Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Accepted manuscripts
    • Issue in progress
    • Latest complete issue
    • Issue archive
    • Archive by article type
    • Special issues
    • Subject collections
    • Interviews
    • Sign up for alerts
  • About us
    • About JEB
    • Editors and Board
    • Editor biographies
    • Travelling Fellowships
    • Grants and funding
    • Journal Meetings
    • Workshops
    • The Company of Biologists
    • Journal news
  • For authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Aims and scope
    • Presubmission enquiries
    • Article types
    • Manuscript preparation
    • Cover suggestions
    • Editorial process
    • Promoting your paper
    • Open Access
    • Outstanding paper prize
    • Biology Open transfer
  • Journal info
    • Journal policies
    • Rights and permissions
    • Media policies
    • Reviewer guide
    • Sign up for alerts
  • Contacts
    • Contact JEB
    • Subscriptions
    • Advertising
    • Feedback
  • COB
    • About The Company of Biologists
    • Development
    • Journal of Cell Science
    • Journal of Experimental Biology
    • Disease Models & Mechanisms
    • Biology Open

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Experimental Biology
  • COB
    • About The Company of Biologists
    • Development
    • Journal of Cell Science
    • Journal of Experimental Biology
    • Disease Models & Mechanisms
    • Biology Open

supporting biologistsinspiring biology

Journal of Experimental Biology

  • Log in
Advanced search

RSS  Twitter  Facebook  YouTube  

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Accepted manuscripts
    • Issue in progress
    • Latest complete issue
    • Issue archive
    • Archive by article type
    • Special issues
    • Subject collections
    • Interviews
    • Sign up for alerts
  • About us
    • About JEB
    • Editors and Board
    • Editor biographies
    • Travelling Fellowships
    • Grants and funding
    • Journal Meetings
    • Workshops
    • The Company of Biologists
    • Journal news
  • For authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Aims and scope
    • Presubmission enquiries
    • Article types
    • Manuscript preparation
    • Cover suggestions
    • Editorial process
    • Promoting your paper
    • Open Access
    • Outstanding paper prize
    • Biology Open transfer
  • Journal info
    • Journal policies
    • Rights and permissions
    • Media policies
    • Reviewer guide
    • Sign up for alerts
  • Contacts
    • Contact JEB
    • Subscriptions
    • Advertising
    • Feedback
Inside JEB
OSTRACODS' OXYGEN PUZZLE
Yfke van Bergen
Journal of Experimental Biology 2004 207: ii doi: 10.1242/jeb.01363
Yfke van Bergen
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & metrics
  • PDF
Loading

According to palaeontological records, two billion years ago atmospheric oxygen levels were a tenth of the levels they are today. Prehistoric water-breathing crustaceans presumably adapted to these low levels, but when oxygen levels rocketed, some creatures took advantage of the metabolic advantages offered and allowed their blood oxygen levels to rise. However, crustaceans seem to have stuck to their old-fashioned low-oxygen habits; they have remarkably low blood oxygenation levels even to this day. Oddly enough, despite the large evolutionary gap between crustaceans and warm-blooded animals, modern mammalian brains share the low oxygenation levels of crab and crayfish circulation. Jean-Charles Massabuau and Laure Corbari at Bordeaux University wondered if this striking similarity was evidence that the crustaceans' prehistoric oxygen regulation strategy was preserved over evolutionary time (p. 4415).

Massabuau reasoned that if he could show how primitive water-breathers were able to regulate their tissue oxygenation levels in prehistoric times, this would reveal an early adaptation strategy that could have maintained low tissue oxygenation levels in animals throughout the course of evolution. Massabuau needed a primitive animal, so when Pierre Carbonel told him about tiny creatures called ostracods that hadn't changed much in the past 500 million years, Massabuau realised he had found an `open window into the past' to study ancient oxygen regulation strategies.

The team decided to focus on the ostracods' breathing apparatus. Ostracods are minute crustaceans, complete with little appendages that beat rhythmically to waft water into the animal's breathing cavity, where gas exchange occurs by diffusion. Wondering whether the diminutive creatures were able to adjust their breathing rate at different oxygen levels, the team designed miniature aquaria, allowing them to change the oxygenation levels in the mini-habitats. The team videotaped the crustaceans to see whether the animals would beat their breathing appendages faster as oxygen levels dropped. The team were surprised when they saw that the ostracods didn't change the beating frequency of their breathing apparatus at different oxygen levels. Clearly, the ostracods couldn't regulate their ventilation in response to changes in water oxygenation. So how had the animals coped for millions of years?

The team suspected that ostracods might regulate their oxygen by choosing to live at particular oxygen levels. To test this, they needed to study the distribution of the little sediment-dwellers in their natural habitat. They didn't have to travel far to collect sediment core samples: the Bay of Arcachon in France, where ostracods live, is right outside their lab. The researchers then determined the ostracods' preferred oxygen levels by measuring the oxygen profile of each sediment sample, freezing and slicing up the samples and counting the number of animals in each slice. The team found that the crustaceans were escaping both oxygen-rich and oxygen-depleted regions and migrating to sediments where the oxygen levels were slightly higher than those required by their tissues. The ostracods were regulating their body oxygenation simply by crawling to their comfort zone.

So 500 million years ago, these tiny crustaceans were already managing their tissue oxygenation levels using a behavioural rather than a physiological strategy, which could have been conserved over evolutionary time. But what is the evolutionary advantage to maintaining such low body tissue oxygenation? `One explanation is that metabolism produces oxygen free radicals, which damage cells', says Massabuau, `so maintaining low oxygen levels may protect an animal's tissues from free radical attack'. It seems ostracods may have a very good reason for being stuck in the past.

  • © The Company of Biologists Limited 2004

References

  1. Corbari, L., Carbonel, P. and Massabuau, J.-C. (2004). How a low tissue O2 strategy could be conserved in early crustaceans: the example of the podocopid ostracods. J. Exp. Biol. 207,4415 -4425.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
Previous ArticleNext Article
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

This Issue

 Download PDF

Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Experimental Biology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
OSTRACODS' OXYGEN PUZZLE
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Experimental Biology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Experimental Biology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Inside JEB
OSTRACODS' OXYGEN PUZZLE
Yfke van Bergen
Journal of Experimental Biology 2004 207: ii doi: 10.1242/jeb.01363
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Inside JEB
OSTRACODS' OXYGEN PUZZLE
Yfke van Bergen
Journal of Experimental Biology 2004 207: ii doi: 10.1242/jeb.01363

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Alerts

Please log in to add an alert for this article.

Sign in to email alerts with your email address

Article navigation

  • Top
  • Article
    • References
  • Info & metrics
  • PDF

Related articles

Cited by...

More in this TOC section

  • Nocturnal reef residents have deep-sea-like eyes
  • Oxygen doesn't limit mayflies when the temperature soars
  • Chilly smaller chicks can't forage as long
Show more INSIDE JEB

Similar articles

Other journals from The Company of Biologists

Development

Journal of Cell Science

Disease Models & Mechanisms

Biology Open

Advertisement

Meet the Editors at SICB Virtual 2021

Reserve your place to join some of the journal editors, including Editor-in-Chief Craig Franklin, at our Meet the Editor session on 17 February at 2pm (EST). Don’t forget to view our SICB Subject Collection, featuring relevant JEB papers relating to some of the symposia sessions.


2020 at The Company of Biologists

Despite 2020's challenges, we were able to bring a number of long-term projects and new ventures to fruition. As we enter a new year, join us as we reflect on the triumphs of the last 12 months.


Critical temperature window sends migratory black-headed buntings on their travels

The spring rise in temperature at black-headed bunting overwintering sites is essential for triggering the physical changes that they undergo before embarking on their spring migration – read more.


Developmental and reproductive physiology of small mammals at high altitude

Cayleih Robertson and Kathryn Wilsterman focus on high-altitude populations of the North American deer mouse in their review of the challenges and evolutionary innovations of pregnant and nursing small mammals at high altitude.


Read & Publish participation extends worldwide

“Being able to publish Open Access articles free of charge means that my article gets maximum exposure and has maximum impact, and that all my peers can read it regardless of the agreements that their universities have with publishers.”

Professor Roi Holzman (Tel Aviv University) shares his experience of publishing Open Access as part of our growing Read & Publish initiative. We now have over 60 institutions in 12 countries taking part – find out more and view our full list of participating institutions.

Articles

  • Accepted manuscripts
  • Issue in progress
  • Latest complete issue
  • Issue archive
  • Archive by article type
  • Special issues
  • Subject collections
  • Interviews
  • Sign up for alerts

About us

  • About JEB
  • Editors and Board
  • Editor biographies
  • Travelling Fellowships
  • Grants and funding
  • Journal Meetings
  • Workshops
  • The Company of Biologists
  • Journal news

For Authors

  • Submit a manuscript
  • Aims and scope
  • Presubmission enquiries
  • Article types
  • Manuscript preparation
  • Cover suggestions
  • Editorial process
  • Promoting your paper
  • Open Access
  • Outstanding paper prize
  • Biology Open transfer

Journal Info

  • Journal policies
  • Rights and permissions
  • Media policies
  • Reviewer guide
  • Sign up for alerts

Contact

  • Contact JEB
  • Subscriptions
  • Advertising
  • Feedback

 Twitter   YouTube   LinkedIn

© 2021   The Company of Biologists Ltd   Registered Charity 277992