Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Accepted manuscripts
    • Issue in progress
    • Latest complete issue
    • Issue archive
    • Archive by article type
    • Special issues
    • Subject collections
    • Interviews
    • Sign up for alerts
  • About us
    • About JEB
    • Editors and Board
    • Editor biographies
    • Travelling Fellowships
    • Grants and funding
    • Journal Meetings
    • Workshops
    • The Company of Biologists
    • Journal news
  • For authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Aims and scope
    • Presubmission enquiries
    • Article types
    • Manuscript preparation
    • Cover suggestions
    • Editorial process
    • Promoting your paper
    • Open Access
    • Outstanding paper prize
    • Biology Open transfer
  • Journal info
    • Journal policies
    • Rights and permissions
    • Media policies
    • Reviewer guide
    • Sign up for alerts
  • Contacts
    • Contact JEB
    • Subscriptions
    • Advertising
    • Feedback
    • For library administrators
  • COB
    • About The Company of Biologists
    • Development
    • Journal of Cell Science
    • Journal of Experimental Biology
    • Disease Models & Mechanisms
    • Biology Open

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Experimental Biology
  • COB
    • About The Company of Biologists
    • Development
    • Journal of Cell Science
    • Journal of Experimental Biology
    • Disease Models & Mechanisms
    • Biology Open

supporting biologistsinspiring biology

Journal of Experimental Biology

  • Log in
Advanced search

RSS  Twitter  Facebook  YouTube  

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Accepted manuscripts
    • Issue in progress
    • Latest complete issue
    • Issue archive
    • Archive by article type
    • Special issues
    • Subject collections
    • Interviews
    • Sign up for alerts
  • About us
    • About JEB
    • Editors and Board
    • Editor biographies
    • Travelling Fellowships
    • Grants and funding
    • Journal Meetings
    • Workshops
    • The Company of Biologists
    • Journal news
  • For authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Aims and scope
    • Presubmission enquiries
    • Article types
    • Manuscript preparation
    • Cover suggestions
    • Editorial process
    • Promoting your paper
    • Open Access
    • Outstanding paper prize
    • Biology Open transfer
  • Journal info
    • Journal policies
    • Rights and permissions
    • Media policies
    • Reviewer guide
    • Sign up for alerts
  • Contacts
    • Contact JEB
    • Subscriptions
    • Advertising
    • Feedback
    • For library administrators
Research Article
Transcriptional regulation of neuropeptide and peptide hormone expression by the Drosophila dimmed and cryptocephal genes
Sebastien A. Gauthier, Randall S. Hewes
Journal of Experimental Biology 2006 209: 1803-1815; doi: 10.1242/jeb.02202
Sebastien A. Gauthier
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Randall S. Hewes
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & tables
  • Supp info
  • Info & metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Tables

Figures

  • Table 1.

    Paired genotype comparisons used in the qRTPCR analysis

    AlleleAllele classControl genotypeTest genotype
    Rev8 Null crc allele and strong dimm hypomorphyw; Rev8/CyO, y+ yw; Rev8/Rev8
    dimm KG02598 Weak crc allele and strong dimm hypomorphyw; dimmKG02598/+yw; dimmKG02598/Rev4
    Rev4 Null allele for crc, dimm and Tsp39D
    crc 1 Strong crc hypomorphyw; crc1/CyO, y+yw; crc1/crc1
  • Fig. 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 1.

    Genomic map of the 39D1 region, showing the locations of three genes (crc, dimm and Tsp39D), the P element insertion in dimmKG02598 (arrowhead), a single non-conservative base substitution in the crc1 allele, and two local deletions (Rev8 and Rev4). The box on Rev8 indicates the proximal breakpoint uncertainty region.

  • Table 2.

    Genes selected for qRTPCR analysis

    CategoryGeneKnown or predicted function(s)Protein levels in dimm-/- mutants
    Neuropeptide biosynthetic enzymesFurin 1 (Fur1)Neuropeptide endoprotease (Roebroek et al., 1991)Reduceda
    Peptidylglycine-α-hydroxylating monooxygenase (Phm)Neuropeptide amidation (Jiang et al., 2000)Reduceda
    amontillado (amon)Neuropeptide endoprotease (PC2) (Siekhaus and Fuller, 1999)Reducedb
    Secretory granule proteins ia2 Protein tyrosine phosphatase (Walchli et al., 2000)ND
    Calcium activated protein for secretion (Caps)Secretory granule protein (Renden et al., 2001)ND
    dimm regiondimmed (dimm)bHLH transcription factoraND
    cryptocephal (crc)bZIP transcription factor (Hewes et al., 2000)ND
    Tetraspanin 39D (Tsp39D)Tetraspanin (Todres et al., 2000)ND
    NeuropeptidesPigment—dispersing factor (Pdf)NeuropeptidefNormala,c
    FMRF amide-related (Fmrf)NeuropeptidefReduceda
    Dromyosuppressin (Dms)NeuropeptidefReduceda,d
    Drososulfakinin (Dsk)NeuropeptidefReduceda,d
    Leucokinin (Lk)NeuropeptidefReduceda
    Cardioacceleratory peptide (Ccap)NeuropeptidefND
    Eclosion hormone (Eh)NeuropeptidefNormala
    Ecdysis triggering hormone (ETH)Peptide hormones (ETH1 and ETH2)fReduceda,e
    Biogenic amine synthetic enzymesDopa decarboxylase (Ddc)Dopa decarboxylase (Livingstone and Tempel, 1983)Normala
    pale (ple)Tyrosine hydroxylase (Neckameyer and White, 1993)ND
    RibosomalRibosomal protein L32 (RpL32)Ribosomal protein (O'Connell and Rosbash, 1984)ND
    • ND, not done.

    • ↵a (Hewes et al., 2003)

    • ↵b (Park et al., 2004)

    • ↵c Native expression pattern only.

    • ↵d Inferred from immunostaining of the MP1 and MP2 neurons with the PT-2 antiserum, which detects —RFamide-containing peptides (Taghert, 1999), likely including DMS and DSK. The MP1 cells express Dsk, and the MP2 cells are immunopositive for DMS (Nichols et al., 1997).

    • ↵e Inferred from immunostaining of the endocrine Inka cells with the anti-myomodulin (MM) antiserum (Hewes et al., 2003). This antiserum likely cross-reacts with ETH, since both peptides share a PRL-amide C-terminal motif (Zitnan et al., 2003).

    • ↵f For reviews see (Hewes and Taghert, 2001; Vanden Broeck, 2001).

  • Fig. 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 2.

    Quantification of mRNA levels in hatchling larvae by qRTPCR. (A–C) Mean gene ΔCt values for (A) Rev8/+ vs Rev8/Rev8 (N=5), (B) dimmKG02598/Rev4 vs dimmKG02598/+ (N=6) and (C) crc1/crc1 vs crc1/+ larvae (N=5). The N values represent the number of independent mRNA extractions. (A′–C′) Levels of transcripts in homozygous or transheterozygous mutants in A–C expressed as a percentage of the levels in heterozygous controls. During each cycle of the qRTPCR, the Ct value increases by 1 as the quantity of qRTPCR product is doubled. Therefore, the percentage change in each mRNA shown in A′–C′ was calculated as 1/2(ΔCt experimental–ΔCt control). *P<0.05; **P<0.01; ***P<0.001; one-way ANOVA, sequential Bonferroni post-hoc test.

  • Fig. 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 3.

    Reduced Dms transcript levels in the CNS of dimm mutant, but not crc mutant, hatchling larvae. (A) In situ hybridization with a Dms antisense probe in dimmKG02598/+ CNS. (B–D) Intensity of Dms in situ hybridization for the MP2, SE and SP cells in (B) dimmKG02598/Rev4 (N=9) vs dimmKG02598/+ (N=11), (C) Rev8/Rev8 (N=12) vs Rev8/+ (N=13), and (D) crc1/crc1 (N=5) vs crc1/+ (N=11) larvae. Paired genotypes were processed for in situ hybridization in parallel within each experiment (e.g. Rev8/Rev8 vs Rev8/+) but not between experiments (e.g. B vs D), and the baseline in situ hybridization intensities between experiments cannot be directly compared. *P<0.05; ***P<0.001; one-way ANOVA. Scale bars: 25μ m (A); 2.5 μm (B–D).

  • Fig. 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 4.

    Reduced Lk transcript levels in the CNS of dimm, crc double mutant hatchling larvae. (A) In situ hybridization with a Lk antisense probe in a wild-type CNS. (B) Intensity of Lk in situ hybridization for selected neurons in Rev8/Rev8 (N=17) vs Rev8/+ (N=12) larvae. **P<0.01; ***P<0.001; one-way ANOVA. Scale bars: 50μ m (A); 2.5 μm (B).

  • Fig. 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 5.

    Reduced ETH transcript levels in the endocrine Inka cells of crc mutant third instar larvae. (A,B) Intensity of in situ hybridization with an ETH antisense probe in the Inka cells on tracheal metameres 5 (TM5) and 8 (TM8) of the tracheae in (A) dimmKG02598/Rev4 (N=9) vs dimmKG02598/+ (N=8) and (B) crc1/crc1 (N=9) vs crc1/+ (N=10) larvae. **P<0.01; ***P<0.001; one-way ANOVA. Scale bar, 10 μm.

  • Fig. 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 6.

    Reduced ETH reporter gene expression in crc mutant third instar larvae. Expression of EGFP was driven under the control of a 382 bp promoter sequence from the ETH gene. (A,B) Intensity of Inka cell (TM5 and TM8) EGFP fluorescence in (A) Rev4, ETH-EGFP/dimmKG02598 (N=9) vs Rev4, ETH-EGFP/+ (N=4) and (B) Rev4, ETH-EGFP/crc1 (N=9) vs Rev4, ETH-EGFP/+ (N=11) larvae. ***P<0.001; one-way ANOVA. Scale bar, 5 μm.

  • Fig. 7.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 7.

    Comparative genomic analysis of the 382 bp ETH gene regulatory region. (A) VISTA plot of the D. melanogaster assembly in pairwise alignments with five other Drosophila species. The gray bar, with tick marks at 50 bp intervals, shows the extent of the 382 bp region. The percent identity from 50–100% (vertical axis) in a 20 bp window sliding in 1 bp increments is displayed for each alignment (horizontal axis). Windows (excluding gaps) that were at least 70% identical with D. melanogaster are highlighted (non-coding sequences in pink). The conservation track (bottom plot) shows phastCons scores for the three-way MULTIZ alignment of D. melanogaster, D. yakuba and D. pseudoobscura. Two highly conserved regions (CR1 and CR2) exceeded the 0.4 score threshold (broken line). Arrows, direction of transcription; asterisks, start ATG of the ETH gene [the 5′ UTR of ETH is predicted to be 14 bp long (Park et al., 1999)]; purple box, ETH coding sequence; turquoise box, Orc4 3′ UTR. (B) MULTIZ alignment of CR1 and CR2. Bases that were identical in at least seven Drosophila species are indicated with asterisks with the consensus sequence shown directly below. Positions marked x below the consensus denote ATF4, DR4 and E74A binding sites predicted by rVISTA. Four selected transcription factor binding sites (see Results) are also shown at the bottom of the alignment, and bases matching the CR1 or CR2 consensus are highlighted in blue.

Previous ArticleNext Article
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

This Issue

 Download PDF

Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Experimental Biology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Transcriptional regulation of neuropeptide and peptide hormone expression by the Drosophila dimmed and cryptocephal genes
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Experimental Biology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Experimental Biology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Research Article
Transcriptional regulation of neuropeptide and peptide hormone expression by the Drosophila dimmed and cryptocephal genes
Sebastien A. Gauthier, Randall S. Hewes
Journal of Experimental Biology 2006 209: 1803-1815; doi: 10.1242/jeb.02202
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Research Article
Transcriptional regulation of neuropeptide and peptide hormone expression by the Drosophila dimmed and cryptocephal genes
Sebastien A. Gauthier, Randall S. Hewes
Journal of Experimental Biology 2006 209: 1803-1815; doi: 10.1242/jeb.02202

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Alerts

Please log in to add an alert for this article.

Sign in to email alerts with your email address

Article navigation

  • Top
  • Article
    • SUMMARY
    • Introduction
    • Materials and methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • List of abbreviations
    • ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • References
  • Figures & tables
  • Supp info
  • Info & metrics
  • PDF

Related articles

Cited by...

More in this TOC section

  • Na+/H+-exchangers differentially contribute to midgut fluid sodium and proton concentration in the sea urchin larva
  • Testing the influence of crushing surface variation on seed-cracking performance among beak morphs of the African seedcracker Pyrenestes ostrinus
  • Diversity in rest-activity patterns among Lake Malawi cichlid fishes suggests a novel axis of habitat partitioning
Show more RESEARCH ARTICLE

Similar articles

Other journals from The Company of Biologists

Development

Journal of Cell Science

Disease Models & Mechanisms

Biology Open

Advertisement

Predicting the Future: Species Survival in a Changing World

Read our new special issue exploring the significant role of experimental biology in assessing and predicting the susceptibility or resilience of species to future, human-induced environmental change.


Adam Hardy wins the 2020 Journal of Experimental Biology Outstanding Paper Prize

Congratulations to winner Adam Hardy for his work showing that goby fins are as touch sensitive as primate fingertips. Read Adam’s paper and find out more about the 12 papers nominated for the award.


Stark trade-offs and elegant solutions in arthropod visual systems

Many elegant eye specializations that evolved in response to visual challenges continue to be discovered. A new Review by Meece et al. summarises exciting solutions evolved by insects and other arthropods in response to specific visual challenges.


Head bobbing gives pigeons a sense of perspective

Pigeons might look goofy with their head-bobbing walk, but it turns out that the ungainly head manoeuvre allows the birds to judge distance.

Articles

  • Accepted manuscripts
  • Issue in progress
  • Latest complete issue
  • Issue archive
  • Archive by article type
  • Special issues
  • Subject collections
  • Interviews
  • Sign up for alerts

About us

  • About JEB
  • Editors and Board
  • Editor biographies
  • Travelling Fellowships
  • Grants and funding
  • Journal Meetings
  • Workshops
  • The Company of Biologists
  • Journal news

For Authors

  • Submit a manuscript
  • Aims and scope
  • Presubmission enquiries
  • Article types
  • Manuscript preparation
  • Cover suggestions
  • Editorial process
  • Promoting your paper
  • Open Access
  • Outstanding paper prize
  • Biology Open transfer

Journal Info

  • Journal policies
  • Rights and permissions
  • Media policies
  • Reviewer guide
  • Sign up for alerts

Contact

  • Contact JEB
  • Subscriptions
  • Advertising
  • Feedback

 Twitter   YouTube   LinkedIn

© 2021   The Company of Biologists Ltd   Registered Charity 277992