Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Accepted manuscripts
    • Issue in progress
    • Latest complete issue
    • Issue archive
    • Archive by article type
    • Special issues
    • Subject collections
    • Interviews
    • Sign up for alerts
  • About us
    • About JEB
    • Editors and Board
    • Editor biographies
    • Travelling Fellowships
    • Grants and funding
    • Journal Meetings
    • Workshops
    • The Company of Biologists
    • Journal news
  • For authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Aims and scope
    • Presubmission enquiries
    • Article types
    • Manuscript preparation
    • Cover suggestions
    • Editorial process
    • Promoting your paper
    • Open Access
    • Outstanding paper prize
    • Biology Open transfer
  • Journal info
    • Journal policies
    • Rights and permissions
    • Media policies
    • Reviewer guide
    • Sign up for alerts
  • Contacts
    • Contact JEB
    • Subscriptions
    • Advertising
    • Feedback
  • COB
    • About The Company of Biologists
    • Development
    • Journal of Cell Science
    • Journal of Experimental Biology
    • Disease Models & Mechanisms
    • Biology Open

User menu

  • Log in
  • Log out

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Experimental Biology
  • COB
    • About The Company of Biologists
    • Development
    • Journal of Cell Science
    • Journal of Experimental Biology
    • Disease Models & Mechanisms
    • Biology Open

supporting biologistsinspiring biology

Journal of Experimental Biology

  • Log in
Advanced search

RSS  Twitter  Facebook  YouTube  

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Accepted manuscripts
    • Issue in progress
    • Latest complete issue
    • Issue archive
    • Archive by article type
    • Special issues
    • Subject collections
    • Interviews
    • Sign up for alerts
  • About us
    • About JEB
    • Editors and Board
    • Editor biographies
    • Travelling Fellowships
    • Grants and funding
    • Journal Meetings
    • Workshops
    • The Company of Biologists
    • Journal news
  • For authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Aims and scope
    • Presubmission enquiries
    • Article types
    • Manuscript preparation
    • Cover suggestions
    • Editorial process
    • Promoting your paper
    • Open Access
    • Outstanding paper prize
    • Biology Open transfer
  • Journal info
    • Journal policies
    • Rights and permissions
    • Media policies
    • Reviewer guide
    • Sign up for alerts
  • Contacts
    • Contact JEB
    • Subscriptions
    • Advertising
    • Feedback
Research Article
Transepithelial potential differences and Na+ flux in isolated perfused gills of the crab Chasmagnathus granulatus (Grapsidae) acclimated to hyper- and hypo-salinity
C. M. Luquet, U. Postel, J. Halperin, M. R. Urcola, R. Marques, D. Siebers
Journal of Experimental Biology 2002 205: 71-77;
C. M. Luquet
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
U. Postel
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
J. Halperin
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
M. R. Urcola
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
R. Marques
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
D. Siebers
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & tables
  • Info & metrics
  • PDF
Loading

SUMMARY

We studied the transepithelial potential difference (TEPD) and 22Na flux across isolated perfused gills (anterior pair 5 and posterior pairs 6–8) of the crab Chasmagnathus granulatus acclimated to either hypo- or hyper-osmotic conditions.

The gills of crabs acclimated to low salinity, perfused and bathed with 10 ‰ saline solutions, produced the following TEPDs (hemolymph side with respect to bath side): 0.4±0.7, –10.2±1.6, –10.8±1.3 and –6.7±1.3 mV for gills 5, 6, 7 and 8, respectively. Gills 6, 7 and 8 did not differ significantly. Reducing the saline concentration of bath and perfusate from 30 ‰ to 20 ‰ or 10 ‰ increased significantly the TEPDs of these gills. TEPDs of gill 6 (representative of posterior gills) were reduced by 69±5 % and 60±5 % after perfusion with ouabain or BaCl2 (5 mmol l–1 each), respectively. The same gill showed a net ouabain-sensitive Na+ influx of 1150±290 μequiv g–1 h–1.

Gill 6 of crabs acclimated to high salinity produced TEPDs of –1.5±0.1 and –1.3±0.09 mV after perfusion with 30 ‰ or 40 ‰ salines, respectively. Perfusion with ouabain or BaCl2 reduced TEPDs by 76±7 % and 86±4 %, respectively. A net ouabain-sensitive Na+ efflux of 2282±337 μequiv g–1 h–1 was recorded in gill 6 perfused with 38 ‰ saline.

  • isolated perfused gill
  • transepithelial potential difference
  • Na+K+-ATPase
  • ion flux
  • hypo-regulation
  • hyper-regulation
  • ouabain
  • crab
  • Chasmagnathus granulatus.

Introduction

Semiterrestrial estuarine crabs are adapted to a wide range of conditions. Water salinity varies from full-strength seawater to almost freshwater in a geographical and tidal basis. Excursions to intertidal and supratidal areas include the chance of entering into rain pools or into tide pools concentrated by evaporation. Moreover, aerial ventilation may cause evaporative concentration of water retained within the branchial chambers, leading to hyper-saline exposure of the gills and the gill chamber epithelium (Schmitt and Santos, 1993). Terrestrial and semiterrestrial crabs of marine or estuarine origin possess hyper- and hypo-regulation capacities, showing little variation in their internal osmotic and ionic concentrations within a wide range of salinity (Gross, 1964; Mantel and Farmer, 1983; Schubart and Diesel, 1998, 1999).

The gills of euryhaline crabs are histologically and functionally differentiated. While anterior gills are lined with thin epithelium and have a mainly respiratory function, the posterior ones play a key role in compensatory active uptake of ions (Siebers et al., 1982; Gilles and Péqueux, 1986; Towle and Kays, 1986; Compère et al., 1989). The predominant cells in posterior gills are thick and possess large basolateral membrane interdigitations together with mitochondria (Copeland and Fitzjarrell, 1968; Compère et al., 1989; Luquet et al., 1997). There is much evidence from electrophysiological and ion flux studies on the ion-uptake capacity of posterior gills of different crab species (Gilles and Péqueux, 1981, 1985; Péqueux et al., 1988; Siebers et al., 1985; Lucu and Siebers, 1986; Burnett and Towle, 1990) (for a review, see Péqueux, 1995).

Two models for the mechanisms involved in such active ion transport through the gills, have been reviewed recently (Onken and Riestenpatt, 1998). (1) In the gills of species such as Carcinus maenas, which possess limited capacity to invade low-salinity environments (weak hyper-regulators), it is proposed that the ions enter the cell by crossing the apical membrane through Na+/2Cl–/K+ symports coupled to K+ channels. (2) In strong hyper-regulators, such as Eriocheir sinensis, Onken and Riestenpatt suggest that Na+ crosses the apical membrane through epithelial Na+ channels while Cl– is exchanged with HCO3–, driven by an apical H+-V-ATPase. At the basolateral side, Na+K+-ATPase and K+ and Cl– channels are thought to drive ions into the hemolymph in both weak and strong hyper-regulating species.

Early work on salt and water regulation by intact fiddler crabs of the genus Uca (Green et al., 1959; Baldwin and Kirschner, 1976a; Evans et al., 1976) suggests that active ion excretion follows an extra-renal route. There is some physiological and histological evidence to suggest that the gills of hypo-regulating crabs are the organs involved in this function. Martínez et al. (1998), working with isolated perfused gills of Ucides cordatus, reported that gill 6 is capable of active ion excretion, while gill 5 is specialized in ion uptake. Ultrastructural studies also suggested an ion excretion capacity of the gills of crabs acclimated to hypersaline media; Martelo and Zanders (1986) and Luquet et al. (1997) described a cell architecture characteristic of an ion-excreting epithelium in the gills of grapsids and ocypodids. Some features of this cell architecture, such as the apparently low-resistance cell junctions, resemble those of the extensively studied vertebrate salt-secreting organs such as the avian salt gland (Riddle and Ernst, 1979), the teleost opercular epithelium (Ernst et al., 1980) and the rectal gland of elasmobranchs (Ernst et al., 1981).

Chasmagnathus granulatus Dana 1851 is a strong ion hyper- and hypo-regulating crab species that inhabits intertidal estuarine coasts of Brazil, Uruguay and Argentina (Boschi, 1964; Mougabure Cueto, 1998). The posterior gills of this species are believed to be involved in both ion uptake and excretion, since their epithelium thickness is increased to the same extent after transfer from full seawater to either dilute or concentrated seawater (Genovese et al., 2000).

The aim of this work was to establish, by electrophysiological and ion tracer flux experiments, the possible role of the different gill pairs of C. granulatus in ion-transport functions at low and high salinity. The participation of Na+K+-ATPase and K+ channels was also studied.

Materials and methods

Animals

Crabs were collected from Faro San Antonio beach (36°18′S 56°48′W), near the southern edge of the Rio de la Plata estuary, Argentina. Once in the laboratory, the animals were separated at random into two groups and acclimated in glass containers with aerated seawater of either 12 ‰ or 45 ‰ salinity for at least 2 weeks. Laboratory temperature was kept at 20±2°C. Stage C intermoult adult male crabs (Drach and Tchernigovtzeff, 1967) of 26±0.3 mm carapace widths were selected for the study.

Gill perfusion

Crabs were killed by destroying the ventral nervous ganglion with a spike. After removing the dorsal carapace, the gills were gently excised and placed in a Petri dish with saline solution. The afferent and efferent vessels of gills 5–8 were connected by fine polyethylene tubing of 0.4 mm diameter to a peristaltic pump (afferent) and to a glass tube (efferent). Perfusion rate was kept at 0.1 ml min–1. The tubing was held in position by an acrylic clamp and the preparation put into a glass beaker with the appropriate saline solution and constant aeration.

Gills 5–8 from crabs acclimated to low (12 ‰) and high (45 ‰) salinity were perfused and bathed with identical solutions, except that the perfusate contained 2 mmol l–1 glucose. Table 1 shows the composition of the saline solutions used in the different experiments. All solutions were adjusted with Tris-base to the physiological pH 7.75 for C. granulatus (Luquet and Ansaldo, 1997). The effects of the following drugs were tested in gills perfused with 10 ‰ saline for low-salinity crabs and 38 ‰ saline for high-salinity crabs: ouabain (a specific Na+K+-ATPase inhibitor) (Skou, 1965), 5 mmol l–1 applied basolaterally, and BaCl2 and CsCl (K+ channel blockers) (Zeiske, 1990; Draber and Hansen, 1994), 5–10 mmol l–1 applied at both apical and basolateral sides.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table 1.

Transepithelial potential difference (TEPD)

Ag/AgCl electrodes were connected by agar bridges to the external bath and to the glass tube collecting the perfusate. Potential differences were measured in the internal perfusate with respect to the external bath by means of a millivoltmeter.

Na+ flux

Na+ outward and inward movements were measured in the same gill by applying 22Na first in the perfusate and afterwards in the bathing solution. Identical ionic concentrations (20 ‰ or 38 ‰, for low- and high-salinity crabs, respectively) were used in the bath and perfusate. For Na+ efflux, 22Na was included in the perfusate at a final concentration of 0.25 μCi ml–1. After stabilization for 15 min, three samples (1 ml each) were collected from the perfusate and the bath at intervals of 15 min. Na+ efflux was calculated from the radioactivity that appeared in the bath. To avoid overestimated flux due to a possible leak, we also measured the radioactivity lost by the perfusate after passing through the gill. Gills showing large discrepancies between both methods of measurement were discarded. Results from measurements of radioactivity that appeared in the bath were chosen for the study.

After washing with non-radioactive solution, Na+ influx was measured by applying 22Na in the bath at a final concentration of 9 kBq (0.25 μCi) ml–1. After stabilization for 15 min, radioactivity was measured in the collected perfusate at 10 min intervals during the subsequent 30 min.

Radioactivity was measured with a Canberra Series 35 plus gamma scintillation counter. Na+ efflux and influx were calculated according to the formula of Lucu and Siebers (1986):

Math1

where J is the calculated unidirectional flux of Na+ in μequiv h–1 g–1; 22Na is the radioactivity (cts min–1) collected during each interval; S is the number of samples collected during 1 h (6 and 4 for influx and efflux, respectively); SRA is the specific radioactivity (cts min–1 μequiv–1) and m is the fresh mass of the gill (g).

Chemicals

NaCl, KCl, MgCl2, BaCl2, KCN and glucose were obtained from Merck Argentina; NaHCO3 was obtained from Mallinckrodt USA; CaCl2 and 4-(2-hydroxyethyl)-1-piperazineethanesulfonic acid (Hepes) were purchased from J. T. Baker, USA; ouabain was purchased from Sigma USA and 22Na was obtained from Amersham Pharmacia Biotech.

Statistics

Data were analyzed by one- or two-way repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) or paired t-test when appropriate (Sokal and Rohlf, 1981). All values are means ± s.e.m.

Results

The preparations of isolated perfused gills remained viable for at least 3 h, since stable values of transepithelial potential difference (TEPDs) could be recorded along this period. The rate of perfusion was also constant during each experiment.

Crabs acclimated to low salinity

Transepithelial potential difference

Posterior gills of crabs acclimated to low salinity, perfused and bathed with identical salines, showed hemolymph-side negative TEPDs, which increased significantly in absolute value as the concentration of saline solutions decreased; no significant TEPD was recorded in gill 5 (representative of anterior gills) (Fig. 1). Two-way repeated measures ANOVA comparing gills 6, 7 and 8 indicated that saline concentration was the only significant source of variation (P<0.001, N=6 for each gill). TEPDs for gill 6 ranged between –2.4±0.5 mV (N=6) in 30 ‰ saline and –10.2±1.6 mV (N=6) in 10 ‰ saline. Since the three posterior gills responded similarly to the different saline concentrations, gill 6 was chosen as representative for further experiments because it was bigger than gills 7 and 8 and therefore easier to handle.

   Fig. 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 1.

Transepithelial potential differences (TEPD) of gills of crabs acclimated to low salinity, perfused with different saline concentrations. TEPD of posterior gills increased significantly in absolute value at lower concentrations (P<0.001, N=6 for each gill). TEPD of gill 5 did not differ significantly from 0 mV (P>0.05).

Basolaterally applied ouabain (5 mmol l–1) significantly reduced the TEPD of gill 6 by 69±5 % (P<0.001, N=7). 5 mmol l–1 BaCl2 applied basolaterally caused a similar inhibitory effect of 60±5 % (P<0.001, N=5). The same inhibitor was totally ineffective when applied at the apical (bath) side, even when the concentration was raised to 10 mmol l–1. In preliminary experiments CsCl (10 mmol l–1) was also ineffective at the apical side (data not shown). The effects of ouabain and BaCl2 were totally reversed after washing out with normal saline solution (Table 2). Results from single experiments are shown in Fig. 2.

   Fig. 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 2.

Effects of ouabain and BaCl2 on the transepithelial potential difference (TEPD) of individual gills 6 from a crab acclimated to low salinity, perfused with 10 ‰ saline.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table 2.

Na+ influx

A net Na+ influx of 1150±290 μequiv g–1 h–1 (N=6) was calculated for isolated gills 6 of crabs acclimated to low salinity, perfused and bathed with 20 ‰ saline. Unidirectional flux of Na+ was 719±163 μequiv g–1 h–1 (N=6) in the outward (Jout) direction and 1824±410 μequiv g–1 h–1 (N=6) in the inward direction (Jin). The Jin/Jout ratio calculated from these results (2.87±0.67) was significantly different (P<0.05) from the ratio predicted by the Ussing equation (Ussing, 1949), which was 1.33±0.05. Ouabain (5 mmol l–1) added to the perfusate caused a reduction of 35±5 % in Jin (P<0.05, N=5); inhibition of the net Na+ influx calculated from this value was 70±20 %, N=5 (Fig. 3).

   Fig. 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 3.

Unidirectional Na+ fluxes of gills 6 from crabs acclimated to low and high salinity, perfused with 20 and 38 ‰ saline, respectively. Ouabain (5 mmol l–1) added to the perfusate significantly inhibited both Jin of crabs acclimated to low salinity (P<0.05, N=5) and Jout of crabs acclimated to high salinity (P<0.001, N=4).

Crabs acclimated to high salinity

Transepithelial potential difference

In a preliminary series of experiments, gills 6, 7 and 8 of crabs acclimated to high salinity, perfused with either 30 ‰ or 40 ‰ saline, produced TEPDs of the same polarity but substantially smaller than those shown by posterior gills of crabs acclimated to low salinity, i.e. –1.5±0.1 and –1.3±0.09 mV (N=13) for gill 6 perfused with 30 ‰ and 40 ‰ solutions, respectively. These values did not differ significantly. Gill 5 did not show any significant TEPD.

In a second series of experiments, gill 6 was used as representative of posterior gills and the concentration of the bath and perfusate was increased stepwise from 30 ‰ to 40 ‰, in an attempt to minimize the effects of a possible osmotic shock. A slight tendency to increased TEPD at higher saline concentrations was observed, with the highest values recorded at 36–38 ‰ (N=9). Nevertheless, these differences were not statistically significant (Fig. 4).

   Fig. 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 4.

Transepithelial potential difference (TEPD) of gill 6 from crabs acclimated to high salinity, perfused at different saline concentrations (N=9).

Effects of inhibitors are summarized in Table 3. Basolateral application of 5 mmol l–1 ouabain significantly inhibited the TEPD by 76±7 % (P<0.005, N=6). This effect was hardly reversed after washing out with normal saline. Similarly, 10 mmol l–1 BaCl2 applied at the basolateral side had an inhibitory effect of 86±4 % (P<0.001, N=5) but did not cause consistent effects when applied at the apical side (N=9). Another series of experiments was performed to test whether the effects of BaCl2 were due to diffusive potentials caused by the asymmetrical addition of Cl– ions or by actual inhibition of K+ channels. Choline chloride (20 mmol l–1) applied basolaterally caused a significant decrease in TEPD of 36±6 % (P<0.01, N=5), whereas BaCl2 under the same conditions produced a significantly higher effect of 84±5 % (P<0.001, N=5). Fig. 5 shows the results of individual experiments with ouabain, BaCl2 and choline chloride.

   Fig. 5.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 5.

Effects of ouabain, BaCl2 and choline chloride on the transepithelial potential difference (TEPD) of individual gills 6 from a crab acclimated to high salinity, perfused with 38 ‰ saline. Inhibition was almost irreversible.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table 3.

Na+ efflux

A mean net Na+ efflux of 2282±337 μequiv g–1 h–1 (N=9) was calculated for gill 6 of crabs acclimated to high salinity, perfused and bathed with 38 ‰ saline. Unidirectional Na+ efflux (Jout) was 2900±329 μequiv g–1 h–1 (N=9), while unidirectional influx (Jin) measured in the same preparations was 619±73 μequiv g–1 h–1 (N=9). The observed Jout/Jin ratio (4.48±0.91) was significantly different (P<0.05) from the ratio predicted by the Ussing equation (0.95±0.01). Jout was 58±9 % inhibited by basolaterally applied 5 mmol l–1 ouabain (P<0.001, N=4); inhibition of net efflux calculated from this value was 81±6 %, N=4 (Fig. 3).

Discussion

Ion-uptake functions of crab gills have been extensively studied in the hyper-regulators Carcinus maenas, Eriocheir sinensis, Callinectes sapidus, (Burnett and Towle, 1990; Gilles and Péqueux, 1981; Onken and Siebers, 1992; Siebers et al., 1985) (for reviews, see Péqueux, 1995; Onken and Riestenpatt, 1998) and the hyper-hyporegulators Uca tangeri and Pachygrapsus marmoratus (Drews and Graszynski, 1987; Krippeit Drews et al., 1989; Pierrot et al., 1995a,b). Ion excretion has received much less attention. Early studies conducted on fiddler crabs acclimated to hyper-osmotic media (Green et al., 1959; Baldwin and Kirschner, 1976a,b) (Evans et al., 1976) demonstrated active excretion of Na+ and Cl– by the whole animal, but the organ responsible for this function is still to be determined. Martínez et al. (1998) recorded active Na+ excretion through the isolated perfused gills of Ucides cordatus acclimated to iso-osmotic media. The present paper presents a comparative study of ion-transport functions in the gills of the hyper-hyporegulating crab Chasmagnathus granulatus acclimated to either hypo-osmotic or hyper-osmotic conditions.

Acclimation to low salinity

Posterior gills of C. granulatus acclimated to low salinity, perfused and bathed with identical solutions, produce hemolymph-side negative TEPDs similar to those reported for hyper-regulating crabs (Lucu and Siebers, 1986; Siebers et al., 1985) and also for the hyper-hyporegulating crabs Uca tangeri and Pachygrapsus marmoratus (Drews and Graszynski, 1987; Krippeit Drews et al., 1989; Pierrot et al., 1995a,b). These TEPDs are sensitive to the dilution of the perfusion and bathing media, being the lowest absolute values measured at 30 ‰, which is near the physiological hemolymphatic concentrations of Na+ and Cl– in this species (Mougabure Cueto, 1998). This change in potential difference seems to reflect an autoregulatory mechanism of gill tissue, which involves enhanced ion transport activity and/or increased paracellular resistance in response to hypo-osmotic stress. Onken (1996) and Onken and Riestenpatt (1998) reported that changes in short-circuit currents measured in split gill lamellae of Eriocheir sinensis respond to osmotic variations at the basolateral side. Our results indicate that these changes in TEPD take place in C. granulatus within a few minutes and are totally reversed when the gill is perfused again with iso-ionic saline. This rapid response should be important for a species that is often observed emerging from brackish or seawater and entering into rain pools for feeding on supratidal plants.

Radioactive tracer flux suggests that posterior gills of this species actively take up Na+ at low salinity. Both influx and efflux rates as well as net influx are somewhat high compared with data reported for other species in similar experimental conditions (Lucu and Siebers, 1986; Pierrot et al., 1995a). This high rate of Na+ uptake is possibly a response to a high rate of ion loss by the animal. Gill and whole animal ionic permeability should be studied in order to test this hypothesis.

As a first approach to understanding the mechanisms involved in gill ion uptake, it can be concluded that Na+K+-ATPase located at the basolateral membrane is the major driving force, since both TEPD and Na+ influx are inhibited by ouabain in similar proportions. The reason why ouabain does not cause total inhibition could be incomplete access of the drug to the enzyme molecules, due to the complex basolateral membrane interdigitations of gill ionocytes, as suggested by Burnett and Towle (1990) to explain similar results obtained with Callinectes sapidus.

As our results imply, barium-sensitive K+ channels located in the basolateral membrane are also involved in generating the observed transepithelial potentials. The lack of effect of apical BaCl2 and CsCl (preliminary data) suggests the absence of barium-sensitive K+ channels in this membrane. It has been reported that these channels are necessary for electrogenic uptake of Na+ and Cl– across the apical membrane through Na+/2Cl–/K+ cotransporters in Uca tangeri and Carcinus maenas (Drews and Graszynski, 1987; Riestenpatt et al., 1996).

Onken and Riestenpatt (1998) have proposed that in strong hyper-regulators, such as Eriocheir sinensis, Na+ and Cl– cross the apical membrane through Na+ channels and Cl–/HCO3– antiports, driven by an H+-V-ATPase. Although we have no direct evidence for apical transporters, expression of both Na+/H+ exchangers and H+-V-ATPase has been detected in gill 6 of C. granulatus in preliminary molecular biology experiments (D. Weihrauch and C. M. Luquet, unpublished observations). In addition, Genovese et al. (2000) reported increased activity of cytosolic carbonic anhydrase in posterior gills of C. granulatus after acclimation to low salinity. This enzyme is believed to produce H+ and HCO3– as counterions for Na+ and Cl– exchangers, respectively, and is also important for the function of an H+-V-ATPase (Henry, 1988; Henry and Swenson, 2000).

Acclimation to high salinity

The involvement of crab gills in hypo-regulatory ion excretion is still a matter of controversy. In the past two decades histological evidence has accumulated. There are reports of ultrastructural changes and increased posterior gill epithelium thickness after acclimation to hypersaline media (Martelo and Zanders, 1986; Luquet et al., 1997; Rosa et al., 1999; Genovese et al., 2000). Martínez et al. (1998) perfused gills 5 and 6 of Ucides cordatus acclimated in isosmotic medium, reporting net Na+ uptake by gill 5, even when the external saline was more concentrated than the perfusate. In contrast, they found net Na+ excretion by gill 6 at all concentrations tested. This experiment, however, is not comparable with the present results, since it was performed with asymmetrical perfusion. In addition, the authors acclimated the crabs to isosmotic medium. A clear difference does seem to exist between both species, however; whereas in U. cordatus different gills are specialized for transporting ions in opposite directions, the TEPDs measured on the three posterior gills of C. granulatus suggested that they have similar ion transport capacities. Thus gills 6, 7 and 8 of C. granulatus seem to be equally involved in both transport directions, after chronic acclimation to either low or high salinity.

At least two basolateral membrane proteins involved in ion uptake are also involved in ion excretion. These are Na+K+-ATPase, since both TEPD and Na+ flux are reduced by ouabain, and K+ channels, which are inhibited by basolateral application of BaCl2. By contrast, our results provide no evidence for any apical ion-transport proteins.

Current models for salt excretion in vertebrates (gills, and opercular epithelia of teleost fish, rectal glands of elasmobranchs and avian salt glands) consider Na+ pumping into the paracellular space and a transcellular flux of Cl–, which in turn generates a positive transepithelial potential difference that drives Na+ efflux via low-resistance tight junctions (Ernst et al., 1980, 1981; Lowy et al., 1987). Our results on crabs acclimated to high salinity indicate that Na+K+-ATPase is the main driving force for ion extrusion. In addition, previous electron microscopic work shows shorter septate junctions in gills of Uca uruguayensis and C. granulatus acclimated to high salinity (Luquet et al., 1997; Rosa et al., 1999) compared with gills of the same species acclimated to low salinity. Thus, paracellular flux of ions through these junctions also seems possible. However, the vertebrate model predicts a positive transepithelial potential difference for driving paracellular Na+ efflux. This is not the case for the gills of C. granulatus, which produce a little negative potential difference. Therefore the routes followed by Na+ and Cl– at the apical side seem to differ from known models for salt excretion and deserve further investigation.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

This study was supported by a grant UBACYT TX 07. We acknowledge material support by the Instituto Antártico Argentino. We also wish to thank Susanne Luck-Kopp, Analía Pérez, Martín Ansaldo and Carolina Luchetti for their kind help and two anonymous reviewers for their helpful suggestions.

  • © The Company of Biologists Limited 2002

References

  1. ↵
    Baldwin, G. F. and Kirschner, L. B. (1976a). Sodium and chlorde regulation in Uca adapted to 175 % sea water. J. Exp. Zool. 49, 158–171.
    OpenUrl
  2. ↵
    Baldwin, G. F. and Kirschner, L. B. (1976b). Sodium and chloride regulation in Uca adapted to 175 % sea water. J. Exp. Zool. 49, 172–180.
    OpenUrl
  3. ↵
    Boschi, E. E. (1964). Los crustáceos decápodos brachyura del litoral bonaerense. Bol. Instit. Biol. Marina (Mar del Plata) 164, 1–34.
  4. ↵
    Burnett, L. E. and Towle, D. W. (1990). Sodium ion uptake by perfused gills of the blue crab Callinectes sapidus: effects of ouabain and amiloride. J. Exp. Biol. 149, 293–305.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. ↵
    Compère, Ph., Wanson, S., Péqueux, A., Gilles, R. and Goffinet, G. (1989). Ultrastructural changes in the gill epithelium of the green crab Carcinus maenas in relation to the external salinity. Tissue Cell 21, 299–318.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    Copeland, D. E. and Fitzjarrell, A. T. (1968). The salt absorbing cells in the gills of the blue crab (Callinectes sapidus Rathbun) with notes on modified mitochondria. Zeits. Zellf. 92, 1–22.
  7. ↵
    Draber, S. and Hansen, U.-P. (1994). Fast single-channel measurements resolve the blocking effect of Cs+ on the K+ channel. Biophys. J. 67, 120–129.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    Drach, P. and Tchernigovtzeff, C. (1967). Sur la mèthode de détermination des stades d’intermue et son application générale aux crustacés. Vie Milieu 18, 597–607.
    OpenUrl
  9. ↵
    Drews, G. and Graszynsky, K. (1987). The transepithelial potential differences in the gills of the fiddler crab, Uca tangeri: influence of some inhibitors. J. Comp. Physiol. 157B, 345–353.
    OpenUrl
  10. ↵
    Ernst, S. A., Dodson, W. C. and Karnaky, K. J., Jr (1980). Structural diversity of occluding junctions in the low-resistance of seawater-adapted killifish (Fundulus heteroclitus). J. Cell Biol. 87, 488–497.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. ↵
    Ernst, S. A., Hootman, S. R., Schreiber, J. H. and Riddle, C. V. (1981). Freeze-fracture and morphometric analysis of occluding junctions in rectal glands of elasmobranch fish. J. Membr. Biol. 58, 101–114.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    Evans, D. H., Cooper, K. and Bogan, M. B. (1976). Sodium extrusion by the seawater-acclimated fiddler crab Uca pugilator: comparison with other marine crustacea and marine teleost fish. J. Exp. Biol. 64, 203–219.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. ↵
    Genovese, G., Luquet, C. M., Paz, D. A., Rosa, G. A. and Pellerano, G. N. (2000). The morphometric changes in the gills of the estuarine crab Chasmagnathus granulatus under hyper- and hypo-regulation conditions are not caused by proliferation of specialized cells. J. Anat. 197, 239–246.
  14. ↵
    Gilles, R. and Péqueux, A. (1981). Cell volume regulation in Crustaceans: relationship between mechanisms for controlling the osmolality of extracellular fluids. J. Exp. Zool. 215, 351–362.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  15. ↵
    Gilles, R. and Péqueux, A. (1985). Ion transport in Crustacean gills: physiological and ultrastructural approaches. In Transport Processes, Iono- and Osmoregulation: Current Comparative Approaches (ed. R. Gilles and M. Gilles-Baillien), p. 136. Berlin, New York: Springer-Verlag.
  16. ↵
    Gilles, R. and Péqueux, A. (1986). Physiological and ultrastructural studies of NaCl transport in crustacean gills. Boll. Zool. 53, 173–182.
    OpenUrl
  17. ↵
    Green, J. W., Harsch, M., Barr, L. and Prosser, C. L. (1959). The regulation of water and salt by the fiddler crabs, Uca pugnax and Uca pugilator. Biol. Bull. 116, 76–87.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. ↵
    Gross, W. J. (1964). Trends in water and salt regulation among aquatic and amphibious crabs. Biol. Bull. 127, 447–466.
  19. ↵
    Henry, R. P. (1988). Multiple functions of carbonic anhydrase in the crustacean gill. J. Exp. Zool. 248, 19–24.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  20. ↵
    Henry, R. P. and Swenson, E. R. (2000). The distribution and physiological significance of carbonic anhydrase in vertebrate gas exchange organs. Respir. Physiol. 121, 1–12.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  21. ↵
    Krippeit-Drews, P., Drews, G. and Graszynski, K. (1989). Effects of ion substitution on the transepithelial potential difference of the gills of the fiddler crab Uca tangeri: evidence for a H+-pump in the apical membrane. J. Comp. Physiol. 159, 43–49.
    OpenUrl
  22. ↵
    Lowy, R. J., Dawson, D. C. and Ernst, S. A. (1987). Mechanism of ion transport by avian salt gland primary cell cultures. Am. J. Physiol. 256, R1184–R1191.
    OpenUrl
  23. ↵
    Lucu, C. and Siebers, D. (1986). Amilorid-sensitive sodium flux and potentials in perfused Carcinus gill preparations. J. Exp. Biol. 122, 25–35.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  24. ↵
    Luquet, C. and Ansaldo, M. (1997). Acid–base balance and ionic regulation during emersion in the estuarine entertidal crab Chasmagnathus granulata Dana (Decapoda Grapsidae). Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 117A, 407–410.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  25. ↵
    Luquet, C., Pellerano, G. and Rosa, G. (1997). Salinity-induced changes in the fine structure of the gills of the semiterrestrial estuarian crab, Uca uruguayensis (Nobili, 1901) (Decapoda, Ocypodidae). Tissue Cell 29, 495–501.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. ↵
    Mantel, L. H. and Farmer, L. L. (1983). Osmotic and ionic regulation. In The Biology of Crustacea, vol. 5 (ed. L. H. Mantel), pp. 53–161. London, New York: Academic Press.
  27. ↵
    Martelo, M. J. and Zanders, I. P. (1986). Modifications of gill ultrastructure and ionic composition in the crab Goniopsis cruentata acclimated to various salinities. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 84A, 383–389.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  28. ↵
    Martinez, C. B. R., Harris, R. R. and Santos, M. C. F. (1998). Transepithelial potential differences and sodium fluxes in isolated perfused gills of the mangrove crab Ucides cordatus. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 120A, 227–236.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  29. ↵
    Mougabure Cueto, G. A. (1998). Interacción entre la regulación iónica y el equilibrio ácido-base en el cangrejo Chasmagnathus granulata Dana, 1851 (Decapoda, Grapsidae). pp. 1–55. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Graduate Thesis.
  30. ↵
    Onken, H. (1996). Active and electrogenic absorption of Na+ and Cl– across posterior gills of Eriocheir sinensis: influence of short-term osmotic variations. J. Exp. Biol. 199, 901–910.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  31. ↵
    Onken, H. and Riestenpatt, S. (1998). NaCl absorption across split gill lamellae of hyperregulating crabs: Transport mechanisms and their regulation. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 119A, 883–893.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  32. ↵
    Onken, H. and Siebers, D. (1992). Voltage-clamp measurements on single split lamellae of posterior gills of the shore crab Carcinus maenas. Mar. Biol. 114, 385–390.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  33. ↵
    Péqueux, A. (1995). Osmotic regulation in crustaceans. J. Crust. Biol. 15, 1–60.
  34. ↵
    Péqueux, A., Gilles, R. and Marshall, W. S. (1988). NaCl transport in gills and related structures. In Advances in Comparative and Environmental Physiology, vol. 1 (ed. R. Greger), pp. 1–73. Berlin: Springer.
  35. ↵
    Pierrot C., Péqueux, A. and Thuet, P. (1995a). Perfusion of gills isolated from the hyper-hyporegulating crab Pachygrapsus marmoratus (Crustacea, Decapoda): adaptation of a method. Arch. Physiol. Biochem. 103, 401–409.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  36. ↵
    Pierrot, C., Péqueux, A. and Thuet, P. (1995b). Effects of ion substitution and of inhibitors on transepithelial potential difference and sodium fluxes in perfused gills of the crab Pachygrapsus marmoratus. Arch. Physiol. Biochem. 103, 466–475.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  37. ↵
    Riddle, C. V. and Ernst, S. A. (1979). Structural simplicity of the zonula occludens in the electrolyte secreting epithelium of the avian salt gland. J. Membr. Biol. 45, 21–35.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  38. ↵
    Riestenpatt, S., Onken, H. and Siebers, D. (1996). Active absorption of Na+ and Cl– across the gill epithelium of the shore crab Carcinus maenas: voltage-clamp and ion-flux studies. J. Exp. Biol. 199, 1545–1554.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  39. ↵
    Rosa, G. A., Genovese, G., Luquet, C. M., Ansaldo, M. and Pellerano, G. N. (1999). Histophysiological changes in Chasmagnathus granulatus during acclimation from low to high salinity. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 124A, S142. (Abstract)
    OpenUrl
  40. ↵
    Schmidt, A. S. C. and Santos, E. A. (1993). Behavior and haemolymphatic ionic composition of the intertidal crab Chasmagnathus granulata Dana, 1851 (Crustacea: Decapoda) during emersion. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 106A, 337–342.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  41. ↵
    Schubart, C. D. and Diesel, R. (1998). Osmoregulatory capacities and penetration into terrestrial habitats: A comparative study of jamaican crabs of the genus Armases Abele, 1992 (Brachyura: Grapsidae: Sesarminae). Bull. Mar. Sci. 62, 743–752.
    OpenUrl
  42. ↵
    Schubart, C. D. and Diesel, R. (1999). Osmoregulation and the transition from marine to freshwater and terrestrial life: A comparative study of jamaican crabs of the genus Sesarma. Arch. Hydrobiol. 145, 331–347.
    OpenUrl
  43. ↵
    Siebers, D., Leweck, K., Markus, H. and Winkler, A. (1982). Sodium regulation in the shore crab Carcinus maenas as related to ambient salinity. Mar. Biol. 69, 37–43.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  44. ↵
    Siebers, D., Winkler, A., Lucu, C., Thedens, G. and Weichart, D. (1985). Na-K-ATPase generates an active transport potential in the gills of the hyperregulating shore crab Carcinus maenas. Mar. Biol. 87, 185–192.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  45. ↵
    Skou, J. C. (1965). Enzymatic basis for active transport of Na+ and K+ across the cell membrane. Physiol. Rev. 45, 596–617.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  46. ↵
    Sokal, R. R. and Rohlf, F. J. (1981). Biometry. 859pp. New York: W. H. Freeman.
  47. ↵
    Towle, D. W. and Kays, W. T. (1986). Basolateral localization of Na+ K+-ATPase in gill epithelium of two osmoregulating crabs, Callinectes sapidus and Carcinus maenas. J. Exp. Zool. 239, 311–318.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  48. ↵
    Ussing, H. H. (1949). The distinction by means of tracers between active transport and diffusion. Acta Physiol. Scand. 19, 43–56
  49. ↵
    Zeiske, W. (1990). Noise from apical potassium ion channels. Curr. Top. Membr. Transp. 37, 157–190.
    OpenUrl
View Abstract
Previous ArticleNext Article
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

This Issue

 Download PDF

Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Experimental Biology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Transepithelial potential differences and Na+ flux in isolated perfused gills of the crab Chasmagnathus granulatus (Grapsidae) acclimated to hyper- and hypo-salinity
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Experimental Biology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Experimental Biology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Research Article
Transepithelial potential differences and Na+ flux in isolated perfused gills of the crab Chasmagnathus granulatus (Grapsidae) acclimated to hyper- and hypo-salinity
C. M. Luquet, U. Postel, J. Halperin, M. R. Urcola, R. Marques, D. Siebers
Journal of Experimental Biology 2002 205: 71-77;
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Research Article
Transepithelial potential differences and Na+ flux in isolated perfused gills of the crab Chasmagnathus granulatus (Grapsidae) acclimated to hyper- and hypo-salinity
C. M. Luquet, U. Postel, J. Halperin, M. R. Urcola, R. Marques, D. Siebers
Journal of Experimental Biology 2002 205: 71-77;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Alerts

Please log in to add an alert for this article.

Sign in to email alerts with your email address

Article navigation

  • Top
  • Article
    • SUMMARY
    • Introduction
    • Materials and methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
    • References
  • Figures & tables
  • Info & metrics
  • PDF

Related articles

Cited by...

More in this TOC section

  • Sex-specific microhabitat use is associated with sex-biased thermal physiology in Anolis lizards
  • Early developmental stages of native populations of Ciona intestinalis under increased temperature are affected by local habitat history
  • Three auditory brainstem response (ABR) methods tested and compared in two anuran species
Show more RESEARCH ARTICLE

Similar articles

Other journals from The Company of Biologists

Development

Journal of Cell Science

Disease Models & Mechanisms

Biology Open

Advertisement

Meet the Editors at SICB Virtual 2021

Reserve your place to join some of the journal editors, including Editor-in-Chief Craig Franklin, at our Meet the Editor session on 17 February at 2pm (EST). Don’t forget to view our SICB Subject Collection, featuring relevant JEB papers relating to some of the symposia sessions.


2020 at The Company of Biologists

Despite 2020's challenges, we were able to bring a number of long-term projects and new ventures to fruition. As we enter a new year, join us as we reflect on the triumphs of the last 12 months.


The Big Biology podcast

JEB author Christine Cooper talks to Big Biology about her research. In this fascinating JEB sponsored podcast she tells us how tough zebra finches adjust their physiology to cope with extreme climate events. 


Developmental and reproductive physiology of small mammals at high altitude

Cayleih Robertson and Kathryn Wilsterman focus on high-altitude populations of the North American deer mouse in their review of the challenges and evolutionary innovations of pregnant and nursing small mammals at high altitude.


Read & Publish participation extends worldwide

“Being able to publish Open Access articles free of charge means that my article gets maximum exposure and has maximum impact, and that all my peers can read it regardless of the agreements that their universities have with publishers.”

Professor Roi Holzman (Tel Aviv University) shares his experience of publishing Open Access as part of our growing Read & Publish initiative. We now have over 60 institutions in 12 countries taking part – find out more and view our full list of participating institutions.

Articles

  • Accepted manuscripts
  • Issue in progress
  • Latest complete issue
  • Issue archive
  • Archive by article type
  • Special issues
  • Subject collections
  • Interviews
  • Sign up for alerts

About us

  • About JEB
  • Editors and Board
  • Editor biographies
  • Travelling Fellowships
  • Grants and funding
  • Journal Meetings
  • Workshops
  • The Company of Biologists
  • Journal news

For Authors

  • Submit a manuscript
  • Aims and scope
  • Presubmission enquiries
  • Article types
  • Manuscript preparation
  • Cover suggestions
  • Editorial process
  • Promoting your paper
  • Open Access
  • Outstanding paper prize
  • Biology Open transfer

Journal Info

  • Journal policies
  • Rights and permissions
  • Media policies
  • Reviewer guide
  • Sign up for alerts

Contact

  • Contact JEB
  • Subscriptions
  • Advertising
  • Feedback

 Twitter   YouTube   LinkedIn

© 2021   The Company of Biologists Ltd   Registered Charity 277992