 h) simulating a time when mice are typically inactive, and the EL group was exposed just after the beginning of the dark period (treatment time 19:00 h–21:00 h), simulating a time when mice are typically active (Chang et al., 2002). The EL group was illuminated in a lightless room without disturbing the circadian rhythm. The intensity of the light in the headphones of the light source (Valkee NPT 1000, Valkee Inc., Oulu, Finland) was 2.00×1015 photons cm−2 s−1. Light spectrum is shown in Fig. 3. A nonmeasurable small fraction of the mechanical heat produced by the light source (totally less than 14.7 mW) conducts into the ear canal and there is no significant heat effect caused by the device. The control group was anaesthetized and headphones were inserted, but no light was given. After four weeks of light treatment, the mice were killed by cervical dislocation, the animals were measured and samples of hypothalamus, cerebellum, liver, retina and plasma were collected between 8:00 h and 14:00 h and stored at −80°C. Body mass index (BMI) was calculated using the general BMI formula: BMI=mass/length2. Masses are reported in kilograms and length in metres.

SDS-PAGE and western blotting

Total protein concentrations of the brain tissue samples were measured according to Bradford (1976). Homogenization buffer (62.5 mmol l−1 Tris-HCl, pH 6.8), containing leupeptin (1 µg ml−1), pepstatin A (1 µg ml−1) and PMSF (1 mmol l−1) was added to the samples and homogenized (Qiagen TissueLyser, Retsch, Haan, Germany).

Samples with equal amounts of protein (12.06 μg per lane) were loaded in a separating gel (4–12%, Amersham ECL Gel, GE Healthcare Bio-Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden) and electrophoretically separated at 160 V for 60 min. The separated proteins were transferred to nitrocellulose membrane (0.45 μm, Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA, USA) according to the method of Towbin et al. (1979).

After electroblotting, the membranes were blocked with 5% non-fat milk powder in TBS for 1 h at room temperature. After washing (3×5 min) in TBST (TBS+0.05% Tween 20), the membranes were incubated in primary antibody for OPN3 (45 kDa, anti-encephalopsin antibody ab75285, Abcam, Cambridge, UK). OPN3 antibody was diluted in TBST (1:500) and incubated for 2 h at room temperature. Then the membranes were washed (3×5 min) and incubated with secondary antibody [1:3000, goat anti-rabbit IgG (H+L)-AP-conjugate, Bio-Rad Laboratories] in TBST for 2 h at room temperature. Antibody detection was performed with bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl phosphate mono-(toluidinium) salt/nitro blue tetrazolium (BCIP/NBT) substrate. β-tubulin (molecular mass 50 kDa) was used as a loading control (anti-β-tubulin antibody ab6046, Abcam). β-tubulin was diluted in TBST-antibody solution (1:1500) and incubated for 2 hours with the primary antibody. Immunoreactive band intensities compared with background were analysed using the VersaDoc imaging system (Bio-Rad). Liver was used as a negative control and retina as a positive control.

Monoamine concentration analysis by HPLC

Monoamine concentrations were determined by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) in plasma and adrenal gland samples, as described by Nieminen et al. (2004). 5-HT samples were analysed using the same technique. Briefly, plasma samples were deproteinized before injection into the HPLC autosampler. The running buffer contained 50 mmol l−1 NaH2PO4, methanol and aluminium chlorohydrate in a 77:15:8 ratio, respectively (pH 3.22). The running buffer was filtered and 200 mg Na-dodecylsulphate and 77.4 mg Na-EDTA were added to buffer. The total concentration of base solution was 5 µg ml−1 in 0.1 HClO4.

Cortisol assay

Cortisol concentration was assayed by ELISA in blood serum samples with a DIAsource kit for human cortisol according to the instructions of the commercial kit (KAPDB270, DIAsource ImmunoAssays SA, Louvain-La-Neuve, Belgium). Calibrators, controls and samples were made as duplicates, and absorbances were read at 450 nm using a microplate reader (SPECTROstar Nano, BMG LAbtech, Ortenberg, Germany). The sensitivity for cortisol was 0.4 µg dl−1, and calibrators were used to validate the method.

Statistics

In this study, all values are expressed as means±s.e. One-way ANOVA was used for comparisons between groups for the amounts of OPN3, cortisol and monoamines. In the case of significant changes, pair-wise comparisons between the test group and control group were made using the Tukey post-test. The length, mass and BMI comparisons between groups were also made with one-way ANOVA and Tukey post-test. Mass changes within groups were determined using the paired t-test.

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge senior technician Mr Matti Rauman, for his contribution in modifying the Valkee headset, and laboratory technicians Ms Marja-Liisa Martimo-Halmetoja and Ms Minna Orreveteläinen for their contributions to laboratory analyses.

FOOTNOTES

  • Competing interests

    S.M. and S.S. have no conflicts of interest to declare. J.N. is the founder and a shareholder and M.T. is a minor shareholder of Valkee Ltd. A.F. received a grant from Valkee Ltd for this study.

  • Author contributions

    All authors were responsible for designing the study. A.F. was responsible for conducting the study and for the western blot and HPLC results. A.F., S.M. and S.S. were responsible for analysing the results. All authors were responsible for drafting and revising the article.

  • Funding

    A.F. recieved grants from the Northern Ostrobothnia Hospital District and Valkee Oy. Other authors recieved no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

References

  1. ↵
    1. Alfinito, P. D. and
    2. Townes-Anderson, E.
    (2001). Dopamine D-4 receptor-mediated regulation of rod opsin mRNA expression in tiger salamander. J. Neurochem. 76, 881-891. doi:10.1046/j.1471-4159.2001.00109.x
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  2. ↵
    1. Bailes, H. J. and
    2. Lucas, R. J.
    (2010). Melanopsin and inner retinal photoreception. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 67, 99-111. doi:10.1007/s00018-009-0155-7
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  3. ↵
    1. Bellingham, J. and
    2. Foster, R. G.
    (2002). Opsins and mammalian photoentrainment. Cell Tissue Res. 309, 57-71. doi:10.1007/s00441-002-0573-4
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  4. ↵
    1. Blackshaw, S. and
    2. Snyder, S.
    (1999). Encephalopsin: a novel mammalian extraretinal opsin discretely localized in the brain. J. Neurosci. 19, 3681-3690.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. ↵
    1. Blasic, J. R., Jr.,
    2. Brown, R. L. and
    3. Robinson, P. R.
    (2012). Light-dependent phosphorylation of the carboxy tail of mouse melanopsin. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 69, 1551-1562. doi:10.1007/s00018-011-0891-3
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Bradford, M. M.
    (1976). A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal. Biochem. 72, 248-254. doi:10.1016/0003-2697(76)90527-3
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Bromundt, V.,
    2. Frey, S.,
    3. Odermatt, J. and
    4. Cajochen, C.
    (2014). Extraocular light via the ear canal does not acutely affect human circadian physiology, alertness and psychomotor vigilance performance. Chronobiol. Int. 31, 343-348. doi:10.3109/07420528.2013.854250
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Brunt, E. E. V.,
    2. Shepherd, M. D.,
    3. Wall, J. R.,
    4. Ganong, W. F. and
    5. Clegg, M. T.
    (1964). Penetration of light into the brain of mammals. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 117, 217-224. doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.1964.tb48177.x
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  9. ↵
    1. Calver, A. R.,
    2. Michalovich, D.,
    3. Testa, T. T.,
    4. Robbins, M. J.,
    5. Jaillard, C.,
    6. Hill, J.,
    7. Szekeres, P. G.,
    8. Charles, K. J.,
    9. Jourdain, S.,
    10. Holbrook, J. D. et al.
    (2003). Molecular cloning and characterisation of a novel GABA(B)-related G-protein coupled receptor. Mol. Brain Res. 110, 305-317. doi:10.1016/S0169-328X(02)00662-9
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    1. Campbell, S. S.,
    2. Murphy, P. J. and
    3. Suhner, A. G.
    (2001). Extraocular phototransduction and circadian timing systems in vertebrates. Chronobiol. Int. 18, 137-172. doi:10.1081/CBI-100103183
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  11. ↵
    1. Cassone, V. M.
    (1990). Effects of melatonin on vertebrate circadian systems. Trends Neurosci. 13, 457-464. doi:10.1016/0166-2236(90)90099-V
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  12. ↵
    1. Cavusoglu, N.,
    2. Thierse, D.,
    3. Mohand-Saïd, S.,
    4. Chalmel, F.,
    5. Poch, O.,
    6. Van-Dorsselaer, A.,
    7. Sahel, J. and
    8. Léveillard, T.
    (2003). Differential proteomic analysis of the mouse retina. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 2, 494-505.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. ↵
    1. Chang, B.,
    2. Hawes, N. L.,
    3. Hurd, R. E.,
    4. Davisson, M. T.,
    5. Nusinowitz, S. and
    6. Heckenlively, J. R.
    (2002). Retinal degeneration mutants in the mouse. Vision Res. 42, 517-525. doi:10.1016/S0042-6989(01)00146-8
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  14. ↵
    1. D'Angelo, E.,
    2. Mazzarello, P.,
    3. Prestori, F.,
    4. Mapelli, J.,
    5. Solinas, S.,
    6. Lombardo, P.,
    7. Cesana, E.,
    8. Gandolfi, D. and
    9. Congi, L.
    (2011). The cerebellar network: from structure to function and dynamics. Brain Res. Rev. 66, 5-15. doi:10.1016/j.brainresrev.2010.10.002
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  15. ↵
    1. Eakin, R. M.
    (1973). The Third Eye. USA: University of California Press.
  16. ↵
    1. Enrico, P.,
    2. Bouma, M.,
    3. de Vries, J. B. and
    4. Westerink, B. H. C.
    (1998). The role of afferents to the ventral tegmental area in the handling stress-induced increase in the release of dopamine in the medial prefrontal cortex: a dual-probe microdialysis study in the rat brain. Brain Res. 779, 205-213. doi:10.1016/S0006-8993(97)01132-3
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  17. ↵
    1. Feenstra, M. G. P.,
    2. Botterblom, M. H. A. and
    3. Mastenbroek, S.
    (2000). Dopamine and noradrenaline efflux in the prefrontal cortex in the light and dark period: effects of novelty and handling and comparison to the nucleus accumbens. Neuroscience 100, 741-748. doi:10.1016/S0306-4522(00)00319-5
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  18. ↵
    1. Fischer, R. M.,
    2. Fontinha, B. M.,
    3. Kirchmaier, S.,
    4. Steger, J.,
    5. Bloch, S.,
    6. Inoue, D.,
    7. Panda, S.,
    8. Rumpel, S. and
    9. Tessmar-Raible, K.
    (2013). Co-expression of VAL- and TMT-opsins uncovers ancient photosensory interneurons and motorneurons in the vertebrate brain. PLoS Biol. 11, e1001585. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1001585
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. ↵
    1. Folk, G. E. and
    2. Long, J. P.
    (1988). Serotonin as a neurotransmitter: a review. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. C 91, 251-257. doi:10.1016/0742-8413(88)90193-4
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  20. ↵
    1. Fuller, R. W.
    (1980). Pharmacology of central serotonin neurons. Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 20, 111-127. doi:10.1146/annurev.pa.20.040180.000551
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. ↵
    1. Gordon, G. R. J. and
    2. Bains, J. S.
    (2005). Noradrenaline triggers multivesicular release at glutamatergic synapses in the hypothalamus. J. Neurosci. 25, 11385-11395. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2378-05.2005
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  22. ↵
    1. Hampp, G.,
    2. Ripperger, J. A.,
    3. Houben, T.,
    4. Schmutz, I.,
    5. Blex, C.,
    6. Perreau-Lenz, S.,
    7. Brunk, I.,
    8. Spanagel, R.,
    9. Ahnert-Hilger, G.,
    10. Meijer, J. H. et al.
    (2008). Regulation of monoamine oxidase A by circadian-clock components implies clock influence on mood. Curr. Biol. 18, 678-683. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2008.04.012
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  23. ↵
    1. Iverson, L.
    (1967). The Uptake and Storage of Noradrenaline in Sympathetic Nerves. London, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  24. ↵
    1. Jurvelin, H.,
    2. Takala, T.,
    3. Heberg, L.,
    4. Nissilä, J.,
    5. Rüger, M.,
    6. Leppäluoto, J.,
    7. Saarela, S. and
    8. Vakkuri, O.
    (2014). Transcranial bright light exposure via ear canals does not suppress nocturnal melatonin in healthy adults-A single-blind, sham-controlled, crossover trial. Chronobiol. Int. 31, 1-6. doi:10.3109/07420528.2014.916297
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. ↵
    1. Koyanagi, M.,
    2. Takada, E.,
    3. Nagata, T.,
    4. Tsukamoto, H. and
    5. Terakita, A.
    (2013). Homologs of vertebrate Opn3 potentially serve as a light sensor in nonphotoreceptive tissue. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 110, 4998-5003. doi:10.1073/pnas.1219416110
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  26. ↵
    1. Kumbalasiri, T. and
    2. Provencio, I.
    (2005). Melanopsin and other novel mammalian opsins. Exp. Eye Res. 81, 368-375. doi:10.1016/j.exer.2005.05.004
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  27. ↵
    1. Leszkiewicz, D. N. and
    2. Aizenman, E.
    (2003). Reversible modulation of GABA(A) receptor-mediated currents by light is dependent on the redox state of the receptor. Eur. J. Neurosci. 17, 2077-2083. doi:10.1046/j.1460-9568.2003.02656.x
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  28. ↵
    1. Li, P.,
    2. Temple, S.,
    3. Gao, Y.,
    4. Haimberger, T. J.,
    5. Hawryshyn, C. W. and
    6. Li, L.
    (2005). Circadian rhythms of behavioral cone sensitivity and long wavelength opsin mRNA expression: a correlation study in zebrafish. J. Exp. Biol. 208, 497-504. doi:10.1242/jeb.01424
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  29. ↵
    1. Libersat, F. and
    2. Pflueger, H.-J.
    (2004). Monoamines and the orchestration of behavior. Bioscience 54, 17-25. doi:10.1641/0006-3568(2004)054[0017:MATOOB]2.0.CO;2
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  30. ↵
    1. Lisk, R. D. and
    2. Kannwischer, L. R.
    (1964). Light: evidence for its direct effect on hypothalamic neurons. Science 146, 272-273. doi:10.1126/science.146.3641.272
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  31. ↵
    1. Max, M.,
    2. McKinnon, P.,
    3. Seidenman, K.,
    4. Barrett, R.,
    5. Applebury, M.,
    6. Takahashi, J. and
    7. Margolskee, R.
    (1995). Pineal opsin: a nonvisual opsin expressed in chick pineal. Science 267, 1502-1506. doi:10.1126/science.7878470
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  32. ↵
    1. Nakane, Y.,
    2. Ikegami, K.,
    3. Ono, H.,
    4. Yamamoto, N.,
    5. Yoshida, S.,
    6. Hirunagi, K.,
    7. Ebihara, S.,
    8. Kubo, Y. and
    9. Yoshimura, T.
    (2010). A mammalian neural tissue opsin (Opsin 5) is a deep brain photoreceptor in birds. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 107, 15264-15268. doi:10.1073/pnas.1006393107
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  33. ↵
    1. Nieminen, P.,
    2. Saarela, S.,
    3. Pyykonen, T.,
    4. Asikainen, J.,
    5. Mononen, J. and
    6. Mustonen, A.-M.
    (2004). Endocrine response to fasting in the overwintering captive raccoon dog (Nyctereutes procyonoides). J. Exp. Zool. Part A 301A, 919-929. doi:10.1002/jez.a.126
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  34. ↵
    1. Nieoullon, A. and
    2. Coquerel, A.
    (2003). Dopamine: a key regulator to adapt action, emotion, motivation and cognition. Curr. Opin. Neurol. 16, S3-S9. doi:10.1097/00019052-200312002-00002
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  35. ↵
    1. Nissilä, J.,
    2. Mänttari, S.,
    3. Särkioja, T.,
    4. Tuominen, H.,
    5. Takala, T.,
    6. Timonen, M. and
    7. Saarela, S.
    (2012). Encephalopsin (OPN3) protein abundance in the adult mouse brain. J. Comp. Physiol. A Neuroethol. Sens. Neural Behav. Physiol. 198, 833-839. doi:10.1007/s00359-012-0754-x
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  36. ↵
    1. Panda, S.,
    2. Provencio, I.,
    3. Tu, D. C.,
    4. Pires, S. S.,
    5. Rollag, M. D.,
    6. Castrucci, A. M.,
    7. Pletcher, M. T.,
    8. Sato, T. K.,
    9. Wiltshire, T.,
    10. Andahazy, M. et al.
    (2003). Melanopsin is required for non-image-forming photic responses in blind mice. Science 301, 525-527. doi:10.1126/science.1086179
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  37. ↵
    1. Penev, P. D.,
    2. Turek, F. W. and
    3. Zee, P. C.
    (1993). Monoamine depletion alters the entrainment and the response to light of the circadian activity rhythm in hamsters. Brain Res. 612, 156-164. doi:10.1016/0006-8993(93)91656-D
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  38. ↵
    1. Persinger, M. A.,
    2. Dotta, B. T. and
    3. Saroka, K. S.
    (2013). Bright light transmits through the brain: measurement of photon emissions and frequency-dependent modulation of spectral electroencephalographic power. World J. Neurosci. 3, 10-16. doi:10.4236/wjns.2013.31002
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  39. ↵
    1. Porter, M. L.,
    2. Blasic, J. R.,
    3. Bok, M. J.,
    4. Cameron, E. G.,
    5. Pringle, T.,
    6. Cronin, T. W. and
    7. Robinson, P. R.
    (2012). Shedding new light on opsin evolution. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 279, 3-14. doi:10.1098/rspb.2011.1819
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  40. ↵
    1. Provencio, I.,
    2. Jiang, G.,
    3. De Grip, W. J.,
    4. Hayes, W. P. and
    5. Rollag, M. D.
    (1998). Melanopsin: an opsin in melanophores, brain, and eye. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95, 340-345. doi:10.1073/pnas.95.1.340
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  41. ↵
    1. Ralph, M.,
    2. Foster, R.,
    3. Davis, F. and
    4. Menaker, M.
    (1990). Transplanted suprachiasmatic nucleus determines circadian period. Science 247, 975-978. doi:10.1126/science.2305266
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  42. ↵
    1. Rao, S. H. and
    2. Diwan, P.
    (1995). A behavioral profile of bilateral anophthalmic mutant rats. Exp. Anim. 44, 67-69. doi:10.1538/expanim.44.67
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  43. ↵
    1. Ruby, N. F.,
    2. Brennan, T. J.,
    3. Xie, X.,
    4. Cao, V.,
    5. Franken, P.,
    6. Heller, H. C. and
    7. O'Hara, B. F.
    (2002). Role of melanopsin in circadian responses to light. Science 298, 2211-2213. doi:10.1126/science.1076701
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  44. ↵
    1. Sanchez, A.,
    2. Toledo-Pinto, E. A.,
    3. Menezes, M. L. and
    4. Pereira, O. C. M.
    (2003). Changes in norepinephrine and epinephrine concentrations in adrenal gland of the rats submitted to acute immobilization stress. Pharmacol. Res. 48, 607-613. doi:10.1016/S1043-6618(03)00241-X
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  45. ↵
    1. Shahani, S.,
    2. Lingamaneni, R. and
    3. Hemmings, H.
    (2002). General anesthetic actions on norepinephrine, dopamine, and gamma-aminobutyric acid transporters in stably transfected cells. Anesth. Analg. 95, 893-899. doi:10.1213/00000539-200210000-00019
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  46. ↵
    1. Siegel, G.,
    2. Agranoff, B.,
    3. Albers, R.,
    4. Fisher, S. and
    5. Uhler, M.
    (1999). Basic neurochemistry: molecular, cellular and medical aspects. Philadelphia, USA: Lippincott-Raven.
  47. ↵
    1. Starck, T.,
    2. Nissilä, J.,
    3. Aunio, A.,
    4. Abou-Elseoud, A.,
    5. Remes, J.,
    6. Nikkinen, J.,
    7. Timonen, M.,
    8. Takala, T.,
    9. Tervonen, O. and
    10. Kiviniemi, V.
    (2012). Stimulating brain tissue with bright light alters functional connectivity in brain at the resting state. World J. Neurosci. 2, 81-90. doi:10.4236/wjns.2012.22012
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  48. ↵
    1. Sudo, A. and
    2. Miki, K.
    (1995). Circadian rhythm of catecholamine excretion in rats after phase shift of light-dark cycle. Ind. Health 33, 57-66. doi:10.2486/indhealth.33.57
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  49. ↵
    1. Tanaka, M.,
    2. Yoshida, M.,
    3. Emoto, H. and
    4. Ishii, H.
    (2000). Noradrenaline systems in the hypothalamus, amygdala and locus coeruleus are involved in the provocation of anxiety: basic studies. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 405, 397-406. doi:10.1016/S0014-2999(00)00569-0
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  50. ↵
    1. Terakita, A.
    (2005). The opsins. Genome Biol. 6, 213. doi:10.1186/gb-2005-6-3-213
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  51. ↵
    1. Toh, K. L.
    (2008). Basic science review on circadian rhythm biology and circadian sleep disorders. Ann. Acad. Med. Singapore 37, 662-668.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  52. ↵
    1. Towbin, H.,
    2. Staehelin, T. and
    3. Gordon, J.
    (1979). Electrophoretic transfer of proteins from polyacrylamide gels to nitrocellulose sheets: procedure and some applications. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 76, 4350-4354. doi:10.1073/pnas.76.9.4350
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  53. ↵
    1. Wada, Y.,
    2. Okano, T.,
    3. Adachi, A.,
    4. Ebihara, S. and
    5. Fukada, Y.
    (1998). Identification of rhodopsin in the pigeon deep brain. FEBS Lett. 424, 53-56. doi:10.1016/S0014-5793(98)00138-0
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  54. ↵
    1. Wade, P. D.,
    2. Taylor, J. and
    3. Siekevitz, P.
    (1988). Mammalian cerebral cortical tissue responds to low-intensity visible light. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 85, 9322-9326. doi:10.1073/pnas.85.23.9322
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  55. ↵
    1. Wetterberg, L.,
    2. Geller, E. and
    3. Yuwiler, A.
    (1970). Harderian gland: an extraretinal photoreceptor influencing the pineal gland in neonatal rats? Science 167, 884-885. doi:10.1126/science.167.3919.884
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  56. ↵
    1. Yamazaki, S.,
    2. Goto, M. and
    3. Menaker, M.
    (1999). No evidence for extraocular photoreceptors in the circadian system of the Syrian hamster. J. Biol. Rhythms 14, 197-201. doi:10.1177/074873099129000605
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  57. ↵
    1. Yasin, S. A.,
    2. Grossman, A. and
    3. Forsling, M. L.
    (1996). Diurnal variation in the effect of melatonin on neurohypophysial hormone release from the rat hypothalamus. Brain Res. Bull. 39, 1-5. doi:10.1016/0361-9230(95)02024-1
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  58. ↵
    1. Zubidat, A. E.,
    2. Nelson, R. J. and
    3. Haim, A.
    (2010). Photoentrainment in blind and sighted rodent species: responses to photophase light with different wavelengths. J. Exp. Biol. 213, 4213-4222. doi:10.1242/jeb.048629
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  59. ↵
    1. Zweig, M.,
    2. Snyder, S. H. and
    3. Axelrod, J.
    (1966). Evidence for a nonretinal pathway of light to the pineal gland of newborn rats. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 56, 515-520. doi:10.1073/pnas.56.2.515
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
View Abstract
Back to top

Keywords

 Download PDF

Email
Research Article
Transcranial light affects plasma monoamine levels and expression of brain encephalopsin in the mouse
Antti Flyktman, Satu Mänttäri, Juuso Nissilä, Markku Timonen, Seppo Saarela
Journal of Experimental Biology 2015 218: 1521-1526; doi: 10.1242/jeb.111864
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Alerts

Article navigation

Other journals from The Company of Biologists

Advertisement

When fieldwork meets a global pandemic

“Eventually, food transport was going to be stopped, so the field team were airlifted back to Cayenne.”

For Lauren O’Connell (Stanford University), lockdown had a dramatic start when members of her lab were given 24 hours’ notice to detag their poison frogs and evacuate their field station in French Guiana. Read the full story to find out more and hear how her lab is now returning to the bench.

Journal of Cell Science launches new microscopy community site

FocalPlane is an online meeting place for microscopists and biologists to share the latest microscopy news, events and resources. Find out more from Community Manager Christos Kyprianou and read the origin story of FocalPlane.

Pygmy mice whistle for the audience

Pygmy mice voices are much deeper than expected, as deep as those of rats which are 40 times their size, and even more surprisingly, instead of using their vocal cords to communicate, pygmy mice whistle.

E-journal price freeze for 2021

In recognition of the unprecedented and ongoing challenges facing the library and research communities worldwide, there will be no increase in The Company of Biologists’ e-journal prices in 2021. Further details are available in the full announcement.

Molecular mechanisms of biomineralization in marine invertebrates

Understanding marine biomineralization has many tangible benefits in our changing world. In a new Review, Melody Clark (British Antarctic Survey) discusses our current understanding of the factors affecting skeletal production in marine invertebrates.