Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Accepted manuscripts
    • Issue in progress
    • Latest complete issue
    • Issue archive
    • Archive by article type
    • Special issues
    • Subject collections
    • Interviews
    • Sign up for alerts
  • About us
    • About JEB
    • Editors and Board
    • Editor biographies
    • Travelling Fellowships
    • Grants and funding
    • Journal Meetings
    • Workshops
    • The Company of Biologists
    • Journal news
  • For authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Aims and scope
    • Presubmission enquiries
    • Article types
    • Manuscript preparation
    • Cover suggestions
    • Editorial process
    • Promoting your paper
    • Open Access
    • Outstanding paper prize
    • Biology Open transfer
  • Journal info
    • Journal policies
    • Rights and permissions
    • Media policies
    • Reviewer guide
    • Sign up for alerts
  • Contacts
    • Contact JEB
    • Subscriptions
    • Advertising
    • Feedback
  • COB
    • About The Company of Biologists
    • Development
    • Journal of Cell Science
    • Journal of Experimental Biology
    • Disease Models & Mechanisms
    • Biology Open

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Experimental Biology
  • COB
    • About The Company of Biologists
    • Development
    • Journal of Cell Science
    • Journal of Experimental Biology
    • Disease Models & Mechanisms
    • Biology Open

supporting biologistsinspiring biology

Journal of Experimental Biology

  • Log in
Advanced search

RSS  Twitter  Facebook  YouTube  

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Accepted manuscripts
    • Issue in progress
    • Latest complete issue
    • Issue archive
    • Archive by article type
    • Special issues
    • Subject collections
    • Interviews
    • Sign up for alerts
  • About us
    • About JEB
    • Editors and Board
    • Editor biographies
    • Travelling Fellowships
    • Grants and funding
    • Journal Meetings
    • Workshops
    • The Company of Biologists
    • Journal news
  • For authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Aims and scope
    • Presubmission enquiries
    • Article types
    • Manuscript preparation
    • Cover suggestions
    • Editorial process
    • Promoting your paper
    • Open Access
    • Outstanding paper prize
    • Biology Open transfer
  • Journal info
    • Journal policies
    • Rights and permissions
    • Media policies
    • Reviewer guide
    • Sign up for alerts
  • Contacts
    • Contact JEB
    • Subscriptions
    • Advertising
    • Feedback
Research Article
Running over rough terrain: guinea fowl maintain dynamic stability despite a large unexpected change in substrate height
Monica A. Daley, James R. Usherwood, Gladys Felix, Andrew A. Biewener
Journal of Experimental Biology 2006 209: 171-187; doi: 10.1242/jeb.01986
Monica A. Daley
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
James R. Usherwood
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Gladys Felix
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Andrew A. Biewener
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & tables
  • Supp info
  • Info & metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Tables

Figures

  • Fig. 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 1.

    Still frames of a guinea fowl during an unexpected perturbation. A 0.6 m long force plate placed at the midpoint of an 8 m long runway rested 8.5 cm below the runway surface. White tissue paper pulled tightly across the resulting gap and secured with white masking tape created the appearance of a uniform surface. The velocity and position of the bird's COM through time (moving from frame A to frame B) were calculated through integration of the measured ground reaction forces and used to calculate total COM energy, as described in Materials and methods.

  • Fig. 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 2.

    Correction of initial velocity conditions for calculation of the guinea fowl's COM path. Initial velocity conditions derived using standard methods result in a path that diverges considerably from kinematic observation. The calculated vertical position (A, broken red line) and the observed kinematic estimates (black dots) relate to the left axes in A and B, and show a discrepancy represented as the squared difference at each point (grey vertical bars, right axes in A and B). The sum of the squared differences through the step period (SSD, inset in A and B) is used as a statistic for selecting the Vi,v that minimizes the divergence between the two vertical paths. The Vi values resulting in the closest path match for the vertical (B, solid blue line) and horizontal components (not displayed, but identical principles), are then used as the integration constants in the calculation of instantaneous velocities from the ground reaction force data (Eqn 5, 6).

  • Fig. 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 3.

    (A) COM paths over a step cycle for one individual during the three treatments: control (C), unexpected substrate drops (U) and visible substrate drops (V). All U trials for this individual are shown to illustrate within-subject variation (solid blue lines), with a representative V trial (dotted red line) and C step (broken green line) drawn for comparison. Thin gray lines represent the aerial phase of the step. In (B) the periods of analysis are schematically illustrated. In all cases, the COM trajectory was calculated between subsequent aerial phase peaks in COM height. During level running this corresponded to subsequent COM apexes, where EKv is zero and EP is at a maximum. However, in the U and V trials the COM generally did not return to stable periodic motion within the perturbed step, and the COM was often moving downward at the beginning of the aerial phase following the perturbation. In these cases, there was a net gain in EKv, and the aerial phase peak in COM height occurred at the beginning of the flight phase. ThisΔ EKv must be dealt with during the next stance phase because total vertical energy (EV=EP+EKv), total horizontal energy (EH=EKh) and total mechanical energy (Ecom) can change only during ground contact.

  • Table 1.

    Subject data: mass, sum of limb segment lengths, standing hip height and number of trials

    Trials
    IndividualMass (kg)Σlseg (m)HH (m)CUV
    11.100.310.19252
    21.520.320.20242
    32.060.330.20223
    42.410.370.22232
    52.640.370.22251
    • Σlseg, sum of limb segment lengths; HH, standing hip height; C, U and V trials, control, unexpected drop and visible drop trials, respectively.

  • Table 2.

    ANOVA for effects of treatment and individual

    Treatment Individual
    Variabled.f.FPd.f.FP
    ΔEP232.06<0.001*41.010.425ns
    ΔEKh26.180.024*40.970.447ns
    ΔEKv221.460.001*41.350.288ns
    ΔEcom21.950.204ns40.720.586ns
    Speed29.950.007*42.190.102ns
    t c 218.850.001*46.730.001*
    |J|235.24<0.001*41.180.346ns
    Φ25.210.036ns40.570.691ns
    • For an explanation of symbols, see text and List of symbols and abbreviations.

    • ↵* Significant difference after Bonferroni correction.

  • Fig. 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 4.

    Summary of COM mechanics during C, U and V treatments (A,B,C, respectively). Silhouettes of the bird with corresponding limb stick figures at three points during the perturbed step: toe-down, midstance, and toe-off. The broken silhouette and stick figure represent the time of tissue paper contact in the U treatment. The COM path is overlaid for the time interval illustrated in Fig. 3B, along with the corresponding net change in height (Δsv, blue), GRF impulse vector (J, red, summed over the stance phase), and initial and final velocity vectors (Vi and Vf, respectively, green) to illustrate differences among treatments.

  • Fig. 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 5.

    Net changes in gravitational potential (ΔEP), horizontal and vertical kinetic (ΔEKh andΔ EKv, respectively), and total mechanical energy (ΔEcom) of the COM over the course of one step for the C, U and V treatments. The broken gray line indicates theΔ EP that would occur if the birds fell the entire substrate drop (ΔH=8.5 cm). Values are means ± s.e.m for all individuals (N=5). The net changes in energy were determined over the time interval illustrated in Fig. 3B.

  • Table 3.

    ANOVA test for effect of energy exchange mode

    Mode Mode frequency
    Variabled.f.FPIndividualEKhEKvEcom
    ΔEP20.420.667ns1131
    ΔEKh218.09<0.001*2202
    ΔEKv29.950.002*3200
    ΔEcom212.330.001*4201
    Speed20.050.956ns5203
    t c 22.540.11ns
    |J|27.090.006*
    ϕ210.650.001*
    ΔSv20.210.816ns
    • Only unexpected drop trials are included.

      For an explanation of symbols, see text and List of symbols and abbreviations.

  • Fig. 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 6.

    Comparison of mechanical variables across C (black bars), U (pale grey bars) and V (dark grey bars) treatments, with U trials subdivided into energy exchange modes. Values are means ± s.e.m for all instances of each response. Initial horizontal velocity (Vi,h) was measured at the COM apex during the flight phase prior to the measured step (`begin' point in Fig. 3B). The net change in COM height (Δsv) was determined over the time interval illustrated in Fig. 3B. The other mechanical variables were measured over the period of ground contact.

  • Fig. 7.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 7.

    Ground reaction force (top), and COM energy changes (below) over time for the step period for representative trials, comparing steady, spring-like dynamics of level running (A) to the three energy responses observed during U perturbations: (B) `EKh mode', (C) `Ecom mode' and (D) `EKv mode'. The time interval shown is that illustrated in Fig. 3B. Bold and dotted lines in top panels indicate instantaneous vertical (fv) and horizontal (fh) GRF, respectively. The dotted vertical lines indicate time of tissue paper contact, and gray bars indicate duration of ground contact. Gravitational potential (EP), horizontal kinetic (EKh) and vertical kinetic (EKv) energies are shown over time, with dotted horizontal lines to indicate the initial energy. Two energy sums, total vertical energy (EV=EP+EKv) and total COM energy (Ecom=EP+EKtot), allow distinction between energy conversion (e.g. EP→EKh as in B and net energy absorption (as in C). Note that at the point of ground contact in U trials (B-D), EKv is greater than in level running (A) because the body falls during the perturbation.

  • Fig. 8.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 8.

    The COM mechanics occur along a continuum related to how well the limb supported body weight BW and whether it produced or absorbed net energy. Different symbols represent different `energy mode' categories. The GRF impulse magnitude and direction (|J| and ϕ) distinguish the different response patterns, as illustrated by their relationship with two energy ratios. (A) The vertical energy ratio (ΔEKv: ΔEP) strongly correlates with |J|, and indicates the level of BW support (0 indicates full BW support, 1.0 indicates free fall). We categorized trials in which the EV ratio ≥0.5 as `EKv' mode (dotted line). (B) The perturbation energy ratio (ΔEcom: ΔEV) correlates with ϕ, and distinguishes energy redistribution vs actuation by the limb. A value of zero indicates that theΔ EV was converted to EKh (ΔEV→ΔEKh), with no net muscular work, consistent with spring-like limb function. A value of 1.0 indicates that all of ΔEV is absorbed, a value> 1.0 indicates deceleration (-ΔEKh) and a value<0 indicates acceleration (+ ΔEKh). We categorized trials in which the perturbation energy ratio ≥0.5 as `Ecom' mode (dotted line).

  • Fig. 9.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 9.

    Comparison of COM mechanics among different U perturbation responses (A-C). (D) The V perturbation response. On the left, silhouettes of the bird with corresponding limb stick figures are shown at three points: toe-down, mid-stance and toe-off. Broken silhouettes represent the time of tissue paper contact in U trials. The COM path is shown for the time interval illustrated in Fig. 3B, along with the corresponding net change in height (Δsv, blue), initial and final velocity vectors (Vi and Vf, respectively, green), and GRF impulse vector (J, red, summed over the stance period). On the right, net changes in external energy shown as means ± s.e.m. for all instances of each response.

Previous ArticleNext Article
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

This Issue

 Download PDF

Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Experimental Biology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Running over rough terrain: guinea fowl maintain dynamic stability despite a large unexpected change in substrate height
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Experimental Biology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Experimental Biology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Research Article
Running over rough terrain: guinea fowl maintain dynamic stability despite a large unexpected change in substrate height
Monica A. Daley, James R. Usherwood, Gladys Felix, Andrew A. Biewener
Journal of Experimental Biology 2006 209: 171-187; doi: 10.1242/jeb.01986
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Research Article
Running over rough terrain: guinea fowl maintain dynamic stability despite a large unexpected change in substrate height
Monica A. Daley, James R. Usherwood, Gladys Felix, Andrew A. Biewener
Journal of Experimental Biology 2006 209: 171-187; doi: 10.1242/jeb.01986

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Alerts

Please log in to add an alert for this article.

Sign in to email alerts with your email address

Article navigation

  • Top
  • Article
    • SUMMARY
    • Introduction
    • Materials and methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • References
  • Figures & tables
  • Supp info
  • Info & metrics
  • PDF

Related articles

Cited by...

More in this TOC section

  • Early developmental stages of native populations of Ciona intestinalis under increased temperature are affected by local habitat history
  • Three auditory brainstem response (ABR) methods tested and compared in two anuran species
  • Differing thermal sensitivities of physiological processes alter ATP allocation
Show more RESEARCH ARTICLE

Similar articles

Other journals from The Company of Biologists

Development

Journal of Cell Science

Disease Models & Mechanisms

Biology Open

Advertisement

Meet the Editors at SICB Virtual 2021

Reserve your place to join some of the journal editors, including Editor-in-Chief Craig Franklin, at our Meet the Editor session on 17 February at 2pm (EST). Don’t forget to view our SICB Subject Collection, featuring relevant JEB papers relating to some of the symposia sessions.


2020 at The Company of Biologists

Despite 2020's challenges, we were able to bring a number of long-term projects and new ventures to fruition. As we enter a new year, join us as we reflect on the triumphs of the last 12 months.


The Big Biology podcast

JEB author Christine Cooper talks to Big Biology about her research. In this fascinating JEB sponsored podcast she tells us how tough zebra finches adjust their physiology to cope with extreme climate events. 


Developmental and reproductive physiology of small mammals at high altitude

Cayleih Robertson and Kathryn Wilsterman focus on high-altitude populations of the North American deer mouse in their review of the challenges and evolutionary innovations of pregnant and nursing small mammals at high altitude.


Read & Publish participation extends worldwide

“Being able to publish Open Access articles free of charge means that my article gets maximum exposure and has maximum impact, and that all my peers can read it regardless of the agreements that their universities have with publishers.”

Professor Roi Holzman (Tel Aviv University) shares his experience of publishing Open Access as part of our growing Read & Publish initiative. We now have over 60 institutions in 12 countries taking part – find out more and view our full list of participating institutions.

Articles

  • Accepted manuscripts
  • Issue in progress
  • Latest complete issue
  • Issue archive
  • Archive by article type
  • Special issues
  • Subject collections
  • Interviews
  • Sign up for alerts

About us

  • About JEB
  • Editors and Board
  • Editor biographies
  • Travelling Fellowships
  • Grants and funding
  • Journal Meetings
  • Workshops
  • The Company of Biologists
  • Journal news

For Authors

  • Submit a manuscript
  • Aims and scope
  • Presubmission enquiries
  • Article types
  • Manuscript preparation
  • Cover suggestions
  • Editorial process
  • Promoting your paper
  • Open Access
  • Outstanding paper prize
  • Biology Open transfer

Journal Info

  • Journal policies
  • Rights and permissions
  • Media policies
  • Reviewer guide
  • Sign up for alerts

Contact

  • Contact JEB
  • Subscriptions
  • Advertising
  • Feedback

 Twitter   YouTube   LinkedIn

© 2021   The Company of Biologists Ltd   Registered Charity 277992