Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Accepted manuscripts
    • Issue in progress
    • Latest complete issue
    • Issue archive
    • Archive by article type
    • Special issues
    • Subject collections
    • Interviews
    • Sign up for alerts
  • About us
    • About JEB
    • Editors and Board
    • Editor biographies
    • Travelling Fellowships
    • Grants and funding
    • Journal Meetings
    • Workshops
    • The Company of Biologists
    • Journal news
  • For authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Aims and scope
    • Presubmission enquiries
    • Article types
    • Manuscript preparation
    • Cover suggestions
    • Editorial process
    • Promoting your paper
    • Open Access
    • Outstanding paper prize
    • Biology Open transfer
  • Journal info
    • Journal policies
    • Rights and permissions
    • Media policies
    • Reviewer guide
    • Sign up for alerts
  • Contacts
    • Contact JEB
    • Subscriptions
    • Advertising
    • Feedback
    • Institutional usage stats (logged-in users only)
  • COB
    • About The Company of Biologists
    • Development
    • Journal of Cell Science
    • Journal of Experimental Biology
    • Disease Models & Mechanisms
    • Biology Open

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Experimental Biology
  • COB
    • About The Company of Biologists
    • Development
    • Journal of Cell Science
    • Journal of Experimental Biology
    • Disease Models & Mechanisms
    • Biology Open

supporting biologistsinspiring biology

Journal of Experimental Biology

  • Log in
Advanced search

RSS  Twitter  Facebook  YouTube  

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Accepted manuscripts
    • Issue in progress
    • Latest complete issue
    • Issue archive
    • Archive by article type
    • Special issues
    • Subject collections
    • Interviews
    • Sign up for alerts
  • About us
    • About JEB
    • Editors and Board
    • Editor biographies
    • Travelling Fellowships
    • Grants and funding
    • Journal Meetings
    • Workshops
    • The Company of Biologists
    • Journal news
  • For authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Aims and scope
    • Presubmission enquiries
    • Article types
    • Manuscript preparation
    • Cover suggestions
    • Editorial process
    • Promoting your paper
    • Open Access
    • Outstanding paper prize
    • Biology Open transfer
  • Journal info
    • Journal policies
    • Rights and permissions
    • Media policies
    • Reviewer guide
    • Sign up for alerts
  • Contacts
    • Contact JEB
    • Subscriptions
    • Advertising
    • Feedback
    • Institutional usage stats (logged-in users only)
Outside JEB
FLIP AND FUSE
Hans Merzendorfer
Journal of Experimental Biology 2003 206: 3892 doi: 10.1242/jeb.00693
Hans Merzendorfer
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Figure1

Membrane fusion is a pivotal process for eucaryotic cells. It facilitates communication between different cellular compartments and the secretion of diverse molecules such as neurotransmitters and hormones. The underlying cellular machinery mediates the recognition and subsequent attachment of the merging membranes in the course of endocytic and secretory pathways. One of the cellular systems that are thought to be involved in fusion between a vesicle and its target membrane are the SNARE proteins, where vesicle (v-) SNAREs and SNARES in the target membranes (t-SNAREs) interact specifically to form inter-membrane complexes, which subsequently trigger fusion. Although numerous other proteins may be involved in regulating membrane mergers, the SNAREs are currently the best candidates for universal fusion mediators.

In order to fortify the SNARE hypothesis, Jim Rothman and his team tried to obtain the same level of experimental evidence for SNARE-mediated membrane fusion as already exists for viral fusion proteins such as the influenza hemagglutinins. For this purpose they simply asked: Are SNARE proteins, which mediate membrane fusion within cells under natural conditions, sufficient to fuse cells together if they are expressed on the cell's surface?

To answer this question they first had to design a cellular system that allows functional expression of the SNARE proteins on the extracellular surface. SNARE complexes are formed by three subunits that belong to different protein families. The VAMP proteins comprise the v-SNAREs, while syntaxins and SNAP-25s assemble to form the t-SNAREs. During membrane fusion, v- and t-SNAREs associate via their cytoplasm-facing interaction domains, so Rothman's team needed to express the SNARE proteins so that the interaction domains were placed on the extracellular side of the plasma membrane, to get cells to fuse.

The team engineered expression vectors to generate SNARE proteins with an N-terminal signal sequence that directed the proteins to the plasma membrane and exposed the protein's interacting domains on the cell's external surface. They also introduced some genetic mutations into the SNAREs to prevent unwanted post-transcriptional modifications to the protein. When Rothman and his coworkers expressed the proteins in monkey COS cells and determined the protein's orientation by means of antibodies, they found significant amounts of flipped SNAREs on the extracellular surface.

To test whether the flipped SNAREs could mediate cell-cell fusion, the scientists expressed the v-SNARE (VAMP) in one cell population and the t-SNAREs (syntaxin and SNAP-25) in another. The cytoplasm of the v-SNARE expressing cells was labeled with a red fluorescent protein, and the nuclei of the cells producing the t-SNAREs were labelled with a cyan-coloured fluorescent protein. After combining both cell populations and incubating for a while, the team found numerous merged cells, with multiple cyan nuclei surrounded by red cytoplasm. So the v- and t-SNARE expressing cells had fused within minutes. A series of elaborate control experiments left no doubt that the observed cell-cell fusions were strictly dependent on the presence of functional SNAREs.

Until Rothman and colleagues demonstrated SNARE-dependent cell-cell fusion, evidence for the involvement of SNAREs in membrane fusion was lacking at the cellular level. Now there is strong evidence that SNARE core complex formation is sufficient for physiological membrane fusion. Defining the core of the fusion machinery is also a central issue in neurophysiology and will help us to understand how neurotransmitters are released into the synapse.

  • © The Company of Biologists Limited 2003

References

  1. Hu, C., Ahmed, M., Melia, T. J., Söllner, T. H., Mayer, T. and Rothman, J. E. (2003). Fusion of cells by flipped SNAREs. Science 300,1745 -1749.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
Previous ArticleNext Article
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

This Issue

 Download PDF

Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Experimental Biology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
FLIP AND FUSE
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Experimental Biology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Experimental Biology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Outside JEB
FLIP AND FUSE
Hans Merzendorfer
Journal of Experimental Biology 2003 206: 3892 doi: 10.1242/jeb.00693
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Outside JEB
FLIP AND FUSE
Hans Merzendorfer
Journal of Experimental Biology 2003 206: 3892 doi: 10.1242/jeb.00693

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Alerts

Please log in to add an alert for this article.

Sign in to email alerts with your email address

Article navigation

  • Top
  • Article
    • References
  • Info & metrics
  • PDF

Related articles

Cited by...

More in this TOC section

  • Gusty winds, flappy wings
  • Synthetic sunflower scent trains bees for better pollination
  • Panting zebra finches twitter to keep cool
Show more OUTSIDE JEB

Similar articles

Other journals from The Company of Biologists

Development

Journal of Cell Science

Disease Models & Mechanisms

Biology Open

Advertisement

Welcome to JEB’s new Editor Monica Daley

We are pleased to welcome Monica Daley to JEB’s Editorial team. Monica has had a long association with JEB before taking up her new role, overseeing peer review of neuromuscular physiology, terrestrial biomechanics and integrative physiology of locomotion.


In the field with Robyn Hetem

Continuing our fieldwork series, Robyn Hetem reflects on working with species ranging from aardvark to zebra, and the impact COVID-19 has had on fieldwork.


Read & Publish participation continues to grow

“It is particularly encouraging for early career researchers, as it allows them to display their research globally without the need to find costs to cover the open access option.”

Professor Fernando Montealegre-Z (University of Lincoln) shares his experience of publishing Open Access as part of our growing Read & Publish initiative. We now have over 150 institutions in 15 countries and four library consortia taking part – find out more and view our full list of participating institutions.


Nocturnal reef residents have deep-sea-like eyes

Fanny de Busserolles and colleagues from The University of Queensland have discovered that the eyes of nocturnal reef fish have multibank retinas, layers of photoreceptors, similar to the eyes of deep-sea fish that live in dim light conditions.


Mechanisms underlying gut microbiota–host interactions in insects

In their Review, Konstantin Schmidt and Philipp Engel summarise recent findings about the mechanisms involved in gut colonisation and the provisioning of beneficial effects in gut microbiota–insect symbiosis.

Articles

  • Accepted manuscripts
  • Issue in progress
  • Latest complete issue
  • Issue archive
  • Archive by article type
  • Special issues
  • Subject collections
  • Interviews
  • Sign up for alerts

About us

  • About JEB
  • Editors and Board
  • Editor biographies
  • Travelling Fellowships
  • Grants and funding
  • Journal Meetings
  • Workshops
  • The Company of Biologists
  • Journal news

For Authors

  • Submit a manuscript
  • Aims and scope
  • Presubmission enquiries
  • Article types
  • Manuscript preparation
  • Cover suggestions
  • Editorial process
  • Promoting your paper
  • Open Access
  • Outstanding paper prize
  • Biology Open transfer

Journal Info

  • Journal policies
  • Rights and permissions
  • Media policies
  • Reviewer guide
  • Sign up for alerts

Contact

  • Contact JEB
  • Subscriptions
  • Advertising
  • Feedback

 Twitter   YouTube   LinkedIn

© 2021   The Company of Biologists Ltd   Registered Charity 277992