Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Accepted manuscripts
    • Issue in progress
    • Latest complete issue
    • Issue archive
    • Archive by article type
    • Special issues
    • Subject collections
    • Interviews
    • Sign up for alerts
  • About us
    • About JEB
    • Editors and Board
    • Editor biographies
    • Travelling Fellowships
    • Grants and funding
    • Journal Meetings
    • Workshops
    • The Company of Biologists
    • Journal news
  • For authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Aims and scope
    • Presubmission enquiries
    • Article types
    • Manuscript preparation
    • Cover suggestions
    • Editorial process
    • Promoting your paper
    • Open Access
    • Outstanding paper prize
    • Biology Open transfer
  • Journal info
    • Journal policies
    • Rights and permissions
    • Media policies
    • Reviewer guide
    • Sign up for alerts
  • Contacts
    • Contact JEB
    • Subscriptions
    • Advertising
    • Feedback
  • COB
    • About The Company of Biologists
    • Development
    • Journal of Cell Science
    • Journal of Experimental Biology
    • Disease Models & Mechanisms
    • Biology Open

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Experimental Biology
  • COB
    • About The Company of Biologists
    • Development
    • Journal of Cell Science
    • Journal of Experimental Biology
    • Disease Models & Mechanisms
    • Biology Open

supporting biologistsinspiring biology

Journal of Experimental Biology

  • Log in
Advanced search

RSS  Twitter  Facebook  YouTube  

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Accepted manuscripts
    • Issue in progress
    • Latest complete issue
    • Issue archive
    • Archive by article type
    • Special issues
    • Subject collections
    • Interviews
    • Sign up for alerts
  • About us
    • About JEB
    • Editors and Board
    • Editor biographies
    • Travelling Fellowships
    • Grants and funding
    • Journal Meetings
    • Workshops
    • The Company of Biologists
    • Journal news
  • For authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Aims and scope
    • Presubmission enquiries
    • Article types
    • Manuscript preparation
    • Cover suggestions
    • Editorial process
    • Promoting your paper
    • Open Access
    • Outstanding paper prize
    • Biology Open transfer
  • Journal info
    • Journal policies
    • Rights and permissions
    • Media policies
    • Reviewer guide
    • Sign up for alerts
  • Contacts
    • Contact JEB
    • Subscriptions
    • Advertising
    • Feedback
Outside JEB
MALE OR FEMALE? CAN THE ENVIRONMENT DECIDE?
Katherine A. Sloman
Journal of Experimental Biology 2004 207: vi doi: 10.1242/jeb.01029
Katherine A. Sloman
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Figure1

Sexual differentiation in zebrafish occurs after hatching and is a labile process. During early life, gonads are undifferentiated and become either testes or ovaries during sexual differentiation. The balance between circulating levels of male (androgen) and female (oestrogen) hormones is crucial to the process of sexual differentiation, determining whether a fish becomes male or female. Therefore, zebrafish are particularly susceptible to factors in the environment that may modify or interfere with this process.

Endocrine-disrupting chemicals are natural or man-made compounds that can mimic endogenous hormones and cause physiological disturbances. Current research has focused mainly on chemicals that mimic the effect of natural oestrogens, but endocrine disruptors can also interfere with the synthesis of endogenous hormones. So, can endocrine disruptors influence the sexual differentiation of zebrafish?

The enzyme aromatase converts androgens to oestrogens, playing a vital role in maintaining a balance between male and female hormones. Two forms of the aromatase-encoding gene have previously been identified and are mainly expressed in the gonad (CYP19A) and brain (CYP19B). The important nature of this enzyme made it an appealing focus for this study. Exposing fish to aromatase-inhibiting chemicals, Martina Fenske and Helmut Segner measured both the formation of gonads and the expression of the aromatase genes to determine the effects of these chemicals on fish sexual differentiation. The team chose to work with a compound called fadrozole, as it is a competitive inhibitor of aromatase activity. Taking two sets of fish, the team kept one lot in water to monitor normal development, while they exposed the other zebrafish to fadrozole during the period of sexual differentiation. After fadrozole exposure, they sampled some fish directly, while others were returned to control water and raised to adulthood to see if exposure-related effects were reversible.

In control fish, 44% developed testes and 56% ovaries, and aromatase gene expression varied depending on the developmental stage. During sexual differentiation there was no detectable difference in aromatase gene expression between males and females, but in reproductively active adult zebrafish CYP19A expression was higher in females than in males.

Amazingly, complete gonadal `masculinisation' occurred in all the fish exposed to fadrozole, and the effects persisted through to adulthood. Fadrozole also reduced gonadal CYP19A expression during sexual differentiation. Interestingly, while these fish possessed male gonads, 36% of fadrozole-treated adult fish showed female-like expression of CYP19A, whereas 64% had male-like expression. So while 100% of fish would be identified as males based on their gonad morphology, sexing of fish based upon expression of CYP19A might suggest that some of the fish were female.

This study highlights that zebrafish sexual differentiation is susceptible to interference by chemicals. Manipulation of the aromatase system completely and irreversibly altered the formation of gonads. Despite this, gene expression still displayed a dimorphic expression in adult fish, suggesting a partial recovery from fadrozole treatment. However, the genetic gender of these fish could not be identified due to the lack of sex-linked markers for zebrafish. The likelihood of masculinisation of female organisms by aromatase inhibitors is likely to depend on species, developmental stage and exposure concentrations. Nevertheless, it appears that endocrine-disrupting chemicals provide potential for the environment to decide: male or female?

  • © The Company of Biologists Limited 2004

References

  1. Fenske M. and Segner, H. (2004). Aromatase modulation alters gonadal differentiation in developing zebrafish (Danio rerio). Aquat. Toxicol. 67,105 -126.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
Previous ArticleNext Article
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

This Issue

 Download PDF

Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Experimental Biology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
MALE OR FEMALE? CAN THE ENVIRONMENT DECIDE?
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Experimental Biology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Experimental Biology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Outside JEB
MALE OR FEMALE? CAN THE ENVIRONMENT DECIDE?
Katherine A. Sloman
Journal of Experimental Biology 2004 207: vi doi: 10.1242/jeb.01029
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Outside JEB
MALE OR FEMALE? CAN THE ENVIRONMENT DECIDE?
Katherine A. Sloman
Journal of Experimental Biology 2004 207: vi doi: 10.1242/jeb.01029

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Alerts

Please log in to add an alert for this article.

Sign in to email alerts with your email address

Article navigation

  • Top
  • Article
    • References
  • Info & metrics
  • PDF

Related articles

Cited by...

More in this TOC section

  • Mole-rats play evolution by ear
  • Gusty winds, flappy wings
  • Synthetic sunflower scent trains bees for better pollination
Show more OUTSIDE JEB

Similar articles

Other journals from The Company of Biologists

Development

Journal of Cell Science

Disease Models & Mechanisms

Biology Open

Advertisement

Welcome to JEB’s new Editor Monica Daley

We are pleased to welcome Monica Daley to JEB’s Editorial team. Monica has had a long association with JEB before taking up her new role, overseeing peer review of neuromuscular physiology, terrestrial biomechanics and integrative physiology of locomotion.


In the field with Robyn Hetem

Continuing our fieldwork series, Robyn Hetem reflects on working with species ranging from aardvark to zebra, and the impact COVID-19 has had on fieldwork.


Read & Publish participation continues to grow

“It is particularly encouraging for early career researchers, as it allows them to display their research globally without the need to find costs to cover the open access option.”

Professor Fernando Montealegre-Z (University of Lincoln) shares his experience of publishing Open Access as part of our growing Read & Publish initiative. We now have over 150 institutions in 15 countries and four library consortia taking part – find out more and view our full list of participating institutions.


Nocturnal reef residents have deep-sea-like eyes

Fanny de Busserolles and colleagues from The University of Queensland have discovered that the eyes of nocturnal reef fish have multibank retinas, layers of photoreceptors, similar to the eyes of deep-sea fish that live in dim light conditions.


Mechanisms underlying gut microbiota–host interactions in insects

In their Review, Konstantin Schmidt and Philipp Engel summarise recent findings about the mechanisms involved in gut colonisation and the provisioning of beneficial effects in gut microbiota–insect symbiosis.

Articles

  • Accepted manuscripts
  • Issue in progress
  • Latest complete issue
  • Issue archive
  • Archive by article type
  • Special issues
  • Subject collections
  • Interviews
  • Sign up for alerts

About us

  • About JEB
  • Editors and Board
  • Editor biographies
  • Travelling Fellowships
  • Grants and funding
  • Journal Meetings
  • Workshops
  • The Company of Biologists
  • Journal news

For Authors

  • Submit a manuscript
  • Aims and scope
  • Presubmission enquiries
  • Article types
  • Manuscript preparation
  • Cover suggestions
  • Editorial process
  • Promoting your paper
  • Open Access
  • Outstanding paper prize
  • Biology Open transfer

Journal Info

  • Journal policies
  • Rights and permissions
  • Media policies
  • Reviewer guide
  • Sign up for alerts

Contact

  • Contact JEB
  • Subscriptions
  • Advertising
  • Feedback

 Twitter   YouTube   LinkedIn

© 2021   The Company of Biologists Ltd   Registered Charity 277992