Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Accepted manuscripts
    • Issue in progress
    • Latest complete issue
    • Issue archive
    • Archive by article type
    • Special issues
    • Subject collections
    • Interviews
    • Sign up for alerts
  • About us
    • About JEB
    • Editors and Board
    • Editor biographies
    • Travelling Fellowships
    • Grants and funding
    • Journal Meetings
    • Workshops
    • The Company of Biologists
    • Journal news
  • For authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Aims and scope
    • Presubmission enquiries
    • Article types
    • Manuscript preparation
    • Cover suggestions
    • Editorial process
    • Promoting your paper
    • Open Access
    • Outstanding paper prize
    • Biology Open transfer
  • Journal info
    • Journal policies
    • Rights and permissions
    • Media policies
    • Reviewer guide
    • Sign up for alerts
  • Contacts
    • Contact JEB
    • Subscriptions
    • Advertising
    • Feedback
    • Institutional usage stats (logged-in users only)
  • COB
    • About The Company of Biologists
    • Development
    • Journal of Cell Science
    • Journal of Experimental Biology
    • Disease Models & Mechanisms
    • Biology Open

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Experimental Biology
  • COB
    • About The Company of Biologists
    • Development
    • Journal of Cell Science
    • Journal of Experimental Biology
    • Disease Models & Mechanisms
    • Biology Open

supporting biologistsinspiring biology

Journal of Experimental Biology

  • Log in
Advanced search

RSS  Twitter  Facebook  YouTube  

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Accepted manuscripts
    • Issue in progress
    • Latest complete issue
    • Issue archive
    • Archive by article type
    • Special issues
    • Subject collections
    • Interviews
    • Sign up for alerts
  • About us
    • About JEB
    • Editors and Board
    • Editor biographies
    • Travelling Fellowships
    • Grants and funding
    • Journal Meetings
    • Workshops
    • The Company of Biologists
    • Journal news
  • For authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Aims and scope
    • Presubmission enquiries
    • Article types
    • Manuscript preparation
    • Cover suggestions
    • Editorial process
    • Promoting your paper
    • Open Access
    • Outstanding paper prize
    • Biology Open transfer
  • Journal info
    • Journal policies
    • Rights and permissions
    • Media policies
    • Reviewer guide
    • Sign up for alerts
  • Contacts
    • Contact JEB
    • Subscriptions
    • Advertising
    • Feedback
    • Institutional usage stats (logged-in users only)
Inside JEB
PENGUINS PLAN DIVES
Kathryn Knight
Journal of Experimental Biology 2011 214: i doi: 10.1242/jeb.063255
Kathryn Knight
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & tables
  • Info & metrics
  • PDF
Loading
Figure1
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint

Diving seems effortless for penguins. Plunging beneath the surface, emperor penguins regularly remain submerged for up to 12 min by carefully managing their oxygen reserves. Paul Ponganis from the Scripps Institution of Oceanography explains that emperors diving from isolated ice holes fuel the dive aerobically for the first 5.6 min and supplement the remainder of the dive with anaerobic metabolism. However, when Ponganis compared the aerobic dive limit for ice hole diving penguins with estimates of the aerobic dive limit for freely foraging animals, it appeared that the free ranging birds were able to sustain the aerobic portion of a dive for up to 8 min. What were the free ranging birds doing to eke out their oxygen supply for an additional 2.4 min? Ponganis and an international team of collaborators travelled to the Antarctic to find out how the birds extend their aerobic dive limit (p. 2854).

Attaching swim speed/acceleration data loggers to penguins diving in open water and through an isolated ice hole, Katsufumi Sato, Greg Marshall, Gerald Kooyman and Ponganis allowed the free ranging birds to venture off foraging for a couple of weeks while the ice hole divers dipped in and out of the water. `From the acceleration data you can see a surge every time the animal strokes with its wings, so you can count the number of peaks per dive to get the stroke rate pattern,' explains Ponganis. He adds, `We expected that stroke rate would be lower in dives at sea and because of that there would be less muscle work and less oxygen consumption and that would explain how these birds dive as long and as frequently as they do.'

However, the freely diving birds were stroking faster. The birds were not extending their aerobic dive limit by beating their wings more slowly to conserve oxygen. And when the team compared the length of time spent by birds at the surface recovering from dives, the free divers spent no more time at the surface than the ice-hole divers. `Then we became interested in looking at the diving air volume, how much air they take down with them, because it is a significant proportion of the oxygen store,' explains Ponganis.

`Knowing the swim speed, depth and body angle during a penguin's passive glide to the surface at the end of a dive, we can make calculations – based on a buoyancy model developed by Katsu Sato – as to how much air is in the respiratory system,' says Ponganis. Assuming that the penguins did not exhale while submerged, the team found that the penguins carried more air as they extended their dives down to 300 m. The penguins seemed to anticipate how deep they would dive and adjusted the amount of air they carried down accordingly.

However, penguins that dived between 400 and 500 m appeared to be carrying less air than the birds that only dived to 300 m. `They probably exhaled prior to the final segment of the dive and that is why we were getting the low volumes, and we are trying to pursue that,' Pongains says.

Most amazingly, the team recorded one dive where an emperor penguin remained submerged for a record breaking 27.6 m. According to Ponganis, the accelerometery data show that after it emerged from the water the penguin just lay on the ice for 6 min before it stood, took another 20 min before it started walking and then waited a further 8.4 h before it ventured back into the water. `This animal was exhausted,' says Ponganis, who suspects that the dive was extended when the pack ice shifted above the penguin's head, blocking its escape route.

  • © 2011.

References

    1. Sato, K.,
    2. Shiomi, K.,
    3. Marshall, G.,
    4. Kooyman, G. L. and
    5. Ponganis, P. J.
    (2011). Stroke rates and diving air volumes of emperor penguins: implications for dive performance. J. Exp. Biol. 214, 2854-2863.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
Previous ArticleNext Article
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

This Issue

 Download PDF

Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Experimental Biology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
PENGUINS PLAN DIVES
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Experimental Biology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Experimental Biology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Inside JEB
PENGUINS PLAN DIVES
Kathryn Knight
Journal of Experimental Biology 2011 214: i doi: 10.1242/jeb.063255
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Inside JEB
PENGUINS PLAN DIVES
Kathryn Knight
Journal of Experimental Biology 2011 214: i doi: 10.1242/jeb.063255

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Alerts

Please log in to add an alert for this article.

Sign in to email alerts with your email address

Article navigation

  • Top
  • Article
    • References
  • Figures & tables
  • Info & metrics
  • PDF

Related articles

Cited by...

More in this TOC section

  • Wing damage no obstacle for hummingbird hawkmoths
  • Making a difference: the role of comparative biology in tackling climate change
  • Lifestyle difference gives female yellow-billed hornbills the edge
Show more INSIDE JEB

Similar articles

Other journals from The Company of Biologists

Development

Journal of Cell Science

Disease Models & Mechanisms

Biology Open

Advertisement

Welcome to JEB’s new Editor Monica Daley

We are pleased to welcome Monica Daley to JEB’s Editorial team. Monica has had a long association with JEB before taking up her new role, overseeing peer review of neuromuscular physiology, terrestrial biomechanics and integrative physiology of locomotion.


In the field with Robyn Hetem

Continuing our fieldwork series, Robyn Hetem reflects on working with species ranging from aardvark to zebra, and the impact COVID-19 has had on fieldwork.


Read & Publish participation continues to grow

“It is particularly encouraging for early career researchers, as it allows them to display their research globally without the need to find costs to cover the open access option.”

Professor Fernando Montealegre-Z (University of Lincoln) shares his experience of publishing Open Access as part of our growing Read & Publish initiative. We now have over 150 institutions in 15 countries and four library consortia taking part – find out more and view our full list of participating institutions.


Nocturnal reef residents have deep-sea-like eyes

Fanny de Busserolles and colleagues from The University of Queensland have discovered that the eyes of nocturnal reef fish have multibank retinas, layers of photoreceptors, similar to the eyes of deep-sea fish that live in dim light conditions.


Mechanisms underlying gut microbiota–host interactions in insects

In their Review, Konstantin Schmidt and Philipp Engel summarise recent findings about the mechanisms involved in gut colonisation and the provisioning of beneficial effects in gut microbiota–insect symbiosis.

Articles

  • Accepted manuscripts
  • Issue in progress
  • Latest complete issue
  • Issue archive
  • Archive by article type
  • Special issues
  • Subject collections
  • Interviews
  • Sign up for alerts

About us

  • About JEB
  • Editors and Board
  • Editor biographies
  • Travelling Fellowships
  • Grants and funding
  • Journal Meetings
  • Workshops
  • The Company of Biologists
  • Journal news

For Authors

  • Submit a manuscript
  • Aims and scope
  • Presubmission enquiries
  • Article types
  • Manuscript preparation
  • Cover suggestions
  • Editorial process
  • Promoting your paper
  • Open Access
  • Outstanding paper prize
  • Biology Open transfer

Journal Info

  • Journal policies
  • Rights and permissions
  • Media policies
  • Reviewer guide
  • Sign up for alerts

Contact

  • Contact JEB
  • Subscriptions
  • Advertising
  • Feedback

 Twitter   YouTube   LinkedIn

© 2021   The Company of Biologists Ltd   Registered Charity 277992