Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Accepted manuscripts
    • Issue in progress
    • Latest complete issue
    • Issue archive
    • Archive by article type
    • Special issues
    • Subject collections
    • Interviews
    • Sign up for alerts
  • About us
    • About JEB
    • Editors and Board
    • Editor biographies
    • Travelling Fellowships
    • Grants and funding
    • Journal Meetings
    • Workshops
    • The Company of Biologists
    • Journal news
  • For authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Aims and scope
    • Presubmission enquiries
    • Article types
    • Manuscript preparation
    • Cover suggestions
    • Editorial process
    • Promoting your paper
    • Open Access
    • Outstanding paper prize
    • Biology Open transfer
  • Journal info
    • Journal policies
    • Rights and permissions
    • Media policies
    • Reviewer guide
    • Sign up for alerts
  • Contacts
    • Contact JEB
    • Subscriptions
    • Advertising
    • Feedback
    • For library administrators
  • COB
    • About The Company of Biologists
    • Development
    • Journal of Cell Science
    • Journal of Experimental Biology
    • Disease Models & Mechanisms
    • Biology Open

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Experimental Biology
  • COB
    • About The Company of Biologists
    • Development
    • Journal of Cell Science
    • Journal of Experimental Biology
    • Disease Models & Mechanisms
    • Biology Open

supporting biologistsinspiring biology

Journal of Experimental Biology

  • Log in
Advanced search

RSS  Twitter  Facebook  YouTube  

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Accepted manuscripts
    • Issue in progress
    • Latest complete issue
    • Issue archive
    • Archive by article type
    • Special issues
    • Subject collections
    • Interviews
    • Sign up for alerts
  • About us
    • About JEB
    • Editors and Board
    • Editor biographies
    • Travelling Fellowships
    • Grants and funding
    • Journal Meetings
    • Workshops
    • The Company of Biologists
    • Journal news
  • For authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Aims and scope
    • Presubmission enquiries
    • Article types
    • Manuscript preparation
    • Cover suggestions
    • Editorial process
    • Promoting your paper
    • Open Access
    • Outstanding paper prize
    • Biology Open transfer
  • Journal info
    • Journal policies
    • Rights and permissions
    • Media policies
    • Reviewer guide
    • Sign up for alerts
  • Contacts
    • Contact JEB
    • Subscriptions
    • Advertising
    • Feedback
    • For library administrators
Research Article
Physiological mechanisms underlying a trade-off between growth rate and tolerance of feed deprivation in the European sea bass (Dicentrarchus labrax)
A. Dupont-Prinet, B. Chatain, L. Grima, M. Vandeputte, G. Claireaux, D. J. McKenzie
Journal of Experimental Biology 2010 213: 1143-1152; doi: 10.1242/jeb.037812
A. Dupont-Prinet
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
B. Chatain
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
L. Grima
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
M. Vandeputte
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
G. Claireaux
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
D. J. McKenzie
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: david.mckenzie@univ-montp2.fr
  • Article
  • Figures & tables
  • Info & metrics
  • PDF
Loading

SUMMARY

The specific growth rate (SGR) of a cohort of 2000 tagged juvenile European sea bass was measured in a common tank, during two sequential cycles comprising three-weeks feed deprivation followed by three-weeks ad libitum re-feeding. After correction for initial size at age as fork length, there was a direct correlation between negative SGR (rate of mass loss) during feed deprivation and positive SGR (rate of compensatory growth) during re-feeding (Spearman rank correlation R=0.388, P=0.000002). Following a period of rearing under standard culture conditions, individuals representing ‘high growth’ phenotypes (GP) and ‘high tolerance of feed deprivation’ phenotypes (DP) were selected from either end of the SGR spectrum. Static and swimming respirometry could not demonstrate lower routine or standard metabolic rate in DP to account for greater tolerance of feed deprivation. Increased rates of compensatory growth in GP were not linked to greater maximum metabolic rate, aerobic metabolic scope or maximum cardiac performance than DP. When fed a standard ration, however, GP completed the specific dynamic action (SDA) response significantly faster than DP. Therefore, higher growth rate in GP was linked to greater capacity to process food. There was no difference in SDA coefficient, an indicator of energetic efficiency. The results indicate that individual variation in growth rate in sea bass reflects, in part, a trade-off against tolerance of food deprivation. The two phenotypes represented the opposing ends of a spectrum. The GP aims to exploit available resources and grow as rapidly as possible but at a cost of physiological and/or behavioural attributes, which lead to increased energy dissipation when food is not available. An opposing strategy, exemplified by DP, is less ‘boom and bust’, with a lower physiological capacity to exploit resources but which is less costly to sustain during periods of food deprivation.

  • LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS

    AS
    aerobic scope of exercise
    DP
    deprivation phenotypes
    fH
    heart rate
    GP
    growth phenotypes
    IMR
    immobile metabolic rate
    MMR
    maximum metabolic rate
    Embedded Image
    metabolic rate (rate of O2 consumption)
    Embedded Image
    peak Embedded Image during the SDA response
    Embedded Image
    cardiac output
    RMR
    routine metabolic rate
    SDA
    specific dynamic action
    SGR
    specific growth rate
    SMR
    standard metabolic rate
    Tpeak
    time to Embedded Image during the SDA response
    Ucrit
    critical swimming speed
    VS
    stroke volume
    • © 2010.
    View Full Text
    Previous ArticleNext Article
    Back to top
    Previous ArticleNext Article

    This Issue

     Download PDF

    Email

    Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Experimental Biology.

    NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

    Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
    Physiological mechanisms underlying a trade-off between growth rate and tolerance of feed deprivation in the European sea bass (Dicentrarchus labrax)
    (Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Experimental Biology
    (Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Experimental Biology web site.
    CAPTCHA
    This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
    Share
    Research Article
    Physiological mechanisms underlying a trade-off between growth rate and tolerance of feed deprivation in the European sea bass (Dicentrarchus labrax)
    A. Dupont-Prinet, B. Chatain, L. Grima, M. Vandeputte, G. Claireaux, D. J. McKenzie
    Journal of Experimental Biology 2010 213: 1143-1152; doi: 10.1242/jeb.037812
    del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
    Citation Tools
    Research Article
    Physiological mechanisms underlying a trade-off between growth rate and tolerance of feed deprivation in the European sea bass (Dicentrarchus labrax)
    A. Dupont-Prinet, B. Chatain, L. Grima, M. Vandeputte, G. Claireaux, D. J. McKenzie
    Journal of Experimental Biology 2010 213: 1143-1152; doi: 10.1242/jeb.037812

    Citation Manager Formats

    • BibTeX
    • Bookends
    • EasyBib
    • EndNote (tagged)
    • EndNote 8 (xml)
    • Medlars
    • Mendeley
    • Papers
    • RefWorks Tagged
    • Ref Manager
    • RIS
    • Zotero
    Alerts

    Please log in to add an alert for this article.

    Sign in to email alerts with your email address

    Article navigation

    • Top
    • Article
      • SUMMARY
      • INTRODUCTION
      • MATERIALS AND METHODS
      • RESULTS
      • DISCUSSION
      • CONCLUSIONS
      • ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
      • LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS
      • REFERENCES
    • Figures & tables
    • Info & metrics
    • PDF

    Related articles

    Cited by...

    More in this TOC section

    • Nest substrate and tool shape significantly affect the mechanics and energy requirements of avian eggshell puncture
    • Jaw kinematics and tongue protraction-retraction during Chewing and drinking in the pig
    • Early developmental stages of native populations of Ciona intestinalis under increased temperature are affected by local habitat history
    Show more RESEARCH ARTICLES

    Similar articles

    Other journals from The Company of Biologists

    Development

    Journal of Cell Science

    Disease Models & Mechanisms

    Biology Open

    Advertisement

    Predicting the Future: Species Survival in a Changing World

    Read our new special issue exploring the significant role of experimental biology in assessing and predicting the susceptibility or resilience of species to future, human-induced environmental change.


    Adam Hardy wins the 2020 Journal of Experimental Biology Outstanding Paper Prize

    Congratulations to winner Adam Hardy for his work showing that goby fins are as touch sensitive as primate fingertips. Read Adam’s paper and find out more about the 12 papers nominated for the award.


    Stark trade-offs and elegant solutions in arthropod visual systems

    Many elegant eye specializations that evolved in response to visual challenges continue to be discovered. A new Review by Meece et al. summarises exciting solutions evolved by insects and other arthropods in response to specific visual challenges.


    Head bobbing gives pigeons a sense of perspective

    Pigeons might look goofy with their head-bobbing walk, but it turns out that the ungainly head manoeuvre allows the birds to judge distance.

    Articles

    • Accepted manuscripts
    • Issue in progress
    • Latest complete issue
    • Issue archive
    • Archive by article type
    • Special issues
    • Subject collections
    • Interviews
    • Sign up for alerts

    About us

    • About JEB
    • Editors and Board
    • Editor biographies
    • Travelling Fellowships
    • Grants and funding
    • Journal Meetings
    • Workshops
    • The Company of Biologists
    • Journal news

    For Authors

    • Submit a manuscript
    • Aims and scope
    • Presubmission enquiries
    • Article types
    • Manuscript preparation
    • Cover suggestions
    • Editorial process
    • Promoting your paper
    • Open Access
    • Outstanding paper prize
    • Biology Open transfer

    Journal Info

    • Journal policies
    • Rights and permissions
    • Media policies
    • Reviewer guide
    • Sign up for alerts

    Contact

    • Contact JEB
    • Subscriptions
    • Advertising
    • Feedback

     Twitter   YouTube   LinkedIn

    © 2021   The Company of Biologists Ltd   Registered Charity 277992