Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Accepted manuscripts
    • Issue in progress
    • Latest complete issue
    • Issue archive
    • Archive by article type
    • Special issues
    • Subject collections
    • Interviews
    • Sign up for alerts
  • About us
    • About JEB
    • Editors and Board
    • Editor biographies
    • Travelling Fellowships
    • Grants and funding
    • Journal Meetings
    • Workshops
    • The Company of Biologists
    • Journal news
  • For authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Aims and scope
    • Presubmission enquiries
    • Article types
    • Manuscript preparation
    • Cover suggestions
    • Editorial process
    • Promoting your paper
    • Open Access
    • Outstanding paper prize
    • Biology Open transfer
  • Journal info
    • Journal policies
    • Rights and permissions
    • Media policies
    • Reviewer guide
    • Sign up for alerts
  • Contacts
    • Contact JEB
    • Subscriptions
    • Advertising
    • Feedback
  • COB
    • About The Company of Biologists
    • Development
    • Journal of Cell Science
    • Journal of Experimental Biology
    • Disease Models & Mechanisms
    • Biology Open

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Experimental Biology
  • COB
    • About The Company of Biologists
    • Development
    • Journal of Cell Science
    • Journal of Experimental Biology
    • Disease Models & Mechanisms
    • Biology Open

supporting biologistsinspiring biology

Journal of Experimental Biology

  • Log in
Advanced search

RSS  Twitter  Facebook  YouTube  

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Accepted manuscripts
    • Issue in progress
    • Latest complete issue
    • Issue archive
    • Archive by article type
    • Special issues
    • Subject collections
    • Interviews
    • Sign up for alerts
  • About us
    • About JEB
    • Editors and Board
    • Editor biographies
    • Travelling Fellowships
    • Grants and funding
    • Journal Meetings
    • Workshops
    • The Company of Biologists
    • Journal news
  • For authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Aims and scope
    • Presubmission enquiries
    • Article types
    • Manuscript preparation
    • Cover suggestions
    • Editorial process
    • Promoting your paper
    • Open Access
    • Outstanding paper prize
    • Biology Open transfer
  • Journal info
    • Journal policies
    • Rights and permissions
    • Media policies
    • Reviewer guide
    • Sign up for alerts
  • Contacts
    • Contact JEB
    • Subscriptions
    • Advertising
    • Feedback
Research Article
Phylogenetic conservation of disulfide-linked, dimeric acetylcholine receptor pentamers in southern ocean electric rays
M. L. Tierney, K. E. Osborn, P. J. Milburn, M. H. B. Stowell, S. M. Howitt
Journal of Experimental Biology 2004 207: 3581-3590; doi: 10.1242/jeb.01204
M. L. Tierney
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
K. E. Osborn
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
P. J. Milburn
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
M. H. B. Stowell
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
S. M. Howitt
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & tables
  • Info & metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Tables

Figures

  • Fig. 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 1.

    Synthesis of 4,7,10-trioxa-1,13-carboxyethyl-2-trimethylamine-tridecanediaamine (TDAC).

  • Fig. 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 2.

    RT-PCR products generated using specific primers for acetylcholine receptor genes amplified from H. monopterigium. RNA isolated from the electric organ of the coffin ray was reverse transcribed and amplified using primers specific for either the α, β, γ or δ genes of the acetylcholine receptor. Two RNA concentrations were tested with each primer pair, and RT-PCR products were run on a 0.8% agarose gel and stained with ethidium bromide. Lambda DNA cut with EcoR1 and HindIII was used to estimate the size of the DNA fragments (left-hand lane).

  • Table 1.

    Amino acid sequence identity between acetylcholine receptor subunits from different species

    T. californica Human
    SpeciesSubunitαβγδαβγ*ϵ*δ
    T. marmorata α 99 393233 78 34312733
    β39 96 373438 54 393538
    γ3235 97 463238 54 53 47
    δ323446 98 32354239 57
    H. monopterigium α 98 393233 79 34302733
    β38 88 383638 54 403539
    γ3038 94 463239 53 53 46
    δ323445 95 32354339 58
    N. tasmaniensis α 96 393232 78 34302733
    δ323446 98 32354239 57
    • Values represent the percentage identity at the amino acid sequence level between the acetylcholine receptor subunits from T. marmorata, H. monopterigium and N. tasmaniensis, compared with the equivalent proteins from T. californica and humans.

    • ↵* The acetylcholine receptor γ and ϵ subunits, present at the fetal and adult human neuromuscular junction, respectively, are equally homologous to the γ subunit in electric fish, representing a hybrid of the two.

  • Table 2.

    Classification of the amino acid differences in the mature subunits of the acetylcholine receptor into domains and then further into secondary structure elements when compared with T. californica subunits

    Amino acid differences relative to T. californica
    Extracellular domain Pore-forming domain
    SpeciesSubunitTotal amino acid changesβ-strandsLoops/α-helicesTransmembrane α-helicesLoops
    T. marmorata α61032
    β183870
    γ121452
    δ135242
    H. monopterigium α74003
    β519171312
    γ2748312
    δ237682
    N. tasmaniensis α168710
    δ135242
  • Fig. 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 3.

    Purification of the acetylcholine receptor from the numb fish N. tasmaniensis. (A) The membrane fraction from the electric organ was treated with 1.5% Triton X-100, and solubilized material applied to the TDAC affinity column. Bound protein was eluted from the column using an increasing salt gradient. (B) The major contaminant (∼98 kDa) could be purified away from the acetylcholine receptor on an anion exchange column (ResourceQ), where it eluted later in the NaCl gradient. (C) The purified receptor ran close to the void volume on a Superdex200 gel permeation column (670 kDa), consistent with the receptor maintaining its dimeric form under the purification conditions used. Arrows indicate the elution positions of molecular mass markers used to calibrate the column: 670, 158, 44, 17 and 1.35 kDa. Absorbance was measured at 215 nm in A and C and at 280 nm in B.

  • Fig. 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 4.

    SDS–PAGE of the acetylcholine receptor purified from the numb fish N. tasmaniensis on the TDAC affinity column. Fractions 3, 5 and 7, correlating to the peak absorbance in Fig. 3A, were run on a 4–12% Bis-Tris NuPAGE gel and stained with Coomassie. The protein bands corresponding to the four subunits comprising the acetylcholine receptor are indicated on the right. The protein running between the α and β subunits is mostly likely the α subunit, which is known to run as a doublet.

  • Fig. 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 5.

    A rapid filtration method through DE-81 filters was used to measure the binding of 125I-α-bungarotoxin (α-Bgt) to affinity-purified acetylcholine receptors from electric rays at equilibrium. The data presented are from a typical experiment where the specific binding is plotted against increasing α-Bgt concentrations. The dissociation constants calculated from the equation for a single binding site were not significantly different in the four electric rays tested, ranging between 21 and 53 nmol l–1. Error bars represent s.e.m.

  • Table 3.

    Affinity constants for 125I-α-bungarotoxin binding by purified acetylcholine receptors from different species

    SpeciesKd (nmol 1-1)
    T. marmorata 21±4
    T. macneilli 40±6
    H. monopterigium 53±15
    N. tasmaniensis 28±7
    • Average results are expressed as the mean ± s.e.m. of six determinations. The Kd values were not significantly different from each other (P<0.05), calculated using a paired Student's t-test.

  • Fig. 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 6.

    Electron microscopic images of purified acetylcholine receptors from electric rays show them to be dimers. The affinity-purified acetylcholine receptor from H. monopterigium was viewed under the electron microscope in negative stain and is shown in A. Receptor dimers are evident in this (boxes in A) and all other acetylcholine receptor preparations isolated on the TDAC affinity column: (B) T. marmorata; (C) N. tasmaniensis.

Previous ArticleNext Article
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

This Issue

 Download PDF

Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Experimental Biology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Phylogenetic conservation of disulfide-linked, dimeric acetylcholine receptor pentamers in southern ocean electric rays
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Experimental Biology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Experimental Biology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Research Article
Phylogenetic conservation of disulfide-linked, dimeric acetylcholine receptor pentamers in southern ocean electric rays
M. L. Tierney, K. E. Osborn, P. J. Milburn, M. H. B. Stowell, S. M. Howitt
Journal of Experimental Biology 2004 207: 3581-3590; doi: 10.1242/jeb.01204
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Research Article
Phylogenetic conservation of disulfide-linked, dimeric acetylcholine receptor pentamers in southern ocean electric rays
M. L. Tierney, K. E. Osborn, P. J. Milburn, M. H. B. Stowell, S. M. Howitt
Journal of Experimental Biology 2004 207: 3581-3590; doi: 10.1242/jeb.01204

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Alerts

Please log in to add an alert for this article.

Sign in to email alerts with your email address

Article navigation

  • Top
  • Article
    • SUMMARY
    • Introduction
    • Materials and methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
    • References
  • Figures & tables
  • Info & metrics
  • PDF

Related articles

Cited by...

More in this TOC section

  • Departures from isotropy: the kinematics of a larval snail in response to food
  • Trunk and leg kinematics of grounded and aerial running in bipedal macaques
  • The visual ecology of Holocentridae, a nocturnal coral reef fish family with a deep-sea-like multibank retina
Show more RESEARCH ARTICLE

Similar articles

Other journals from The Company of Biologists

Development

Journal of Cell Science

Disease Models & Mechanisms

Biology Open

Advertisement

Meet the Editors at SICB Virtual 2021

Reserve your place to join some of the journal editors, including Editor-in-Chief Craig Franklin, at our Meet the Editor session on 17 February at 2pm (EST). Don’t forget to view our SICB Subject Collection, featuring relevant JEB papers relating to some of the symposia sessions.


2020 at The Company of Biologists

Despite 2020's challenges, we were able to bring a number of long-term projects and new ventures to fruition. As we enter a new year, join us as we reflect on the triumphs of the last 12 months.


Critical temperature window sends migratory black-headed buntings on their travels

The spring rise in temperature at black-headed bunting overwintering sites is essential for triggering the physical changes that they undergo before embarking on their spring migration – read more.


Developmental and reproductive physiology of small mammals at high altitude

Cayleih Robertson and Kathryn Wilsterman focus on high-altitude populations of the North American deer mouse in their review of the challenges and evolutionary innovations of pregnant and nursing small mammals at high altitude.


Read & Publish participation extends worldwide

“Being able to publish Open Access articles free of charge means that my article gets maximum exposure and has maximum impact, and that all my peers can read it regardless of the agreements that their universities have with publishers.”

Professor Roi Holzman (Tel Aviv University) shares his experience of publishing Open Access as part of our growing Read & Publish initiative. We now have over 60 institutions in 12 countries taking part – find out more and view our full list of participating institutions.

Articles

  • Accepted manuscripts
  • Issue in progress
  • Latest complete issue
  • Issue archive
  • Archive by article type
  • Special issues
  • Subject collections
  • Interviews
  • Sign up for alerts

About us

  • About JEB
  • Editors and Board
  • Editor biographies
  • Travelling Fellowships
  • Grants and funding
  • Journal Meetings
  • Workshops
  • The Company of Biologists
  • Journal news

For Authors

  • Submit a manuscript
  • Aims and scope
  • Presubmission enquiries
  • Article types
  • Manuscript preparation
  • Cover suggestions
  • Editorial process
  • Promoting your paper
  • Open Access
  • Outstanding paper prize
  • Biology Open transfer

Journal Info

  • Journal policies
  • Rights and permissions
  • Media policies
  • Reviewer guide
  • Sign up for alerts

Contact

  • Contact JEB
  • Subscriptions
  • Advertising
  • Feedback

 Twitter   YouTube   LinkedIn

© 2021   The Company of Biologists Ltd   Registered Charity 277992