Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Accepted manuscripts
    • Issue in progress
    • Latest complete issue
    • Issue archive
    • Archive by article type
    • Special issues
    • Subject collections
    • Interviews
    • Sign up for alerts
  • About us
    • About JEB
    • Editors and Board
    • Editor biographies
    • Travelling Fellowships
    • Grants and funding
    • Journal Meetings
    • Workshops
    • The Company of Biologists
    • Journal news
  • For authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Aims and scope
    • Presubmission enquiries
    • Article types
    • Manuscript preparation
    • Cover suggestions
    • Editorial process
    • Promoting your paper
    • Open Access
    • Outstanding paper prize
    • Biology Open transfer
  • Journal info
    • Journal policies
    • Rights and permissions
    • Media policies
    • Reviewer guide
    • Sign up for alerts
  • Contacts
    • Contact JEB
    • Subscriptions
    • Advertising
    • Feedback
  • COB
    • About The Company of Biologists
    • Development
    • Journal of Cell Science
    • Journal of Experimental Biology
    • Disease Models & Mechanisms
    • Biology Open

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Experimental Biology
  • COB
    • About The Company of Biologists
    • Development
    • Journal of Cell Science
    • Journal of Experimental Biology
    • Disease Models & Mechanisms
    • Biology Open

supporting biologistsinspiring biology

Journal of Experimental Biology

  • Log in
Advanced search

RSS  Twitter  Facebook  YouTube  

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Accepted manuscripts
    • Issue in progress
    • Latest complete issue
    • Issue archive
    • Archive by article type
    • Special issues
    • Subject collections
    • Interviews
    • Sign up for alerts
  • About us
    • About JEB
    • Editors and Board
    • Editor biographies
    • Travelling Fellowships
    • Grants and funding
    • Journal Meetings
    • Workshops
    • The Company of Biologists
    • Journal news
  • For authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Aims and scope
    • Presubmission enquiries
    • Article types
    • Manuscript preparation
    • Cover suggestions
    • Editorial process
    • Promoting your paper
    • Open Access
    • Outstanding paper prize
    • Biology Open transfer
  • Journal info
    • Journal policies
    • Rights and permissions
    • Media policies
    • Reviewer guide
    • Sign up for alerts
  • Contacts
    • Contact JEB
    • Subscriptions
    • Advertising
    • Feedback
JEB Classics
TAYLOR'S TREADMILL MENAGERIE
Rodger Kram
Journal of Experimental Biology 2012 215: 2349-2350; doi: 10.1242/jeb.062778
Rodger Kram
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & tables
  • Info & metrics
  • PDF
Loading
Figure1
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint

Rodger Kram discusses the series of four papers published by C. Richard Taylor and colleagues, which addressed the energetics and biomechanics of terrestrial locomotion.

Copies of the papers can be obtained from http://jeb.biologists.org/content/97/1.toc

A series of four papers in JEB in 1982, masterminded by C. Richard Taylor, asked two deceptively simple questions: why does running faster consume metabolic energy at a faster rate, and why do larger animals require less energy to transport each gram of tissue? The audacious goal of these experiments was to link the energetics and biomechanics of terrestrial locomotion. These were not the first studies to quantify how the energetics of locomotion change with speed and size, but they were the first to comprehensively explore why. Many of us are still working to answer those same questions, trying to follow the large footprints left by this magnum opus.

The first paper in the series (Taylor et al., 1982) presented new locomotion energetics data for a diverse assortment of 20 wild and domestic mammal species, from the aptly named dwarf mongoose to behemoth bovids. Measuring locomotion energetics does not involve staid, bench-top pipetting. Rather, depending on the animal's temperament, it can require the combined skills of a rodeo clown, an animal psychologist and a circus sanitation worker. Indeed, the first step in this study was to cajole and train the animals to walk and run on a motorized treadmill without them fighting, fidgeting or fatiguing. The smaller animals were enclosed in respirometry chambers that fitted over the treadmills whereas the larger beasts wore loose-fitting face masks from which the expired air was captured using the open flow method of respirometry recently perfected by Taylor's group (Fedak et al., 1981). Note: not mentioned in the methods sections is the fact that the masks were custom-made for each species, cobbled together from plastic laundry detergent bottles, Velcro and the ubiquitous duct tape.

The team combined their new data for 20 species with literature data for 42 other species of mammals and birds. Taylor was a co-author on almost all of those studies too. Body mass ranged from 15 g in mice to 254 kg in zebu cattle, a nearly 17,000-fold span. As expected, metabolic rate increased linearly with speed in all but a few of the animals studied. To analyze across body size, Taylor and colleagues calculated the cost of transport (Joules of energy required to move a kilogram of body mass 1 m forward) and then used allometry. Most comparative physiology students first meet allometry via Max Kleiber's mouse-to-elephant line for resting metabolism (Kleiber, 1932). Allometry quantifies how structures or functions scale with body mass using equations of the form Y=aMb, where Y is the quantity of interest, a is the coefficient, M is body mass and b is the exponent (Schmidt-Nielsen, 1984). Usually, the exponent, representing the slope, is most informative and is called the primary allometric signal (Fig. 1). Taylor's team found that the mass-specific cost of transport scaled with mass to the –0.316 power. Translating that exponent to something more familiar, a mouse uses approximately 12 times more energy than a human to move each gram of its body. The obvious first tentative explanation was that smaller animals perform more mechanical work (per kilogram body mass) when they walk or run.

Thus, in the following papers in the series (Fedak et al., 1982; Heglund et al., 1982a; Heglund et al., 1982b), the team attempted to measure the mechanical work performed by the muscles during terrestrial locomotion. Total work is comprised of the internal work required to swing the legs and the external work required to lift and accelerate the center of mass. The team found that the total mechanical work rate increased curvilinearly with speed, not linearly like metabolic rate. Further, they found that the sum of the internal and external work required to move a given distance (the mechanical cost of transport) was nearly constant in small, medium and large animals. This meant that on a per gram basis, the small animals used a lot more metabolic energy to perform the same amount of work as the large animals. In the last paper in the series (Heglund et al., 1982b), the team had to conclude that, assuming a constant muscle efficiency, mechanical work during locomotion could not explain either the linear increase in metabolic rate with speed or the regular change in cost of locomotion with body size. After years of effort, this result must have been incredibly frustrating. However, the final paper in the series (Heglund et al., 1982b) offered several ideas that have proven prescient.

Fig. 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 1.

From ants to elephants, the mass-specific metabolic cost of transport for terrestrial legged locomotion decreases with increasing body mass in a systematic manner (primary allometric signal). Yet at each body size, one finds species with energetic costs of transport that are much greater or less than expected (secondary allometric signal). Animal figure drawings by Helen J. Huang, PhD.

One beguiling idea was that small and large animals appeared to consume nearly the same amount of metabolic energy per gram, per stride when compared at physiologically equivalent speeds. Norm Heglund and Taylor followed up on that idea a few years later (Heglund and Taylor, 1988), but they found that within each species, the cost per stride did not remain constant across speed. Fortunately, the final sentence of Heglund et al. (Heglund et al., 1982b) pointed to another idea: ‘It seems likely that the energetic costs involved in generating force and activating the muscles may provide a simple explanation [for the linear increase in metabolic rate with speed and the regular change in cost of locomotion with body size].’ Indeed, Taylor and I (Kram and Taylor, 1990) eventually recognized just such a simple explanation by focusing on the time available for generating force on the ground. The concept of the cost of generating force has persisted as a well-accepted, simple explanation for the energetic cost of running.

Even a classic paper is not perfect. Taylor's team made no distinction between walking and running gaits although they have fundamentally different biomechanics. By sorting Taylor et al.'s metabolic data into walking and running gaits, Jonas Rubenson and colleagues found that the energetic costs of walking and running scale differently (Rubenson et al., 2007). Another shortcoming of Taylor et al.'s approach was that they measured as few as two individuals for many of the species studied. But, thanks to the power of allometry, such quibbles do not affect the overall conclusions.

The four papers that are the focus of this article are classics in several senses. The allometric equation (‘the line’) established by Taylor et al. (Taylor et al., 1982) remains the standard by which the locomotion energetics of newly measured species are judged. Knut Schmidt-Nielsen defined deviation from the line as the secondary allometric signal (Fig. 1) (Schmidt-Nielsen, 1984). For example, penguins consume an inordinately large amount of metabolic energy to waddle on foot (Pinshow et al., 1977) whereas turtles walk with exceptional economy (Zani and Kram, 2008). Scientists in my laboratory and many others still use the biomechanics techniques pioneered in the four-paper series to better understand the unusual energetics of such creatures (Griffin and Kram, 2000; Zani et al., 2005). Finally, since 1982, the cost of terrestrial locomotion has been quantified in a diverse assortment of other vertebrate and invertebrate taxa, extended down in size to ants (e.g. Moll et al., 2012) and up in size to elephants (Langman et al., 1995). Taylor et al.'s (Taylor et al., 1982) equation has quantitatively predicted these findings with uncanny accuracy. Any equation that can predict out 30 years of research and three or four orders of magnitude in animal size is, by my definition, a classic.

  • © 2012.

REFERENCES

  1. ↵
    1. Fedak, M. A.,
    2. Rome, L. and
    3. Seeherman, H. J.
    (1981). One-step N2-dilution technique for calibrating VO2 measuring systems. J. Appl. Physiol. 51, 772-776.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. ↵
    1. Fedak, M. A.,
    2. Heglund, N. C. and
    3. Taylor, C. R.
    (1982). Energetics and mechanics of terrestrial locomotion. II. Kinetic energy changes of the limbs and body as a function of speed and body size in birds and mammals. J. Exp. Biol. 97, 23-40.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. ↵
    1. Griffin, T. M. and
    2. Kram, R.
    (2000). Biomechanics: penguin waddling is not wasteful. Nature 408, 929.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Heglund, N. C. and
    2. Taylor, C. R.
    (1988). Speed, stride frequency and energy cost per stride: how do they change with body size and gait? J. Exp. Biol. 138, 301-318.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. ↵
    1. Heglund, N. C.,
    2. Cavagna, G. A. and
    3. Taylor, C. R.
    (1982a). Energetics and mechanics of terrestrial locomotion. III. Kinetic energy changes of the center of mass as a function of speed and body size in birds and mammals. J. Exp. Biol. 97, 41-56.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. ↵
    1. Heglund, N. C.,
    2. Fedak, M. A.,
    3. Taylor, C. R. and
    4. Cavagna, G. A.
    (1982b). Energetics and mechanics of terrestrial locomotion. IV. Total mechanical energy changes of the center of mass as a function of speed and body size in birds and mammals. J. Exp. Biol. 97, 57-66.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. ↵
    1. Kleiber, M.
    (1932). Body size and metabolism. Hilgardia 6, 315-353.
    OpenUrl
  8. ↵
    1. Kram, R. and
    2. Taylor, C. R.
    (1990). The energetics of running: a new perspective. Nature 346, 265-267.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  9. ↵
    1. Langman, V. A.,
    2. Roberts, T. J.,
    3. Black, J.,
    4. Maloiy, G. M. O.,
    5. Heglund, N. C.,
    6. Weber, J. M.,
    7. Kram, R. and
    8. Taylor, C. R.
    (1995). Moving cheaply: energetics of walking in the African elephant. J. Exp. Biol. 198, 629-632.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  10. ↵
    1. Moll, K.,
    2. Federle, W. and
    3. Roces, F.
    (2012). The energetics of running stability: costs of transport in grass-cutting ants depend on fragment shape. J. Exp. Biol. 215, 161-168.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. ↵
    1. Pinshow, B.,
    2. Fedak, M. A. and
    3. Schmidt-Nielsen, K.
    (1977). Terrestrial locomotion in penguins: it costs more to waddle. Science 195, 592-594.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. ↵
    1. Rubenson, J.,
    2. Heliams, D. B.,
    3. Malone, S. K.,
    4. Withers, P. C.,
    5. Lloyd, D. G. and
    6. Fournier, P. A.
    (2007). Reappraisal of the comparative cost of human locomotion using gait-specific allometric analysis. J. Exp. Biol. 210, 3513-3524.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. ↵
    1. Schmidt-Nielsen, K.
    (1984). Scaling: Why Animal Size is so Important. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  14. ↵
    1. Taylor, C. R.,
    2. Heglund, N. C. and
    3. Maloiy, G. M. O.
    (1982). Energetics and mechanics of terrestrial locomotion. I. Metabolic energy consumption as a function of speed and body size in birds and mammals. J. Exp. Biol. 97, 1-21.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. ↵
    1. Zani, P. A. and
    2. Kram, R.
    (2008). Low metabolic cost of locomotion in ornate box turtles, Terrapene ornate. J. Exp. Biol. 211, 3671-3676.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. ↵
    1. Zani, P. A.,
    2. Gottschall, J. S. and
    3. Kram, R.
    (2005). Giant Galápagos tortoises walk without inverted pendulum mechanical-energy exchange. J. Exp. Biol. 208, 1489-1494.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
Previous ArticleNext Article
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

This Issue

 Download PDF

Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Experimental Biology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
TAYLOR'S TREADMILL MENAGERIE
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Experimental Biology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Experimental Biology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
JEB Classics
TAYLOR'S TREADMILL MENAGERIE
Rodger Kram
Journal of Experimental Biology 2012 215: 2349-2350; doi: 10.1242/jeb.062778
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
JEB Classics
TAYLOR'S TREADMILL MENAGERIE
Rodger Kram
Journal of Experimental Biology 2012 215: 2349-2350; doi: 10.1242/jeb.062778

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Alerts

Please log in to add an alert for this article.

Sign in to email alerts with your email address

Article navigation

  • Top
  • Article
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & tables
  • Info & metrics
  • PDF

Related articles

Cited by...

More in this TOC section

  • Xenopus and the art of oxygen maintenance
  • A JEB CLASSIC ON FISH EXERCISE
  • ANALYSIS OF ACID EXCRETION IN FISH AND ITS APPLICATION TO ACIDIC ENVIRONMENTS
Show more JEB Classics

Similar articles

Other journals from The Company of Biologists

Development

Journal of Cell Science

Disease Models & Mechanisms

Biology Open

Advertisement

Meet the Editors at SICB Virtual 2021

Reserve your place to join some of the journal editors, including Editor-in-Chief Craig Franklin, at our Meet the Editor session on 17 February at 2pm (EST). Don’t forget to view our SICB Subject Collection, featuring relevant JEB papers relating to some of the symposia sessions.


2020 at The Company of Biologists

Despite 2020's challenges, we were able to bring a number of long-term projects and new ventures to fruition. As we enter a new year, join us as we reflect on the triumphs of the last 12 months.


Critical temperature window sends migratory black-headed buntings on their travels

The spring rise in temperature at black-headed bunting overwintering sites is essential for triggering the physical changes that they undergo before embarking on their spring migration – read more.


Developmental and reproductive physiology of small mammals at high altitude

Cayleih Robertson and Kathryn Wilsterman focus on high-altitude populations of the North American deer mouse in their review of the challenges and evolutionary innovations of pregnant and nursing small mammals at high altitude.


Read & Publish participation extends worldwide

“Being able to publish Open Access articles free of charge means that my article gets maximum exposure and has maximum impact, and that all my peers can read it regardless of the agreements that their universities have with publishers.”

Professor Roi Holzman (Tel Aviv University) shares his experience of publishing Open Access as part of our growing Read & Publish initiative. We now have over 60 institutions in 12 countries taking part – find out more and view our full list of participating institutions.

Articles

  • Accepted manuscripts
  • Issue in progress
  • Latest complete issue
  • Issue archive
  • Archive by article type
  • Special issues
  • Subject collections
  • Interviews
  • Sign up for alerts

About us

  • About JEB
  • Editors and Board
  • Editor biographies
  • Travelling Fellowships
  • Grants and funding
  • Journal Meetings
  • Workshops
  • The Company of Biologists
  • Journal news

For Authors

  • Submit a manuscript
  • Aims and scope
  • Presubmission enquiries
  • Article types
  • Manuscript preparation
  • Cover suggestions
  • Editorial process
  • Promoting your paper
  • Open Access
  • Outstanding paper prize
  • Biology Open transfer

Journal Info

  • Journal policies
  • Rights and permissions
  • Media policies
  • Reviewer guide
  • Sign up for alerts

Contact

  • Contact JEB
  • Subscriptions
  • Advertising
  • Feedback

 Twitter   YouTube   LinkedIn

© 2021   The Company of Biologists Ltd   Registered Charity 277992