Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Accepted manuscripts
    • Issue in progress
    • Latest complete issue
    • Issue archive
    • Archive by article type
    • Special issues
    • Subject collections
    • Interviews
    • Sign up for alerts
  • About us
    • About JEB
    • Editors and Board
    • Editor biographies
    • Travelling Fellowships
    • Grants and funding
    • Journal Meetings
    • Workshops
    • The Company of Biologists
    • Journal news
  • For authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Aims and scope
    • Presubmission enquiries
    • Article types
    • Manuscript preparation
    • Cover suggestions
    • Editorial process
    • Promoting your paper
    • Open Access
    • Outstanding paper prize
    • Biology Open transfer
  • Journal info
    • Journal policies
    • Rights and permissions
    • Media policies
    • Reviewer guide
    • Sign up for alerts
  • Contacts
    • Contact JEB
    • Subscriptions
    • Advertising
    • Feedback
  • COB
    • About The Company of Biologists
    • Development
    • Journal of Cell Science
    • Journal of Experimental Biology
    • Disease Models & Mechanisms
    • Biology Open

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Experimental Biology
  • COB
    • About The Company of Biologists
    • Development
    • Journal of Cell Science
    • Journal of Experimental Biology
    • Disease Models & Mechanisms
    • Biology Open

supporting biologistsinspiring biology

Journal of Experimental Biology

  • Log in
Advanced search

RSS  Twitter  Facebook  YouTube  

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Accepted manuscripts
    • Issue in progress
    • Latest complete issue
    • Issue archive
    • Archive by article type
    • Special issues
    • Subject collections
    • Interviews
    • Sign up for alerts
  • About us
    • About JEB
    • Editors and Board
    • Editor biographies
    • Travelling Fellowships
    • Grants and funding
    • Journal Meetings
    • Workshops
    • The Company of Biologists
    • Journal news
  • For authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Aims and scope
    • Presubmission enquiries
    • Article types
    • Manuscript preparation
    • Cover suggestions
    • Editorial process
    • Promoting your paper
    • Open Access
    • Outstanding paper prize
    • Biology Open transfer
  • Journal info
    • Journal policies
    • Rights and permissions
    • Media policies
    • Reviewer guide
    • Sign up for alerts
  • Contacts
    • Contact JEB
    • Subscriptions
    • Advertising
    • Feedback
Research Article
Cockroach optomotor responses below single photon level
Anna Honkanen, Jouni Takalo, Kyösti Heimonen, Mikko Vähäsöyrinki, Matti Weckström
Journal of Experimental Biology 2014 217: 4262-4268; doi: 10.1242/jeb.112425
Anna Honkanen
1Department of Physics, University of Oulu, Oulu, FI-90014, Finland
2Biocenter Oulu, University of Oulu, Oulu, FI-90014, Finland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jouni Takalo
1Department of Physics, University of Oulu, Oulu, FI-90014, Finland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kyösti Heimonen
1Department of Physics, University of Oulu, Oulu, FI-90014, Finland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mikko Vähäsöyrinki
1Department of Physics, University of Oulu, Oulu, FI-90014, Finland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Matti Weckström
1Department of Physics, University of Oulu, Oulu, FI-90014, Finland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: matti.weckstrom@oulu.fi
  • Article
  • Figures & tables
  • Supp info
  • Info & metrics
  • PDF + SI
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Tables

Figures

  • Fig. 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 1.

    The virtual reality setup. (A) A fisheye lens on top projects the images of black and white bars from the projector above it (not shown) onto the inner surface of the spherical screen. The trackball system is placed inside the sphere so that the cockroach is at the equator of the sphere. (B) The placement of the animal on the trackball. (C) Electrode placement in the preparation during intracellular recordings. Dashed line shows where the antennae of an intact cockroach would be. For more detailed information, see Takalo et al. (Takalo et al., 2012).

  • Fig. 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 2.

    Behavioural response strengths. The mean strengths of responses ± s.d. of cockroaches to optomotor stimuli at different temporal frequencies (A–D) and angular periods (E–H) of the rotation stimulus under (A,E) 500 lx, (B,F) 5 lx, (C,G) 0.05 lx, (D,H) 0.005 lx. Solid bars denote the response strength during stationary controls, and hatched bars represent that during rotating stimuli. The expected control level is 0; +1 indicates the strongest positive and −1 the strongest anti-directional response. *, **, *** indicate significance between the control and rotation distributions at confidence levels of 0.05, 0.01 and 0.001, respectively (paired sample Wilcoxon signed rank test). (A–D) The responses to rotation of the stimulus with a 60 deg angular period at different temporal frequencies were attenuated and their frequency band narrowed from the brightest (500 lx) to the dimmest (0.005 lx) stimuli. (E–H) The responses to different angular periods of the stimuli were compiled from another data set by pooling all responses to temporal frequencies between 0.4 and 10 Hz (E–G) or 0.4 and 4 Hz (H), the frequencies most likely to elicit the optomotor response according to results in A–D. (E) All angular periods were able to elicit the optomotor response at 500 lx illumination. Responses to angular periods of 40–180 deg remained significant down to 0.05 lx (F,G). The lowest light intensity at which significant responses were seen was 0.005 lx, although 60 deg stimuli did not elicit a significant response (H). Sample sizes were N=20 animals, n=40 measurements (A); N=24, n=78 (B); N=23, n=66 (C); N=23, n=66 (D); and N=8–12, n=48–174 (E–H). See also Fig. 3.

  • Fig. 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 3.

    The average strengths of behavioural responses ± s.d. of cockroaches to optomotor stimuli at 0.0005 lx. See Fig. 2 for key to the symbols. (A) The responses to rotation of the stimulus with a 60 deg angular period at different temporal frequencies. Both control and rotation values were scattered around 0, and the only significant difference at 4 Hz was a confounding factor of the small sample size. (B) Combined responses from temporal frequencies between 0.4 and 4 Hz at different angular periods of the stimulus. No significant differences between control and rotation values were found. Apparently, the absolute dim-light vision threshold of the American cockroach lies somewhere between 0.005 and 0.0005 lx. Sample sizes were N=11 animals, n=22 measurements (A); N=9–12, n=27–132 (B).

  • Fig. 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 4.

    Examples of light-on responses and graded responses to light modulation during rotation (30–60 s) in one photoreceptor cell. Stimulus frequency is indicated above each 500 lx (A) and 5 lx (B) recording. (A) Light-on responses adapt to plateau near resting potential at approximately 800 ms (inset image in the 0.4 Hz recording). Stimulus rotation caused a membrane voltage modulation. In 2.4 and 12 Hz recordings, a slight repolarization marks the onset of rotation (inset image at 12 Hz), because this cell faced white during the control. (B) The 5 lx recordings show small, <10 mV light-on responses (left inset image at 0.4 Hz). The modulation response is overlaid with photon shot noise (inset images at 0.4 and 2.4 Hz). In the 12 Hz recording, the modulation begins to be lost under the noise, but behavioural results show that an optomotor response at this frequency can still be possible.

  • Fig. 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 5.

    Examples of photoreceptor responses near the behavioural threshold. Quantum bumps at 0.05 lx (A–C) and 0.005 lx (D,E). Grey-and-white background denotes the blacks and whites of the rotating grating passing the visual field of the photoreceptor. (A) A recording with the 0.4 Hz stimulus shows bumps during control (0–30 s) and rotation (30–60 s). (B) A 10 s subset of A, with red asterisks denoting identified bumps, and template bumps produced beneath. Cumulated bump sums during successive 2500 ms stimulus cycles are shown on the right (12 cycles per 30 s); bump rate is elevated during the latter 1250 ms when the cell faces white. (C) A 3 s excerpt of a recording with a 4 Hz stimulus. The right-hand panel shows stronger bump synchronization with white than that in B. (D) A recording at 0.005 lx showing characteristically few bumps. The inset image shows the typical bump waveform. (E) A 3 s example with a 4 Hz stimulus (left) contains only one bump. A scarcity of photons leads to similar bump sums for black and white (right). Significant optomotor responses were still measured under these conditions.

  • Table 1.
Previous ArticleNext Article
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

This Issue

Keywords

  • Behaviour
  • intracellular
  • Optomotor
  • Photoreceptor

 Download PDF

Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Experimental Biology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Cockroach optomotor responses below single photon level
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Experimental Biology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Experimental Biology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Research Article
Cockroach optomotor responses below single photon level
Anna Honkanen, Jouni Takalo, Kyösti Heimonen, Mikko Vähäsöyrinki, Matti Weckström
Journal of Experimental Biology 2014 217: 4262-4268; doi: 10.1242/jeb.112425
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Research Article
Cockroach optomotor responses below single photon level
Anna Honkanen, Jouni Takalo, Kyösti Heimonen, Mikko Vähäsöyrinki, Matti Weckström
Journal of Experimental Biology 2014 217: 4262-4268; doi: 10.1242/jeb.112425

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Alerts

Please log in to add an alert for this article.

Sign in to email alerts with your email address

Article navigation

  • Top
  • Article
    • Abstract
    • INTRODUCTION
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • References
  • Figures & tables
  • Supp info
  • Info & metrics
  • PDF + SI
  • PDF

Related articles

Cited by...

More in this TOC section

  • Acclimation to warm temperatures has important implications for mitochondrial function in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar)
  • Sex-specific microhabitat use is associated with sex-biased thermal physiology in Anolis lizards
  • Early developmental stages of native populations of Ciona intestinalis under increased temperature are affected by local habitat history
Show more RESEARCH ARTICLES

Similar articles

Other journals from The Company of Biologists

Development

Journal of Cell Science

Disease Models & Mechanisms

Biology Open

Advertisement

Meet the Editors at SICB Virtual 2021

Reserve your place to join some of the journal editors, including Editor-in-Chief Craig Franklin, at our Meet the Editor session on 17 February at 2pm (EST). Don’t forget to view our SICB Subject Collection, featuring relevant JEB papers relating to some of the symposia sessions.


2020 at The Company of Biologists

Despite 2020's challenges, we were able to bring a number of long-term projects and new ventures to fruition. As we enter a new year, join us as we reflect on the triumphs of the last 12 months.


The Big Biology podcast

JEB author Christine Cooper talks to Big Biology about her research. In this fascinating JEB sponsored podcast she tells us how tough zebra finches adjust their physiology to cope with extreme climate events. 


Developmental and reproductive physiology of small mammals at high altitude

Cayleih Robertson and Kathryn Wilsterman focus on high-altitude populations of the North American deer mouse in their review of the challenges and evolutionary innovations of pregnant and nursing small mammals at high altitude.


Read & Publish participation extends worldwide

“Being able to publish Open Access articles free of charge means that my article gets maximum exposure and has maximum impact, and that all my peers can read it regardless of the agreements that their universities have with publishers.”

Professor Roi Holzman (Tel Aviv University) shares his experience of publishing Open Access as part of our growing Read & Publish initiative. We now have over 60 institutions in 12 countries taking part – find out more and view our full list of participating institutions.

Articles

  • Accepted manuscripts
  • Issue in progress
  • Latest complete issue
  • Issue archive
  • Archive by article type
  • Special issues
  • Subject collections
  • Interviews
  • Sign up for alerts

About us

  • About JEB
  • Editors and Board
  • Editor biographies
  • Travelling Fellowships
  • Grants and funding
  • Journal Meetings
  • Workshops
  • The Company of Biologists
  • Journal news

For Authors

  • Submit a manuscript
  • Aims and scope
  • Presubmission enquiries
  • Article types
  • Manuscript preparation
  • Cover suggestions
  • Editorial process
  • Promoting your paper
  • Open Access
  • Outstanding paper prize
  • Biology Open transfer

Journal Info

  • Journal policies
  • Rights and permissions
  • Media policies
  • Reviewer guide
  • Sign up for alerts

Contact

  • Contact JEB
  • Subscriptions
  • Advertising
  • Feedback

 Twitter   YouTube   LinkedIn

© 2021   The Company of Biologists Ltd   Registered Charity 277992