Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Accepted manuscripts
    • Issue in progress
    • Latest complete issue
    • Issue archive
    • Archive by article type
    • Special issues
    • Subject collections
    • Interviews
    • Sign up for alerts
  • About us
    • About JEB
    • Editors and Board
    • Editor biographies
    • Travelling Fellowships
    • Grants and funding
    • Journal Meetings
    • Workshops
    • The Company of Biologists
    • Journal news
  • For authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Aims and scope
    • Presubmission enquiries
    • Article types
    • Manuscript preparation
    • Cover suggestions
    • Editorial process
    • Promoting your paper
    • Open Access
    • Outstanding paper prize
    • Biology Open transfer
  • Journal info
    • Journal policies
    • Rights and permissions
    • Media policies
    • Reviewer guide
    • Sign up for alerts
  • Contacts
    • Contact JEB
    • Subscriptions
    • Advertising
    • Feedback
    • Institutional usage stats (logged-in users only)
  • COB
    • About The Company of Biologists
    • Development
    • Journal of Cell Science
    • Journal of Experimental Biology
    • Disease Models & Mechanisms
    • Biology Open

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Experimental Biology
  • COB
    • About The Company of Biologists
    • Development
    • Journal of Cell Science
    • Journal of Experimental Biology
    • Disease Models & Mechanisms
    • Biology Open

supporting biologistsinspiring biology

Journal of Experimental Biology

  • Log in
Advanced search

RSS  Twitter  Facebook  YouTube  

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Accepted manuscripts
    • Issue in progress
    • Latest complete issue
    • Issue archive
    • Archive by article type
    • Special issues
    • Subject collections
    • Interviews
    • Sign up for alerts
  • About us
    • About JEB
    • Editors and Board
    • Editor biographies
    • Travelling Fellowships
    • Grants and funding
    • Journal Meetings
    • Workshops
    • The Company of Biologists
    • Journal news
  • For authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Aims and scope
    • Presubmission enquiries
    • Article types
    • Manuscript preparation
    • Cover suggestions
    • Editorial process
    • Promoting your paper
    • Open Access
    • Outstanding paper prize
    • Biology Open transfer
  • Journal info
    • Journal policies
    • Rights and permissions
    • Media policies
    • Reviewer guide
    • Sign up for alerts
  • Contacts
    • Contact JEB
    • Subscriptions
    • Advertising
    • Feedback
    • Institutional usage stats (logged-in users only)
Research Article
Antagonistic control of fluid secretion by the Malpighian tubules of Tenebrio molitor: effects of diuretic and antidiuretic peptides and their second messengers
U. I. M. Wiehart, S. W. Nicolson, R. A. Eigenheer, D. A. Schooley
Journal of Experimental Biology 2002 205: 493-501;
U. I. M. Wiehart
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
S. W. Nicolson
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
R. A. Eigenheer
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
D. A. Schooley
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & tables
  • Info & metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Tables

Figures

  •    Fig. 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 1.

    Dose–response curves for the effect of Tenebrio molitor diuretic peptides Tenmo-DH37 (filled squares) and Tenmo-DH47 (open circles) on fluid secretion rates. Results are expressed as a percentage of the maximal response obtained in the presence of 8-bromo-cyclic AMP (0.1 mmol l–1). Data points are the mean of 6–12 determinations for Tenmo-DH37 and 6–7 determinations for Tenmo-DH47; vertical lines represent ± 1 s.e.m. The EC50 values are 0.12 nmol l–1 for Tenmo-DH37 and 26 nmol l–1 for Tenmo-DH47 (r2 values for the curve fits were 0.95 and 0.96, respectively).

  •    Fig. 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 2.

    Lack of synergism between Tenmo-DH37 (DH37) and Tenmo-DH47 (DH47). Diuretic peptides were tested at 0.2 nmol l–1 and 40 nmol l–1, approximately 1.5 times their respective EC50 values, after which the Ringer’s solution was changed to one containing both peptides (at these same concentrations). No change in secretion rates was observed. Data are presented as means + 1 s.e.m. (N=8).

  •    Fig. 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 3.

    Dose–response curve for the effect of cyclic AMP on fluid secretion by Tenebrio molitor Malpighian tubules. Data are presented as means ± s.e.m. of 7–12 tubules. The EC50 was 350 μmol l–1 (r2=0.999 for the curve fit). Note that data for the two highest cyclic AMP concentrations tested are shown in the graph, but were excluded from the non-linear regression analysis because they indicate some receptor desensitisation at high levels, and this cannot be accommodated by the algorithm used.

  •    Fig. 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 4.

    Comparison of secretory response to cyclic AMP and Tenmo-DH37 (DH37). No significant differences in the response time or maximum rates of secretion were observed when Malpighian tubules of Tenebrio molitor were stimulated with 1 mmol l–1 cyclic AMP (broken line) or 100 nmol l–1 Tenmo-DH37 (solid line). Each point shows the mean ± s.e.m. for 8–12 tubules. The horizontal filled bar indicates the period during which tubules were exposed to either cyclic AMP or Tenmo-DH37.

  •    Fig. 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 5.

    Dose–response curve for the effect of cyclic GMP on fluid secretion. Data are presented as means ± 1 s.e.m., N=5–11. The EC50 value determined was 490 μmol l–1 (r2=0.999, 95 % confidence intervals 99.7 μmol l–1 to 2.4 mmol l–1). Note that data for the highest cyclic GMP concentration have been excluded from the non-linear regression analysis because they indicate some receptor desensitisation at high levels, and this cannot be accommodated by the algorithm used.

  •    Fig. 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 6.

    Antagonistic effect of cyclic GMP on Malpighian tubules of Tenebrio molitor already stimulated with cyclic AMP. Each point shows the mean ± s.e.m. for 8–10 tubules. Responses are shown for 0.5 mmol l–1 cyclic AMP in combination with 0.5 mmol l–1 cyclic GMP (broken line), 0.5 mmol l–1 cyclic AMP with 1 mmol l–1 cyclic GMP (dashed line) and 0.25 mmol l–1 cyclic AMP with 1 mmol l–1 cyclic GMP (solid line). The horizontal dotted bar indicates the period during which tubules were exposed to cyclic AMP, and the horizontal filled bar indicates the period of exposure to cyclic GMP.

  •    Fig. 7.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 7.

    Antagonism between Tenebrio molitor peptides controlling Malpighian tubule secretion and between their second messengers. Effect of adding Tenmo-ADF (ADF) to tubules already stimulated with Tenmo-DH37 (DH37) (both at concentrations of 100 nmol l–1) compared with the effect of adding cyclic GMP to tubules already stimulated with cyclic AMP (both at concentrations of 0.5 mmol l–1). Secretion rates were measured after 45 min of each treatment. Values are means + 1 s.e.m. for eight tubules (peptides) or seven tubules (second messengers). C, control rates.

  •    Fig. 8.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 8.

    Dose–response curve for the effect of CAP2b on fluid secretion by Tenebrio molitor tubules. Data are presented as means ±1 s.e.m. for 8–9 tubules. The EC50 value determined was 85 nmol l–1 (r2=0.79, 95 % confidence intervals 4.3 nmol l–1 to 1.7 μmol l–1).

  •    Fig. 9.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 9.

    Antagonism between CAP2b and Tenmo-DH37 (DH37). Inhibition of fluid secretion by 1 μmol l–1 CAP2b and subsequent slow stimulation by Tenmo-DH37 (10 nmol l–1). Data are presented as means ±1 s.e.m. for five tubules. The horizontal filled bar indicates the period of exposure to CAP2b, and the horizontal dotted bar indicates the period of exposure to Tenmo-DH37.

  •    Fig. 10.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 10.

    Effects of stimulants on secretion rates of Tenebrio molitor larval (filled columns) and adult (open columns) Malpighian tubules. Tubules were stimulated with 100 nmol l–1 Tenmo-DH37 (DH37) and 1 mmol l–1 cyclic AMP. Data are presented as means + 1 s.e.m. (N=9–10). C, control rates.

Previous ArticleNext Article
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

This Issue

 Download PDF

Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Experimental Biology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Antagonistic control of fluid secretion by the Malpighian tubules of Tenebrio molitor: effects of diuretic and antidiuretic peptides and their second messengers
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Experimental Biology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Experimental Biology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Research Article
Antagonistic control of fluid secretion by the Malpighian tubules of Tenebrio molitor: effects of diuretic and antidiuretic peptides and their second messengers
U. I. M. Wiehart, S. W. Nicolson, R. A. Eigenheer, D. A. Schooley
Journal of Experimental Biology 2002 205: 493-501;
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Research Article
Antagonistic control of fluid secretion by the Malpighian tubules of Tenebrio molitor: effects of diuretic and antidiuretic peptides and their second messengers
U. I. M. Wiehart, S. W. Nicolson, R. A. Eigenheer, D. A. Schooley
Journal of Experimental Biology 2002 205: 493-501;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Alerts

Please log in to add an alert for this article.

Sign in to email alerts with your email address

Article navigation

  • Top
  • Article
    • SUMMARY
    • Introduction
    • Materials and methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
    • References
  • Figures & tables
  • Info & metrics
  • PDF

Related articles

Cited by...

More in this TOC section

  • Angling gear avoidance learning in juvenile red sea bream: evidence from individual-based experiments
  • Tactile active sensing in an insect plant pollinator
  • Omega-3 fatty acids accelerate fledging in an avian marine predator: a potential role of cognition
Show more RESEARCH ARTICLE

Similar articles

Other journals from The Company of Biologists

Development

Journal of Cell Science

Disease Models & Mechanisms

Biology Open

Advertisement

Welcome to JEB’s new Editor Monica Daley

We are pleased to welcome Monica Daley to JEB’s Editorial team. Monica has had a long association with JEB before taking up her new role, overseeing peer review of neuromuscular physiology, terrestrial biomechanics and integrative physiology of locomotion.


In the field with Robyn Hetem

Continuing our fieldwork series, Robyn Hetem reflects on working with species ranging from aardvark to zebra, and the impact COVID-19 has had on fieldwork.


Read & Publish participation continues to grow

“It is particularly encouraging for early career researchers, as it allows them to display their research globally without the need to find costs to cover the open access option.”

Professor Fernando Montealegre-Z (University of Lincoln) shares his experience of publishing Open Access as part of our growing Read & Publish initiative. We now have over 150 institutions in 15 countries and four library consortia taking part – find out more and view our full list of participating institutions.


Nocturnal reef residents have deep-sea-like eyes

Fanny de Busserolles and colleagues from The University of Queensland have discovered that the eyes of nocturnal reef fish have multibank retinas, layers of photoreceptors, similar to the eyes of deep-sea fish that live in dim light conditions.


Mechanisms underlying gut microbiota–host interactions in insects

In their Review, Konstantin Schmidt and Philipp Engel summarise recent findings about the mechanisms involved in gut colonisation and the provisioning of beneficial effects in gut microbiota–insect symbiosis.

Articles

  • Accepted manuscripts
  • Issue in progress
  • Latest complete issue
  • Issue archive
  • Archive by article type
  • Special issues
  • Subject collections
  • Interviews
  • Sign up for alerts

About us

  • About JEB
  • Editors and Board
  • Editor biographies
  • Travelling Fellowships
  • Grants and funding
  • Journal Meetings
  • Workshops
  • The Company of Biologists
  • Journal news

For Authors

  • Submit a manuscript
  • Aims and scope
  • Presubmission enquiries
  • Article types
  • Manuscript preparation
  • Cover suggestions
  • Editorial process
  • Promoting your paper
  • Open Access
  • Outstanding paper prize
  • Biology Open transfer

Journal Info

  • Journal policies
  • Rights and permissions
  • Media policies
  • Reviewer guide
  • Sign up for alerts

Contact

  • Contact JEB
  • Subscriptions
  • Advertising
  • Feedback

 Twitter   YouTube   LinkedIn

© 2021   The Company of Biologists Ltd   Registered Charity 277992