Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Accepted manuscripts
    • Issue in progress
    • Latest complete issue
    • Issue archive
    • Archive by article type
    • Special issues
    • Subject collections
    • Interviews
    • Sign up for alerts
  • About us
    • About JEB
    • Editors and Board
    • Editor biographies
    • Travelling Fellowships
    • Grants and funding
    • Journal Meetings
    • Workshops
    • The Company of Biologists
    • Journal news
  • For authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Aims and scope
    • Presubmission enquiries
    • Article types
    • Manuscript preparation
    • Cover suggestions
    • Editorial process
    • Promoting your paper
    • Open Access
    • Outstanding paper prize
    • Biology Open transfer
  • Journal info
    • Journal policies
    • Rights and permissions
    • Media policies
    • Reviewer guide
    • Sign up for alerts
  • Contacts
    • Contact JEB
    • Subscriptions
    • Advertising
    • Feedback
    • Institutional usage stats (logged-in users only)
  • COB
    • About The Company of Biologists
    • Development
    • Journal of Cell Science
    • Journal of Experimental Biology
    • Disease Models & Mechanisms
    • Biology Open

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Experimental Biology
  • COB
    • About The Company of Biologists
    • Development
    • Journal of Cell Science
    • Journal of Experimental Biology
    • Disease Models & Mechanisms
    • Biology Open

supporting biologistsinspiring biology

Journal of Experimental Biology

  • Log in
Advanced search

RSS  Twitter  Facebook  YouTube  

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Accepted manuscripts
    • Issue in progress
    • Latest complete issue
    • Issue archive
    • Archive by article type
    • Special issues
    • Subject collections
    • Interviews
    • Sign up for alerts
  • About us
    • About JEB
    • Editors and Board
    • Editor biographies
    • Travelling Fellowships
    • Grants and funding
    • Journal Meetings
    • Workshops
    • The Company of Biologists
    • Journal news
  • For authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Aims and scope
    • Presubmission enquiries
    • Article types
    • Manuscript preparation
    • Cover suggestions
    • Editorial process
    • Promoting your paper
    • Open Access
    • Outstanding paper prize
    • Biology Open transfer
  • Journal info
    • Journal policies
    • Rights and permissions
    • Media policies
    • Reviewer guide
    • Sign up for alerts
  • Contacts
    • Contact JEB
    • Subscriptions
    • Advertising
    • Feedback
    • Institutional usage stats (logged-in users only)
Research Article
Spring phenology does not affect timing of reproduction in the great tit (Parus major)
Sonja V. Schaper, Carolina Rueda, Peter J. Sharp, Alistair Dawson, Marcel E. Visser
Journal of Experimental Biology 2011 214: 3664-3671; doi: 10.1242/jeb.059543
Sonja V. Schaper
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: s.schaper@nioo.knaw.nl
Carolina Rueda
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Peter J. Sharp
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Alistair Dawson
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Marcel E. Visser
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & tables
  • Info & metrics
  • PDF
Loading

SUMMARY

Many seasonal breeders adjust the timing of reproduction in response to year-to-year variations in supplementary environmental cues, amongst which ambient temperature is thought to be most influential. However, it is possible that for species such as the great tit (Parus major L.), phenological cues from sprouting vegetation and the consequent abundance of invertebrate prey, although dependent on temperature, may provide supplementary environmental cues per se. This hypothesis was investigated in breeding pairs of great tits kept in outdoor aviaries. In spring, experimental pairs were provided with access to leafing birch branches and caterpillars as a visual food cue, while control pairs were provided with non-leafing branches. Observations were made on the onset of laying and on concentrations of plasma luteinizing hormone (LH) at regular intervals to monitor changes in reproductive function. The onset of egg laying was not advanced by the presence of leafing branches and caterpillars. LH concentrations increased during the course of the study, but phenological cues did not affect plasma LH levels in females and males. Early spring vegetation, such as the leafing of birch branches, and the appearance of caterpillar prey do not appear to play a significant role in fine-tuning the onset of egg laying in great tits.

INTRODUCTION

Birds adapt their life histories to fluctuating environmental conditions, with energy-demanding activities, such as reproduction and moult, occurring at a time of year that offers sufficient energetic resources. Matching the rearing of nestlings with the seasonal food peak has large fitness consequences (Charmantier et al., 2008; Perrins, 1965; Sheldon et al., 2003; Thomas et al., 2001; van Noordwijk et al., 1995), and there is strong selection pressure on mechanisms that enable females to predict future food availability from proximate environmental cues (Visser and Lambrechts, 1999; Visser et al., 2010).

In non-equatorial birds, lengthening photoperiod in spring provides the principal cue for the timing of seasonal breeding (Dawson et al., 2001; Farner, 1985; Follett et al., 1985; Sharp, 2005; Silverin et al., 1993), but supplementary cues derived from rainfall, ambient temperature and phenology are available to increase the precision of a timing decision (Dawson, 2008; Hau et al., 2004; Meijer et al., 1999; Perfito et al., 2005; Salvante et al., 2007; Schaper et al., 2011; Small et al., 2008; Visser et al., 2009; Wingfield et al., 1992) (but see Visser et al., 2011). The aims of this study were, firstly, to re-evaluate evidence for the involvement of phenological cues in the onset of egg laying in opportunistic and strictly seasonally breeding birds, and, secondly, to assess experimentally whether there is a causal relationship between phenological cues provided by leafing birch and caterpillars and the onset of reproduction in a seasonal breeder, the great tit (Parus major L.).

Opportunistic breeding birds live in environments in which the distribution of their food supply fluctuates erratically, and thus they require great sensitivity to environmental cues predictive of increased food supply to stimulate reproductive activity (Hahn, 1998). Most studies have been carried out on birds living in arid regions with unpredictable rainfall (Table 1), and because of its importance for primary productivity, rainfall is still the climatic parameter most frequently analysed with regard to the onset of breeding (Barrientos et al., 2007). Rainfall stimulates the growth of vegetation, resulting in the production of leaves, flowers and seeds, and these not only provide plant and associated invertebrate food to feed nestlings but also may act as phenological cues for the initiation of breeding (Hahn et al., 2008). For example, in the granivorous zebra finch (Taeniopygia guttata) in central Australia, hatching coincides with the availability of grass seeds to feed nestlings after the onset of rain, with heavier rainfall resulting in longer breeding episodes, and repeated rainfall stimulating repeated breeding (Zann et al., 1995). A similar phenomenon is observed in Darwin's ground finches (Geospiza spp.) on the Galapagos Islands, where hatching coincides with flushes of insect availability occurring after semi-seasonal rains (Hahn et al., 2008; Hau et al., 2004). However, in male Darwin finches, rainfall or even rainfall-related noise stimulates singing (Grant, 1999) and may therefore act directly as a proximate cue for reproduction.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table 1.

Review of selected publications reporting effects of spring phenology on the seasonal timing of reproductive development and egg laying in both (A) seasonal opportunists and (B) strictly seasonal breeders

Direct evidence that vegetation phenology is likely to provide an environmental cue for breeding activity comes from red crossbills (Loxia curvirostra) that appear to breed in response to the changing availability of their main food, western hemlock (Hahn et al., 2008), and Pinon jays (Gymnorhinus cyanocephalus) that breed in late summer only if green cones of Pinon pines (Pinus monophylla) are abundant (Ligon, 1974; Ligon, 1978). The possibility that food acts as a phenological cue for breeding has been demonstrated in a study using captive male spotted antbirds (Hylophylax n. naevioides) in Panama, in which gonadal growth and singing were stimulated by the addition of live crickets to their diet, while singing was induced even when crickets were only presented visually (Wikelski et al., 2000). In addition, Perfito and colleagues showed in captive lesser sundas zebra finches (Taeniopygia g. guttata) that food availability, in the form of seeds, is a more potent stimulus than increasing day length in regulating testicular development (Perfito et al., 2008). It thus appears that opportunistic breeders use phenological cues alone or in combination with rainfall and/or temperature cues to time the onset of breeding.

Strictly seasonal breeders may also use phenological cues, such as bud burst and the associated appearance of invertebrate prey, to fine-tune the timing of breeding to local conditions, superimposed on an underlying seasonal reproductive pattern (Hahn, 1998; Hahn et al., 2008), particularly if the seasonality of their environment has an unpredictable component (Wingfield et al., 1992). These cues may be dependent on changes in ambient temperature, for example in insectivorous seasonal breeders relying on a food peak in spring to rear their young (Both et al., 2004; Cresswell and McCleery, 2003; Crick et al., 1997; Dhondt and Eyckerman, 1979; Kluyver, 1952; Perrins, 1965; Perrins and McCleery, 1989; Schmidt, 1984; Sokolov, 2000; van Balen, 1973; Visser et al., 1998; Visser et al., 2003). It is thus difficult to distinguish between direct effects of increasing temperature (Schaper et al., 2011) and phenological phenomena cues for timing the onset of breeding.

Possible phenological cues used by insectivorous seasonal breeders for reproductive timing have been most extensively studied in great tits (P. major) and blue tits (Cyanistes caeruleus), which appear to respond to the leafing of trees and appearance of caterpillars (Table 1). Egg laying of great tits in Oxford, UK, is associated with oak bud burst and the first appearance of caterpillars (Jones, 1972; Perrins, 1965; van Noordwijk et al., 1995), while in some other European populations it coincides with the timing of birch (Betula pubescens) leafing (Slagsvold, 1976). In Switzerland, laying dates of great tits correlate with the appearance of caterpillars in mixed forests of conifer, beech (Fagus sylvatica), oaks (Quercus spp.) and hornbeam (Carpinus betulus) (Nager and van Noordwijk, 1995). In Swedish coastal and inland habitats, variation in laying dates of great and blue tits correlates with leafing phenology of oak (Q. robur) and birch (B. pendula) (Nilsson and Källander, 2006). In blue tit populations in Corsica, living in broad-leaved deciduous downy oak (Q. pubescens) or in evergreen Holm oak forests (Q. ilex), egg laying occurs at different times depending on forest type but, regardless of forest type, there is a close correlation between bud burst date and laying date (Blondel et al., 1993; Bourgault et al., 2010). In contrast to these studies, Visser and colleagues observed in great tits, in a ‘natural experiment’ in the Netherlands, that the bud burst of pedunculate oaks (Q. robur) did not correlate with the onset of egg laying when bud burst was delayed in 1992 by an unseasonal frost in the previous year (Visser et al., 2002).

A close relationship between spring phenology and laying date has also been observed in some non-Parids. In song sparrows (Melospiza melodia morphna), in the Northwest USA, differences in the timing of reproductive development between coastal and montane populations can be best explained by an integration of temperature cues and vegetation cues in the form of fresh shoots (Perfito et al., 2004). In Danish barn swallows (Hirundo rustica), the onset of laying is also closely correlated with the phenology of local vegetation, such as broad-leaved elm (Ulmus glabra) and snowdrop (Galanthus nivalis), which is related to increased temperature (Møller, 2008). In contrast with these studies, in the pied flycatcher, a migratory insectivorous passerine, seasonal vegetation phenology does not provide a strong cue for the timing of breeding (Slagsvold, 1976) (Table 1).

Only experiments under controlled conditions can answer questions about the causal effects of supplementary phenological cues on the timing of seasonal avian reproduction, and observations reported to date are conflicting. The timing of the onset of laying in captive great or blue tits kept in outdoor aviaries has been compared in a multi-site experiment carried out in the Netherlands, Sweden and Corsica (Visser et al., 2002). In the Netherlands, the onset of breeding in pairs of great tits given leafing pedunculate oak branches was not affected by the stage of development of the leaves (Visser et al., 2002). In Sweden, gonadal growth and concentrations of plasma testosterone were the same in male great tits in the presence and absence of leafing branches of birch (B. pubescens), although an increase in plasma luteinizing hormone (LH) was advanced in the presence of leafing branches (Visser et al., 2002). In contrast, in a study of captive blue tits from two populations in Corsica, provided with phenological cues from branches of downy oak (Q. pubescens), the most common tree in the habitat of one population, or of evergreen Holm oak (Q. ilex), the most common tree in the habitat of the other population, the laying dates were advanced in both populations when they were provided with leafing evergreen oak (Visser et al., 2002). In a study on song sparrows from the Northwest USA, differences in the timing of the onset of laying in free-living birds observed at different altitudinal temperatures were not replicated in a laboratory study in which the birds were exposed to the same temperatures but not provided with phenological cues (Perfito et al., 2005). White-crowned sparrows (Zonotrichia leucophrys gambelii) receiving green leaves of wheat sprouts as a food additive for 20 days showed a significant increase in ovarian mass compared with controls, even though body mass and testicular mass were not affected (Ettinger and King, 1981). Finally, in a study on wild island canaries (Serinus canaria) held under short day conditions, the onset of breeding was advanced after exposure to green grass (Poa pratensis), bamboo (Phyllostachys aureosulcata) and white spruce (Picea glauca conica), but not after exposure to simulated rainfall (Voigt et al., 2007).

Spring phenology could influence the onset of laying in several ways. Firstly, if the onset of reproduction is energy limited, the increase in prey abundance and diversity might provide energy and nutrient resources to build up reproductive tissues, thus facilitating an early onset of laying. The effect of food availability on the onset of breeding may be dependent on the appropriate ecological conditions (Bourgault et al., 2009). Pre-breeding food supplementation experiments in single-brooded passerines have produced ambiguous results, either showing no effect or advancing the onset of laying by no more than 1 week (Harrison et al., 2010; Meijer and Drent, 1999) (but see Scheuerlein and Gwinner, 2002). Secondly, spring phenology could influence the onset of laying through changes in the composition of the bird's diet, adding chemical compounds that speed up reproductive development. This possibility is suggested by an observation in montane voles (Microtus montanus) in which testicular development and mating are stimulated by 6-methoxybenzoxazolinone (6-MBOA), a substance found in growing seedlings eaten by the animals in spring (Berger et al., 1981; Berger et al., 1987). It is possible that birds ingest similar secondary chemical compounds while feeding on buds of deciduous trees in early spring (Betts, 1955), which might affect their reproductive system in a comparable way. However, Bourgault and colleagues investigated the oak bud scale remains in blue tit gizzards and concluded that consumption of large amounts of buds does not occur before egg laying (Bourgault et al., 2006). Lastly, temperature-dependent vegetation and invertebrate phenology might accelerate the onset of laying by providing a visual stimulus that is translated into a reproductive neuroendocrine response, comparable to the effect of photostimulation in early spring (Ball and Ketterson, 2008; Hahn et al., 1997; Moore et al., 2006; Stevenson et al., 2008). It thus seems likely that phenological cues providing a visual stimulus may be used to fine-tune the onset of reproduction in a photoperiodic seasonal breeder, such as the great tit (P. major).

In order to test the hypothesis that vegetation and invertebrate phenology might advance the onset of laying by providing a visual stimulus, it is first necessary to identify a suitable temperature-dependent cue and an appropriate measure of reproductive neuroendocrine response. If birds have evolved to adjust their reproductive timing in response to vegetational cues, these cues should reliably provide information on the future timing of an invertebrate food peak. After dormancy release, deciduous trees of mature forests, e.g. oaks, respond to increased photoperiod in spring, which is modulated by temperature. In contrast, many short-lived, early successional trees, e.g. birches, are primarily temperature sensitive (Körner and Basler, 2010). The leafing of these trees marks the onset of spring in temperate zones (Chmielewski and Rotzer, 2001), and is thus available to insectivorous birds as a cue integrating past temperature patterns and predicting the temperature-dependent hatching of lepidoptera caterpillars.

We experimentally investigated whether great tits make use of phenological cues from birch, as the leafing of birch branches coincides with the beginning of egg laying in great tits in the natural population used in our study (see Fig. 1 for details). The development of vegetation in early spring promotes an increase in invertebrate food sources, especially caterpillars feeding on developing leaves (Buse and Good, 1996; van Dongen et al., 1997). Therefore, caterpillars were also presented as a visual phenological cue. It was predicted that reproductive development and onset of laying of breeding pairs provided with these supplementary cues would advance relative to control pairs. The causal reproductive neuroendocrine response was assessed in both sexes by measuring changes in the concentration of plasma LH, which correlates with increasing gonadal activity and the onset of breeding in blue tits exposed to natural lighting (Caro et al., 2006).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Experimental birds and housing

These experiments were carried out under licence CTE 09.08 of the Animal Experimentation Committee of the Royal Dutch Academy of Sciences (DEC-KNAW).

Eighty great tits from a long-term study population at the Hoge Veluwe (the Netherlands) were taken into captivity as nestlings in 2008. Broods were selected from early-or late-laying maternal lines (Schaper et al., 2011). All chicks were blood sampled and sexed (Griffiths et al., 1998), and extra-pair offspring were identified (Saladin et al., 2003) prior to brood choice. On day 10 post-hatching, chicks were taken to the Netherlands Institute of Ecology (Heteren) for hand-raising (Drent et al., 2003). After independence they were kept in single-sex groups in open outdoor aviaries (2×4×2.5 m). The birds were fed ad libitum with a constant daily amount of food, consisting of a mixture of minced beef, proteins and vitamins, complemented by sunflower seeds, fat balls, a mix of dried insects (Carnizoo, Kiezebrink International, Putten, The Netherlands), proteins, vitamin and mineral supplements (Nekton S and Nekton Bio, NEKTON GmbH, Pforzheim, The Netherlands), calcium and water for drinking and bathing. In December 2008, 36 breeding pairs were transferred to climate-controlled aviaries. During the 2009 breeding season the birds were kept under naturally increasing photoperiod and on an average temperature of either 14°C or 8°C, which did not affect the onset of laying (Schaper et al., 2011). The birds were moved back to outdoor aviaries in December 2009, kept in single-sex groups over winter and 16 pairs were reformed again in spring for their second breeding season in 2010. These pairs had bred together in 2009, except in two cases where the females were paired with a new mate as their original mates had died. Two pairs did not lay eggs in 2009, but bred successfully in the experiment reported here.

The breeding pairs were housed in two rows of outdoor aviaries from January 2010 onwards. One side of the aviary complex opened onto a grass field, while the birds from the other aviary row could see a hedge, mainly consisting of elder (Sambucus nigra) and hawthorn (Crataegus sp.) at about 15 m distance. In 2010, all birds were kept under natural temperature and daylight conditions. Lighting was supplemented by two tubular lights, which were on for 2 h after sunrise to compensate for the shading effect of the aviary roof. The aviaries offered a choice of four nest boxes. Moss as nesting material was provided from mid-February onwards.

Treatments

Pairs of birds were randomly and equally assigned to a control and a treatment group in the two rows of aviaries. To simulate an early onset of spring and the availability of prey in the environment, the birds were provided with leafing birch (B. pendula) branches and caterpillars. Phenological cues were added from 9 March until the end of May. During this period, day length increased from 11 h 18 min to 16 h 21 min. The cues consisted of branches that had been kept at room temperature for 1 week until an advanced bud burst occurred. Five branches about 1.5 m long with just unfolding leaves were provided for each breeding pair and replaced twice weekly. In addition, a covered transparent 20 cm Petri dish was placed on a feeding table in the centre of each aviary, containing about 20 caterpillars of the great cabbage white (Pieris brassicae) at larval instars 2–3 on a cabbage leaf. The larvae were replaced weekly, after they had developed into instars 3–4.

Fig. 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 1.

Laying dates of great tits of the Hoge Veluwe population in relation to birch (Betula pendula) bud burst dates, defined as the stage when green tips of leaves are unfolding. The analysis was restricted to years (see labels in the graph) in which at least 10 birches from long-term monitoring sites were scored twice a week (range 10–51 trees). The exact laying dates based on daily nest visits only encompass first clutches. If including the exceptionally late year 1992 [see the discussion of Visser et al. (Visser et al., 2002) in the Introduction], the relationship is marginally non-significant (linear model, t1,7=2.34, P=0.058), while without 1992 bud burst predicts laying dates well (linear model, t1,6=3.32, P=0.021). Means ± standard errors are given. Note the advancement of laying in recent years (2009 and 2010) relative to the birch bud burst.

Birds from the control group received undeveloped birch branches with tightly closed buds and, for an equivalent cage enrichment, paper ‘leaves’ were added consisting of 4×4 cm red and blue cardboard squares placed over the branches. Control branches were rotated twice a week to simulate branch replacement and torn ‘leaves’ were replaced. As an equivalent to the presentation of caterpillars, small twigs, which could freely roll around, were placed in the Petri dishes. The birds made extensive use of both the birch branches with young leaves and the control branches with paper ‘leaves’ by climbing in them, and pecking and destroying buds and leaves. It is likely that birds from the treatment group regularly consumed buds and leaves. The birds were also attracted to the caterpillars and in a few cases succeeded in opening the Petri dishes to eat them. It was therefore concluded that the caterpillars provided a satisfactory food cue.

Measurements

Nest boxes were checked daily for eggs. The day that the first egg was found is referred to as the laying date. Blood samples of 100 μl were taken from the jugular vein every 2 weeks for LH analysis. Additionally, an initial sample was taken a week prior to the provisioning of phenological cues. Plasma was separated from red blood cells and stored at –80°C. Plasma LH concentrations were determined using a chicken LH radioimmunoassay (Sharp et al., 1987) validated for use in blue tits (Caro et al., 2006). The assay reaction volume was 60 μl, comprising 20 μl plasma sample or standard, 20 μl primary antibody (rabbit anti-chicken LH) and 20 μl of I125-labeled chicken LH. The primary antibody was precipitated to separate free and bound I125 label using 20 μl of donkey anti-rabbit precipitating serum and 20 μl of non-immune rabbit serum. The samples were measured in a single assay, in duplicate. The intra-assay coefficient of variation was 6.4% for a high value plasma pool and 8.1% for a low value plasma pool, and the minimum detectable dose was 0.15 ng ml–1.

Fig. 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 2.

Luteinizing hormone (LH) development. LH concentrations measured in female (A) and male (B) great tits either with access to leafing birch branches and visual cues of caterpillars (filled diamonds, straight line) or with access to undeveloped branches and visual cues of pieces of twigs (open dots, broken line; control). Arrows indicate the addition of cues. Means ± standard errors are given.

Statistics

Laying dates in 2010 were analysed with linear models in R 2.10.0 (R Development Core Team, 2009), including phenology treatment, as well as laying dates of the female's and male's mother in the wild (a measure of genetic disposition for early or late laying) and laying date of the pair in the previous year as covariates. LH data were log transformed to achieve normality and analysed in general linear models for females and males separately. First, we tested whether initial LH concentrations differed between treatment groups. Second, we tested whether plasma LH concentrations increased over time. Third, we tested whether the seasonal change in LH following the addition of phenological cues differed between the groups in a mixed model with bird identity as a random factor (procedure lmer, package lme4). Fourth, we tested in a general linear model whether the rise in plasma LH 2 weeks after addition of phenological cues was different between treatment groups, as plasma LH concentrations can increase within days of exposure to a stimulatory cue (Meddle and Follett, 1995; Wingfield et al., 1997). Explanatory variables were week of measurement (as a factor), phenology treatment, and the interaction between the two. Fifth, we tested in a linear model whether LH concentrations at the end of April were related to laying dates.

RESULTS

Initial LH concentrations did not differ between phenology treatment and control groups at the start of the experiment (females: t1,16=0.15, P=0.88, males: t1,16=1.23, P=0.24, Fig. 2). In both treatment and control groups, plasma LH increased with time (females: sampling week, χ21=27.5, P<0.001; males: sampling week, χ21=12.8 P<0.001). Two weeks after the start of the experiment, compared with initial values, the difference in LH concentrations was not affected by the addition of phenological cues (females: t1,16=1.45, P=0.17; males: t1,16=1.33, P=0.21; Fig. 2). However, while in females there was no interaction between the effects of treatment and sampling date on the increase in plasma LH (treatment × sampling week: χ23=4.61, P=0.20; treatment: χ21=1.48, P=0.22; sampling week: χ23=22.3, P<0.001; Fig. 2A), in males there was a significant interaction (treatment × sampling week: χ23=11.29, P=0.010). In males exposed to phenological cues, LH concentrations were already near their maximum in early spring, just after the addition of phenological cues, while concentrations in control males increased more slowly, with the steepest rise in late April (Fig. 2B). Females with higher LH concentrations at the end of April tended to lay earlier (t1,14=–2.06, P=0.062, Fig. 3).

One male of a pair given phenological cues died, and one female of a pair also given phenological cues died after laying her first egg. The remaining male was transferred to breed with the remaining female, which started laying 11 days later. Her laying date was included in the analysis. However, one female of the control group was ill and did not lay. Another female of the phenology group started laying extremely late on 11 June, which was considered to be too abnormal to be a consequence of the experimental design and was therefore excluded from subsequent analysis (Grubb's test for outliers: G=2.7, P=0.008).

Laying commenced on 1 May, approximately 8 weeks after the birds were allocated to treatment or control groups. The onset of laying was not advanced by exposure to leafing birch branches and caterpillars (treatment: t1,14=–0.40, P=0.71, Fig. 3). The genetic background of neither the female (laying date of female's mother: t1,14=–1.38, P=0.20) nor the male (laying date of male's mother: t1,14=1.68, P=0.13) influenced laying date. The onset of laying in 2010 in outdoor aviaries correlated with the onset of laying in 2009 in indoor climatized aviaries under standardized conditions (t1,12=3.73, P=0.004, Fig. 4), which means that individual females laid consistently early or late in both years independent of supplementary cues.

DISCUSSION

Vegetation phenology and food abundance have often been suggested as proximate supplementary cues in avian timing of reproduction, but there is little evidence for causality, especially in seasonal breeders. In the current experiment, great tits were exposed to phenological cues that are naturally present in their environment at the time of egg laying and are strongly affected by temperature. Contrary to prediction, exposure to leafing birch branches and caterpillars did not advance the onset of laying in great tits housed in outdoor aviaries exposed to natural light and temperature where birds had access to ad libitum food. This observation is consistent with an earlier study showing no effect of developing oak and birch branches on the timing of reproduction in captive great and blue tits (Visser et al., 2002). The lack of an effect of phenological cues in these earlier studies is therefore not a consequence of inhibitory cues associated with, for example, indoor caging. The failure to demonstrate an effect of phenological cues on the onset of laying is in contrast to many observations in free-living bird populations which imply, or suggest, that the correlation between either bud burst or food phenology and the onset of laying or reproductive activity is causal (see Introduction for references). The interpretation of earlier studies now requires critical re-assessment bearing in mind the following.

Fig. 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 3.

LH concentration and laying date. Relationship between female LH concentrations at the end of April (21 April) and laying date. Females with access to leafing birch branches and visual cues of caterpillars are represented by filled diamonds, while those with access to undeveloped branches and visual cues of pieces of twigs are represented by open circles.

First, some experiments measure reproductive development without reporting laying dates in response to environmental cues. These experiments do not take into account the possibility that a given phenological cue may not affect ovarian development but instead the laying decision itself. This decision is made by the female (Caro et al., 2009), which may be responsive to supplementary cues that differ from those recognized by males (Ball and Ketterson, 2008). In less favourable conditions than used in the present study, captive females often do not lay while males tend to show full gonadal maturation, which is why most experimental work has been restricted to males. The observation that females may not show full gonadal development under captive conditions indicates that cues additional to increasing photoperiod are required for the initiation of egg laying, which might be phenological or social cues. Researchers need to critically investigate whether the choice of physiological measures used to deduce changes in reproductive timing in response to a likely cue is appropriate.

Second, leafing date of, for example, the tree species hosting lepidoptera prey, or caterpillar emergence itself, is a standard phenological measure used to predict the timing of avian breeding (Table 1). Selection for synchrony with the food peak facilitates this correlation, but the bud burst of e.g. oak trees often commences late in spring, sometimes after the onset of egg laying, and therefore cannot be considered a predictive cue (Visser et al., 2002). It thus requires careful observation of natural systems to identify cues that are both relevant, in terms of predictability of future events, and timed in advance of changes in the phenological trait under investigation.

Fig. 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 4.

Relationship between laying dates in 2009 and 2010. Laying dates were recorded per pair of great tits breeding in climate-controlled aviaries in 2009 and in outdoor aviaries in 2010. Females with access to leafing birch branches and visual cues of caterpillars are represented by filled diamonds, while those with access to undeveloped branches and visual cues of pieces of twigs are represented by open dots.

Third, the correlation between temperature, tree phenology and insect abundance excludes any inference of the causal relationship between any one of these cues and the timing of reproduction under natural conditions. Even though many studies report on relationships between phenological cues and laying dates (see Introduction), there is little experimental evidence for a causality, which should be a focus of future efforts.

In females, phenological cues did not affect the photoperiod-dependent seasonal increase in LH. In males receiving phenological cues, LH concentrations were coincidentally high from the beginning onwards, but did not increase much over time after the addition of cues. In contrast, control males showed a rise to levels similar to males from the treatment group over a period of 2 months. One can only speculate what would have happened if initial LH values in males from the phenology treatment group had been lower, but given the hormonal development in females we would not expect a difference between experimental groups.

Unfortunately, at the moment there is no available assay for avian follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), the gonadotropin directly inducing follicle maturation, restricting researchers to measurement of LH instead. It is therefore possible that FSH, and not LH, is the mediator for the integration of phenological cues, but as here we found no effect of vegetation cues on the timing of laying itself, we would not expect different results for FSH.

From an ecological point of view, the functional significance of higher LH plasma concentrations in males exposed to predictive environmental cues in early spring is uncertain. As the development of the male reproductive system precedes that of the female, it is less likely that males will show an adaptive response to phenological cues to fine-tune gonadal development. Yet, in an opportunistic breeder, the rufous-winged sparrow (Aimophila carpalis), environmental factors associated with summer rains stimulated both gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) synthesis and LH secretion in males, which was, however, unrelated to gonadal growth earlier in the season (Small et al., 2008). Similarly, the higher LH concentrations reported by Visser and colleagues did not induce a greater increase in testis size (Visser et al., 2002); also, in the present experiment there was only a weak correlation between female LH concentrations and actual laying date. These findings demonstrate that different components of the hypothalamo-pituitary–gonadal axis might be influenced by various supplementary cues in different species. In addition, measuring the actual laying decision of the female is crucial to drawing conclusions about the timing of breeding.

As there was no effect of spring vegetational cues on the timing of reproduction in great tit females, it seems that the between-year variation in laying dates is triggered directly by temperature, which thus causes the correlation between birch bud burst and the onset of laying in the wild population (Fig. 1). In recent years, warmer springs have advanced both the leafing of birches and egg laying in great tits. The results of this experiment support our recent study (Schaper et al., 2011) showing that different patterns of increasing spring temperatures, rather than mean temperature itself, affect the onset of egg laying differently for early- and late-laying female great tits from the same population used in the current setup, implying genetic differences in sensitivity to temperature cues. The current experiment thus indicates that sensitivity to early spring vegetation, or food cues, plays only a minor role in fine-tuning the onset of egg laying.

Besides influencing the decision of when to lay, temperature can also affect the photo-induced timing of gonadal growth, as shown for white-crowned sparrows (Zonotrichia leucophrys) (Wingfield et al., 2003; Wingfield et al., 1997). To date, possible pathways that can accommodate this temperature effect, which might act at a physiological level or as a proximate cue, remain to be discovered. Low temperatures may also limit the speed of gonadal maturation by increasing the daily energy expenditure under natural conditions when food is scarce (Perrins, 1970; Stevenson and Bryant, 2000). In captive great tits, however, we did not observe an effect of ambient temperature on the regulation of gonadal growth (Schaper et al., 2011).

The high repeatability in the timing of laying between 2009 and 2010 in individual pairs, irrespective of whether they were early or late layers, supports findings by Visser and colleagues that laying dates of great tits in climate-controlled aviaries are closely correlated with laying dates of the same females under natural conditions (Visser et al., 2009). This consistency again stresses a genetic component in the mechanisms underlying the timing of reproduction, which could well be sensitivity to environmental cues, such as photoperiod or temperature (Visser et al., 2011), but is apparently not related to phenological cues.

In 2009, the birds in this study bred in climate-controlled aviaries (Schaper et al., 2011) and in 2010 bred again when exposed to more natural conditions in open aviaries. Against expectations, egg laying commenced later in 2010 than in 2009, even though second-year breeders normally lay earlier than first-year breeders and additional environmental information, also in the form of vegetational growth, was available to the birds in outdoor aviaries. Part of this effect could be attributed to the lower light levels caused by the roofing in the outdoor aviaries, as the increase in day length is the primary cue for the timing of reproduction. However, this is unlikely, as supplementary light was provided in outdoor aviaries. A different explanation could be that birds experienced colder night conditions in 2010 than in climate-controlled aviaries in 2009, which delayed the onset of laying relative to the previous year.

In conclusion, from both previous work and the experimental observations presented here, there is little direct evidence for an effect of tree phenology or presence of lepidopteran prey on the onset of reproduction in great tits. Nonetheless, several studies reported close correlations between tree phenology and laying dates of both opportunists and seasonal breeders in the field. Experimental work on a range of species is needed to further investigate whether those potential proximate cues assumed to advance or even induce breeding are really causal for the timing of reproductive development. This is one of a few studies that have examined direct effects of phenological cues on both male and female reproductive development, as well as egg laying under controlled conditions. More thorough physiological work concentrated on the reproductive development and behavioural decisions of the female is needed to investigate to what extent seasonal breeders make use of phenological cues. It is likely that, at least in great tits, the correlation between spring phenology and onset of laying is mediated by other proximate factors, such as direct temperature cues stimulating both vegetation growth and avian breeding.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank Léon Westerd from the Laboratory of Entomology, Wageningen University and Research Centre, for providing a constant supply of Pieris brassicae larvae, Piet de Goede for help with birch branch sampling, Timur Durmaz and Michelle Nijenhuis for their help in the aviaries and Floor Petit and Marylou Aaldering for animal care. We thank two anonymous referees for useful comments and suggestions. P.J.S. thanks the Roslin Institute, University of Edinburgh, for providing access to laboratory facilities.

FOOTNOTES

  • FUNDING

    This work was supported by a Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (NWO) vici grant to M.E.V. and a Leonardo da Vinci grant to C.R.

  • © 2011.

REFERENCES

  1. ↵
    1. Ball, G. F. and
    2. Ketterson, E. D.
    (2008). Sex differences in the response to environmental cues regulating seasonal reproduction in birds. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 363, 231-246.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. ↵
    1. Barrientos, R.,
    2. Barbosa, A.,
    3. Valera, F. and
    4. Moreno, E.
    (2007). Temperature but not rainfall influences timing of breeding in a desert bird, the trumpeter finch (Bucanetes githagineus). J. Ornithol. 148, 411-416.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  3. ↵
    1. Berger, P. J.,
    2. Negus, N. C.,
    3. Sanders, E. H. and
    4. Gardner, P. D.
    (1981). Chemical triggering of reproduction in Microtus montanus. Science 214, 69-70.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. ↵
    1. Berger, P. J.,
    2. Negus, N. C. and
    3. Rowsemitt, C. N.
    (1987). Effect of 6-methoxybenzoxazolinone on sex ratio and breeding performance in Microtus montanus. Biol. Reprod. 36, 255-260.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  5. ↵
    1. Betts, M. M.
    (1955). The food of titmice in oak woodland. J. Anim. Ecol. 24, 282-323.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  6. ↵
    1. Blondel, J.,
    2. Dias, P. C.,
    3. Maistre, M. and
    4. Perret, P.
    (1993). Habitat heterogeneity and life-history variation of Mediterranean blue tits (Parus caeruleus). Auk 110, 511-520.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  7. ↵
    1. Both, C.,
    2. Artemyev, A. V.,
    3. Blaauw, B.,
    4. Cowie, R. J.,
    5. Dekhuijzen, A. J.,
    6. Eeva, T.,
    7. Enemar, A.,
    8. Gustafsson, L.,
    9. Ivankina, E. V.,
    10. Jarvinen, A.,
    11. et al
    . (2004). Large-scale geographical variation confirms that climate change causes birds to lay earlier. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 271, 1657-1662.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. ↵
    1. Bourgault, P.,
    2. Caro, S. P. and
    3. Perret, P.
    (2006). Do blue tits time their breeding based on cues obtained by consuming buds? J. Field Ornithol. 77, 399-403.
    OpenUrl
  9. ↵
    1. Bourgault, P.,
    2. Perret, P. and
    3. Lambrechts, M. M.
    (2009). Food supplementation in distinct Corsican oak habitats and the timing of egg laying by blue tits. J. Field Ornithol. 80, 127-134.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  10. ↵
    1. Bourgault, P.,
    2. Thomas, D.,
    3. Perret, P. and
    4. Blondel, J.
    (2010). Spring vegetation phenology is a robust predictor of breeding date across broad landscapes: a multi-site approach using the Corsican blue tit (Cyanistes caeruleus). Oecologia 162, 885-892.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. Buse, A. and
    2. Good, J. E. G.
    (1996). Synchronization of larval emergence in winter moth (Operophtera brumata L.) and budburst in pedunculate oak (Quercus robur L.) under simulated climate change. Ecol. Entomol. 21, 335-343.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  12. ↵
    1. Caro, S. P.,
    2. Lambrechts, M. M.,
    3. Chastel, O.,
    4. Sharp, P. J.,
    5. Thomas, D. W. and
    6. Balthazart, J.
    (2006). Simultaneous pituitary-gonadal recrudescence in two Corsican populations of male blue tits with asynchronous breeding dates. Horm. Behav. 50, 347-360.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    1. Caro, S. P.,
    2. Charmantier, A.,
    3. Lambrechts, M. M.,
    4. Blondel, J.,
    5. Balthazart, J. and
    6. Williams, T. D.
    (2009). Local adaptation of timing of reproduction: females are in the driver’s seat. Funct. Ecol. 23, 172-179.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  14. ↵
    1. Charmantier, A.,
    2. McCleery, R. H.,
    3. Cole, L. R.,
    4. Perrins, C.,
    5. Kruuk, L. E. B. and
    6. Sheldon, B. C.
    (2008). Adaptive phenotypic plasticity in response to climate change in a wild bird population. Science 320, 800-803.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. ↵
    1. Chmielewski, F. M. and
    2. Rotzer, T.
    (2001). Response of tree phenology to climate change across Europe. Agricult. Forest Meteorol. 108, 101-112.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  16. ↵
    1. Cresswell, W. and
    2. McCleery, R.
    (2003). How great tits maintain synchronization of their hatch date with food supply in response to long-term variability in temperature. J. Anim. Ecol. 72, 356-366.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  17. ↵
    1. Crick, H. Q. P.,
    2. Dudley, C. and
    3. Glue, D. E.
    (1997). Long-term trends towards earlier egg-laying by UK birds. Nature 388, 526.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  18. ↵
    1. Dawson, A.
    (2008). Control of the annual cycle in birds: endocrine constraints and plasticity in response to ecological variability. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 363, 1621-1633.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. ↵
    1. Dawson, A.,
    2. King, V. M.,
    3. Bentley, G. E. and
    4. Ball, G. F.
    (2001). Photoperiodic control of seasonality in birds. J. Biol. Rhythms 16, 365-380.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. ↵
    1. Dhondt, A. A. and
    2. Eyckerman, R.
    (1979). Temperature and date of laying by tits Parus spp. Ibis 121, 329-331.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  21. ↵
    1. Drent, P. J.,
    2. van Oers, K. and
    3. van Noordwijk, A. J.
    (2003). Realized heritability of personalities in the great tit (Parus major). Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 270, 45-51.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  22. ↵
    1. Ettinger, A. O. and
    2. King, J. R.
    (1981). Consumption of green wheat enhances photostimulated ovarian growth in white-crowned sparrows. Auk 98, 832-834.
    OpenUrl
  23. ↵
    1. Farner, D. S.
    (1985). Annual rhythms. Annu. Rev. Physiol. 47, 65-82.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  24. ↵
    1. Follett, B. K.,
    2. Foster, R. G. and
    3. Nichols, T. J.
    (1985). Photoperiodism in birds. Ciba Found. Symp. 117, 93-105.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  25. ↵
    1. Grant, P. R.
    (1999). Ecology and Evolution of Darwin’s Finches. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  26. ↵
    1. Griffiths, R.,
    2. Double, M. C.,
    3. Orr, K. and
    4. Dawson, R. J. G.
    (1998). A DNA test to sex most birds. Mol. Ecol. 7, 1071-1075.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  27. ↵
    1. Hahn, T. P.
    (1998). Reproductive seasonality in an opportunistic breeder, the red crossbill, Loxia curvirostra. Ecology 79, 2365-2375.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  28. ↵
    1. Hahn, T. P.,
    2. Boswell, T.,
    3. Wingfield, J. C. and
    4. Ball, G. F.
    (1997). Temporal flexibility in avian reproduction. Patterns and mechanisms. In Current Ornithology, Vol. 14 (ed. Nolau, V., Ketterson, E. D. and Thompson, C. F.), pp. 39-80. New York: Plenum.
    OpenUrl
  29. ↵
    1. Hahn, T. P.,
    2. Cornelius, J. M.,
    3. Sewall, K. B.,
    4. Kelsey, T. R.,
    5. Hau, M. and
    6. Perfito, N.
    (2008). Environmental regulation of annual schedules in opportunistically-breeding songbirds: adaptive specializations or variations on a theme of white-crowned sparrow? Gen. Comp. Endocrinol. 157, 217-226.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  30. ↵
    1. Harrison, T. J. E.,
    2. Smith, J. A.,
    3. Martin, G. R.,
    4. Chamberlain, D. E.,
    5. Bearhop, S.,
    6. Robb, G. N. and
    7. Reynolds, S. J.
    (2010). Does food supplementation really enhance productivity of breeding birds? Oecologia 164, 311-320.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  31. ↵
    1. Hau, M.,
    2. Wikelski, M.,
    3. Gwinner, H. and
    4. Gwinner, E.
    (2004). Timing of reproduction in a Darwin’s finch: temporal opportunism under spatial constraints. Oikos 106, 489-500.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  32. ↵
    1. Jones, P. J.
    (1972). Food as a proximate factor regulating the breeding season of the great tit (Parus major). Proc. Int. Ornithol. Congr. 15, 657-658.
    OpenUrl
  33. ↵
    1. Kluyver, H. N.
    (1952). Notes on body weight and time of breeding in the great tit, Parus m. major L. Ardea 40, 123-141.
    OpenUrl
  34. ↵
    1. Körner, C. and
    2. Basler, D.
    (2010). Warming, photoperiods, and tree phenology response. Science 329, 278.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  35. ↵
    1. Ligon, J. D.
    (1974). Green cones of the pinon pine stimulate late summer breeding in the pinon jay. Nature 250, 80-81.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  36. ↵
    1. Ligon, J. D.
    (1978). Reproductive interdependence of pinon jays and pinon pines. Ecol. Monogr. 48, 111-126.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  37. ↵
    1. Meddle, S. L. and
    2. Follett, B. K.
    (1995). Photoperiodic activation of fos-like immunoreactive protein in neurones within the tuberal hypothalamus of Japanese quail. J. Comp. Physiol. A Sens. Neural Behav. Physiol. 176, 79-89.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  38. ↵
    1. Meijer, T. and
    2. Drent, R.
    (1999). Re-examination of the capital and income dichotomy in breeding birds. Ibis 141, 399-414.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  39. ↵
    1. Meijer, T.,
    2. Nienaber, U.,
    3. Langer, U. and
    4. Trillmich, F.
    (1999). Temperature and timing of egg-laying of European Starlings. Condor 101, 124-132.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  40. ↵
    1. Møller, A. P.
    (2008). Climate change and micro-geographic variation in laying date. Oecologia 155, 845-857.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  41. ↵
    1. Moore, I. T.,
    2. Bentley, G. E.,
    3. Wotus, C. and
    4. Wingfield, J. C.
    (2006). Photoperiod-independent changes in immunoreactive brain gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) in a free-living, tropical bird. Brain Behav. Evol. 68, 37-44.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  42. ↵
    1. Nager, R. G. and
    2. van Noordwijk, A. J.
    (1995). Proximate and ultimate aspects of phenotypic plasticity in timing of great tit breeding in a heterogeneous environment. Am. Nat. 146, 454-474.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  43. ↵
    1. Nilsson, J. A. and
    2. Källander, H.
    (2006). Leafing phenology and timing of egg laying in great tits Parus major and blue tits P. caeruleus. J. Avian Biol. 37, 357-363.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  44. ↵
    1. Perfito, N.,
    2. Tramontin, A. D.,
    3. Meddle, S.,
    4. Sharp, P.,
    5. Afik, D.,
    6. Gee, J.,
    7. Ishii, S.,
    8. Kikuchi, M. and
    9. Wingfield, J. C.
    (2004). Reproductive development according to elevation in a seasonally breeding male songbird. Oecologia 140, 201-210.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  45. ↵
    1. Perfito, N.,
    2. Meddle, S. L.,
    3. Tramontin, A. D.,
    4. Sharp, P. J. and
    5. Wingfield, J. C.
    (2005). Seasonal gonadal recrudescence in song sparrows: response to temperature cues. Gen. Comp. Endocrinol. 143, 121-128.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  46. ↵
    1. Perfito, N.,
    2. Kwong, J. M. Y.,
    3. Bentley, G. E. and
    4. Hau, M.
    (2008). Cue hierarchies and testicular development: is food a more potent stimulus than day length in an opportunistic breeder (Taeniopygia g. guttata)? Horm. Behav. 53, 567-572.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  47. ↵
    1. Perrins, C. M.
    (1965). Population fluctuations and clutch-size in the great tit, Parus major L. J. Anim. Ecol. 34, 601-647.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  48. ↵
    1. Perrins, C. M.
    (1970). The timing of birds’ breeding season. Ibis 112, 242-255.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  49. ↵
    1. Perrins, C. M. and
    2. McCleery, R. H.
    (1989). Laying dates and clutch size in the great tit. Wilson Bull. 101, 236-253.
    OpenUrl
  50. ↵
    R Development Core Team (2009). R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna. Available at: http://www.R-project.org.
  51. ↵
    1. Saladin, V.,
    2. Bonfils, D.,
    3. Binz, T. and
    4. Richner, H.
    (2003). Isolation and characterization of 16 microsatellite loci in the great tit Parus major. Mol. Ecol. Notes 3, 520-522.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  52. ↵
    1. Salvante, K. G.,
    2. Walzem, R. L. and
    3. Williams, T. D.
    (2007). What comes first, the zebra finch or the egg: temperature-dependent reproductive, physiological and behavioural plasticity in egg-laying zebra finches. J. Exp. Biol. 210, 1325-1334.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  53. ↵
    1. Schaper, S. V.,
    2. Dawson, A.,
    3. Sharp, P. J.,
    4. Gienapp, P.,
    5. Caro, S. P. and
    6. Visser, M. E.
    (2011). Increasing temperature, not mean temperature, is a cue for avian timing of reproduction. Am. Nat. in press.
  54. ↵
    1. Scheuerlein, A. and
    2. Gwinner, E.
    (2002). Is food availability a circannual Zeitgeber in tropical birds? A field experiment on stonechats in tropical Africa. J. Biol. Rhythms 17, 171-180.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  55. ↵
    1. Schmidt, K. H.
    (1984). Frühjahrstemperaturen und Legebeginn bei Meisen (Parus). J. Ornithol. 125, 321-331.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  56. ↵
    1. Sharp, P. J.
    (2005). Photoperiodic regulation of seasonal breeding in birds. Trends Comp. Endocrinol. Neurobiol. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1040, 189-199.
    OpenUrl
  57. ↵
    1. Sharp, P. J.,
    2. Dunn, I. C. and
    3. Talbot, R. T.
    (1987). Sex-differences in the LH responses to chicken LHRH-I and LHRH-II in the domestic fowl. J. Endocrinol. 115, 323-331.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  58. ↵
    1. Sheldon, B. C.,
    2. Kruuk, L. E. B. and
    3. Merilä, J.
    (2003). Natural selection and inheritance of breeding time and clutch size in the collared flycatcher. Evolution 57, 406-420.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  59. ↵
    1. Silverin, B.,
    2. Massa, R. and
    3. Stokkan, K. A.
    (1993). Photoperiodic adaptation to breeding at different latitudes in Great Tits. Gen. Comp. Endocrinol. 90, 14-22.
    OpenUrl
  60. ↵
    1. Slagsvold, T.
    (1976). Annual and geographical variation in the time of breeding of the Great tit Parus major and the Pied flycatcher Ficedula hypoleuca in relation to environmental phenology and spring temperature. Ornis Scand. 7, 127-145.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  61. ↵
    1. Small, T. W.,
    2. Sharp, P. J.,
    3. Bentley, G. E.,
    4. Millar, R. P.,
    5. Tsutsui, K.,
    6. Mura, E. and
    7. Deviche, P.
    (2008). Photoperiod-independent hypothalamic regulation of luteinizing hormone secretion in a free-living sonoran desert bird, the Rufous-winged Sparrow (Aimophila carpalis). Brain Behav. Evol. 71, 127-142.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  62. ↵
    1. Sokolov, L. V.
    (2000). Spring ambient temperature as an important factor controlling timing of arrival, breeding, post-fledging dispersal and breeding success of Pied Flycatchers Ficedula hypoleuca in Eastern Baltic. Avian Ecol. Behav. 5, 79-104.
    OpenUrl
  63. ↵
    1. Stevenson, I. R. and
    2. Bryant, D. M.
    (2000). Climate change and constraints on breeding. Nature 406, 366-367.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  64. ↵
    1. Stevenson, T. J.,
    2. Bentley, G. E.,
    3. Ubuka, T.,
    4. Arckens, L.,
    5. Hampson, E. and
    6. MacDougall-Shackleton, S. A.
    (2008). Effects of social cues on GnRH-I, GnRH-II, and reproductive physiology in female house sparrows (Passer domesticus). Gen. Comp. Endocrinol. 156, 385-394.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  65. ↵
    1. Thomas, D. W.,
    2. Blondel, J.,
    3. Perret, P.,
    4. Lambrechts, M. M. and
    5. Speakman, J. R.
    (2001). Energetic and fitness costs of mismatching resource supply and demand in seasonally breeding birds. Science 291, 2598-2600.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  66. ↵
    1. van Balen, J. H.
    (1973). A comparative study of the breeding ecology of the great tit (Parus major) in different habitats. Ardea 61, 1-93.
    OpenUrlWeb of Science
  67. ↵
    1. van Dongen, S.,
    2. Backeljau, T.,
    3. Matthysen, E. and
    4. Dhondt, A. A.
    (1997). Synchronization of hatching date with budburst of individual host trees (Quercus robur) in the winter moth (Operophtera brumata) and its fitness consequences. J. Anim. Ecol. 66, 113-121.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  68. ↵
    1. van Noordwijk, A. J.,
    2. McCleery, R. H. and
    3. Perrins, C. M.
    (1995). Selection of timing of great tit (Parus major) breeding in relation to caterpillar growth and temperature. J. Anim. Ecol. 64, 451-458.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  69. ↵
    1. Visser, M. E. and
    2. Lambrechts, M. M.
    (1999). Information constraints in the timing of reproduction in temperate zone birds: great and blue tits. In Proceeding of the 22th International Ornithology Congress, Durban (ed. Adams, N. J. and Slotow, R. H.), pp. 249-264. Johannesburg: BirdLife South Africa.
  70. ↵
    1. Visser, M. E.,
    2. van Noordwijk, A. J.,
    3. Tinbergen, J. M. and
    4. Lessells, C. M.
    (1998). Warmer springs lead to mistimed reproduction in great tits (Parus major). Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 265, 1867-1870.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  71. ↵
    1. Visser, M. E.,
    2. Silverin, B.,
    3. Lambrechts, M. M. and
    4. Tinbergen, J. M.
    (2002). No evidence for tree phenology as a cue for the timing of reproduction in tits Parus spp. Avian Sci. 2, 77-86.
    OpenUrl
  72. ↵
    1. Visser, M. E.,
    2. Adriaensen, F.,
    3. van Balen, J. H.,
    4. Blondel, J.,
    5. Dhondt, A. A.,
    6. van Dongen, S.,
    7. du Feu, C.,
    8. Ivankina, E. V.,
    9. Kerimov, A. B.,
    10. de Laet, J.,
    11. et al
    . (2003). Variable responses to large-scale climate change in European Parus populations. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 270, 367-372.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  73. ↵
    1. Visser, M. E.,
    2. Holleman, L. J. M. and
    3. Caro, S. P.
    (2009). Temperature has a causal effect on avian timing of reproduction. Proc. R. Soc. B 276, 2323-2331.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  74. ↵
    1. Visser, M. E.,
    2. Caro, S. P.,
    3. van Oers, K.,
    4. Schaper, S. V. and
    5. Helm, B.
    (2010). Phenology, seasonal timing and circannual rhythms: towards a unified framework. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 365, 3113-3127.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  75. ↵
    1. Visser, M. E.,
    2. Schaper, S. V.,
    3. Holleman, L. J. M.,
    4. Dawson, A.,
    5. Sharp, P.,
    6. Gienapp, P. and
    7. Caro, S. P.
    (2011). Genetic variation in cue sensitivity involved in avian timing of reproduction. Funct. Ecol. 25, 868-877.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  76. ↵
    1. Voigt, C.,
    2. Goymann, W. and
    3. Leitner, S.
    (2007). Green matters! Growing vegetation stimulates breeding under short-day conditions in wild canaries (Serinus canaria). J. Biol. Rhythms 22, 554-557.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  77. ↵
    1. Wikelski, M.,
    2. Hau, M. and
    3. Wingfield, J. C.
    (2000). Seasonality of reproduction in a neotropical rain forest bird. Ecology 81, 2458-2472.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  78. ↵
    1. Wingfield, J. C.,
    2. Hahn, T. P.,
    3. Levin, R. and
    4. Honey, P.
    (1992). Environmental predictability and control of gonadal cycles in birds. J. Exp. Zool. 261, 214-231.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  79. ↵
    1. Wingfield, J. C.,
    2. Hahn, T. P.,
    3. Wada, M. and
    4. Schoech, S. J.
    (1997). Effects of day length and temperature on gonadal development, body mass, and fat depots in white-crowned sparrows, Zonotrichia leucophrys pugetensis. Gen. Comp. Endocrinol. 107, 44-62.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  80. ↵
    1. Wingfield, J. C.,
    2. Hahn, T. P.,
    3. Maney, D. L.,
    4. Schoech, S. J.,
    5. Wada, M. and
    6. Morton, M. L.
    (2003). Effects of temperature on photoperiodically induced reproductive development, circulating plasma luteinizing hormone and thyroid hormones, body mass, fat deposition and molt in mountain white-crowned sparrows, Zonotrichia leucophrys oriantha. Gen. Comp. Endocrinol. 131, 143-158.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  81. ↵
    1. Zann, R. A.,
    2. Morton, S. R.,
    3. Jones, K. R. and
    4. Burley, N. T.
    (1995). The timing of breeding by Zebra finches in relation to rainfall in Central Australia. Emu 95, 208-222.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
Previous ArticleNext Article
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

This Issue

 Download PDF

Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Experimental Biology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Spring phenology does not affect timing of reproduction in the great tit (Parus major)
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Experimental Biology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Experimental Biology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Research Article
Spring phenology does not affect timing of reproduction in the great tit (Parus major)
Sonja V. Schaper, Carolina Rueda, Peter J. Sharp, Alistair Dawson, Marcel E. Visser
Journal of Experimental Biology 2011 214: 3664-3671; doi: 10.1242/jeb.059543
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Research Article
Spring phenology does not affect timing of reproduction in the great tit (Parus major)
Sonja V. Schaper, Carolina Rueda, Peter J. Sharp, Alistair Dawson, Marcel E. Visser
Journal of Experimental Biology 2011 214: 3664-3671; doi: 10.1242/jeb.059543

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Alerts

Please log in to add an alert for this article.

Sign in to email alerts with your email address

Article navigation

  • Top
  • Article
    • SUMMARY
    • INTRODUCTION
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & tables
  • Info & metrics
  • PDF

Related articles

Cited by...

More in this TOC section

  • Maternal provisioning and fluctuating thermal regimes enhance immune response in a reptile with temperature-dependent sex determination
  • Cutaneous tactile sensitivity before and after tail loss and regeneration in the leopard gecko (Eublepharis macularius)
  • Intersection of motor volumes predicts the outcome of ambush predation of larval zebrafish
Show more RESEARCH ARTICLES

Similar articles

Other journals from The Company of Biologists

Development

Journal of Cell Science

Disease Models & Mechanisms

Biology Open

Advertisement

Welcome to JEB’s new Editor Monica Daley

We are pleased to welcome Monica Daley to JEB’s Editorial team. Monica has had a long association with JEB before taking up her new role, overseeing peer review of neuromuscular physiology, terrestrial biomechanics and integrative physiology of locomotion.


In the field with Robyn Hetem

Continuing our fieldwork series, Robyn Hetem reflects on working with species ranging from aardvark to zebra, and the impact COVID-19 has had on fieldwork.


Read & Publish participation continues to grow

“It is particularly encouraging for early career researchers, as it allows them to display their research globally without the need to find costs to cover the open access option.”

Professor Fernando Montealegre-Z (University of Lincoln) shares his experience of publishing Open Access as part of our growing Read & Publish initiative. We now have over 150 institutions in 15 countries and four library consortia taking part – find out more and view our full list of participating institutions.


Nocturnal reef residents have deep-sea-like eyes

Fanny de Busserolles and colleagues from The University of Queensland have discovered that the eyes of nocturnal reef fish have multibank retinas, layers of photoreceptors, similar to the eyes of deep-sea fish that live in dim light conditions.


Mechanisms underlying gut microbiota–host interactions in insects

In their Review, Konstantin Schmidt and Philipp Engel summarise recent findings about the mechanisms involved in gut colonisation and the provisioning of beneficial effects in gut microbiota–insect symbiosis.

Articles

  • Accepted manuscripts
  • Issue in progress
  • Latest complete issue
  • Issue archive
  • Archive by article type
  • Special issues
  • Subject collections
  • Interviews
  • Sign up for alerts

About us

  • About JEB
  • Editors and Board
  • Editor biographies
  • Travelling Fellowships
  • Grants and funding
  • Journal Meetings
  • Workshops
  • The Company of Biologists
  • Journal news

For Authors

  • Submit a manuscript
  • Aims and scope
  • Presubmission enquiries
  • Article types
  • Manuscript preparation
  • Cover suggestions
  • Editorial process
  • Promoting your paper
  • Open Access
  • Outstanding paper prize
  • Biology Open transfer

Journal Info

  • Journal policies
  • Rights and permissions
  • Media policies
  • Reviewer guide
  • Sign up for alerts

Contact

  • Contact JEB
  • Subscriptions
  • Advertising
  • Feedback

 Twitter   YouTube   LinkedIn

© 2021   The Company of Biologists Ltd   Registered Charity 277992