Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Accepted manuscripts
    • Issue in progress
    • Latest complete issue
    • Issue archive
    • Archive by article type
    • Special issues
    • Subject collections
    • Interviews
    • Sign up for alerts
  • About us
    • About JEB
    • Editors and Board
    • Editor biographies
    • Travelling Fellowships
    • Grants and funding
    • Journal Meetings
    • Workshops
    • The Company of Biologists
    • Journal news
  • For authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Aims and scope
    • Presubmission enquiries
    • Article types
    • Manuscript preparation
    • Cover suggestions
    • Editorial process
    • Promoting your paper
    • Open Access
    • Outstanding paper prize
    • Biology Open transfer
  • Journal info
    • Journal policies
    • Rights and permissions
    • Media policies
    • Reviewer guide
    • Sign up for alerts
  • Contacts
    • Contact JEB
    • Subscriptions
    • Advertising
    • Feedback
  • COB
    • About The Company of Biologists
    • Development
    • Journal of Cell Science
    • Journal of Experimental Biology
    • Disease Models & Mechanisms
    • Biology Open

User menu

  • Log in
  • Log out

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Experimental Biology
  • COB
    • About The Company of Biologists
    • Development
    • Journal of Cell Science
    • Journal of Experimental Biology
    • Disease Models & Mechanisms
    • Biology Open

supporting biologistsinspiring biology

Journal of Experimental Biology

  • Log in
Advanced search

RSS  Twitter  Facebook  YouTube  

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Accepted manuscripts
    • Issue in progress
    • Latest complete issue
    • Issue archive
    • Archive by article type
    • Special issues
    • Subject collections
    • Interviews
    • Sign up for alerts
  • About us
    • About JEB
    • Editors and Board
    • Editor biographies
    • Travelling Fellowships
    • Grants and funding
    • Journal Meetings
    • Workshops
    • The Company of Biologists
    • Journal news
  • For authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Aims and scope
    • Presubmission enquiries
    • Article types
    • Manuscript preparation
    • Cover suggestions
    • Editorial process
    • Promoting your paper
    • Open Access
    • Outstanding paper prize
    • Biology Open transfer
  • Journal info
    • Journal policies
    • Rights and permissions
    • Media policies
    • Reviewer guide
    • Sign up for alerts
  • Contacts
    • Contact JEB
    • Subscriptions
    • Advertising
    • Feedback
Research Article
Pendular energy transduction within the step in human walking
G. A. Cavagna, P. A. Willems, M. A. Legramandi, N. C. Heglund
Journal of Experimental Biology 2002 205: 3413-3422;
G. A. Cavagna
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
P. A. Willems
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
M. A. Legramandi
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
N. C. Heglund
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & tables
  • Info & metrics
  • PDF
Loading

SUMMARY

During walking, the centre of mass of the body moves like that of a `square wheel': with each step cycle, some of its kinetic energy, Ek, is converted into gravitational potential energy, Ep, and then back into kinetic energy. To move the centre of mass, the locomotory muscles must supply only the power required to overcome the losses occurring during this energy transduction. African women carry loads of up to 20% of their body weight on the head without increasing their energy expenditure. This occurs as a result of an unexplained, more effective energy transduction between Ek and Ep than that of Europeans. In this study we measured the value of the Ek to Ep transduction at each instant in time during the step in African women and European subjects during level walking at 3.5-5.5 km h-1, both unloaded and carrying loads spanning 20-30% of their body weight. A simulation of the changes in Ek and Ep during the step by sinusoidal curves was used for comparison. It was found that loading improves the transduction of Ep to Ek during the descent of the centre of mass. The improvement is not significant in European subjects, whereas it is highly significant in African women.

  • locomotion
  • walking
  • recovery
  • energy expenditure
  • human

Introduction

During each step of walking, the gravitational potential energy Ep and the kinetic energy Ek of the centre of mass of the body oscillate between a maximum and a minimum value. A priori, active movements of an organism are assumed to be powered by muscles: positive muscle work to increase potential energy and kinetic energy, and negative muscle work to absorb potential energy and kinetic energy. Both positive and negative muscular work require the expenditure of chemical energy. During walking, both the positive and the negative work actually done by the muscles to sustain the mechanical energy changes of the centre of mass (positive and negative external work) are reduced by the pendular transduction of potential energy to kinetic energy and vice versa (Cavagna et al., 1963).

The fraction of mechanical energy recovered due to this transduction, Rstep, has been defined as: Math1 where W+v represents the positive work calculated from the sum, over one step, of the positive increments undergone by the gravitational potential energy, Ep=Mgh (where M is the mass of the body and h is the height of the centre of mass), W+f is the positive work calculated from the sum, over one step, of the positive increments undergone by the kinetic energy of forward motion Ekf. Ekf=0.5MVf2 (where Vf is the instantaneous forward velocity of the centre of mass), and W+ext is the positive external work calculated from the sum over one step of the positive increments undergone by the total mechanical energy of the centre of mass, Ecg=Ep+Ekf+Ekv (Cavagna et al., 1976). The kinetic energy of vertical motion, Ekv=0.5MVv2 (where Vv is the instantaneous vertical velocity of the centre of mass), has not been taken into account when obtaining Rstep from W+v and W+f. Ekv has no effect on W+v because the vertical velocity is zero at the top/bottom endpoints of the Ep curve. As will be shown below, using W+k, measured from the total kinetic energy curve Ek=Ekv+Ekf, instead of W+f, measured from the Ekf curve, has a negligible effect on Rstep (see Fig. 8).

Fig. 8.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 8.

The pendular recovery of mechanical energy, defined by equation 1 (Rstep, open circles) and by equation 6 (Rint, open squares), and the external work done per unit distance (W+ext, filled circles) plotted as a function of speed during unloaded walking for the 11 European subjects of this study. Values are means ± S.D. (N is given by the numbers near the filled circles) for data grouped into the following intervals along the abscissa: <2, 2 to <2.5,...., 8.5 to <9, >9 km h-1. Lines are fitted using a third-order polynomial fit (r2=0.98, KaleidaGraph 3.5). The crosses and the dotted line show how Rstep changes when the kinetic energy of vertical motion of the centre of mass, Ekv, is taken into account in the calculation of W+v and W+k (see text). Note that Wext attains a minimum at a speed lower than the speed at which the pendular recovery attains a maximum.

Rstep, as defined in Equation 1, represents the fraction of the maximum positive energy increments possibly undergone by the centre of mass (measured assuming no energy transduction) that is recovered by the pendular mechanism over the whole step cycle: it does not give information about the time course of this transduction within the step. Factors that are expected to affect Rstep are: (i) the relative amplitude of the potential and kinetic energy curves, (ii) their shape and (iii) their relative phase. In a frictionless pendulum, energy recovery, R, equals unity because the changes in potential energy mirror the changes in kinetic energy. During walking, Rstep attains a maximum at an intermediate speed when the difference in amplitude of the potential and kinetic energy curves approaches zero and the phase difference between the potential and kinetic energy curves approaches 180° (Cavagna et al., 1976, 1983; Griffin and Kram, 2000).

More information about the pendular mechanism of walking may be obtained by analyzing how the pendular transduction of the mechanical energy occurs during the step cycle. The factors affecting the pendular transduction of mechanical energy within the step are not known. The aim of this study is to define these factors by following the transduction between potential and kinetic energy at each instant of time during the step.

We applied this new approach to the great skill of African women carrying loads (Maloiy et al., 1986): African women carry loads more economically than Europeans as a result of their greater Rstep (Heglund et al., 1995); however, it is not known how this greater Rstep is attained. The within-step analysis of the potential kinetic energy transduction demonstrates the phases of the step in which the difference between African women and European subjects is most apparent.

Materials and methods

Subjects and experimental procedure

In this study, we analyzed the changes in Ek, Ep and Ek+Ep of the centre of mass of the body during one step of level walking at a constant speed with and without a load being carried by the subject (loaded and unloaded walking steps). Data were obtained for 11 Europeans (five male and six female, 65.6±7.1 kg, mean ± S.D.) and four African women (three Luo and one Kikuyu, 73.9±14.4 kg, mean ± S.D.) previously described by Heglund et al. (1995). The steps analyzed were recorded during walking at 3.5-5.5 km h-1, both for unloaded subjects and for subjects carrying loads spanning 20-30% of their body weight. The speed range corresponds to freely chosen walking speeds. The load range was chosen because it results in the maximum difference between Rstep measured in the European subjects and Rstep measured in the African subjects (see fig. 2 in Heglund et al., 1995). Data collected within these speed and load ranges were averaged (see Table 1) neglecting any effect of the speed and load change, because the scatter of the data was too large to define a trend within such a narrow speed and load range. Loads were head-supported by the African women and shoulder-supported by the Europeans. The Kikuyu woman carried the loads on her back supported solely by a strap over their head. Two of the Luo women carried the loads on top of her head, and the other Luo woman carried the loads both ways. A step was considered to be suitable for analysis when the sum of the increments of Ep and Ek over the step cycle did not differ by more than 10% from the sum of the decrements due to variability between successive steps of the subject. All the usable steps (N=32) of the African women during walking with loads were analyzed. An equal number of steps was randomly chosen for analysis from a larger pool of data for African women during unloaded walking and for European subjects during both unloaded and loaded walking. The five European males walked both loaded (18 steps analyzed) and unloaded (15 steps analyzed) whereas, of the six European females, four walked loaded and unloaded, one walked unloaded only and one walked loaded only, giving a total of 14 loaded steps and 17 unloaded steps analyzed.

Fig. 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 2.

Simulation: effect of the phase shift α. The fraction of the mechanical energy recovered through the pendular transduction in the simulation, calculated as Rstep (dotted line, Equation 4) or as Rint (solid line, Equation 6) is plotted as a function of the phase shift α between the curves Ep=-sinx and Ek=sin(x-α) illustrated in Fig. 1. The two vertical continuous lines encompass the values of α attained during all speeds of walking: α decreases from approximately 45° at the lowest speeds to approximately -45° at highest speeds (Cavagna et al., 1983). The two vertical broken lines encompass the values of α (10°-20°) observed in this study (Table 1). Note that Rstep≥Rint over the entire range ofα measured during walking.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1.

Experimental values of the parameters of the walking step

The subjects walked across a force platform sensitive to the vertical and horizontal (fore—aft) components of the force exerted by the feet on the ground. The lateral component of the force was neglected (Cavagna et al., 1963). The force platform had a natural frequency greater than 180 Hz in both directions and was mounted at ground level in the middle of a walkway. The dimensions of the platform were 1.8 m×0.4 m in the case of the African women and 6.0 m×0.4 m in the case of the Europeans. The mean walking speed was measured by means of photocells placed 1.2 m apart (Africans) and 1.9-3.6 m apart (Europeans) alongside the platform.

The platform signals were collected by a microcomputer for analysis using a sampling rate of 500 Hz for the African subjects and 100 Hz for the European subjects. The changes in Ek, Ep and Ek+Ep of the centre of mass of the body were determined from the platform signals using the procedure described in detail by Cavagna (1975). In short, integration of the horizontal force and of the vertical force minus the body weight, both divided by the body mass, yielded the velocity changes of the centre of mass. The instantaneous velocity in the forward direction was obtained using the mean walking speed, measured from the photocell signal, to determine the integration constant. A first integration was made in the vertical direction on the assumption that the initial and final velocities of the step cycle were equal.

Contrary to our previous studies, in which the kinetic energy of forward and vertical motion were calculated separately, the kinetic energy of both forward and vertical motion, Ek, was calculated from the velocity of the centre of mass in the sagittal plane. Wk is the work necessary to sustain the kinetic energy changes (positive when Ek increases, negative when Ek decreases).

A second integration of the vertical velocity yields the vertical displacement of the centre of mass. This integration assumes that the net vertical displacement over the whole step cycle was zero. The oscillations of the gravitational potential energy Ep were calculated from the vertical displacement. Wv is the work necessary to sustain the gravitational potential energy changes (positive when Ep increases, negative when Ep decreases). The total energy of the centre of mass, Ecg, due to its motion in the sagittal plane, is the algebraic sum at each instant of Ep and Ek. Wext is the sum of the changes in Ecg during one step (the sum of the positive increments corresponds to the external positive work done by the muscular force, the sum of the negative increments corresponds to the external negative work done by the muscular force).

During walking, the negative work done by external friction is small and was neglected: a maximum error of 10% due to this assumption was measured in sprint running (Cavagna et al., 1971). During level walking at a constant speed, the net changes in mechanical energy of the centre of mass of the body are zero over the whole step cycle. It follows that the external positive work done by the muscular force equals the external negative work (neglecting the negative work done by friction outside the muscles), i.e. during each step, the muscles and elastic structures deliver and absorb an equal amount of mechanical energy and the net work (positive + negative) is zero. As mentioned above, chemical energy is expended to perform positive work and also, to a lesser extent, to perform negative work. To reduce energy expenditure, the mechanical energy changes of the centre of mass (both positive and negative) should be reduced to a minimum.

Within-step analysis of the potential—kinetic energy transduction

The mechanisms resulting in the measured value of Rstep (Equation 1) were analyzed in this study by measuring the fraction of mechanical energy recovered due to the transduction between Ep and Ek at each instant in time during the step. The step period, τ, was divided into equal time intervals (2 ms for the Africans and 10 ms for the Europeans), and the recovery, r(t), was calculated from the absolute value of the changes, both positive and negative increments, in Ep, Ek and Ecg during each time interval: Math2 where t is time. The signal-to-noise ratio in r(t) decreased when the changes in energy during a particular time interval approached zero (see Fig. 7).

Fig. 7.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 7.

Recordings such as those depicted in Fig. 5, showing an extreme case in which loading results in tpk- being reduced to zero and in an increase in the instantaneous recovery of mechanical energy r(t) during the descent of the centre of mass to a level equal to that attained during the lift. This leads to very high values of pendular recovery during the step (African woman, Luo, 88.9 kg, 4.5 km h-1, loaded with 19.1 kg). For further details, see legend to Fig. 5.

Simulation of the energy transduction within the step

To examine the trend of r(t) within the step (Equation 2), the changes in Ep and Ek taking place during a walking step were simulated by two sinusoidal curves. This simulation is not meant to represent a model of the complex walking mechanics but offers a useful background within which to interpret the experimental recording of r(t) and to distinguish different phases within the step. In addition, it allows us to define the relationship between the mean pendular energy transduction derived from the present analysis and Rstep, previously used in the literature (see below).

Since, during walking, Ep and Ek of the centre of mass change roughly out of phase, we assumed in the simulation that Ep=-sinx and Ek=sin(x-α), where the phase shiftα =0° when the Ep and Ek curves are exactly 180° out of phase. In previous studies (Cavagna et al., 1983; Griffin et al., 1999), this phase shift was defined as α=360° Δt/τ, whereΔ t is the difference between the time at which Ekf is at a maximum and the time at which Ep was at a minimum and τ is the step period. At low and intermediate walking speeds, such as those considered in the present study, α >0°; at high walking speeds (>6 km h-1),α<0° (Cavagna et al., 1983). For most walking speeds, 45°>α>-45°.

The total mechanical energy of the centre of mass Ecg was calculated as the algebraic sum of the curves for Ep and Ek: Math3 The effect of a change in the phase shift α is shown in Fig. 1. Ecg attains a maximum or a minimum when its derivative is zero, i.e. when cosx=cos(x-α). In contrast, cosx=cos(2π-x=cos(-x), so the angle for a maximum of Ecg will be (π+α/2) and the angle for a minimum of Ecg will be α/2 (Fig. 1). Substituting these angles into Equation 3, one obtains the maximum and minimum values of the total mechanical energy in the simulation, i.e. Ecg,max=2sin(α/2) and Ecg,min=-2sin(α/2). The changes in Rstep in the simulation with the phase shift α (Fig. 2, dotted line) can then be defined as: Math4 The recovery of mechanical energy at each instant during one cycle, r(x), was calculated in the simulation according to Equation 2 by substituting |ΔEp(t)|,|Δ Ek(t)| and|Δ Ecg(t)| with the absolute value of the derivative of the functions: -sinx, sin(x-α) and -sinx+sin(x-α), for x=0-360° in increments of 1° (Fig. 1, upper panels, thick lines): Math5 The calculated value of r(x) for sinusoidal curves was equal to that measured on the same sinusoidal curves with the procedure used to determine r(t) on the experimental tracings.

Fig. 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 1.

Simulation of the transduction between kinetic and potential energy of the centre of mass when the maximum in kinetic energy is set to lag behind the minimum in potential energy by a value of α=10° (A) andα =20° (B), which covers the range of mean experimental values measured in this study during walking (see values of α in Table 1). α is the phase shift between the maximum of the kinetic energy Ek and the minimum of the potential energy Ep. Upper panels: the total energy of the centre of mass of the body (Ecg, thin continuous line) is simulated as the sum of two sine waves representing its potential energy (Ep=-sinx; dotted lines) and kinetic energy [Ek=sin(x-10°) in A, and Ek=sin(x-20°) in B: broken lines) during a step cycle, expressed in degrees. The fraction of the mechanical energy recovered at each instant by the pendular transduction within the cycle, r(x) (thick lines and right-hand ordinates), is calculated according to Equation 5 from the relative changes in the Ek, Ep and Ecg curves. r(x) is zero when the changes in the Ek and Ep curves have the same sign, and attains unity when the Ecg curve is at a maximum or at a minimum. Lower panels: the area under the r(x) curve divided by 360°, defined as Embedded Image, attains the value Rint(360°)=Rint at the end of each cycle. Time-averaged Rint is less than Rstep, calculated according to Equation 1 from the total amplitude reached by the Ep, Ek and Ecg curves during the cycle. The relationship between Rint and Rstep for different values ofα is shown in Fig. 2.

If the two sinusoidal curves, representing Ep and Ek, are exactly out of phase (α=0°) and have the same amplitude, Ecg is constant, W+ext(x) is zero and r(x=1 over the whole cycle. If the two sinusoidal curves are exactly out of phase (α=0°) but have different amplitudes, Ecg(x) oscillates in phase with the curve of larger amplitude, Wext(x)≠0, and r(x) decreases below unity, maintaining a constant value over the cycle. For example, if the amplitude of Ep is half that of Ek, r(x)=1-(1/3)=0.66 (Equation 2).

If the two energy curves have the same amplitude, but are not exactly out of phase (α≠0°), r(x) changes as described in Fig. 1 for α=10° and 20°. In each cycle, there are two periods when r(x=0: the changes in potential energy and in kinetic energy have the same sign and, as a consequence,|Δ Ecg(x)|=|Ep(x)|+|ΔEk(x)| (see Equation 2). During one of these periods, henceforth called tpk+, lasting from the minimum of Ep to the maximum of Ek, positive external work is done to increase Ep and Ek simultaneously. During the other, tpk-, lasting from the maximum of Ep to the minimum of Ek, negative external work is done to absorb Ep and Ek simultaneously. The phase shift between Ep and Ek was calculated both asα =360°tpk+/τ and asβ =360°tpk-/τ (Table 1).

The two periods when r(x) is zero are separated by two time intervals when r(x) increases to unity and then decreases to zero following a bell-shaped curve: one period after tpk+ during most of the lift phase (increment of the Ep curve in Fig. 1), the other after tpk- during most of the lowering phase (decrement of the Ep curve in Fig. 1). According to equation 2, r(x)=1 is attained whenΔ Ecg(x) is zero (i.e. Ecg attains a maximum or a minimum and Ep=Ek).

The mean value of r over the whole step cycle was calculated, both for the simulation, r(x), and for the experimental tracings, r(t), as the time integral divided by the period: Math where z=360° for the simulation and z=τ for the experimental tracings. In the case of two sinusoidal curves of different amplitude and exactly out of phase (α=0°), Rint=Rstep (Rstep is defined as in Equation 1). In the case of two sinusoidal curves of the same amplitude but with a phase shift α between the time at which Ek is at a maximum and the time at which Ep is at a minimum, the relationship between Rint and α (Fig. 2, continuous line) is given by: Math6 where α is expressed in rad. Equation 6 is obtained by integrating r(x), as defined in Equation 5, and dividing the result by 2π. In the simulation, Rint is not equal to Rstep except when the curves are exactly out of phase (α=0°) or exactly in phase (α=180°), or whenα =±96.3° (Fig. 2). When the phase shift varies in the simulation as in human walking (45°>α>-45°), Rint≤Rstep and both decrease with|α| .

Average recordings

To compare the energy transduction within the step in different subjects, the step cycle was divided into four periods: the two periods with r(t)=0 (tpk+ and tpk-) and the two with r(t)≠0 (Fig. 1). The mean values for the four periods are given in Table 1 for each experimental condition. The abscissa of each of the two phases with r(t)≠0 was normalized from zero to one, and an average of r(t) was calculated at discrete intervals along the normalized abscissa (0.01). The mean step cycle was then reconstructed using on the abscissa, the mean values of the four time intervals (Table 1, Figs 4, 6).

Fig. 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 4.

Unloaded walking. (A) Average curves of the instantaneous recovery of mechanical energy r(t) for the African women (thick continuous line, mean of 32 steps by four subjects), the European women (thin continuous line, mean of 17 steps by five subjects) and all European subjects (males and females, broken line, average of 32 steps on ten subjects). The time-average of the standard deviation of the mean was less than 25% of r(t) during the lift of the centre of mass (ttr,up in Fig. 3) and less than 35% during its descent (ttr,down). (B) The area under the average r(t) curve divided by the step period Embedded Image attains a value of Rint(τ)=Rint at the end of the step which is equal for all groups of subjects. The corresponding mean values of the parameters for all European subjects and for the African women are given in Table 1 (unloaded).

Fig. 6.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 6.

Loaded walking. (A) Average curves of the instantaneous recovery of mechanical energy r(t) for the African women (thick continuous line, mean of 32 steps by four subjects), the European women (thin continuous line, mean of 14 steps by five subjects) and all European subjects (males and females, dotted line, mean of 32 steps by ten subjects). A comparison with Fig. 4 shows that, in all subjects, loading decreases tpk- and increases r(t) at the beginning of the descent of the centre of mass (ttr,down), but that this results in a net increase in Rint in the African women only (final value attained by the thick line at the end of the step in B). The corresponding mean values of the parameters for all European subjects and the African women are given in Table 1 (loaded). For further details, see legend to Fig. 4.

In some recordings, tpk+ and/or tpk- were zero, and the separation between the two periods with r(t)≠0 was made using the minimum of r(t) or, when oscillations where present (see Fig. 7), the maximum and/or the minimum of Ep and Ek. Often r(t) failed to attain unity in spite of the fact that Ecg attained a maximum or a minimum (i.e.|Δ Ecg(t)|=0) because of the discrete time periods used to calculate|Δ Ecg(t)| and/or the averaging of the curves (see Figs 3,4,5,6,7).

Fig. 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 3.

Typical experimental recordings of unloaded walking. The fraction of the mechanical energy recovered during unloaded walking at each instant of the step cycle [r(t), thick lines] is superimposed on the mechanical energy changes of the centre of mass (Ep, gravitational potential energy; Ek, kinetic energy; and Ecg=Ep+Ek, where Ecg is the total mechanical energy of the centre of mass, thin lines). Typical record obtained from (A) a European subject (male, 66.2 kg, 4.86 km h-1) and (B) an African woman (Kikuyu, 83.3 kg, 4.85 km h-1). The vertical broken lines on the Ek and Ep curves delimit the periods when the instantaneous recovery of mechanical energy r(t) is zero, indicated on the figure as tpk+ when Ep and Ek increase simultaneously, and as tpk- when Ep and Ek decrease simultaneously. The periods during which energy transduction between Ep and Ek occurs are indicated as ttr,up during the lift of the centre of mass and ttr,down during the descent of the centre of mass. As in the simulation, Rstep is greater than Rint but, in contrast to the simulation, the r(t) curves recorded during the rise and fall of the centre of mass during walking are not symmetrical see (Fig. 1).

Fig. 5.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 5.

Typical experimental recordings of loaded walking for (A) a European subject (male, 65.6 kg, 3.71 km h-1, loaded with 19.3 kg) and (B) an African woman (Luo, 83.5 kg, 3.95 km h-1, loaded with 19.5 kg). For further details, see legend to Fig. 3. Note that in the African subject, loading results in a reduction in tpk- and in an increase in r(t) at the beginning of the descent of the centre of mass (ttr,down).

Results

Time course of energy recovery within the step of unloaded subjects

Typical recordings showing r(t) during an unloaded step together with the simultaneous changes in Ep, Ek and Ecg are given in Fig. 3A for a European subject and in Fig. 3B for an African subject. Similar to the trend shown by the simulation (Fig. 1), r(t)=0 during two periods. The first period, tpk+, occurs at the beginning of the lift of the centre of mass, when both Ep and Ek increase simultaneously as a result of positive work done by the muscular force. The second period, tpk-, occurs just after the maximum of Ep, when both Ep and Ek decrease simultaneously as a result of negative work done by the muscular force. The succession of events, both in the simulation and during the walking step, is therefore: (i) tpk+ to begin the upward displacement and complete the acceleration forwards; (ii) some transduction from Ek to Ep taking place up to the end of the lift of the centre of mass, during a period henceforth referred to as ttr,up; (iii) tpk- to begin the downward displacement of the centre of mass and complete the deceleration forwards; (iv) some transduction from Ep to Ek taking place up to the end of the descent, during a period henceforth referred to as ttr,down. Both tpk+ and tpk- start at the extremes of the vertical oscillation of the centre of mass of the body.

A comparison of Figs 1 and 3 shows that, in contrast to the simulation, the changes in r(t) during ttr,up and ttr,down are not symmetrical. During ttr,up, when the body rides upwards on the front leg and the point of application of force moves forward from heel towards the toe of the supporting foot (Elftman, 1939), r(t) increases steeply to a plateau and then falls abruptly to zero. Three peaks are usually observed on the plateau corresponding to a more or less pronounced oscillation of Ecg. During ttr,down, when the body `falls forwards', r(t) changes in a manner more similar to the simulation, reaching a single peak and forming a bell-shaped curve.

In the simulation, Ecg attains one maximum (during the lift) and one minimum (during the fall). During the walking step, in contrast, Ecg usually attains two peaks: the first at the beginning of the lift, the second at the end of the lift. The first peak of Ecg occurs near the maximum of Ek, which coincides with the end of tpk+; the second peak of Ecg occurs near the maximum of Ep, which coincides with the beginning of tpk-. The positive increment in Ecg to the first peak (increment a) corresponds to external positive work done by the muscular force mainly to increase the kinetic energy of the centre of mass beyond the level attained as a result of the decrement in potential energy. The end of increment a occurs during the time of double contact, tdc. The positive increment in Ecg to the second peak (increment b) corresponds to positive work done to complete the lift of the centre of mass to a level greater than that attained as a result of the decrement in kinetic energy. Increment b occurs during the time of single contact, tsc. The sum of these two positive increments of Ecg (a+b) represents the positive external work done at each step to translate the centre of mass of the body in the sagittal plane (Cavagna et al., 1963; Cavagna and Margaria, 1966).

Average r(t) recordings, constructed as described in Materials and methods, are given in Fig. 4A for unloaded European subjects (broken line), for unloaded European women (thin continuous line) and for unloaded African women (thick line). The area below the average r(t) recordings, divided by the mean step period, is given by the curves in Fig. 4B (to be compared with the bottom graphs of Fig. 1). These curves show that: (i) the relative amount of energy recovered during ttr,up is on average larger than that recovered during ttr,down in both European and African subjects; (ii) this asymmetry is smaller in African women than in the European subjects as a result of less complete pendular transduction during ttr,up and more complete transduction during ttr,down, which is a consequence of the more pronounced `shoulder' on the r(t) recording at the beginning of the descent of the centre of mass; (iii) the recovery at the end of the step period, Rint, is equal in African women and in European subjects; and (iv) no appreciable difference was found between all European subjects (male and female) and the European women.

The mean values of Rint and Rstep (Equation 1) are given in Table 1. It can be seen that Rint<Rstep as predicted by the simulation, both in the Europeans and in the African women. However, both Rint and Rstep measured during the walking step are smaller than those predicted by the simulation (Fig. 2).

Effect of loading

Typical recordings showing r(t) within a step of walking with a load, together with the simultaneous changes in Ep, Ek and Ecg, are given in Fig. 5A for a European subject and in Fig. 5B for an African subject. The average r(t) recordings in Fig. 6 compare the load-carrying skills of African women and European subjects.

In all subjects, loading tends to decrease the duration of tpk- and, to a lesser extent, the duration of tpk+: the reductions are, however, not significant in Europeans subjects whereas they are significant in African women, for whom tpk- decreases by approximately two-thirds (Table 1). Since the step period τ is not significantly decreased by loading (by only 2-3%, see Table 1), the phase shiftsα =360°tpk+/τ andβ =360°tpk-/τ change in a manner similar to tpk+ and tpk-. Loading therefore tends to increase the transduction between potential and kinetic energy by making the two curves more exactly out of phase, particularly during the swing phase (single-contact phase) of the step. As mentioned above, the effect is significant in African women and not in European subjects.

Another effect of loading results from a change in the shape of the potential and kinetic energy curves. This is shown by a more pronounced `shoulder' of the r(t) record during the first part of the descent of the centre of mass. This effect is also more pronounced in the African women than in the European subjects (Fig. 6).

Both these effects of loading tend to increase the fraction of the total mechanical energy changes of the centre of mass that is recovered by the pendular mechanism in the African women. This results in an increase in Rint by the end of the step cycle compared with the European subjects (Fig. 6). The increase in Rint in the African women during load-carrying is approximately equal to the increase in Rstep (Table 1). It should be stressed that the effect of load-carrying occurs mainly during the swing phase of the step, when (more frequently in African women) loading sometimes results in a tpk- value of zero with a continuous high levels of transduction between potential and kinetic energy of the centre of mass (Fig. 7).

Discussion

Normal walking

The present study provides (i) a new parameter, Rint, which summarizes the transduction between Ep and Ek over the whole step cycle and (ii) the possibility of a continuous analysis of such transduction during a walking step.

The time-average Rint is related but not equal to Rstep, previously determined from the total changes in Ep, Ekf and Ecg (see equation 1 in Cavagna et al., 1976). As shown by the simulation, Rint and Rstep are affected in different ways by a phase shift between sinusoidal curves representing Ep and Ek (Fig. 2). By contrast, the experiments analyzed in the present study suggest that Rint and Rstep change in a similar manner when a load is applied to the trunk during walking (Table 1).

Rint, Rstep and W+ext were calculated for the 11 European subjects of the present study during unloaded walking at different speeds (Fig. 8). On average, Rint is less than Rstep up to approximately 7 km h-1, after which the trend is reversed, probably as a result of a relative change in the amplitude and shape of the Ep and Ek curves with the speed of walking. Both Rint and Rstep attain a maximum at intermediate speeds: approximately 5 km h-1 for Rstep and 6 km h-1 for Rint, whereas W+ext attains a minimum at approximately 4 km h-1. This result confirms that maximal pendular transduction takes place at a speed higher than the most economical speed of walking, as has become progressively more evident as more data are collected (Willems et al., 1995). The speed difference between the minimum of W+ext and the maximum of Rstep is due to the fact that, when the speed increases above 4 km h-1, the increase in W+ext from its minimum is smaller than the continuous increase in W+v+W+f; as a consequence, the ratio W+ext/(W+v+W+f) decreases and Rstep increases (Equation 1). The same argument is probably valid for Rint which, however, does not have a simple relationship with Rstep, not only for the reasons explained by the simulation (Fig. 2), but also because of the changes in amplitude and shape of the Ep and Ek curves with speed. In general, both Rstep and Rint represent an index of the ability of the pendular mechanism to minimize the impact of W+v+W+f on W+ext. The result is that the minimum of W+ext is attained at a lower speed, when and because W+v+W+f is smaller, in spite of the fact that the pendular mechanism works better at a higher speed, when W+v+W+f is larger.

Our within-step analysis of pendular energy transduction shows that muscular intervention may be divided into two components: (i) when the transduction between Ep and Ek is zero (i.e. during tpk+, to increase both Ep and Ek and during tpk-, to decrease both Ep and Ek), and (ii) during the transduction between Ep and Ek, when the muscles both release and absorb energy (during ttr,up and ttr,down). The first component is due to a shift between the Ep and Ek curves away from being exactly out of phase (180°), whereas the second component is due to a difference in the amplitude and shape of the two curves. It is now possible to assess how energy recovery through pendular transduction is affected by the phase shift between the Ep and Ek curves and how it is affected by the difference in shape/amplitude of the two curves. An example is discussed below for loaded compared with unloaded walking.

An obvious reason for failure to recover energy using the pendular mechanism is a phase shift of other than 180° between the potential and kinetic energy curves. Why is the value of 180° not maintained? Although a net input of energy during tpk+ to increase both Ep and Ek is to be expected, to overcome the energy lost by friction in the pendular motion, the necessity of a net absorption of both Ep and Ek during tpk- is less clear. tpk+ occurs mostly during the period of double contact and corresponds to the forward and upward push of the back foot as it is about to leave the ground (Cavagna and Margaria, 1966). Mochon and McMahon (1980) showed that the action of muscles during the double-support phase establishes the initial conditions for the succeeding mainly ballistic phase of the step, which takes place during the single contact. tpk- on the other hand occurs during the single-contact phase and corresponds to an unexplained waste of energy due to the fact that the maximum of Ep is attained before the minimum of Ek.

During the periods when energy transduction does occur between Ep and Ek, the failure of r(t) to attain a value of unity implies that negative and positive work is done by the muscular force to absorb or deliver energy because the Ep and Ek curves are not mirror images. During normal, unloaded walking, this failure is smaller during ttr,up, corresponding to the lift of the centre of mass, than during ttr,down, corresponding to the descent of the centre of mass. This is unexpected because, as mentioned above, the lift is initiated by the double-support phase of the step, whereas the descent is initiated with the whole body pole-vaulting over the supporting leg in the ballistic single-contact phase of the step, i.e. when the inverted pendulum model should apply. The `square' shape of r(t) rising abruptly to a plateau during ttr,up, results in an increase of approximately 60% in the total fractional energy recovered (Rint). The less effective `triangular' shape of r(t) during ttr,down is due to a slower rise to unity, during which the gravitational potential energy actively absorbed by the muscles and elastic structures is greater than the simultaneous increase in kinetic energy. The contrary is true for the shorter period after the peak of r(t): energy must now be added to increase Ek beyond the level attained due to the decrease in Ep (Fig. 3).

Walking with loads

One effect of loading is to improve the pendular transduction between potential and kinetic energy of the centre of mass by making the changes in Ep and Ek more exactly out of phase. This is shown by the reduction in both tpk+ and tpk-, which is significant in the African women only (Table 1). The reduction is relatively larger for tpk- than tpk+, suggesting that the period during which both Ep and Ek decrease as a result of negative work being done by the muscular force is more easily reduced than the period during which energy is added to the system. In fact, under some conditions, tpk-, but not tpk+, can disappear (Fig. 7).

Of the two periods when an energy transduction occurs between Ep and Ek, loading affects mainly ttr,down, when the body `falls forwards' on the supporting leg (Figs 5, 6). Loading favors the transduction of Ep to Ek, so that a smaller amount of Ep has to be absorbed by the muscles (compare the negative slopes of the Ecg curves during ttr,down in Figs 3 and 5). This is shown by a faster increase in r(t) at the beginning of the descent of the centre of mass, which is particularly evident in the African women (Fig. 6). In the extreme case illustrated in Fig. 7, loading results both in the disappearance of tpk- (discussed above), and in a transduction between Ep and Ek during the descent of the centre of mass similar to that attained during the lift, resulting in a plateau at a high value of r(t). It is quite possible that the differences described between European subjects and African women in the present study may derive in part from the location of the mass support: head-supported in the African women and shoulder-supported in the European subjects.

Concluding remarks

The present study throws more light on pendular energy transduction during walking because it offers the possibility of investigating this energy transduction at different phases of the gait cycle. One of the first outcomes of this new analysis is a demonstration of the asymmetry between the upward and downward phases of the pnedular oscillation of the centre of mass. The new index Rint, designed to quantify pendular energy transduction, confirms and extends the information given by the previously used index, Rstep. An application of this new approach is the analysis of the effect of loading on the mechanics of walking: the phases of the step mainly affected by loading can now be determined, even though the mechanism of the observed changes is still unknown. Loading improves the pendular transduction between Ep and Ek, particularly during the single-contact ballistic phase of the step. The improved pendular transduction is achieved because the Ep and Ek curves become more exactly out of phase because of a change in their relative shape, particularly at the beginning of the descent of the centre of mass. Even if this mechanism occurs at least to some extent in the European subjects, it is exploited fully by the African women, with the result that the increase in the fraction of energy recovered by pendular transduction over the whole step cycle in response to loading is significant in the African women only.

List of symbols
Ecg
total mechanical energy of the centre of mass: Ecg=Ek+Ep
Ek
kinetic energy of the centre of mass: Ek=Ekf+Ekv
Ekf
kinetic energy of forward motion of the centre of mass: Ekf=0.5MVf2
Ekv
kinetic energy of vertical motion of the centre of mass: Ekv=0.5MVv2
Ep
gravitational potential energy of the centre of mass
g
acceleration due to gravity
M
body mass
r(t)
instantaneous recovery of mechanical energy calculated from the absolute value of the increments, both positive and negative, of Ep, Ek and Ecg during the step (Equation 2)
r(x)
instantaneous recovery of mechanical energy calculated from the absolute value of the derivative of the functions simulating Ep, Ek and Ecg during a cycle (Equation 5)
R
recovery
Rint
mean value over one period of r(x) (simulation) or r(t) (experimental data); for the simulation: Math and Rint(360°)=Rint; for the experimental data: Math and Rint(τ)=Rint
Rstep
recovery of mechanical energy calculated from the sum over one step of the positive increments of Ep, Ek and Ecg (Equation 1)
t
time
tdc
fraction of the step period τ during which both feet are in contact with the ground (double contact)
tpk+
difference between the time at which Ek is maximum and the time at which Ep is minimum. Ek and Ep increase simultaneously during tpk+
tpk-
difference between the time at which Ek is minimum and the time at which Ep is maximum. Ek and Ep decrease simultaneously during tpk-
tsc
fraction of the period τ during which one foot only contacts the ground (single contact)
ttr,down
time of Ek—Ep transduction during the descent of the centre of mass
ttr,up
time of Ek—Ep transduction during the lift of the centre of mass
Vf
instantaneous velocity of forward motion of the centre of mass
Vv
instantaneous velocity of vertical motion of the centre of mass
Wext
external work done during each step calculated from the changes in mechanical energy of the centre of mass, Ecg=Ep+Ekf+Ekv. W+ext is the sum of the positive increments of Ecg during τ
Wf
work calculated from the forward speed changes of the centre of mass during each step. W+f is the sum of the positive increments of Ekf during τ
Wk
work calculated from the kinetic energy changes of the centre of mass during each step. W+k is the sum of the positive increments of Ek during τ
Wv
work calculated from the potential energy changes of the centre of mass during each step. W+v is the sum of the positive increments of Ep during τ
α
phase shift between the maximum of Ek and the minimum of Ep;α =360°tpk+/τ, where tpk+ is the difference between the time at which Ek is a maximum and the time at which Ep is a minimum
β
phase shift between the minimum of Ek and the maximum of Ep;β =360°tpk-/τ, where tpk- is the difference between the time at which Ek is a minimum and the time at which Ep is a maximum
τ
step period, i.e. period of repeating change in the motion of the centre of mass: τ=tsc+tdc

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

The authors would like to thank Dr Luigi Tremolada for his analysis of the simulation (Equations 4-6).

  • © The Company of Biologists Limited 2002

References

  1. ↵
    Cavagna, G. A. (1975). Force platforms as ergometers. J. Appl. Physiol. 39,174 -179.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. ↵
    Cavagna, G. A. and Margaria, R. (1966). Mechanics of walking. J. Appl. Physiol. 21,271 -278.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  3. ↵
    Cavagna, G. A., Franzetti, P. and Fuchimoto, T. (1983). The mechanics of walking in children. J. Physiol., Lond. 343,323 -339.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  4. ↵
    Cavagna, G. A., Komarek, L. and Mazzoleni, S. (1971). The mechanics of sprint running. J. Physiol., Lond. 217,709 -721.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  5. ↵
    Cavagna, G. A., Saibene, F. P. and Margaria, R. (1963). External work in walking. J. Appl. Physiol. 18,1 -9.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. ↵
    Cavagna, G. A., Thys, H. and Zamboni, A. (1976). The sources of external work in level walking and running. J. Physiol., Lond. 262,639 -657.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  7. ↵
    Elftman, H. (1939). Force and energy changes in the leg during walking. Am. J. Physiol. 125,339 -356.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  8. ↵
    Griffin, T. M. and Kram, R. (2000). Penguin waddling is not wasteful. Nature 408, 929.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    Griffin, T. M., Tolani, N. A. and Kram, R. (1999). Walking in simulated reduced gravity: mechanical energy fluctuations and transduction. J. Appl. Physiol. 86,383 -390.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. ↵
    Heglund, N. C., Willems, P. A., Penta, M. and Cavagna, G. A. (1995). Energy-saving gait mechanics with head-supported loads. Nature 375,52 -54.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    Maloiy, G. M. O., Heglund, N. C., Prager, L. M., Cavagna, G. A. and Taylor, C. R. (1986). Energetic cost of carrying loads: have African women discovered an economic way? Nature 319,668 -669.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    Mochon, S. and McMahon, T. A. (1980). Ballistic walking. J. Biomech. 13,49 -57.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  13. ↵
    Willems, P. A., Cavagna, G. A. and Heglund, N. C. (1995). External, internal and total work in human locomotion. J. Exp. Biol. 198,379 -393.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
View Abstract
Previous ArticleNext Article
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

This Issue

 Download PDF

Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Experimental Biology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Pendular energy transduction within the step in human walking
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Experimental Biology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Experimental Biology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Research Article
Pendular energy transduction within the step in human walking
G. A. Cavagna, P. A. Willems, M. A. Legramandi, N. C. Heglund
Journal of Experimental Biology 2002 205: 3413-3422;
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Research Article
Pendular energy transduction within the step in human walking
G. A. Cavagna, P. A. Willems, M. A. Legramandi, N. C. Heglund
Journal of Experimental Biology 2002 205: 3413-3422;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Alerts

Please log in to add an alert for this article.

Sign in to email alerts with your email address

Article navigation

  • Top
  • Article
    • SUMMARY
    • Introduction
    • Materials and methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
    • References
  • Figures & tables
  • Info & metrics
  • PDF

Related articles

Cited by...

More in this TOC section

  • Different fuel regulation in two types of myofiber results in different antioxidant strategies in Daurian ground squirrels (Spermophilus dauricus) during hibernation
  • Departures from isotropy: the kinematics of a larval snail in response to food
  • Trunk and leg kinematics of grounded and aerial running in bipedal macaques
Show more RESEARCH ARTICLE

Similar articles

Other journals from The Company of Biologists

Development

Journal of Cell Science

Disease Models & Mechanisms

Biology Open

Advertisement

Meet the Editors at SICB Virtual 2021

Reserve your place to join some of the journal editors, including Editor-in-Chief Craig Franklin, at our Meet the Editor session on 17 February at 2pm (EST). Don’t forget to view our SICB Subject Collection, featuring relevant JEB papers relating to some of the symposia sessions.


2020 at The Company of Biologists

Despite 2020's challenges, we were able to bring a number of long-term projects and new ventures to fruition. As we enter a new year, join us as we reflect on the triumphs of the last 12 months.


Critical temperature window sends migratory black-headed buntings on their travels

The spring rise in temperature at black-headed bunting overwintering sites is essential for triggering the physical changes that they undergo before embarking on their spring migration – read more.


Developmental and reproductive physiology of small mammals at high altitude

Cayleih Robertson and Kathryn Wilsterman focus on high-altitude populations of the North American deer mouse in their review of the challenges and evolutionary innovations of pregnant and nursing small mammals at high altitude.


Read & Publish participation extends worldwide

“Being able to publish Open Access articles free of charge means that my article gets maximum exposure and has maximum impact, and that all my peers can read it regardless of the agreements that their universities have with publishers.”

Professor Roi Holzman (Tel Aviv University) shares his experience of publishing Open Access as part of our growing Read & Publish initiative. We now have over 60 institutions in 12 countries taking part – find out more and view our full list of participating institutions.

Articles

  • Accepted manuscripts
  • Issue in progress
  • Latest complete issue
  • Issue archive
  • Archive by article type
  • Special issues
  • Subject collections
  • Interviews
  • Sign up for alerts

About us

  • About JEB
  • Editors and Board
  • Editor biographies
  • Travelling Fellowships
  • Grants and funding
  • Journal Meetings
  • Workshops
  • The Company of Biologists
  • Journal news

For Authors

  • Submit a manuscript
  • Aims and scope
  • Presubmission enquiries
  • Article types
  • Manuscript preparation
  • Cover suggestions
  • Editorial process
  • Promoting your paper
  • Open Access
  • Outstanding paper prize
  • Biology Open transfer

Journal Info

  • Journal policies
  • Rights and permissions
  • Media policies
  • Reviewer guide
  • Sign up for alerts

Contact

  • Contact JEB
  • Subscriptions
  • Advertising
  • Feedback

 Twitter   YouTube   LinkedIn

© 2021   The Company of Biologists Ltd   Registered Charity 277992