Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Accepted manuscripts
    • Issue in progress
    • Latest complete issue
    • Issue archive
    • Archive by article type
    • Special issues
    • Subject collections
    • Interviews
    • Sign up for alerts
  • About us
    • About JEB
    • Editors and Board
    • Editor biographies
    • Travelling Fellowships
    • Grants and funding
    • Journal Meetings
    • Workshops
    • The Company of Biologists
    • Journal news
  • For authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Aims and scope
    • Presubmission enquiries
    • Article types
    • Manuscript preparation
    • Cover suggestions
    • Editorial process
    • Promoting your paper
    • Open Access
    • Outstanding paper prize
    • Biology Open transfer
  • Journal info
    • Journal policies
    • Rights and permissions
    • Media policies
    • Reviewer guide
    • Sign up for alerts
  • Contacts
    • Contact JEB
    • Subscriptions
    • Advertising
    • Feedback
    • For library administrators
  • COB
    • About The Company of Biologists
    • Development
    • Journal of Cell Science
    • Journal of Experimental Biology
    • Disease Models & Mechanisms
    • Biology Open

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Experimental Biology
  • COB
    • About The Company of Biologists
    • Development
    • Journal of Cell Science
    • Journal of Experimental Biology
    • Disease Models & Mechanisms
    • Biology Open

supporting biologistsinspiring biology

Journal of Experimental Biology

  • Log in
Advanced search

RSS  Twitter  Facebook  YouTube  

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Accepted manuscripts
    • Issue in progress
    • Latest complete issue
    • Issue archive
    • Archive by article type
    • Special issues
    • Subject collections
    • Interviews
    • Sign up for alerts
  • About us
    • About JEB
    • Editors and Board
    • Editor biographies
    • Travelling Fellowships
    • Grants and funding
    • Journal Meetings
    • Workshops
    • The Company of Biologists
    • Journal news
  • For authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Aims and scope
    • Presubmission enquiries
    • Article types
    • Manuscript preparation
    • Cover suggestions
    • Editorial process
    • Promoting your paper
    • Open Access
    • Outstanding paper prize
    • Biology Open transfer
  • Journal info
    • Journal policies
    • Rights and permissions
    • Media policies
    • Reviewer guide
    • Sign up for alerts
  • Contacts
    • Contact JEB
    • Subscriptions
    • Advertising
    • Feedback
    • For library administrators
Research Article
Permeation and toxicity of ethylene glycol and methanol in larvae of Anopheles gambiae
Xiang-Hong Liu, Hongjun Pan, Peter Mazur
Journal of Experimental Biology 2003 206: 2221-2228; doi: 10.1242/jeb.00420
Xiang-Hong Liu
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hongjun Pan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Peter Mazur
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & tables
  • Info & metrics
  • PDF
Loading

SUMMARY

In this study, we applied proton NMR to measure the permeation of two cryoprotective agents (CPAs), ethylene glycol (EG) and methanol, into 1st instar Anopheles larvae. Calibration with standard solutions of EG or methanol (0–10 mol l-1) confirmed the reliability of the NMR measurements for determining the concentration of these solutes. To assess permeation, larvae were immersed in 1.5 mol l-1 EG or 1.5 mol l-1 methanol for different periods of time at 22°C. The concentration of both CPAs in the larvae was then measured as a function of exposure time using 1H-NMR spectroscopy. Results show that after a 6 h exposure to 1.5 mol l-1 EG, the larval concentration of EG reaches a maximum value of 1.44 mol l-1, which is 96% of the theoretical maximum. By contrast, after just 1 h exposure to 1.5 mol l-1 methanol, the larval methanol concentration reaches its maximum, which, however, is only 75% of the theoretical maximum. Toxicity data show that larval survival remains 91% and 95% after 4 h and 1 h exposure to 1.5 mol l-1 EG and 1.5 mol l-1 methanol, respectively, at which time the larval concentration of EG and methanol has risen to 1.21 mol l -1 and 1.13 mol l-1, respectively. These results suggest that CPAs such as EG and methanol do permeate Anopheles larvae to up to 81% and 75% of equilibrium, respectively, before the exposure becomes toxic.

  • cryoprotectant
  • permeation
  • toxicity
  • ethylene glycol
  • methanol
  • NMR
  • larvae
  • mosquito
  • Anopheles gambiae

Introduction

Mosquitoes are, by far, the deadliest creatures on the planet. They transmit malaria, yellow fever, dengue fever, encephalitis and other diseases to more than 700 million people each year. Among them, malaria, transmitted by Anopheles mosquitoes, is the worst and it infects nearly half a billion people, resulting in several million deaths worldwide each year (WHO, 1996). Malaria control strategies have been proposed in which genes for resistance to malaria will be introduced into vector populations in order to convert normal vector populations to mosquitoes that are unable to transmit malaria (Collins et al., 1986; Ito et al., 2002; Zheng et al., 1997). The recently complete genome sequence of both Anopheles gambiae (Holt et al., 2002) and the malaria parasite Plasmodium falciparum (Gardner et al., 2002) ought to accelerate the development of engineered mosquitoes refractory to Plasmodium and of methods for driving this genotype into the wild population. Such genetic studies will require the creation, maintenance and characterization of many genetic lines; however, such maintenance with present breeding techniques, in addition to being costly and time consuming, has problems of cross-contamination among strains, loss of stains through handling errors, and genetic changes caused by laboratory domestication or genetic drift. The ability to preserve Anopheles eggs or larvae cryobiologically would eliminate or substantially ameliorate these problems.

Cryopreservation of any biological material requires that cryoprotective agents (CPAs) are present in the cells either to prevent so-called `solution-effect' injury (Mazur, 1970) during classical slow-freezing procedures or to prevent intracellular ice formation during vitrification procedures that involve cooling at high rates. The former approach is used in the cryopreservation of most mammalian cells; the latter, vitrification, was used by Steponkus et al. (1990) and Mazur et al. (1992a) in the successful cryopreservation of Drosophila embryos. Both approaches demand that the cells in question be permeable to both water and CPAs. Unfortunately, native Anopheles eggs show poor permeability to water and are essentially impermeable to ethylene glycol (EG; Valencia et al., 1996a), the CPA used in the cryopreservation of Drosophila (Mazur et al., 1992a; Steponkus et al., 1990) and house flies (Wang et al., 2000). Native eggs of Drosophila and house flies are also impermeable to both water and CPA; however, procedures were developed to successfully permeabilize them and thereby permit cryopreservation. The permeability barrier in the eggs of these two species appears to be a wax layer lying on the surface of the endochorion

(=vitelline membrane), the innermost of the two shells that surround the embryo proper. An essential component of the permeabilization procedure is exposure to the alkanes hexane or heptane, compounds that presumably solubilize the wax layer. Unfortunately, these procedures are not applicable to the Anopheles eggs (Valencia et al., 1996b) or are applicable to only a limited extent. Early eggs of Anopheles also appear to have a wax layer. The problem is that they develop a second permeability barrier between 8 h and 12 h after egg laying that is refractory to removal by alkanes. This second barrier is probably related to tyrosine cross-linking in the endochorion of the egg (Mazur et al., 2001). To date, we have found no method to breach this second barrier or to prevent it from forming without killing the egg.

An alternative to cryopreserving eggs would be to cryopreserve larvae. Recently, we found (X.-H. Liu, unpublished data) that untreated 1st instar Anopheles larvae were uniformly stained by rhodamine B, which has a molecular mass (Mr) of 479, so it is reasonable to predict that the larvae will probably be permeable to CPAs with low molecular masses, such as EG (Mr=62) and methanol (Mr=32). To verify this assumption, we applied nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy to measure the concentration of CPAs within the larvae. NMR is a phenomenon that occurs when certain nuclei (such as 1H) that possess an intrinsic magnetic property imparted by their spin are immersed in a powerful static magnetic field and are simultaneously exposed to a second oscillating magnetic field (Ault and Dudek, 1976). For example, when a proton with a spin is placed in an external magnetic field, the spin vector of the proton aligns itself with the external field, just as a magnet would. This proton can undergo a transition between the two energy states by the absorption of a photon and can jump to the less stable orientation (higher energy state) when the frequency of the oscillating electromagnetic signal matches the resonance frequency of the proton or the energy difference between the two states. Each proton in a chemical has a characteristic resonance frequency, which is affected by the neighboring electrons since the circulation of the electrons creates small magnetic fields that can oppose (generally) or enhance the externally applied field. The variation in resonance frequency of a nuclear spin due to the chemical environment around the nucleus is referred to as a chemical shift. Removal of the oscillating magnetic field causes the proton to revert to the more stable orientation (lower energy state) and emit electromagnetic radiation, which is the NMR signal. Protons with different chemical environments produce separate NMR signals at different chemical shifts. The intensity of the NMR signal at a given frequency is proportional to the number of protons with that characteristic resonance frequency. In Fourier-transformed spectra, the NMR signals yield NMR peaks. Calculation of the integrated area of the peaks will permit determination of the molar ratio of different protons and thereby measurement of the concentrations of a specific chemical. These principles have been applied to study the permeation of dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO; Me2SO) in rat liver (Fuller and Busza, 1994; Fuller et al., 1989), rat carotid artery (Bateson et al., 1994) and rabbit and porcine corneas (Taylor and Busza, 1992; Walcerz et al., 1995; Wusteman et al., 1999), ethylene glycol in the rabbit common carotid artery (Wusteman et al., 1995) and a number of CPAs in human ovarian tissue (Newton et al., 1998). Proton NMR has thus been shown to be a very useful method for measurement of the kinetics of CPA permeation in tissues. The prime objective of the present study was therefore to use proton NMR to determine the kinetics of permeation of EG and methanol into larvae of Anopheles mosquitoes. A second objective was to determine the resulting toxicity of the CPAs as a function of permeation. While our underlying goal is cryopreservation, the permeation of solutes in multicellular systems such as larvae is of broader biological relevance. We believe that this study illustrates the applicability of NMR to this broader question.

Materials and methods

Experimental animals

Blood-fed female Anopheles gambiae Giles adults were provided weekly by the Laboratory of Parasitic Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA and the Centers for Disease Control, Atlanta, GA, USA. After arrival at our laboratory, the mosquitoes were placed in an incubator, which was kept at 26°C and 70% relative humidity. A piece of cotton saturated with 15% Karo light corn syrup (Bestfoods, Sarasota, FL, USA) in Millipore water was provided as a food source. Egg collection was carried out 4 days after a blood feed. Approximately 40–60 mosquitoes were aspirated from their container and anesthetized with carbon dioxide gas. Mosquitoes were then placed in an inverted OPTILUXTM Petri dish (100 mm×15 mm; Becton Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA) containing Whatman No.1 filter paper. After the mosquitoes recovered from the carbon dioxide (approximately 15–20 min), 2 ml of Millipore water was added to the filter paper to induce oviposition. After 1 h of egg laying, the mosquitoes were removed from the Petri dish and the eggs were incubated in the 26°C incubator until they hatched (approximately 46 h). Newly hatched 1st instar larvae were collected and maintained in Millipore water for the treatments that followed. No food was given to the larvae before and during the treatments.

Determination of the kinetics of permeation of ethylene glycerol and methanol into 1st instar larvae

The 1st instar larvae were immersed in 1.5 mol l-1 ethylene glycol (EG; Sigma Chemical Co., St Louis, MO, USA) or 1.5 mol l-1 methanol (GR Anhydrous; EM Science, Gibbstown, NJ, USA), which were prepared in Millipore water, for different period of times (1, 15, 30, 60, 120, 180, 240, 360 and 480 min) in a 15 ml centrifuge tube (Corning Inc., Acton, MA, USA) at room temperature (22–24°C). After the appropriate exposure time, approximately 100–200 larvae were pipetted to a nylon cell strainer (70 μm, Becton Dickinson) to drain the CPA solutions. The strainer was then blotted with facial tissue and the larvae were briefly washed using 1 ml H2O to remove the residual surface CPAs.

NMR measurements require that the larvae are in deuterium oxide (D2O) rather than water to eliminate proton signals from the solvent. The H2O on the larval surface was removed by washing them twice with 99.90% D2O (Aldrich Chemical Co., Milwaukee, WI, USA). The strainer was briefly blotted following each washing. The whole washing procedure took less than 2 min, so the potential washout of permeated CPA was minimal. The larvae were then suspended in 0.2 ml of high-purity D2O (≥99.96%; Aldrich Chemical Co.) and immediately transferred to a 5 mm symmetrical D2O matched NMR microtube (Catalog no. BMS-005V; Shigemi, Inc., Allison Park, PA, USA) for measurements. Once the larvae were in the NMR tubes, efflux of CPA from the larvae into the surrounding medium would be of no significance. NMR measurements were carried out using the same NMR parameters as those used for the standard solutions described below. Each time point was repeated three times for both CPAs at each exposure time to the CPA.

For experiments involving determination of the kinetics of CPA efflux (washout), larvae that had previously been exposed to 1.5 mol l-1 EG for 4 h or to methanol for 1 h were put in a nylon cell strainer to briefly drain the CPA solution and lightly blotted. The strainer with the larvae was then transferred to a Falcon tissue culture dish (35 mm×10 mm; Becton Dickinson) containing 5 ml Millipore water. After sitting in the water for 15 min, 30 min, 60 min, 120 min (only for EG) or 240 min (only for EG), approximately 100 larvae were removed and placed in another strainer and washed twice with D2O to remove surface water. The subsequent procedures for the NMR measurements were the same as described above.

NMR measurements on standard solutions of EG and methanol

In order to determine the concentration of EG and methanol in the larvae versus exposure time, it was necessary to first determine the NMR proton signals generated by a series of solutions of EG and methanol at a range of concentrations. These standards (0–10 mol l-1) were prepared in Millipore water. Specifically, from the NMR peaks we determined the molar ratio of the NMR peaks attributable to the protons in the CH2- groups of EG and the CH3- group of methanol to the area of the peak due to -OH groups. These peaks occur at different chemical shifts. Concentrations can be calculated from the magnitude of the peaks knowing the molecular masses and densities of EG and methanol. Once the standard curves of CH2/OH and CH3/OH proton ratios versus molar concentration of EG and methanol have been constructed, one can then use these to calculate the concentrations of EG and methanol in the larvae from the proton signals generated by the larvae. Specifically, 20μ l of each standard solution was added to 0.2 ml pure D2O (≥99.96%) in a 5 mm D2O matched NMR tube. The NMR tube was preloaded with a sealed glass capillary tube containing chloroform (3.82 mg CHCl3 or 0.032 mg 1H). Since this internal reference contained a fixed number of protons, it served as a proton quantity comparison for all experiments. A blank control sample that contained only 0.2 ml of the pure D2O and the reference was measured in order to know the background proton count from residual water in the D2O, and the data was used for calibration. When calculating the integrated proton peak area, the value of the chloroform reference was set at 100 and then the relative area value of each proton peak could be compared among different NMR spectra so that the proton contributed by the residual H2O in D2O could be subtracted from the OH proton peak.

The proton NMR experiments were performed on a Mercury 300 NMR spectrometer (Varian, Fort Collins, CO, USA) with proton resonance frequency at 300 MHz and a vertical 7 T magnet, using a single 20° pulse, 5 s relaxation delay and 32 scans for proton Bloch decay acquisition. The data were recorded at 25°C and processed using MestRe-C software (version 2.1.0; Universidad de Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain). The data were multiplied by 1 Hz line broadening faction and were Fourier transformed to yield the final spectra. The integrated proton peak area was determined by the MestRe-C software.

Toxicity of 1.5 mol l-1 EG and 1.5 mol l-1 methanol

The 1st instar larvae were immersed in 1.5 mol l-1 EG or 1.5 mol l-1 methanol for 0 (control), 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 or 8 h in a centrifuge tube at room temperature (22–24°C). After the appropriate exposure time in the cryoprotectant solutions, approximately 50 of the larvae were pipetted to a cell strainer to drain the CPA solutions. The strainer was then blotted with facial tissue and transferred into 5 ml water in a tissue culture dish for 15 min to wash out the internal CPAs. The number of larvae was determined under a dissecting microscope and they were then transferred into 50 ml water in a plastic box. Larvae were fed with slurry comprising a mixture of tropical fish food (VitaPro Plus Cichlid Power Flakes; M. Reed Enterprises, Sutter Creek, CA, USA) and active baker's yeast (2% w/v; 2:1 fish food:baker's yeast in water). The larval feeding and culture methods were according to the procedures described by Benedict (1997). After 4 days incubation in a 26°C incubator, larval survival was assessed on the basis of motility and normal morphology. The data are expressed as percentage survival relative to the percentage survival of control untreated larvae.

Results

Calibration curve

Fig. 1 shows the 1H-NMR spectrum of 1 mol l-1 EG. In addition to the small reference peak at the left for CHCl3, there are two proton peaks to the right. The far-right peak at a chemical shift of approximately 3.5 p.p.m. represents methyl (CH2) protons from EG. The large peak at a chemical shift of approximately 4.7 p.p.m. arises from the hydroxyl (OH) protons from water in EG solution, -OH groups of EG and residual water in D2O (the contribution of which is known from the blank control and subtracted).

Fig. 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 1.

Proton NMR spectrum of 1 mol l-1 ethylene glycol (EG) solution showing three distinguishable peaks. The peak at a chemical shift of approximately 3.5 p.p.m. represents CH2 protons from EG, and the peak at a chemical shift of approximately 4.7 p.p.m. arises from the OH protons from both water and EG. The left-hand peak is the reference CHCl3 proton peak. The data were acquired using a Varian Mercury 300 NMR spectrometer with proton resonance frequency at 300 MHz and subjected to Fourier transformation.

The signal intensity of each peak (integrated peak area) is proportional to the amount of each proton in the sample. The relative intensities of the CH2 proton peak and the OH proton peak represent the relative molar concentrations of CH2 protons and OH protons, respectively. Therefore, the molar ratio of CH2 protons to OH protons in each standard solution of EG can be measured from its 1H-NMR spectrum. The proton molar ratio (CH2/OH) of each EG solution can be calculated on the basis of the relative molecular mass (62.07) and density (1.11 g ml-1) of pure EG (CH2OHCH2OH). For example, 1.5 mol l-1 EG=93.11 g (1.5×62.07 g), i.e. 83.88 ml (93.11/1.11) EG + 916.12 ml (1000–83.88 ml), i.e. 50.90 moles (916.12×1/18) water. Each EG molecule has a ratio of four CH2 protons to two OH protons, and each water (HOH) molecule contributes two OH protons. Thus, a 1.5 mol l-1 EG solution contains 6 mol l-1 (4×1.5) CH2 protons and 104.80 mol l-1 [(2×1.5)+(2×50.90)] OH protons. Therefore, proton molar ratio (CH2 protons/OH protons)=6/104.80=5.73%.

According to the above calculations, there exists the following theoretical relationship between the proton molar ration (percentage), R, and the molar concentration of EG (CEG): Math1 Similarly, each methanol (CH3OH) molecule provides three CH3 protons to one OH proton, and, based on the relative molecular mass (32.03) and density (0.79 g ml-1) of pure methanol, the calculated relationship between the proton molar ratio (percentage of CH3 protons/OH protons), R, and the molar concentration of methanol (Cmet) is given by: Math2

Fig. 2 compares these calculated proton molar ratios for a series of concentrations of EG and methanol with those obtained experimentally from NMR measurements. The agreement is very close, confirming that the 1H-NMR measurement method is reliable.

Fig. 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 2.

Comparison of calculated curves and the NMR-measured curves of the proton molar ratio (CH2/OH or CH3/OH) versus the molar concentration of (A) ethylene glycol (EG) and (B) methanol. The NMR-measured values are means ± s.e.m.; N=2 or 3.

On the basis of this agreement, one can use measured proton molar ratios to calculate the concentration of EG and methanol in an unknown sample. This is achieved by rearranging equations 1 and 2 to derive the following equations: Math3

and Math4 In the present study, the unknowns are the concentrations of EG and methanol in the larvae as a function of the time of exposure to these two solutes; i.e. as a function of the permeation kinetics. These measurements are possible because the washing procedure described in the Materials and methods removes nearly all the external EG and methanol, and the contribution of the external water hydroxyls is essentially eliminated by the suspension of the larvae in high-purity D2O.

Kinetics of influx and efflux of EG and methanol

The filled circles in Fig. 3A show the measured influx curve for the permeation of EG into the larvae suspended in 1.5 mol l-1 EG at room temperature. It can be seen that the larval concentration of EG increased with exposure time during the first 6 h. At that point, the concentration of EG in the larvae was 1.44 mol l-1, which is 96% of the theoretical maximum if full equilibration were achieved.

Fig. 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 3.

Influx and efflux kinetics of cryoprotective agents in and out of 1st instar Anopheles larvae at room temperature. (A) Influx and efflux of 1.5 mol l-1 ethylene glycol (EG) in Anopheles larvae as a function of time. (B) Influx and efflux of 1.5 mol l-1 methanol in Anopheles larvae as a function of time. Values are means ± s.e.m.; N=3.

In separate experiments, larvae were exposed to 1.5 mol l-1 EG for 4 h, at which time the larval concentration of EG had risen to 1.21 mol l-1, and then transferred to EG-free water for various times before initiating the NMR measurements. The open circles in Fig. 3A show the resulting curve for the efflux of EG. The efflux occurred at a somewhat similar rate as influx, but approximately 0.4 mol l-1 EG remained in larval tissue after 4 h washing.

Fig. 3B shows the results of analogous experiments with methanol. Methanol shows much faster rates of both influx and efflux compared with those of EG. After just a 1 h exposure to 1.5 mol l-1 methanol, the concentration of methanol in the larvae reached a maximum of 1.13 mol l-1, which is only 75% of the theoretical maximum. The internal larval concentration of methanol also appears to drop slowly with permeation times longer than 1 h, but the drop is not statistically significant (P>0.05, N=3). When, after 1 h, the larvae are transferred from methanol to water; the rate of efflux of the methanol (open triangles) is almost as high as the rate of influx.

Toxicity of 1.5 mol l-1 EG and 1.5 mol l-1 methanol

The results of Fig. 3 clearly show that EG and methanol permeate the larvae. The next question is how high a concentration and exposure time they can tolerate. The toxicity studies (Fig. 4) show that larvae can tolerate 1.5 mol l-1 EG and 1.5 mol l-1 methanol at room temperature up to 4 h and 1 h, respectively, with a normalized survival of 90.6±5.81% and 95.1±2.6%, respectively. When the exposure time was extended to 5 h in EG and 2 h in methanol, larval survival dropped significantly (P<0.01 for EG and P<0.05 for methanol; N=4) when compared with that of controls. However, larval survival remained rather high (77.9±3.8%) after 3 h exposure in 1.5 mol l-1 methanol. About 59% of the larvae survived a 6 h exposure in 1.5 mol l-1 EG, by which time the concentration of EG within the larvae reached the maximum of 1.44 mol l-1.

Fig. 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 4.

Toxicity of 1.5 mol l-1 ethylene glycol (EG) and 1.5 mol l-1 methanol to 1st instar Anopheles larvae at room temperature. Larval survival was normalized with respect to that of untreated controls, which was 87.9±2.5%. Values are means ± s.e.m.; N=4.

Discussion

To achieve successful cryopreservation, CPAs must be able to permeate into cells and tissues. The design of cryopreservation procedures needs the information about the kinetics of CPA permeation into biological samples and also the toxicity of the CPAs. There exists a number of methods to assess CPA permeability. Measurements of volume change by light microscopy have been most used to study cell and embryo membrane permeability to CPAs (Lin et al., 1989; McCaa et al., 1991; Valencia et al., 1996b), but this method would be difficult to apply to an organism that has an irregular shape and contains several compartments of gut, intracellular and extracellular spaces. Other methods such as radioisotopes (Jackowski et al., 1980; Mazur and Rajotte, 1981), depression of freezing or melting points using differential thermal analysis or differential scanning calorimetry (Jacobsen, 1978; Liu et al., 2001), measurements of mass changes (Elford, 1970) and staining with rhodamine (Mazur et al., 1992b) have been used to assess the permeation of CPAs into cells, embryos and other tissues. Proton NMR was first applied to study the permeation of DMSO into rat liver by Fuller et al. (1989) and it provides not only a rapid and noninvasive method but also a direct measurement of CPA concentration in tissues. In the present study, the extremely close agreement between the NMR-measured proton molar ratios of standard solutions of both CPAs and the theoretically calculated values further confirm the reliability of proton NMR spectroscopy.

Ethylene glycol and methanol were chosen here because EG is the main permeating CPA used for the cryopreservation of insect eggs (Mazur et al., 1992a; Nunamaker and Lockwood, 2001; Steponkus et al., 1990; Wang et al., 2000) and because methanol has been reported to be an effective cryoprotectant in both slow-cooling (Ali and Shelton, 1993; Czlonkowska et al., 1991; Rall et al., 1983, 1984; Rapatz, 1973) and vitrification (James, 1980; Liu et al., 1998) approaches to cryopreservation.

Our data indicate that the permeation of EG into larvae is rather slow (only 37% equilibration in 1h and nearly full equilibration in 6 h), whereas the permeation of methanol is much faster; the maximum internal concentration of methanol (75% of equilibrium) being reached in just 1 h. The rates of efflux of the two CPAs were similar to those for influx. It is not surprising that methanol permeates rapidly. It has been found to be the only CPA that is able to penetrate the embryo of zebrafish (Danio rerio; Hagedorn et al., 1996; Liu et al., 2001; Zhang and Rawson, 1996b) and also to penetrate mammalian cells and embryos very rapidly (Naccache and Sha'afi, 1973; Rall et al., 1984). Although it permeates rapidly, it seems to be a paradox that the maximum larval tissue concentration of methanol falls shorter of the theoretical maximum (1.5 mol l-1) than does that of EG. Other investigators also found that the proton NMR-measured concentration of CPA in tissues such as cornea, liver or ovaries does not reach the full theoretical maximum, usually with an equilibration of 50–82% of the theoretical achievable maximum (Fuller and Busza, 1994; Taylor and Busza, 1992; Thomas et al., 1997). Taylor and Busza (1992) suggested that this could be partly due to a fraction of tissue water that is inaccessible for exchange with CPAs, namely `non-solvent' water, and this might reflect mitochondrial compartments as proposed by Garlid (1979). Thomas et al. (1997), however, suggested another explanation in their work with porcine ovaries; that the tissue organization could produce an effective diffusion barrier for CPAs. Both of the two explanations are inapplicable here, however, since EG does permeate into the larvae to a level of nearly full equilibration. Rather, we think the explanation here is that significant quantities of the internal methanol in larval tissues are lost by efflux during the several washes during sample preparation just before the NMR measurements are initiated. The purpose of the washing procedure was to remove the surface CPAs with minimal possible loss of internal CPAs, and it appears to effectively serve this aim for larvae treated with EG, but less so for the methanol-treated larvae. We also tried using cold (0°C) H2O and D2O to wash the larvae, considering that low temperature might slow down the methanol efflux; however, the results were similar (data not shown).

D2O was used as the medium to finally wash away the residual water from the larval surface and to suspend the larvae for NMR measurements, since pure D2O would not contribute any proton signal under proton NMR. However, commercially pure D2O (≥99.96%) still contains a very small amount of H2O and it can be contaminated easily during the experiments. The residual and contaminated water in D2O could make a significant difference since a relatively large amount of D2O was used to suspend the relatively small amount of larvae. Therefore, a CH3Cl reference was used for all samples in order to calibrate the data by subtracting the amount of protons from residual H2O in D2O, the value of which is obtained from a blank sample of D2O.

Another concern is that larval tissues contain hydroxyl protons from sources other than water, which also contribute to the OH peak. A pilot experiment with both fully dehydrated and fully hydrated larvae found that the OH protons from larval tissues only consist of 0.52% of the total OH protons of fully hydrated normal larvae. It is a reasonable figure considering that approximately 82% of the total mass of larvae is water (Liu and Mazur, in press). Therefore, the amount of OH protons contributed by larval tissue is negligible. A final point is that proton exchange occurs between OH (of H2O, EG or methanol) and OD of D2O to give HOD and partially deuterated EG or methanol. However, there exists no proton exchange between CH2 (of EG) or CH3 (of methanol) and OD. Moreover, once the larvae are in the NMR tube, any proton exchange between OH and OD will not affect the results of NMR measurements since HOD is visible to NMR and the resonance frequency of HOD is the same as that of HOH.

The larva is, at a minimum, a three-compartment system consisting of a gut, extracellular tissue space and intracellular space. One important question regarding the CPA concentration in larvae is whether CPA permeation is primarily limited to the gut or whether permeation occurs throughout the larval tissues. While the present study provides no direct answer, it seems unlikely that EG permeation is just confined to the gut since after 6 h exposure the larval EG concentration reaches about 96% of the theoretical maximum, indicating that full equilibration has almost been reached. NMR measured the concentration of CPA in the larvae and not the absolute amounts. Consequently, one possibility is that the larval tissues could have been dehydrated by the EG solution in the gut, thus raising the larval EG concentration in those tissues closer to equilibrium. But we did not see obvious larval shrinkage following up to 12 h exposure in 1.5 mol l-1 EG at room temperature based on microscope observation. Our recent differential scanning calorimetry data on the amount of freezable water (X.-H. Liu and P. Mazur, unpublished data) also indicate that after 4–6 h exposure in 1.5 mol l-1 EG, the larvae contain a similar amount of freezable water to that of untreated control larvae, suggesting no significant larval dehydration. Therefore, it seems to be the case that EG does fully permeate into the Anopheles larvae following approximately 6 h exposure. Finally, we need to point out that, from the viewpoint of cryopreservation, the concentration of CPA is more important than the absolute amount.

What is the mechanism of CPA permeation? The outer surface of mosquito larvae is covered by a chitin–protein cuticle, which is presumably not permeable to CPAs. However, Anopheles larvae are freshwater species and they possess osmoregulatory mechanisms (Bradley, 1987). In hyperosmotic medium, the larvae tend to lose water due to dehydration by the outward diffusion of water down an osmotic gradient, but they maintain normal volume by constant drinking. Presumably, when the hyperosmotic medium contains CPAs, these will enter the gut in the course of this drinking. The gut is separated from the intestinal epithelium and other tissues by an acellular chitin-containing sheath, the peritrophic matrix membrane (PM). Recently, the PM of Anopheles mosquitoes has been found to be permeable to particles of ≤148 kDa (Edwards and Jacobs-Lorena, 2000). Therefore, the PM is presumably permeable to EG and methanol, both of which are much smaller than 148 kDa. It is also reasonable to assume that these low-molecular-mass CPAs are able to permeate through the larval intestinal epithelium, which is a cellular layer. As far as the cells themselves, a wide variety of types have been found to be permeable to both EG and methanol. Although this study sheds no direct light on the exact mechanism of CPA permeation, it probably involves both passive transport and a physiological mechanism such as that involved in osmoregulation.

EG appears to be less toxic to Anopheles larvae than is methanol for the same time exposure. However, the permeation of EG is considerably slower than that of methanol, and, if we consider larval survival after the tissues are exposed to the two CPAs for the times required to attain equivalent concentrations, these are similar. For example, the larval survival is 95% when, after 1 h exposure, the tissue concentration of methanol reaches 1.13 mol l-1, and the survival is about 93% after exposure to 1.5 mol l-1 EG for 3.5 h, at which time the EG concentration in the larvae rises to the same concentration of 1.1 mol l-1. EG and methanol have been reported to be less toxic to a variety of cells and tissues than other commonly used CPAs such as DMSO and glycerol (Ali and Shelton, 1993; Pollock et al., 1991; Zhang and Rawson, 1996a). Our study shows that high percentages (>90%) of Anopheles larvae survive the exposure in EG and methanol for a sufficient time period that allows them to permeate up to reasonably high concentrations without excessive injury. These promising results encourage us to conduct further investigation on the cryopreservation of these larvae.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

The authors thank Andre Laughinghouse at the Laboratory of Parasitic Diseases, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases for providing adult mosquitoes and Dr Mark Benedict at the National Center for Infectious Diseases, CDC, for helpful suggestions about mosquito larval culturing. This research was supported by NIH 5RO1-AI36243 (PI: P. Mazur).

  • © The Company of Biologists Limited 2003

References

  1. ↵
    Ali, J. and Shelton, J. N. (1993). Design of vitrification solutions for the cryopreservation of embryos. J. Reprod. Fertil. 99,471 -477.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. ↵
    Ault, A. and Dudek, G. O. (1976). NMR – An Intoduction to Proton Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy. London: Holden-Day, Inc.
  3. ↵
    Bateson, E. A., Busza, A. L., Pegg, D. E. and Taylor, M. J. (1994). Permeation of rabbit common carotid arteries with dimethyl sulfoxide. Cryobiology 31,393 -397.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    Benedict, M. Q. (1997). Care and maintenance of anopheline mosquito colonies. In The Molecular Biology Of Insect Disease Vectors: A Methods Manual (ed. J. M. Crampton, C. B. Beard and C. Louis), pp. 3-12. London, New York: Chapman and Hall.
  5. ↵
    Bradley, T. J. (1987). Physiology of osmoregulation in mosquitoes. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 32,439 -462.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  6. ↵
    Collins, F. H., Sakai, R. K., Vernick, K. D., Paskewitz, S., Seeley, D. C., Miller, L. H., Collins, W. E., Campbell, C. C. and Gwadz, R. W. (1986). Genetic selection of a Plasmodium-refractory strain of the malaria vector Anopheles gambiae. Science 234,607 -610.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. ↵
    Czlonkowska, M., Papis, K., Guszkiewicz, A., Kossakowski, M. and Eysymont, U. (1991). Freezing of sheep embryos in 3.0 M methanol. Cryo Lett. 12, 11-16.
    OpenUrlWeb of Science
  8. ↵
    Edwards, M. J. and Jacobs-Lorena, M. (2000). Permeability and disruption of the peritrophic matrix and caecal membrane from Aedes aegypti and Anopheles gambiae mosquito larvae. J. Insect Physiol. 46,1313 -1320.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  9. ↵
    Elford, B. C. (1970). Diffusion and distribution of dimethyl sulphoxide in the isolated guinea-pig taenia coli. J. Physiol. 209,187 -208.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  10. ↵
    Fuller, B. J. and Busza, A. L. (1994). Proton NMR-studies on the permeation of tissue fragments by dimethyl-sulfoxide– liver as a model for compact tissues. Cryo Lett. 15,131 -134.
    OpenUrl
  11. ↵
    Fuller, B. J., Busza, A. L. and Proctor, E. (1989). Studies on cryoprotectant equilibration in the intact rat liver using nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy: a noninvasive method to assess distribution of dimethyl sulfoxide in tissues. Cryobiology 26,112 -118.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    Garlid, K. D. (1979). Aqueous phase structure in cells and organells. In Cell- Associated Water (ed. W. Drost-Hansen and J. S. Clegg), pp. 293-361. New York: Academic Press.
  13. ↵
    Gardner, M. J., Hall, N., Fung, E., White, O., Berriman, M., Hyman, R. W., Carlton, J. M., Pain, A., Nelson, K. E., Bowman, S. et al. (2002). Genome sequence of the human malaria parasite Plasmodium falciparum. Nature 419,498 -511.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  14. ↵
    Hagedorn, M., Hsu, E. W., Pilatus, U., Wildt, D. E., Rall, W. R. and Blackband, S. J. (1996). Magnetic resonance microscopy and spectroscopy reveal kinetics of cryoprotectant permeation in a multicompartmental biological system. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93,7454 -7459.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. ↵
    Holt, R. A., Subramanian, G. M., Halpern, A., Sutton, G. G., Charlab, R., Nusskern, D. R., Wincker, P., Clark, A. G., Ribeiro, J. M., Wides, R. et al. (2002). The genome sequence of the malaria mosquito Anopheles gambiae. Science 298,129 -149.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. ↵
    Ito, J., Ghosh, A., Moreira, L. A., Wimmer, E. A. and Jacobs-Lorena, M. (2002). Transgenic anopheline mosquitoes impaired in transmission of a malaria parasite. Nature 417,452 -455.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  17. ↵
    Jackowski, S., Leibo, S. P. and Mazur, P. (1980). Glycerol permeabilities of fertilized and unfertilized mouse ova. J. Exp. Zool. 212,329 -341.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  18. ↵
    Jacobsen, I. B. (1978). Distribution and removal of glycerol by vascular albumin perfusion in rabbit kidneys. Cryobiology 15,302 -311.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. ↵
    James, E. R. (1980). Cryopreservation of schistosoma–Mansoni schistosomula using 40-percent V-V (10-M) methanol and rapid cooling. Cryo Lett. 1, 535-544.
    OpenUrl
  20. ↵
    Lin, T. T., Pitt, R. E. and Steponkus, P. L. (1989). Osmometric behavior of Drosophila melanogaster embryos. Cryobiology 26,453 -471.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. ↵
    Liu, X.-H. and Mazur, P. (in press). Effects of sugars on the kinetics of drying and on the survival of partially dehydrated larvae of Anopheles mosquitoes. J. Insect Physiol.
  22. ↵
    Liu, X.-H., Zhang, T. T. and Rawson, D. M. (1998). Feasibility of vitrification of zebrafish (Danio rerio) embryos using methanol. Cryo Lett. 19,309 -318.
    OpenUrl
  23. ↵
    Liu, X.-H., Zhang, T. and Rawson, D. M. (2001). Differential scanning calorimetry studies of intraembryonic freezing and cryoprotectant penetration in zebrafish (Danio rerio) embryos. J. Exp. Zool. 290,299 -310.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  24. ↵
    Mazur, P. (1970). Cryobiology: the freezing of biological systems. Science 168,939 -949.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  25. ↵
    Mazur, P., Cole, K. W., Hall, J., Schreuders, P. D. and Mahowald, A. P. (1992a). Cryobiological preservation of Drosophila embryos. Science 258,1932 -1935.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  26. ↵
    Mazur, P., Cole, K. W. and Mahowald, A. P. (1992b). Critical factors affecting the permeabilization of Drosophila embryos by alkanes. Cryobiology 29,210 -239.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. ↵
    Mazur, P., Liu, X.-H., Koshimoto, C., Cole, K. W., Gamliel, E., Benedict, M., Laughinghouse, A. and Valle, D. (2001). The development of permeability barriers in oocytes and eggs of Anopheles gambiae and the golden cuticle mutant of Anopheles quadrimaculatus. Cryobiology 43, 340.
    OpenUrl
  28. ↵
    Mazur, P. and Rajotte, R. V. (1981). Permeability of the 17-day fetal rat pancreas to glycerol and dimethylsulfoxide. Cryobiology 18, 1-16.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. ↵
    McCaa, C., Diller, K. R., Aggarwal, S. J. and Takahashi, T. (1991). Cryomicroscopic determination of the membrane osmotic properties of human monocytes at subfreezing temperatures. Cryobiology 28,391 -399.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  30. ↵
    Naccache, P. and Sha'afi, R. I. (1973). Patterns of nonelectrolyte permeability in human red blood cell membrane. J. Gen. Physiol. 62,714 -736.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  31. ↵
    Newton, H., Fisher, J., Arnold, J. R., Pegg, D. E., Faddy, M. J. and Gosden, R. G. (1998). Permeation of human ovarian tissue with cryoprotective agents in preparation for cryopreservation. Human Reprod. 13,376 -380.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  32. ↵
    Nunamaker, R. A. and Lockwood, J. A. (2001). Cryopreservation of embryos of Culicoides sonorensis (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae). J. Med. Entomol. 38, 55-58.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  33. ↵
    Pollock, G. A., Hamlyn, L., Maguire, S. H., Stewart-Richardson, P. A. and Hardie, I. R. (1991). Effects of four cryoprotectants in combination with two vehicle solutions on cultured vascular endothelial cells. Cryobiology 28,413 -421.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  34. ↵
    Rall, W. F., Czlonkowska, M., Barton, S. C. and Polge, C. (1984). Cryoprotection of day-4 mouse embryos by methanol. J. Reprod. Fertil. 70,293 -300.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  35. ↵
    Rall, W. F., Czlonkowska, M. and Polge, C. (1983). Cryopreservation of day 4 mouse embryos by methanol. Cryobiology 20,742 -742.
    OpenUrl
  36. ↵
    Rapatz, G. (1973). Cryoprotective effect of methanol during cooling of frog hearts. Cryobiology 10,181 -184.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  37. ↵
    Steponkus, P. L., Myers, S. P., Lynch, D. V., Gardner, L., Bronshteyn, V., Leibo, S. P., Rall, W. F., Pitt, R. E., Lin, T. T. and MacIntyre, R. J. (1990). Cryopreservation of Drosophila melanogaster embryos. Nature 345,170 -172.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  38. ↵
    Taylor, M. and Busza, A. (1992). A convenient, noninvasive method for measuring the kinetics of permeation of dimethyl-sulfoxide into isolated corneas using NMR-spectroscopy. Cryo Lett. 13,273 -282.
    OpenUrl
  39. ↵
    Thomas, N., Busza, A., Cooper, A., Paynter, S., Fuller, B. and Shaw, R. (1997). Measurement of permeating levels of cryoprotectant during ovarian tissue cryopreservation using H-1 NMR spectroscopy in human and porcine ovaries. Cryo Lett. 18,179 -184.
    OpenUrlWeb of Science
  40. ↵
    Valencia, M. P., Miller, L. H. and Mazur, P. (1996a). Permeability of intact and dechorionated embryos of the Anopheles mosquito to water vapor and liquid water: a comparison with Drosophila. Cryobiology 33,142 -148.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  41. ↵
    Valencia, M. P., Miller, L. H. and Mazur, P. (1996b). Permeabilization of eggs of the malaria mosquito Anopheles gambiae. Cryobiology 33,149 -162.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  42. ↵
    Walcerz, D. B., Taylor, M. J. and Busza, A. L. (1995). Determination of the kinetics of permeation of dimethyl sulfoxide in isolated corneas. Cell Biophys. 26, 79-102.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  43. ↵
    Wang, W. B., Leopold, R. A., Nelson, D. R. and Freeman, T. P. (2000). Cryopreservation of Musca domestica (Dipetera: Muscidae) embryos. Cryobiology 41,153 -166.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  44. ↵
    WHO (1996). The World Health Report. Geneva: World Health Organization.
  45. ↵
    Wusteman, M. C., Armitage, J. W., Wang, L. H., Busza, A. L. and Pegg, D. E. (1999). Cryopreservation studies with porcine corneas. Curr. Eye Res. 19,228 -233.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  46. ↵
    Wusteman, M., Busza, A., Boylan, S., Hayes, A. and Pegg, D. (1995). Ethylene glycol permeation and toxicity in the rabbit common carotid artery. Cryobiology 32,428 -435.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  47. ↵
    Zhang, T. and Rawson, D. M. (1996a). Feasibility studies on vitrification of intact zebrafish (Brachydanio rerio) embryos. Cryobiology 33, 1-13.
    OpenUrl
  48. ↵
    Zhang, T. T. and Rawson, D. M. (1996b). Permeability of the vitelline membrane of zebrafish (Brachydanio rerio) embryos to methanol and propane-1,2-diol. Cryo Lett. 17,273 -280.
    OpenUrl
  49. ↵
    Zheng, L., Cornel, A. J., Wang, R., Erfle, H., Voss, H., Ansorge, W., Kafatos, F. C. and Collins, F. H. (1997). Quantitative trait loci for refractoriness of Anopheles gambiae to Plasmodium cynomolgi B. Science 276,425 -428.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
Previous ArticleNext Article
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

This Issue

 Download PDF

Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Experimental Biology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Permeation and toxicity of ethylene glycol and methanol in larvae of Anopheles gambiae
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Experimental Biology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Experimental Biology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Research Article
Permeation and toxicity of ethylene glycol and methanol in larvae of Anopheles gambiae
Xiang-Hong Liu, Hongjun Pan, Peter Mazur
Journal of Experimental Biology 2003 206: 2221-2228; doi: 10.1242/jeb.00420
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Research Article
Permeation and toxicity of ethylene glycol and methanol in larvae of Anopheles gambiae
Xiang-Hong Liu, Hongjun Pan, Peter Mazur
Journal of Experimental Biology 2003 206: 2221-2228; doi: 10.1242/jeb.00420

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Alerts

Please log in to add an alert for this article.

Sign in to email alerts with your email address

Article navigation

  • Top
  • Article
    • SUMMARY
    • Introduction
    • Materials and methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
    • References
  • Figures & tables
  • Info & metrics
  • PDF

Related articles

Cited by...

More in this TOC section

  • Nest substrate and tool shape significantly affect the mechanics and energy requirements of avian eggshell puncture
  • Jaw kinematics and tongue protraction-retraction during Chewing and drinking in the pig
  • Masticatory system integration in a commensal canid: interrelationships between bones, muscles and bite force in the red fox
Show more RESEARCH ARTICLE

Similar articles

Other journals from The Company of Biologists

Development

Journal of Cell Science

Disease Models & Mechanisms

Biology Open

Advertisement

Predicting the Future: Species Survival in a Changing World

Read our new special issue exploring the significant role of experimental biology in assessing and predicting the susceptibility or resilience of species to future, human-induced environmental change.


Adam Hardy wins the 2020 Journal of Experimental Biology Outstanding Paper Prize

Congratulations to winner Adam Hardy for his work showing that goby fins are as touch sensitive as primate fingertips. Read Adam’s paper and find out more about the 12 papers nominated for the award.


Stark trade-offs and elegant solutions in arthropod visual systems

Many elegant eye specializations that evolved in response to visual challenges continue to be discovered. A new Review by Meece et al. summarises exciting solutions evolved by insects and other arthropods in response to specific visual challenges.


Head bobbing gives pigeons a sense of perspective

Pigeons might look goofy with their head-bobbing walk, but it turns out that the ungainly head manoeuvre allows the birds to judge distance.

Articles

  • Accepted manuscripts
  • Issue in progress
  • Latest complete issue
  • Issue archive
  • Archive by article type
  • Special issues
  • Subject collections
  • Interviews
  • Sign up for alerts

About us

  • About JEB
  • Editors and Board
  • Editor biographies
  • Travelling Fellowships
  • Grants and funding
  • Journal Meetings
  • Workshops
  • The Company of Biologists
  • Journal news

For Authors

  • Submit a manuscript
  • Aims and scope
  • Presubmission enquiries
  • Article types
  • Manuscript preparation
  • Cover suggestions
  • Editorial process
  • Promoting your paper
  • Open Access
  • Outstanding paper prize
  • Biology Open transfer

Journal Info

  • Journal policies
  • Rights and permissions
  • Media policies
  • Reviewer guide
  • Sign up for alerts

Contact

  • Contact JEB
  • Subscriptions
  • Advertising
  • Feedback

 Twitter   YouTube   LinkedIn

© 2021   The Company of Biologists Ltd   Registered Charity 277992