Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Accepted manuscripts
    • Issue in progress
    • Latest complete issue
    • Issue archive
    • Archive by article type
    • Special issues
    • Subject collections
    • Interviews
    • Sign up for alerts
  • About us
    • About JEB
    • Editors and Board
    • Editor biographies
    • Travelling Fellowships
    • Grants and funding
    • Journal Meetings
    • Workshops
    • The Company of Biologists
    • Journal news
  • For authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Aims and scope
    • Presubmission enquiries
    • Article types
    • Manuscript preparation
    • Cover suggestions
    • Editorial process
    • Promoting your paper
    • Open Access
    • Outstanding paper prize
    • Biology Open transfer
  • Journal info
    • Journal policies
    • Rights and permissions
    • Media policies
    • Reviewer guide
    • Sign up for alerts
  • Contacts
    • Contact JEB
    • Subscriptions
    • Advertising
    • Feedback
    • Institutional usage stats (logged-in users only)
  • COB
    • About The Company of Biologists
    • Development
    • Journal of Cell Science
    • Journal of Experimental Biology
    • Disease Models & Mechanisms
    • Biology Open

User menu

  • Log in
  • Log out

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Experimental Biology
  • COB
    • About The Company of Biologists
    • Development
    • Journal of Cell Science
    • Journal of Experimental Biology
    • Disease Models & Mechanisms
    • Biology Open

supporting biologistsinspiring biology

Journal of Experimental Biology

  • Log in
Advanced search

RSS  Twitter  Facebook  YouTube  

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Accepted manuscripts
    • Issue in progress
    • Latest complete issue
    • Issue archive
    • Archive by article type
    • Special issues
    • Subject collections
    • Interviews
    • Sign up for alerts
  • About us
    • About JEB
    • Editors and Board
    • Editor biographies
    • Travelling Fellowships
    • Grants and funding
    • Journal Meetings
    • Workshops
    • The Company of Biologists
    • Journal news
  • For authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Aims and scope
    • Presubmission enquiries
    • Article types
    • Manuscript preparation
    • Cover suggestions
    • Editorial process
    • Promoting your paper
    • Open Access
    • Outstanding paper prize
    • Biology Open transfer
  • Journal info
    • Journal policies
    • Rights and permissions
    • Media policies
    • Reviewer guide
    • Sign up for alerts
  • Contacts
    • Contact JEB
    • Subscriptions
    • Advertising
    • Feedback
    • Institutional usage stats (logged-in users only)
Journal Articles
Acoustic detection by sound-producing fishes (Mormyridae): the role of gas-filled tympanic bladders
L.B. Fletcher, J.D. Crawford
Journal of Experimental Biology 2001 204: 175-183;
L.B. Fletcher
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
J.D. Crawford
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Summary

Mormyrid electric fish use sounds for communication and have unusual ears. Each ear has a small gas-filled tympanic bladder coupled to the sacculus. Although it has long been thought that this gas-filled structure confers acoustic pressure sensitivity, this has never been evaluated experimentally. We examined tone detection thresholds by measuring behavioral responses to sounds in normal fish and in fish with manipulations to one or to both of the tympanic bladders. We found that the tympanic bladders increase auditory sensitivity by approximately 30 dB in the middle of the animal's hearing range (200–1200 Hz). Normal fish had their best tone detection thresholds in the range 400–500 Hz, with thresholds of approximately 60 dB (re 1 microPa). When the gas was displaced from the bladders with physiological saline, the animals showed a dramatic loss of auditory sensitivity. In contrast, control animals in which only one bladder was manipulated or in which a sham operation had been performed on both sides had normal hearing.

  • © 2001 by Company of Biologists

REFERENCES

    1. Barimo, J. F. and
    2. Fine, M. L.
    (1998). Relationship of swim-bladder shape to the directionality pattern of underwater sound in the oyster toadfish. Can. J. Zool 76, 134–.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
    1. Canfield, J. G. and
    2. Eaton, R. C.
    (1990). Swimbladder acoustic pressure transduction initiates Mauthner-mediated escape. Nature 347, 760–.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
    1. Crawford, J. D.
    (1992). Individual and sex specificity in the electric organ discharges of breeding mormyrid fish, Pollimyrus isidori. J. Exp. Biol 164, 79–.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Crawford, J. D.,
    2. Cook, A. P. and
    3. Heberlein, A. S.
    (1997). Bioacoustic behavior of African fishes (Mormyridae): Potential cues for species and individual recognition in Pollimyrus. J. Acoust. Soc. Am 102, 1200–.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Crawford, J. D. and
    2. Huang, X.
    (1999). Communication signals and sound production mechanisms of mormyrid electric fish. J. Exp. Biol 202, 1417–.
    OpenUrlAbstract
    1. Crawford, J. D.,
    2. Jacob, P. and
    3. Benech, V.
    (1997). Sound production and reproductive ecology of strongly acoustic fish in Africa: Pollimyrus isidori, Mormyridae. Behaviour 134, 677–.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
    1. Eaton, R. C.,
    2. Canfield, J. G. and
    3. Guzik, A. L.
    (1995). Left—right discrimination of sound onset by the Mauthner system. Brain Behav. Evol 46, 165–.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Fay, R. R.
    (1969). Behavioral audiogram for the goldfish. J. Audit. Res 9, 112–.
    1. Fay, R. R.
    (1995). Perception of spectrally and temporally complex sounds by the goldfish (Carassius auratus). Hearing Res 89, 146–.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Fay, R. R.
    (1998). Perception of two-tone complexes by the goldfish (Carassius auratus). Hearing Res 120, 17–.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Fay, R. R.,
    2. Hillery, C. M. and
    3. Bolan, K.
    (1982). Representation of sound pressure and particle motion information in the midbrain of the goldfish. Comp. Biochem. Physiol 71, 181–.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
    1. Fay, R. R. and
    2. Popper, A. N.
    (1974). Acoustic stimulation of the ear of the goldfish (Carassius auratus). J. Exp. Biol 61, 243–.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Fine, M. L. and
    2. Pennypacker, K. R.
    (1986). Hormonal basis for sexual dimorphism of the sound-producing apparatus of the oyster toadfish. Exp. Neurol 92, 289–.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Kirschbaum, F.
    (1975). Environmental factors control the periodical reproduction of tropical electric fish. Experientia 31, 1159–.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
    1. Kleerekoper, H. and
    2. Roggenkamp, P. A.
    (1959). An experimental study on the effect of the swimbladder on hearing sensitivity in Ameiurus nebulosus nebulosus (Lesueur). Can. J. Zool 37, 1–.
    OpenUrl
    1. Marvit, P. and
    2. Crawford, J. D.
    (2000). Auditory thresholds in a sound-producing electric fish (Pollimyrus): Behavioral measurements of sensitivity to tones and click trains. J. Acoust. Soc. Am 107, 2209–.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Marvit, P. and
    2. Crawford, J. D.
    (2000). Auditory discrimination in a sound-producing electric fish (Pollimyrus): tone frequency and click-rate difference detection. J. Acoust. Soc. Am 108, 1819–.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Rigley, L. and
    2. Marshall, J.
    (1973). Sound production by the elephant nose fish, Gnathonemus petersii (Pisces, Mormyridae). Copeia 1973, 134–.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
    1. Rogers, P. H.,
    2. Popper, A. N.,
    3. Hastings, M. C. and
    4. Saidel, W. M.
    (1988). Processing of acoustic signals in the auditory system of bony fish. J. Acoust. Soc. Am 83, 338–.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. von der Emde, G. and
    2. Bleckmann, H.
    (1998). Finding food: Senses involved in foraging for insect larvae in the electric fish Gnathonemus petersii. J. Exp. Biol 201, 969–.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. von Frisch, K.
    (1938). The sense of hearing in fish. Nature 141, 8–.
    OpenUrl
    1. Werns, S. and
    2. Howland, H. C.
    (1976). Size and allometry of the saccular air bladder of Gnathonemus petersii (Pisces: Mormyridae): implications for hearing. Copeia 1976, 200–.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
Previous ArticleNext Article
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

This Issue

 Download PDF

Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Experimental Biology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Acoustic detection by sound-producing fishes (Mormyridae): the role of gas-filled tympanic bladders
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Experimental Biology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Experimental Biology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Journal Articles
Acoustic detection by sound-producing fishes (Mormyridae): the role of gas-filled tympanic bladders
L.B. Fletcher, J.D. Crawford
Journal of Experimental Biology 2001 204: 175-183;
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Journal Articles
Acoustic detection by sound-producing fishes (Mormyridae): the role of gas-filled tympanic bladders
L.B. Fletcher, J.D. Crawford
Journal of Experimental Biology 2001 204: 175-183;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Alerts

Please log in to add an alert for this article.

Sign in to email alerts with your email address

Article navigation

  • Top
  • Article
  • Info & metrics
  • PDF

Related articles

Cited by...

More in this TOC section

  • Sarcomere number regulation maintained after immobilization in desmin-null mouse skeletal muscle
  • The application of ground force explains the energetic cost of running backward and forward
  • Plasticity of chemotaxis revealed by paired presentation of a chemoattractant and starvation in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans
Show more Journal Articles

Similar articles

Other journals from The Company of Biologists

Development

Journal of Cell Science

Disease Models & Mechanisms

Biology Open

Advertisement

Welcome to JEB’s new Editor Monica Daley

We are pleased to welcome Monica Daley to JEB’s Editorial team. Monica has had a long association with JEB before taking up her new role, overseeing peer review of neuromuscular physiology, terrestrial biomechanics and integrative physiology of locomotion.


In the field with Robyn Hetem

Continuing our fieldwork series, Robyn Hetem reflects on working with species ranging from aardvark to zebra, and the impact COVID-19 has had on fieldwork.


Read & Publish participation continues to grow

“It is particularly encouraging for early career researchers, as it allows them to display their research globally without the need to find costs to cover the open access option.”

Professor Fernando Montealegre-Z (University of Lincoln) shares his experience of publishing Open Access as part of our growing Read & Publish initiative. We now have over 150 institutions in 15 countries and four library consortia taking part – find out more and view our full list of participating institutions.


Nocturnal reef residents have deep-sea-like eyes

Fanny de Busserolles and colleagues from The University of Queensland have discovered that the eyes of nocturnal reef fish have multibank retinas, layers of photoreceptors, similar to the eyes of deep-sea fish that live in dim light conditions.


Mechanisms underlying gut microbiota–host interactions in insects

In their Review, Konstantin Schmidt and Philipp Engel summarise recent findings about the mechanisms involved in gut colonisation and the provisioning of beneficial effects in gut microbiota–insect symbiosis.

Articles

  • Accepted manuscripts
  • Issue in progress
  • Latest complete issue
  • Issue archive
  • Archive by article type
  • Special issues
  • Subject collections
  • Interviews
  • Sign up for alerts

About us

  • About JEB
  • Editors and Board
  • Editor biographies
  • Travelling Fellowships
  • Grants and funding
  • Journal Meetings
  • Workshops
  • The Company of Biologists
  • Journal news

For Authors

  • Submit a manuscript
  • Aims and scope
  • Presubmission enquiries
  • Article types
  • Manuscript preparation
  • Cover suggestions
  • Editorial process
  • Promoting your paper
  • Open Access
  • Outstanding paper prize
  • Biology Open transfer

Journal Info

  • Journal policies
  • Rights and permissions
  • Media policies
  • Reviewer guide
  • Sign up for alerts

Contact

  • Contact JEB
  • Subscriptions
  • Advertising
  • Feedback

 Twitter   YouTube   LinkedIn

© 2021   The Company of Biologists Ltd   Registered Charity 277992