Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Accepted manuscripts
    • Issue in progress
    • Latest complete issue
    • Issue archive
    • Archive by article type
    • Special issues
    • Subject collections
    • Interviews
    • Sign up for alerts
  • About us
    • About JEB
    • Editors and Board
    • Editor biographies
    • Travelling Fellowships
    • Grants and funding
    • Journal Meetings
    • Workshops
    • The Company of Biologists
    • Journal news
  • For authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Aims and scope
    • Presubmission enquiries
    • Article types
    • Manuscript preparation
    • Cover suggestions
    • Editorial process
    • Promoting your paper
    • Open Access
    • Outstanding paper prize
    • Biology Open transfer
  • Journal info
    • Journal policies
    • Rights and permissions
    • Media policies
    • Reviewer guide
    • Sign up for alerts
  • Contacts
    • Contact JEB
    • Subscriptions
    • Advertising
    • Feedback
    • Institutional usage stats (logged-in users only)
  • COB
    • About The Company of Biologists
    • Development
    • Journal of Cell Science
    • Journal of Experimental Biology
    • Disease Models & Mechanisms
    • Biology Open

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Experimental Biology
  • COB
    • About The Company of Biologists
    • Development
    • Journal of Cell Science
    • Journal of Experimental Biology
    • Disease Models & Mechanisms
    • Biology Open

supporting biologistsinspiring biology

Journal of Experimental Biology

  • Log in
Advanced search

RSS  Twitter  Facebook  YouTube  

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Accepted manuscripts
    • Issue in progress
    • Latest complete issue
    • Issue archive
    • Archive by article type
    • Special issues
    • Subject collections
    • Interviews
    • Sign up for alerts
  • About us
    • About JEB
    • Editors and Board
    • Editor biographies
    • Travelling Fellowships
    • Grants and funding
    • Journal Meetings
    • Workshops
    • The Company of Biologists
    • Journal news
  • For authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Aims and scope
    • Presubmission enquiries
    • Article types
    • Manuscript preparation
    • Cover suggestions
    • Editorial process
    • Promoting your paper
    • Open Access
    • Outstanding paper prize
    • Biology Open transfer
  • Journal info
    • Journal policies
    • Rights and permissions
    • Media policies
    • Reviewer guide
    • Sign up for alerts
  • Contacts
    • Contact JEB
    • Subscriptions
    • Advertising
    • Feedback
    • Institutional usage stats (logged-in users only)
The adaptive evolution and processing of sensory systems
Reconstructing the ancestral butterfly eye: focus on the opsins
Adriana D. Briscoe
Journal of Experimental Biology 2008 211: 1805-1813; doi: 10.1242/jeb.013045
Adriana D. Briscoe
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & tables
  • Info & metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Tables

Figures

  • Fig. 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 1.

    Diagram of an ommatidium and pattern of ultraviolet (UV), blue (B) and long wavelength (LW) opsin mRNA in the main retina of the monarch, Danaus plexippus (modified from Sauman et al., 2005). (A) Longitudinal view of an ommatidium. In nymphalids, the photoreceptor cell bodies that contribute to the fused rhabdom are organized into two tiers, composed of the R1–8 cells (tier I) and the R9 cell (tier II). Thick black lines, Ia. and Ib., indicate the approximate level from which the tangential sections of the R1–8 cells shown to the right were taken. c, cornea; cc, crystalline cone; n, photoreceptor cell nucleus; L, lamina; M, medulla. (B) Tangential views of ommatidial subtypes. Gray, purple and orange indicate the identity of the photoreceptor cells in which specific opsin mRNA expression is shown in the panels to the right. (C) Tangential section showing specific labeling of R1 and R2 cells with a digoxigenin-labeled antisense UV opsin riboprobe. Dashed circles indicate boundaries of identical individual ommatidia to those probed for B opsin mRNA in D. Scale bar, 25 μm. (D) Tangential section showing B opsin mRNA expression in an adjacent section to that shown in C. Dashed circles indicate identical ommatidia. Three subtypes of ommatidia are evident with respect to opsin expression in R1 and R2 photoreceptor cells: B–B, B–UV, UV–UV. Scale bar, 25 μm. (E) Tangential section showing LW opsin mRNA expression in all R3–8 cells (arrows). Scale bar, 25 μm.

  • Fig. 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 2.

    Normalized absorbance spectra of butterfly visual pigments based upon the Bernard template (see Palacios et al., 1996) and wavelengths of peak absorbance (λmax) estimated from either microspectrophotometry or intracellular recordings. (A) The compound eye of the nymphalid Danaus plexippus contains three photopigments (P) with λmax values corresponding to 340 nm (gray), 435 nm (purple) and 545 nm (orange), respectively. Estimates of theλ max values of the UV (P340) and B (P435) photopigments are from electrophysiological recordings (Stalleicken et al., 2006) and for the LW (P545) photopigment, from microspectrophotometric measurements (Frentiu et al., 2007a). (B) The eye of the lycaenid Lycaena rubidus contains four photopigments: P360 (gray), P437 (purple), P500 (blue), P568 (orange). Estimates of theλ max values are from microspectrophotometric measurements (Bernard and Remington, 1991). (C) The eye of the papilionid Papilio xuthus contains five photopigments: P360, P460, P515, P530 and P575. Estimates of theλ max values are from the intracellular recordings (Arikawa, 2003). (D) The eye of the pierid Pieris rapae contains four photopigments: P360 (gray), P425 (violet), P453 (purple) and P563 (orange). Estimates of theλ max values are from intracellular recordings (Qiu and Arikawa, 2003a; Qiu and Arikawa, 2003b) (see also Wakakuwa et al., 2004; Arikawa et al., 2005).

  • Fig. 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 3.

    Phylogenies of the UV, B and LW opsin genes of each of the five butterfly families including genes corresponding to the visual pigments shown in Fig. 2. The neighbor-joining method using 1st+2nd nucleotide positions and the Tamura-Nei model of evolution was used. Numbers represent the percentage of trees in which a particular node was recovered out of 500 replicates. The moths Manduca sexta (Sphingidae) and Bombyx mori (Bombycidae) are used as outgroups. (A) UV opsin gene tree. Opsin genes encoding the UV-absorbing visual pigments in Fig. 2 are indicated by bold gray. In each of the butterfly species shown, the UV visual pigment is encoded by a single-copy gene. The full-length UV opsin cDNA of A. mormo is newly presented in this study (GenBank accession no. AY587905). (B) B opsin gene tree. Opsin genes encoding the B-absorbing visual pigments in Fig. 2 are shown in bold purple. Duplications of the B opsin gene have been observed twice in independent butterfly lineages: once in the pierid P. rapae giving rise to the violet receptor (PrV) (light purple) (Arikawa et al., 2005), and once in the lycaenid L. rubidus, giving rise to a blue–green (B2)-sensitive photopigment (BRh2; blue) (Sison-Mangus et al., 2006). (C) LW opsin gene tree. Opsin genes encoding the LW-absorbing visual pigments shown in Fig. 2 are indicated by bold orange, yellow and green. LW opsin gene duplications have occurred in three of five butterfly families independently. Besides those in Papilio, LW opsin duplicate genes have been recovered from the eye of the riodinid Apodemia mormo and from the genomic DNA of the nymphalid Hermeuptychia hermes (not shown) (Frentiu et al., 2007a). Scale bars indicate substitutions per site.

  • Fig. 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 4.

    Ommatidial subtypes found in the dorsal rim area (DRA), dorsal and ventral retina of butterflies according to opsin mRNA expression in individual R1–8 photoreceptor cells (ovals). Photoreceptor cells are color coded according to the identically colored visual pigments and opsins shown in Figs 2 and 3 that are expressed in them. Question mark indicates that opsin expression is unknown in some parts of the eyes reviewed here. Boxes indicate the UV, B and LW opsin genes and lineage-specific duplicates present in each species and are organized into columns according to membership in the UV, B or LW opsin clades shown in Fig. 2. Note: the patterns of opsin mRNA expression in the riodinid Apodemia mormo are unknown and so are not included in this scheme. Left to right: D. plexippus DRA is composed of approximately 100 ommatidia organized into two to three rows that exclusively express the UV opsin (gray) in the R1–8 cells. Both the dorsal and ventral eye contain three types of ommatidia in which the R1 and R2 cells express UV–UV, UV–B or B–B opsin mRNAs and the R5–8 cells express a LW opsin (orange) (Sauman et al., 2005). P. rapae ventral eye contains four opsins and three ommatidial subtypes in which R5–8 express one LW opsin mRNA (orange) and R1 and R2 express UV–B, UV–UV or V–V (violet) opsin mRNA (Arikawa et al., 2005). It is not yet known whether other ommatidial subtypes are present in the dorsal retina or in the DRA. L. rubidus dorsal eye contains three opsins and is sexually dimorphic with respect to their expression. In males, R5–8 exclusively expresses the B1 (purple) opsin, while in females the B1 opsin is co-expressed with the LW (orange) opsin. The R1 and R2 cells of the dorsal eye are almost entirely UV–UV, with the R1 and R2 cells of a few ommatidia expressing UV–B1 and even fewer expressing B1–B1. The ventral eye of both males and females contains one additional opsin, B2, encoded by a duplicate blue opsin gene, BRh2. The R3–8 cells all express the LW opsin and R1 and R2 all express UV–B1, UV–UV, B1–B1, UV–B2, B1–B2 or B2–B2 (Sison-Mangus et al., 2006). P. xuthus contains a dorsal eye with four opsins and three distinct ommatidial subtypes: B–B (dark purple) in R1 and R2 and PxRh2 (orange) in R3–8; UV–B in R1 and R2, PxRh2 in R3 and R4, and PxRh3 (yellow) in R5–8; UV–UV (gray) in R1 and R2, PxRh2 in R3 and R4, and co-expressed PxRh2 and PxRh3 (orange–yellow). The ventral retina contains five opsins and the same three ommatidial subtypes except PxRh1 is co-expressed with PxRh2 (green–orange) in all R3 and R4 cells in the ventral eye. Squares indicate opsin genes expressed in identically colored photoreceptor cells.

  • Fig. 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 5.

    Diagram of an ommatidium and opsin mRNA expression in the swallowtail butterfly Papilio glaucus, newly presented here. Methods used for the in situ hybridizations are as detailed previously (Briscoe et al., 2003). (A) Longitudinal view of an ommatidium. In Papilio spp., the photoreceptor cell bodies that contribute to the fused rhabdom are organized into three tiers: I, II and III. c, cornea; cc, crystalline cone; n, photoreceptor nucleus; L, lamina; M, medulla. (B) Tangential views of an ommatidium. The most distal tier (I) contains the cell bodies of the R1 and 2 and R3 and 4 cells. The proximal tier (II) contains the cell bodies of the R5–8 cells, and the basal tier (III) contains the R9 cell body. Gray indicates the identity of the photoreceptor cells in which specific opsin mRNA expression is shown in the panels to the right. (C) Digoxigenin-labeled antisense riboprobe of UV (PglRh5) indicating the expression of this opsin mRNA in the distal tier of photoreceptor cells. This opsin is homologous to the UV opsin gene of P. xuthus, PxUV, shown in Fig. 2. (D) A semi-tangential section showing double labeling of R1 and R2 cells with antisense biotin-labeled UV (PglRh5) (brown) and digoxigenin-labeled B opsin mRNA (PglRh6) (blue). The latter is homologous to the blue (B) opsin gene of P. xuthus, PxB, shown in Fig. 2. Three subtypes of ommatidia are evident: UV–UV, UV–B and B–B. (E) UV opsin expression (red) in R1 and R2 cells using a rabbit anti-PglRh5 peptide antibody generated by the author (see Lampel et al., 2005) and visualized with a Cy3-conjugated goat anti-rabbit secondary antibody. Tangential section showing opsin staining in both the rhabdom (white arrow) and cytoplasm. Two subtypes of ommatidia are shown here, UV–UV and UV–?, although all three subtypes implied by D are present elsewhere in the section. (F) Tangential section of the ventral retina showing staining of all R3 and R4 cells with a digoxigenin-labeled antisense PglRh1 riboprobe. PglRh1 is homologous to P. xuthus PxRh1 shown in Fig. 2. (G) Tangential view of an adjacent section to F of the ventral retina showing staining of all R3 and R4 cells with digoxigenin-labeled antisense PglRh2 riboprobe, and indicating co-expression of PglRh1 and PglRh2 in these cells in the ventral retina. In the dorsal eye, only PglRh2 is present in the R3 and R4 cells (data not shown). (H) Longitudinal section of the eye indicating staining of the proximal (R5–8) tier of photoreceptor cells with a digoxigenin-labeled antisense riboprobe to PglRh3. (I) Tangential section showing strong staining of the R5–8 cells (arrow) of some ommatidia with a digoxigenin-labeled anti-sense riboprobe to PglRh3. (J) Tangential section showing strong staining of the R5–8 cells (arrow) of some ommatidia with a digoxigenin-labeled antisense riboprobe to PglRh2. (K) Dissociated ommatidium in which the R9 cell (arrow), but not the adjoining R5–8 cells, is clearly stained with a digoxigenin-labeled antisense riboprobe to PglRh2. This represents one (Type I) of three ommatidial subtypes defined by Arikawa (Arikawa, 2003). (L) Dissociated ommatidium in which both the R9 cell (arrow) and the R5–8 cells are clearly stained with a digoxigenin-labeled antisense riboprobe to PglRh2. This ommatidial subtype corresponds to either the Type II or Type III subtype (Arikawa, 2003).

  • Fig. 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 6.

    Phylogeny of the butterfly families, character mapping of opsin mRNA expression patterns in individual photoreceptor cell subtypes, and proposed ancestral butterfly eye. Question mark indicates unknown opsin expression in the photoreceptor cells of the riodinid eye. (A) Character mapping of opsin mRNA expression in the R1 and R2 cells and inferred relative timing of opsin gene duplication events. Ovals indicate UV (gray) or B (purple, violet, blue) opsin expression. Boxes and ovals indicate the inferred ancestral states along specific branches of the butterfly family tree for both opsin genes and expression patterns. The R1 and R2 opsin expression patterns are not known for the Riodinidae. (B) Character mapping of opsin expression in the R3–8 cells. Ovals indicate photoreceptor cells expressing LW (orange, yellow or green) or B (purple) opsin mRNAs. Asterisk indicates ventral eye only. Red box indicates a LW opsin duplicate, the precursor to Apodemia mormo LWRh1, that is inferred to have arisen prior to the radiation of the lycaenid and riodinid families, and was subsequently lost in lycaenids. The R3–8 opsin expression patterns are not known for the Riodinidae.

Previous ArticleNext Article
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

This Issue

 Download PDF

Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Experimental Biology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Reconstructing the ancestral butterfly eye: focus on the opsins
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Experimental Biology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Experimental Biology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
The adaptive evolution and processing of sensory systems
Reconstructing the ancestral butterfly eye: focus on the opsins
Adriana D. Briscoe
Journal of Experimental Biology 2008 211: 1805-1813; doi: 10.1242/jeb.013045
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
The adaptive evolution and processing of sensory systems
Reconstructing the ancestral butterfly eye: focus on the opsins
Adriana D. Briscoe
Journal of Experimental Biology 2008 211: 1805-1813; doi: 10.1242/jeb.013045

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Alerts

Please log in to add an alert for this article.

Sign in to email alerts with your email address

Article navigation

  • Top
  • Article
    • SUMMARY
    • Introduction
    • Anatomy of the butterfly eye
    • An eye to the future
    • ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
    • References
  • Figures & tables
  • Info & metrics
  • PDF

Related articles

Cited by...

More in this TOC section

  • Energy limitation as a selective pressure on the evolution of sensory systems
  • Molecular evolution of communication signals in electric fish
Show more The adaptive evolution and processing of sensory systems

Similar articles

Other journals from The Company of Biologists

Development

Journal of Cell Science

Disease Models & Mechanisms

Biology Open

Advertisement

Welcome to JEB’s new Editor Monica Daley

We are pleased to welcome Monica Daley to JEB’s Editorial team. Monica has had a long association with JEB before taking up her new role, overseeing peer review of neuromuscular physiology, terrestrial biomechanics and integrative physiology of locomotion.


In the field with Robyn Hetem

Continuing our fieldwork series, Robyn Hetem reflects on working with species ranging from aardvark to zebra, and the impact COVID-19 has had on fieldwork.


Read & Publish participation continues to grow

“It is particularly encouraging for early career researchers, as it allows them to display their research globally without the need to find costs to cover the open access option.”

Professor Fernando Montealegre-Z (University of Lincoln) shares his experience of publishing Open Access as part of our growing Read & Publish initiative. We now have over 150 institutions in 15 countries and four library consortia taking part – find out more and view our full list of participating institutions.


Nocturnal reef residents have deep-sea-like eyes

Fanny de Busserolles and colleagues from The University of Queensland have discovered that the eyes of nocturnal reef fish have multibank retinas, layers of photoreceptors, similar to the eyes of deep-sea fish that live in dim light conditions.


Mechanisms underlying gut microbiota–host interactions in insects

In their Review, Konstantin Schmidt and Philipp Engel summarise recent findings about the mechanisms involved in gut colonisation and the provisioning of beneficial effects in gut microbiota–insect symbiosis.

Articles

  • Accepted manuscripts
  • Issue in progress
  • Latest complete issue
  • Issue archive
  • Archive by article type
  • Special issues
  • Subject collections
  • Interviews
  • Sign up for alerts

About us

  • About JEB
  • Editors and Board
  • Editor biographies
  • Travelling Fellowships
  • Grants and funding
  • Journal Meetings
  • Workshops
  • The Company of Biologists
  • Journal news

For Authors

  • Submit a manuscript
  • Aims and scope
  • Presubmission enquiries
  • Article types
  • Manuscript preparation
  • Cover suggestions
  • Editorial process
  • Promoting your paper
  • Open Access
  • Outstanding paper prize
  • Biology Open transfer

Journal Info

  • Journal policies
  • Rights and permissions
  • Media policies
  • Reviewer guide
  • Sign up for alerts

Contact

  • Contact JEB
  • Subscriptions
  • Advertising
  • Feedback

 Twitter   YouTube   LinkedIn

© 2021   The Company of Biologists Ltd   Registered Charity 277992