Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Accepted manuscripts
    • Issue in progress
    • Latest complete issue
    • Issue archive
    • Archive by article type
    • Special issues
    • Subject collections
    • Interviews
    • Sign up for alerts
  • About us
    • About JEB
    • Editors and Board
    • Editor biographies
    • Travelling Fellowships
    • Grants and funding
    • Journal Meetings
    • Workshops
    • The Company of Biologists
    • Journal news
  • For authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Aims and scope
    • Presubmission enquiries
    • Article types
    • Manuscript preparation
    • Cover suggestions
    • Editorial process
    • Promoting your paper
    • Open Access
    • Outstanding paper prize
    • Biology Open transfer
  • Journal info
    • Journal policies
    • Rights and permissions
    • Media policies
    • Reviewer guide
    • Sign up for alerts
  • Contacts
    • Contact JEB
    • Subscriptions
    • Advertising
    • Feedback
  • COB
    • About The Company of Biologists
    • Development
    • Journal of Cell Science
    • Journal of Experimental Biology
    • Disease Models & Mechanisms
    • Biology Open

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Experimental Biology
  • COB
    • About The Company of Biologists
    • Development
    • Journal of Cell Science
    • Journal of Experimental Biology
    • Disease Models & Mechanisms
    • Biology Open

supporting biologistsinspiring biology

Journal of Experimental Biology

  • Log in
Advanced search

RSS  Twitter  Facebook  YouTube  

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Accepted manuscripts
    • Issue in progress
    • Latest complete issue
    • Issue archive
    • Archive by article type
    • Special issues
    • Subject collections
    • Interviews
    • Sign up for alerts
  • About us
    • About JEB
    • Editors and Board
    • Editor biographies
    • Travelling Fellowships
    • Grants and funding
    • Journal Meetings
    • Workshops
    • The Company of Biologists
    • Journal news
  • For authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Aims and scope
    • Presubmission enquiries
    • Article types
    • Manuscript preparation
    • Cover suggestions
    • Editorial process
    • Promoting your paper
    • Open Access
    • Outstanding paper prize
    • Biology Open transfer
  • Journal info
    • Journal policies
    • Rights and permissions
    • Media policies
    • Reviewer guide
    • Sign up for alerts
  • Contacts
    • Contact JEB
    • Subscriptions
    • Advertising
    • Feedback
Commentary
The diversity of hydrostatic skeletons
William M. Kier
Journal of Experimental Biology 2012 215: 1247-1257; doi: 10.1242/jeb.056549
William M. Kier
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & tables
  • Info & metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Tables

Figures

  • Fig. 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 1.

    Schematic diagram illustrating common muscle fiber orientations in hydrostatic skeletons. The cross-sectional area can be controlled by fibers oriented circumferentially, radially and transversely; fibers in these orientations are important for elongation and also support of bending movements. The length is controlled by longitudinal fibers, which shorten the organ or body and, through selective contraction, also create bending. Helically arranged muscle fibers are found in muscular hydrostats and create torsion or twisting around the long axis. Both right- and left-handed helical muscle fiber layers are typically present and create torsion in either direction.

  • Fig. 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 2.

    Relationship between diameter and length of a constant volume cylinder. The positions on the graph of shapes A through D (drawn to scale) are indicated. A small decrease in diameter from shape B to D causes a large increase in length. From Kier and Smith (Kier and Smith, 1985).

  • Fig. 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 3.

    Diagram illustrating the differences between a pressurized cylinder reinforced with fibers in an orthogonal array (A–D) and a cylinder reinforced with fibers in a crossed-fiber helical array (E–H). Orthogonal fiber reinforcement prevents length change (B), provides stiffness in bending until failure occurs by kinking (C), and allows torsion or twisting around the long axis (D). Cylinders reinforced with a crossed-fiber helical array can change length (F), bend in smooth curves (G) and resist torsion (H). After Wainwright (Wainwright, 1988).

  • Fig. 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 4.

    Relationship between the volume contained by the crossed-fiber helical system and the fiber angle. The actual volumes of several nemertean and turbellarian worms are indicated with fine horizontal lines; the heavy lines show the measured range of elongation and contraction. Note that a worm with a smaller relative volume (e.g. Lineus longissimus) is typically capable of a greater range of elongation and shortening than a worm with a greater relative volume (e.g. Geonemertes). Some worms (e.g. Polycelis) do not reach the limits set by the crossed-fiber helical system because of other morphological constraints. From Clark and Cowey (Clark and Cowey, 1958).

  • Fig. 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 5.

    Schematic cutaway view of a sea anemone showing the circular muscle fibers (C), parietal longitudinal muscle fibers (L), mouth (M), pharynx (P), retractor muscles (R), sphincter muscle (S), and tentacles (T). After Ruppert et al. (Ruppert et al., 2004).

  • Fig. 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 6.

    Diagram showing the stages in locomotory cycle of an earthworm. Regions undergoing longitudinal muscle contraction are stationary (indicated by large dots) and are drawn twice as wide as those regions undergoing circular muscle contraction. The tracks of individual points on the body through time are indicated by the lines connecting each drawing, extending from left to right on the page. From Gray and Lissman (Gray and Lissman, 1938).

  • Fig. 7.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 7.

    Schematic cutaway diagram of the arrangement of the tube feet (T), ampullae (A), and the lateral (LC) and radial canals (R) of the starfish Luidia clathrata, showing the trajectories of the connective tissue fibers (CT), longitudinal muscle (L) of the tube feet, and circular muscle (C) of the ampullae. From McCurley and Kier (McCurley and Kier, 1995).

  • Fig. 8.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 8.

    Transverse sections showing the muscular arrangement of three examples of muscular hydrostats. (A) Transverse muscle fibers (T) occupy the core of the squid tentacle and extend to interdigitate with bundles of longitudinal muscle fibers (L) arranged near the surface. Scale bar, 1 mm. (B) Radial muscle fibers (R) extend from the center of the trunk of the elephant between bundles of longitudinal muscle (L). (C) Circular muscle fibers (C) surround two large bundles of longitudinal fibers (L) in the tongue of a monitor lizard. Scale bar, 1 mm. Panels A and C are histological sections stained with Masson’s Trichrome. Panel B is after Boas and Paulli (Boas and Paulli, 1908).

  • Fig. 9.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 9.

    Recordings of pressure (upper trace) and force (lower trace) from the crab Callinectes sapidus following a molt. (A) Recording from a soft-shell crab 1 h following exuviation, showing correlation between peaks of increased pressure and peaks of increased force. (B) Recordings from a paper-shell crab 12 h after exuviation. Correlation between force and pressure is still observed at this stage. (C) Recordings from a hard-shell crab 7 days after exuviation. Large forces are observed but there are no corresponding increases in pressure. Note that the scale for force in C is different. All traces represent approximately 19.5 s of recording. From Taylor and Kier (Taylor and Kier, 2003).

  • Table 1.
Previous ArticleNext Article
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

This Issue

 Download PDF

Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Experimental Biology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The diversity of hydrostatic skeletons
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Experimental Biology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Experimental Biology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Commentary
The diversity of hydrostatic skeletons
William M. Kier
Journal of Experimental Biology 2012 215: 1247-1257; doi: 10.1242/jeb.056549
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Commentary
The diversity of hydrostatic skeletons
William M. Kier
Journal of Experimental Biology 2012 215: 1247-1257; doi: 10.1242/jeb.056549

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Alerts

Please log in to add an alert for this article.

Sign in to email alerts with your email address

Article navigation

  • Top
  • Article
    • Summary
    • Introduction
    • Structure and function of hydrostatic skeletons
    • Examples of hydrostatic skeletons
    • Additional examples
    • Perspectives and conclusions
    • Acknowledgments
    • FOOTNOTES
    • Glossary
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & tables
  • Info & metrics
  • PDF

Related articles

Cited by...

More in this TOC section

  • Thermal robustness of biomechanical processes
  • Help, there are ‘omics’ in my comparative physiology!
  • Structural plasticity of the avian pectoralis: a case for geometry and the forgotten organelle
Show more COMMENTARY

Similar articles

Other journals from The Company of Biologists

Development

Journal of Cell Science

Disease Models & Mechanisms

Biology Open

Advertisement

Meet the Editors at SICB Virtual 2021

Reserve your place to join some of the journal editors, including Editor-in-Chief Craig Franklin, at our Meet the Editor session on 17 February at 2pm (EST). Don’t forget to view our SICB Subject Collection, featuring relevant JEB papers relating to some of the symposia sessions.


2020 at The Company of Biologists

Despite 2020's challenges, we were able to bring a number of long-term projects and new ventures to fruition. As we enter a new year, join us as we reflect on the triumphs of the last 12 months.


The Big Biology podcast

JEB author Christine Cooper talks to Big Biology about her research. In this fascinating JEB sponsored podcast she tells us how tough zebra finches adjust their physiology to cope with extreme climate events. 


Developmental and reproductive physiology of small mammals at high altitude

Cayleih Robertson and Kathryn Wilsterman focus on high-altitude populations of the North American deer mouse in their review of the challenges and evolutionary innovations of pregnant and nursing small mammals at high altitude.


Read & Publish participation extends worldwide

“Being able to publish Open Access articles free of charge means that my article gets maximum exposure and has maximum impact, and that all my peers can read it regardless of the agreements that their universities have with publishers.”

Professor Roi Holzman (Tel Aviv University) shares his experience of publishing Open Access as part of our growing Read & Publish initiative. We now have over 60 institutions in 12 countries taking part – find out more and view our full list of participating institutions.

Articles

  • Accepted manuscripts
  • Issue in progress
  • Latest complete issue
  • Issue archive
  • Archive by article type
  • Special issues
  • Subject collections
  • Interviews
  • Sign up for alerts

About us

  • About JEB
  • Editors and Board
  • Editor biographies
  • Travelling Fellowships
  • Grants and funding
  • Journal Meetings
  • Workshops
  • The Company of Biologists
  • Journal news

For Authors

  • Submit a manuscript
  • Aims and scope
  • Presubmission enquiries
  • Article types
  • Manuscript preparation
  • Cover suggestions
  • Editorial process
  • Promoting your paper
  • Open Access
  • Outstanding paper prize
  • Biology Open transfer

Journal Info

  • Journal policies
  • Rights and permissions
  • Media policies
  • Reviewer guide
  • Sign up for alerts

Contact

  • Contact JEB
  • Subscriptions
  • Advertising
  • Feedback

 Twitter   YouTube   LinkedIn

© 2021   The Company of Biologists Ltd   Registered Charity 277992