Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Accepted manuscripts
    • Issue in progress
    • Latest complete issue
    • Issue archive
    • Archive by article type
    • Special issues
    • Subject collections
    • Interviews
    • Sign up for alerts
  • About us
    • About JEB
    • Editors and Board
    • Editor biographies
    • Travelling Fellowships
    • Grants and funding
    • Journal Meetings
    • Workshops
    • The Company of Biologists
    • Journal news
  • For authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Aims and scope
    • Presubmission enquiries
    • Article types
    • Manuscript preparation
    • Cover suggestions
    • Editorial process
    • Promoting your paper
    • Open Access
    • Outstanding paper prize
    • Biology Open transfer
  • Journal info
    • Journal policies
    • Rights and permissions
    • Media policies
    • Reviewer guide
    • Sign up for alerts
  • Contacts
    • Contact JEB
    • Subscriptions
    • Advertising
    • Feedback
  • COB
    • About The Company of Biologists
    • Development
    • Journal of Cell Science
    • Journal of Experimental Biology
    • Disease Models & Mechanisms
    • Biology Open

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Experimental Biology
  • COB
    • About The Company of Biologists
    • Development
    • Journal of Cell Science
    • Journal of Experimental Biology
    • Disease Models & Mechanisms
    • Biology Open

supporting biologistsinspiring biology

Journal of Experimental Biology

  • Log in
Advanced search

RSS  Twitter  Facebook  YouTube  

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Accepted manuscripts
    • Issue in progress
    • Latest complete issue
    • Issue archive
    • Archive by article type
    • Special issues
    • Subject collections
    • Interviews
    • Sign up for alerts
  • About us
    • About JEB
    • Editors and Board
    • Editor biographies
    • Travelling Fellowships
    • Grants and funding
    • Journal Meetings
    • Workshops
    • The Company of Biologists
    • Journal news
  • For authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Aims and scope
    • Presubmission enquiries
    • Article types
    • Manuscript preparation
    • Cover suggestions
    • Editorial process
    • Promoting your paper
    • Open Access
    • Outstanding paper prize
    • Biology Open transfer
  • Journal info
    • Journal policies
    • Rights and permissions
    • Media policies
    • Reviewer guide
    • Sign up for alerts
  • Contacts
    • Contact JEB
    • Subscriptions
    • Advertising
    • Feedback
Research Article
Kinematics of hovering hummingbird flight along simulated and natural elevational gradients
Douglas L. Altshuler, Robert Dudley
Journal of Experimental Biology 2003 206: 3139-3147; doi: 10.1242/jeb.00540
Douglas L. Altshuler
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Robert Dudley
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & tables
  • Info & metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Tables

Figures

  • Table 1.

    Mean morphological and kinematic values for Selasphorus hummingbirds in the Colorado Rocky Mountains

    GenderElevationm (g)R (mm)n (Hz)Φ (degrees)WDL (g m-2)
    S. platycercus
        Females18753.37556.39834.078146.4310.042
    29003.59257.79037.669151.7420.041
        Males18753.33254.81637.181149.3480.043
    29003.36054.35537.890151.9990.043
    S. rufus
        Females18753.33145.23844.747144.9980.065
    29003.80047.71147.623161.0850.060
        Males18753.40442.75454.066163.8930.066
    29003.60142.49655.563167.5730.071
    • Stroke amplitude (Φ) and wingbeat frequency (n) were measured during free flight at each site

      Body mass (m), wing length (R), and Φ were used to calculate the wing disc loading, WDL

      Free-flight wingbeat kinematics were attained for S. platycercus females although these birds were not included in flight trials

  • Fig. 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 1.

    Hovering kinematics in hypodense air. As ambient air was replaced with normoxic heliox, air density decreased but the partial pressure of oxygen remained constant. The data depicted here were from the experiments performed at 1875 m, although the same trends were evident at 2900 m. (A) Wingbeat frequency increased slightly with decreasing air density. (B) Stroke amplitude increased substantially with decreasing density to a limit near 180°. Values are means ± s.e.m.

  • Fig. 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 2.

    Hovering kinematics in hypoxic air. As ambient air was replaced with pure nitrogen, the partial pressure of oxygen declined but the air density varied only slightly. Otherwise, conditions were identical to that of the first experiment described in Fig. 1. (A) The wingbeat frequency decreased slightly but significantly as oxygen partial pressure decreased (see text). (B) Stroke amplitude varied considerably but exhibited no clear pattern with changing partial pressure of oxygen. Values are means ± s.e.m. All symbols as in Fig. 1. 1 mmHg=133.3 Pa.

  • Fig. 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 3.

    Kinematics in hyperoxic air. As ambient air was replaced with hyperoxic heliox, air density decreased and oxygen concentration increased simultaneously. During normoxia trials, ambient air was replaced with normoxic heliox so that air density decreased but oxygen concentration remained at 21%. Hummingbird kinematics in hyperoxia were equivalent to those in normoxia. Values are means ± s.e.m. See text for details. %O2 is the oxygen concentration at each density under hyperoxia.

  • Fig. 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 4.

    Wingbeat kinematics during hovering across a natural elevational gradient in the Peruvian Andes. Data are species mean for 43 species of hummingbirds. (A) Wingbeat frequency decreased with increasing body mass. The largest hummingbird is the giant hummingbird Patagona gigas, which is substantially larger than all other trochilid taxa and is considered an outlier. However, the decrease in wingbeat frequency with body mass is found even if P. gigas is removed from the analysis (inset; all P<0.001; see text). (B) Stroke amplitude increased with increasing elevation, mirroring the results of experiment 1 ( Fig. 1). See text for regression equations.

  • Fig. 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 5.

    Wingbeat kinematics during free hovering and load-lifting in Peruvian hummingbirds. (A,B) Raw species data, (C,D) phylogenetically corrected independent contrast data. Solid lines, free flight; broken lines, load-lifting. Wingbeat frequency decreased with increasing body mass during both load-lifting and free hovering flight. Stroke amplitude increased with increasing elevation during free flight, but not with elevation during load-lifting, because all hummingbirds reached a maximum stroke amplitude of approximately 180° at the point of maximum lifting. See text for regression equations.

Previous ArticleNext Article
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

This Issue

 Download PDF

Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Experimental Biology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Kinematics of hovering hummingbird flight along simulated and natural elevational gradients
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Experimental Biology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Experimental Biology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Research Article
Kinematics of hovering hummingbird flight along simulated and natural elevational gradients
Douglas L. Altshuler, Robert Dudley
Journal of Experimental Biology 2003 206: 3139-3147; doi: 10.1242/jeb.00540
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Research Article
Kinematics of hovering hummingbird flight along simulated and natural elevational gradients
Douglas L. Altshuler, Robert Dudley
Journal of Experimental Biology 2003 206: 3139-3147; doi: 10.1242/jeb.00540

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Alerts

Please log in to add an alert for this article.

Sign in to email alerts with your email address

Article navigation

  • Top
  • Article
    • SUMMARY
    • Introduction
    • Materials and methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • References
  • Figures & tables
  • Info & metrics
  • PDF

Related articles

Cited by...

More in this TOC section

  • Departures from isotropy: the kinematics of a larval snail in response to food
  • Trunk and leg kinematics of grounded and aerial running in bipedal macaques
  • The visual ecology of Holocentridae, a nocturnal coral reef fish family with a deep-sea-like multibank retina
Show more RESEARCH ARTICLE

Similar articles

Other journals from The Company of Biologists

Development

Journal of Cell Science

Disease Models & Mechanisms

Biology Open

Advertisement

Meet the Editors at SICB Virtual 2021

Reserve your place to join some of the journal editors, including Editor-in-Chief Craig Franklin, at our Meet the Editor session on 17 February at 2pm (EST). Don’t forget to view our SICB Subject Collection, featuring relevant JEB papers relating to some of the symposia sessions.


2020 at The Company of Biologists

Despite 2020's challenges, we were able to bring a number of long-term projects and new ventures to fruition. As we enter a new year, join us as we reflect on the triumphs of the last 12 months.


Critical temperature window sends migratory black-headed buntings on their travels

The spring rise in temperature at black-headed bunting overwintering sites is essential for triggering the physical changes that they undergo before embarking on their spring migration – read more.


Developmental and reproductive physiology of small mammals at high altitude

Cayleih Robertson and Kathryn Wilsterman focus on high-altitude populations of the North American deer mouse in their review of the challenges and evolutionary innovations of pregnant and nursing small mammals at high altitude.


Read & Publish participation extends worldwide

“Being able to publish Open Access articles free of charge means that my article gets maximum exposure and has maximum impact, and that all my peers can read it regardless of the agreements that their universities have with publishers.”

Professor Roi Holzman (Tel Aviv University) shares his experience of publishing Open Access as part of our growing Read & Publish initiative. We now have over 60 institutions in 12 countries taking part – find out more and view our full list of participating institutions.

Articles

  • Accepted manuscripts
  • Issue in progress
  • Latest complete issue
  • Issue archive
  • Archive by article type
  • Special issues
  • Subject collections
  • Interviews
  • Sign up for alerts

About us

  • About JEB
  • Editors and Board
  • Editor biographies
  • Travelling Fellowships
  • Grants and funding
  • Journal Meetings
  • Workshops
  • The Company of Biologists
  • Journal news

For Authors

  • Submit a manuscript
  • Aims and scope
  • Presubmission enquiries
  • Article types
  • Manuscript preparation
  • Cover suggestions
  • Editorial process
  • Promoting your paper
  • Open Access
  • Outstanding paper prize
  • Biology Open transfer

Journal Info

  • Journal policies
  • Rights and permissions
  • Media policies
  • Reviewer guide
  • Sign up for alerts

Contact

  • Contact JEB
  • Subscriptions
  • Advertising
  • Feedback

 Twitter   YouTube   LinkedIn

© 2021   The Company of Biologists Ltd   Registered Charity 277992