Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Accepted manuscripts
    • Issue in progress
    • Latest complete issue
    • Issue archive
    • Archive by article type
    • Special issues
    • Subject collections
    • Interviews
    • Sign up for alerts
  • About us
    • About JEB
    • Editors and Board
    • Editor biographies
    • Travelling Fellowships
    • Grants and funding
    • Journal Meetings
    • Workshops
    • The Company of Biologists
    • Journal news
  • For authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Aims and scope
    • Presubmission enquiries
    • Article types
    • Manuscript preparation
    • Cover suggestions
    • Editorial process
    • Promoting your paper
    • Open Access
    • Outstanding paper prize
    • Biology Open transfer
  • Journal info
    • Journal policies
    • Rights and permissions
    • Media policies
    • Reviewer guide
    • Sign up for alerts
  • Contacts
    • Contact JEB
    • Subscriptions
    • Advertising
    • Feedback
  • COB
    • About The Company of Biologists
    • Development
    • Journal of Cell Science
    • Journal of Experimental Biology
    • Disease Models & Mechanisms
    • Biology Open

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Experimental Biology
  • COB
    • About The Company of Biologists
    • Development
    • Journal of Cell Science
    • Journal of Experimental Biology
    • Disease Models & Mechanisms
    • Biology Open

supporting biologistsinspiring biology

Journal of Experimental Biology

  • Log in
Advanced search

RSS  Twitter  Facebook  YouTube  

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Accepted manuscripts
    • Issue in progress
    • Latest complete issue
    • Issue archive
    • Archive by article type
    • Special issues
    • Subject collections
    • Interviews
    • Sign up for alerts
  • About us
    • About JEB
    • Editors and Board
    • Editor biographies
    • Travelling Fellowships
    • Grants and funding
    • Journal Meetings
    • Workshops
    • The Company of Biologists
    • Journal news
  • For authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Aims and scope
    • Presubmission enquiries
    • Article types
    • Manuscript preparation
    • Cover suggestions
    • Editorial process
    • Promoting your paper
    • Open Access
    • Outstanding paper prize
    • Biology Open transfer
  • Journal info
    • Journal policies
    • Rights and permissions
    • Media policies
    • Reviewer guide
    • Sign up for alerts
  • Contacts
    • Contact JEB
    • Subscriptions
    • Advertising
    • Feedback
Research Article
The simple ears of noctuoid moths are tuned to the calls of their sympatric bat community
Hannah M. ter Hofstede, Holger R. Goerlitz, John M. Ratcliffe, Marc W. Holderied, Annemarie Surlykke
Journal of Experimental Biology 2013 216: 3954-3962; doi: 10.1242/jeb.093294
Hannah M. ter Hofstede
University of Bristol, School of Biological Sciences, Woodland Road, Bristol BS8 1UG, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: Hannah.ter.Hofstede@Dartmouth.edu
Holger R. Goerlitz
University of Bristol, School of Biological Sciences, Woodland Road, Bristol BS8 1UG, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
John M. Ratcliffe
Sound and Behaviour Group, University of Southern Denmark, Institute of Biology, Campusvej 55, Dk-5230 Odense M, Denmark
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Marc W. Holderied
University of Bristol, School of Biological Sciences, Woodland Road, Bristol BS8 1UG, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Annemarie Surlykke
Sound and Behaviour Group, University of Southern Denmark, Institute of Biology, Campusvej 55, Dk-5230 Odense M, Denmark
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & tables
  • Info & metrics
  • PDF
Loading

SUMMARY

Insects with bat-detecting ears are ideal animals for investigating sensory system adaptations to predator cues. Noctuid moths have two auditory receptors (A1 and A2) sensitive to the ultrasonic echolocation calls of insectivorous bats. Larger moths are detected at greater distances by bats than smaller moths. Larger moths also have lower A1 best thresholds, allowing them to detect bats at greater distances and possibly compensating for their increased conspicuousness. Interestingly, the sound frequency at the lowest threshold is lower in larger than in smaller moths, suggesting that the relationship between threshold and size might vary across frequencies used by different bat species. Here, we demonstrate that the relationships between threshold and size in moths were only significant at some frequencies, and these frequencies differed between three locations (UK, Canada and Denmark). The relationships were more likely to be significant at call frequencies used by proportionately more bat species in the moths' specific bat community, suggesting an association between the tuning of moth ears and the cues provided by sympatric predators. Additionally, we found that the best threshold and best frequency of the less sensitive A2 receptor are also related to size, and that these relationships hold when controlling for evolutionary relationships. The slopes of best threshold versus size differ, however, such that the difference in threshold between A1 and A2 is greater for larger than for smaller moths. The shorter time from A1 to A2 excitation in smaller than in larger moths could potentially compensate for shorter absolute detection distances in smaller moths.

FOOTNOTES

  • ↵† Present address: Max Planck Institute for Ornithology, Sensory Ecology Group, Eberhard-Gwinner-Strasse, 82319 Seewiesen, Germany

  • AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

    All authors contributed to the design, execution and writing of this study. H.M.t.H. and H.G. are co-first authors, M.W.H. and A.S. are co-last authors.

  • COMPETING INTERESTS

    No competing interests declared.

  • FUNDING

    This study was funded by a Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council grant to M.W.H. (grant number BB/f002386/1), grants from the Danish Natural Sciences Research Council (FNU) to J.M.R. and A.S., and Post-doctoral Research Fellowships from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada and the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) to H.M.t.H. and H.R.G. (GO 2091/1-1), respectively.

  • LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS

    BF
    best frequency
    BT
    best threshold
    PICs
    phylogenetically independent contrasts
    SA
    surface area
    • © 2013. Published by The Company of Biologists Ltd
    View Full Text
    Previous ArticleNext Article
    Back to top
    Previous ArticleNext Article

    This Issue

    Keywords

    • Sensory ecology
    • constant-frequency echolocation
    • horseshoe bats
    • Predator–prey interactions
    • allotonic frequency hypothesis

     Download PDF

    Email

    Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Experimental Biology.

    NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

    Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
    The simple ears of noctuoid moths are tuned to the calls of their sympatric bat community
    (Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Experimental Biology
    (Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Experimental Biology web site.
    Share
    Research Article
    The simple ears of noctuoid moths are tuned to the calls of their sympatric bat community
    Hannah M. ter Hofstede, Holger R. Goerlitz, John M. Ratcliffe, Marc W. Holderied, Annemarie Surlykke
    Journal of Experimental Biology 2013 216: 3954-3962; doi: 10.1242/jeb.093294
    del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
    Citation Tools
    Research Article
    The simple ears of noctuoid moths are tuned to the calls of their sympatric bat community
    Hannah M. ter Hofstede, Holger R. Goerlitz, John M. Ratcliffe, Marc W. Holderied, Annemarie Surlykke
    Journal of Experimental Biology 2013 216: 3954-3962; doi: 10.1242/jeb.093294

    Citation Manager Formats

    • BibTeX
    • Bookends
    • EasyBib
    • EndNote (tagged)
    • EndNote 8 (xml)
    • Medlars
    • Mendeley
    • Papers
    • RefWorks Tagged
    • Ref Manager
    • RIS
    • Zotero
    Alerts

    Please log in to add an alert for this article.

    Sign in to email alerts with your email address

    Article navigation

    • Top
    • Article
      • SUMMARY
      • INTRODUCTION
      • MATERIALS AND METHODS
      • RESULTS
      • DISCUSSION
      • ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
      • FOOTNOTES
      • LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS
      • REFERENCES
    • Figures & tables
    • Info & metrics
    • PDF

    Related articles

    Cited by...

    More in this TOC section

    • Temporal integration of conflicting directional cues in sound localization
    • Load carrying with flexible bamboo poles: optimization of a coupled oscillator system
    • Communication versus waterproofing: the physics of insect cuticular hydrocarbons
    Show more RESEARCH ARTICLES

    Similar articles

    Other journals from The Company of Biologists

    Development

    Journal of Cell Science

    Disease Models & Mechanisms

    Biology Open

    Advertisement

    Editorial – The changing of the guard

    In his Editorial, Hans Hoppeler announces that he will be stepping down as Editor-in-Chief of JEB in July 2020. He reflects on the history of JEB, why he has enjoyed his tenure as JEB’s Editor-in-Chief and the recent developments in the publishing world.


    Big Biology podcast

    JEB is partnering with the Big Biology podcast and in this sponsored episode, JEB Editor Michael Dickinson talks to the Big Biology team about the aerodynamic mechanisms of insect flight, how insects control flight with their tiny 100k neuron brain and his recent JEB paper showing how fruit flies navigate using the sun and polarized light as a compass.


    Editors’ choice – An appetite for invasion: digestive physiology, thermal performance and food intake in lionfish (Pterois spp.)

    A lionfish

    Invasive lionfish are a colossal problem in the Mediterranean Sea and western Atlantic Ocean. Now it turns out that they are successful invaders because they invest more energy in digestion than moving about.


    Travelling Fellowship – Anti-ageing in the Greenland Shark

    Group photo of Pierre Delaroche and the team in Greenland

    Find out how Pierre Delaroche’s Travelling Fellowship grant from the Journal of Experimental Biology took him to Greenland, where he gathered data to further understand the ageing process in the longest-living vertebrate known to science. Don’t miss the next application deadline for 2020 travel, coming up on 29 November. Where will your research take you?


    Commentary – Yank: the time derivative of force is an important biomechanical variable in sensorimotor systems

    A diagram showing the multi-scale anatomical structures and processes that determine the magnitude of yank

    The derivative of force with respect to time does not have a standard term in physics. In their new Commentary, David C. Lin and his colleagues propose that the term ‘yank’ should be used to denote the time derivative of force.


    Inside JEB – Springy ankle tether saves runners

    Time-lapse photographs of a runner using the exotendon.

    Runners waste energy every time their legs stop swinging, but now a team of scientists from the US and Canada have shown that a springy ankle tether can reduce runners’ energy costs by 6.4%, which is nearly the entire cost of swinging the limbs. Read the full research article here.


    JEB partners with Publons!

    Journal of Experimental Biology is pleased to announce a new partnership with Publons! This allows reviewers to easily track and verify every review by choosing to add the review to their Publons profile when completing the review submission form. Publons also makes it simple for reviewers to showcase their peer review contributions in a format that can be included in job and funding applications (without breaking reviewer anonymity). Read the official announcement here!


    preLights – Oxygenation properties of hemoglobin and the evolutionary origins of isoform multiplicity in an amphibious air-breathing fish, the blue-spotted mudskipper (Boleophthalmus pectinirostris)

    Charlotte Nelson

    Charlotte Nelson highlights work in mudskippers suggesting that a diversity in expressed hemoglobin isoforms is not required for the switch between aquatic and aerial respiration.

    Articles

    • Accepted manuscripts
    • Issue in progress
    • Latest complete issue
    • Issue archive
    • Archive by article type
    • Special issues
    • Subject collections
    • Interviews
    • Sign up for alerts

    About us

    • About JEB
    • Editors and Board
    • Editor biographies
    • Travelling Fellowships
    • Grants and funding
    • Journal Meetings
    • Workshops
    • The Company of Biologists
    • Journal news

    For Authors

    • Submit a manuscript
    • Aims and scope
    • Presubmission enquiries
    • Article types
    • Manuscript preparation
    • Cover suggestions
    • Editorial process
    • Promoting your paper
    • Open Access
    • Outstanding paper prize
    • Biology Open transfer

    Journal Info

    • Journal policies
    • Rights and permissions
    • Media policies
    • Reviewer guide
    • Sign up for alerts

    Contact

    • Contact JEB
    • Subscriptions
    • Advertising
    • Feedback

     Twitter   YouTube   LinkedIn

    © 2019   The Company of Biologists Ltd   Registered Charity 277992