Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Accepted manuscripts
    • Issue in progress
    • Latest complete issue
    • Issue archive
    • Archive by article type
    • Special issues
    • Subject collections
    • Interviews
    • Sign up for alerts
  • About us
    • About JEB
    • Editors and Board
    • Editor biographies
    • Travelling Fellowships
    • Grants and funding
    • Journal Meetings
    • Workshops
    • The Company of Biologists
    • Journal news
  • For authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Aims and scope
    • Presubmission enquiries
    • Article types
    • Manuscript preparation
    • Cover suggestions
    • Editorial process
    • Promoting your paper
    • Open Access
    • Outstanding paper prize
    • Biology Open transfer
  • Journal info
    • Journal policies
    • Rights and permissions
    • Media policies
    • Reviewer guide
    • Sign up for alerts
  • Contacts
    • Contact JEB
    • Subscriptions
    • Advertising
    • Feedback
    • Institutional usage stats (logged-in users only)
  • COB
    • About The Company of Biologists
    • Development
    • Journal of Cell Science
    • Journal of Experimental Biology
    • Disease Models & Mechanisms
    • Biology Open

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Experimental Biology
  • COB
    • About The Company of Biologists
    • Development
    • Journal of Cell Science
    • Journal of Experimental Biology
    • Disease Models & Mechanisms
    • Biology Open

supporting biologistsinspiring biology

Journal of Experimental Biology

  • Log in
Advanced search

RSS  Twitter  Facebook  YouTube  

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Accepted manuscripts
    • Issue in progress
    • Latest complete issue
    • Issue archive
    • Archive by article type
    • Special issues
    • Subject collections
    • Interviews
    • Sign up for alerts
  • About us
    • About JEB
    • Editors and Board
    • Editor biographies
    • Travelling Fellowships
    • Grants and funding
    • Journal Meetings
    • Workshops
    • The Company of Biologists
    • Journal news
  • For authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Aims and scope
    • Presubmission enquiries
    • Article types
    • Manuscript preparation
    • Cover suggestions
    • Editorial process
    • Promoting your paper
    • Open Access
    • Outstanding paper prize
    • Biology Open transfer
  • Journal info
    • Journal policies
    • Rights and permissions
    • Media policies
    • Reviewer guide
    • Sign up for alerts
  • Contacts
    • Contact JEB
    • Subscriptions
    • Advertising
    • Feedback
    • Institutional usage stats (logged-in users only)
Inside JEB
EVOLVING FLIES' CIRCADIAN CLOCKS
Laura Blackburn
Journal of Experimental Biology 2007 210: ii doi: 10.1242/jeb.02739
Laura Blackburn
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & metrics
  • PDF
Loading

It's not just human beings that divide into early rising `larks' and late rising `owls'. Flies too are governed by biological, or circadian, clocks that dictate when they emerge from the pupa and when they are active. But how did these clocks evolve? To investigate, Vijay Kumar Sharma and his colleagues at the Jawaharlal Nehru Centre for Advanced Scientific Research, Bangalore, India, imposed a selection pressure on flies (Drosophila melanogaster) as they emerged from the pupa. By selecting flies that emerged in the morning or evening, they wanted to see if they could change the timing of the flies' clocks over many generations (p. 906).

Keeping flies in a regime of 12 h dark then 12 h light every 24 h, the team chose larks that emerged from their pupae in the morning between 5 am and 9 am, or owls that emerged in the evening between 5 pm and 9 pm. The team kept these early and late risers separate, using them to breed the next generation, before selecting the early and late risers from the offspring for breeding, and so on for 55 generations.

Interested to know how the flies' clocks were changing through the generations, the team carried out a series of tests on the 5th, 10th, 25th, 40th and 55th generations. Measuring when flies in the early or late groups emerged from their pupae, they found that the percentage of flies in the early group emerging in the morning increased, but evening risers decreased. In the late populations the reverse occurred; more flies emerged in the evening, and fewer in the morning. This showed that they were successfully breeding lark and owl populations of flies.

Next, the team looked at the pattern of emergence, noting how many flies emerged during set time periods, so that they could calculate the time when the greatest number of flies emerged relative to when the lights came on. They found that in early groups, the peak emergence occurred close to lights on, with more flies emerging at this peak through the generations. They observed a similar pattern in the late groups, only the peak occurred close to lights off.

While the team had selected flies according to when they emerged, they also wanted to see if any of the flies' other behaviours had changed. By measuring when the adult flies were active, they found that adults from early groups were more active in the morning, and those from late groups were more active in the evening, mirroring the emergence patterns. The implication of this result is that `rhythmic processes in the body are controlled by multiple clocks, but the clocks talk to each other' says Sharma, so selecting for emergence also influences when flies are active.

Finally, to find out how the flies' clocks would operate without any light cues, they plunged the flies into darkness and measured their emergence patterns and activity. Previous studies had shown that animals with early clocks have a slightly faster circadian rhythm than animals with late clocks, and the team found the same with their flies. The flies' emergence patterns and activity followed the same patterns as when the lights were on and off, although the early flies had a slightly faster daily rhythm of 23.6 h compared to the late flies' rhythm of 24.3 h. This shows that `clocks evolve through selection pressure on the timing of rhythmic behaviour,' Sharma says.

  • © The Company of Biologists Limited 2007

References

  1. Kumar, S., Kumar, D., Paranjpe, D. A., Akarsh, C. R. and Sharma, V. K. (2007). Selection on the timing of adult emergence results in altered circadian clocks in fruit flies Drosophila melanogaster. J. Exp. Biol. 210,906 -918.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
Previous ArticleNext Article
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

This Issue

 Download PDF

Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Experimental Biology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
EVOLVING FLIES' CIRCADIAN CLOCKS
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Experimental Biology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Experimental Biology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Inside JEB
EVOLVING FLIES' CIRCADIAN CLOCKS
Laura Blackburn
Journal of Experimental Biology 2007 210: ii doi: 10.1242/jeb.02739
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Inside JEB
EVOLVING FLIES' CIRCADIAN CLOCKS
Laura Blackburn
Journal of Experimental Biology 2007 210: ii doi: 10.1242/jeb.02739

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Alerts

Please log in to add an alert for this article.

Sign in to email alerts with your email address

Article navigation

  • Top
  • Article
    • References
  • Info & metrics
  • PDF

Related articles

Cited by...

More in this TOC section

  • Wing damage no obstacle for hummingbird hawkmoths
  • Making a difference: the role of comparative biology in tackling climate change
  • Lifestyle difference gives female yellow-billed hornbills the edge
Show more INSIDE JEB

Similar articles

Other journals from The Company of Biologists

Development

Journal of Cell Science

Disease Models & Mechanisms

Biology Open

Advertisement

Welcome to JEB’s new Editor Monica Daley

We are pleased to welcome Monica Daley to JEB’s Editorial team. Monica has had a long association with JEB before taking up her new role, overseeing peer review of neuromuscular physiology, terrestrial biomechanics and integrative physiology of locomotion.


In the field with Robyn Hetem

Continuing our fieldwork series, Robyn Hetem reflects on working with species ranging from aardvark to zebra, and the impact COVID-19 has had on fieldwork.


Read & Publish participation continues to grow

“It is particularly encouraging for early career researchers, as it allows them to display their research globally without the need to find costs to cover the open access option.”

Professor Fernando Montealegre-Z (University of Lincoln) shares his experience of publishing Open Access as part of our growing Read & Publish initiative. We now have over 150 institutions in 15 countries and four library consortia taking part – find out more and view our full list of participating institutions.


Nocturnal reef residents have deep-sea-like eyes

Fanny de Busserolles and colleagues from The University of Queensland have discovered that the eyes of nocturnal reef fish have multibank retinas, layers of photoreceptors, similar to the eyes of deep-sea fish that live in dim light conditions.


Mechanisms underlying gut microbiota–host interactions in insects

In their Review, Konstantin Schmidt and Philipp Engel summarise recent findings about the mechanisms involved in gut colonisation and the provisioning of beneficial effects in gut microbiota–insect symbiosis.

Articles

  • Accepted manuscripts
  • Issue in progress
  • Latest complete issue
  • Issue archive
  • Archive by article type
  • Special issues
  • Subject collections
  • Interviews
  • Sign up for alerts

About us

  • About JEB
  • Editors and Board
  • Editor biographies
  • Travelling Fellowships
  • Grants and funding
  • Journal Meetings
  • Workshops
  • The Company of Biologists
  • Journal news

For Authors

  • Submit a manuscript
  • Aims and scope
  • Presubmission enquiries
  • Article types
  • Manuscript preparation
  • Cover suggestions
  • Editorial process
  • Promoting your paper
  • Open Access
  • Outstanding paper prize
  • Biology Open transfer

Journal Info

  • Journal policies
  • Rights and permissions
  • Media policies
  • Reviewer guide
  • Sign up for alerts

Contact

  • Contact JEB
  • Subscriptions
  • Advertising
  • Feedback

 Twitter   YouTube   LinkedIn

© 2021   The Company of Biologists Ltd   Registered Charity 277992