Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Accepted manuscripts
    • Issue in progress
    • Latest complete issue
    • Issue archive
    • Archive by article type
    • Special issues
    • Subject collections
    • Interviews
    • Sign up for alerts
  • About us
    • About JEB
    • Editors and Board
    • Editor biographies
    • Travelling Fellowships
    • Grants and funding
    • Journal Meetings
    • Workshops
    • The Company of Biologists
    • Journal news
  • For authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Aims and scope
    • Presubmission enquiries
    • Article types
    • Manuscript preparation
    • Cover suggestions
    • Editorial process
    • Promoting your paper
    • Open Access
    • Outstanding paper prize
    • Biology Open transfer
  • Journal info
    • Journal policies
    • Rights and permissions
    • Media policies
    • Reviewer guide
    • Sign up for alerts
  • Contacts
    • Contact JEB
    • Subscriptions
    • Advertising
    • Feedback
  • COB
    • About The Company of Biologists
    • Development
    • Journal of Cell Science
    • Journal of Experimental Biology
    • Disease Models & Mechanisms
    • Biology Open

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Experimental Biology
  • COB
    • About The Company of Biologists
    • Development
    • Journal of Cell Science
    • Journal of Experimental Biology
    • Disease Models & Mechanisms
    • Biology Open

supporting biologistsinspiring biology

Journal of Experimental Biology

  • Log in
Advanced search

RSS  Twitter  Facebook  YouTube  

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Accepted manuscripts
    • Issue in progress
    • Latest complete issue
    • Issue archive
    • Archive by article type
    • Special issues
    • Subject collections
    • Interviews
    • Sign up for alerts
  • About us
    • About JEB
    • Editors and Board
    • Editor biographies
    • Travelling Fellowships
    • Grants and funding
    • Journal Meetings
    • Workshops
    • The Company of Biologists
    • Journal news
  • For authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Aims and scope
    • Presubmission enquiries
    • Article types
    • Manuscript preparation
    • Cover suggestions
    • Editorial process
    • Promoting your paper
    • Open Access
    • Outstanding paper prize
    • Biology Open transfer
  • Journal info
    • Journal policies
    • Rights and permissions
    • Media policies
    • Reviewer guide
    • Sign up for alerts
  • Contacts
    • Contact JEB
    • Subscriptions
    • Advertising
    • Feedback
Research Article
The molecular basis for spectral tuning of rod visual pigments in deep-sea fish
David M. Hunt, Kanwaljit S. Dulai, Julian C. Partridge, Phillippa Cottrill, James K. Bowmaker
Journal of Experimental Biology 2001 204: 3333-3344;
David M. Hunt
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kanwaljit S. Dulai
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Julian C. Partridge
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Phillippa Cottrill
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
James K. Bowmaker
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & tables
  • Info & metrics
  • PDF
Loading

SUMMARY

Most species of deep-sea fish possess of a rod-only retina with a pigment that is generally shortwave shifted in λmax towards the blue region of the spectrum. In addition, the λmax values of different species tend to cluster at particular points in the spectrum. In this study, the rod opsin gene sequences from 28 deep-sea fish species drawn from seven different Orders are compared. The λmax values of the rod pigments vary from approximately 520 nm to <470 nm, with the majority lying between 490 nm and 477 nm. The 520 nm pigment in two species of dragon fish is associated with a Phe261Tyr substitution, whereas the shortwave shifts of the pigments in the other 26 species are accountable by substitutions at a further eight sites (83, 122, 124, 132, 208, 292, 299 and 300). Clustering of λmax values does not, however, involve a common subset of these substitutions in the different species. A phylogenetic analysis predicts that the pigment in the ancestral species would have had a λmax of approximately 480 nm. A total of 27 changes is required to generate the pattern of substitutions seen in the different species, with many sites undergoing multiple changes.

  • opsin
  • visual pigment
  • rod photoreceptor
  • deep-sea fish
  • spectral tuning
  • evolution.

Introduction

The ambient light of the deep-sea is composed of dim blue downwelling daylight and bioluminescence (Marshall, 1979). However, the intensity of downwelling light diminishes rapidly with increasing depth, and the limit of scotopic vision has been calculated to be at about 1000 m in the clearest tropical oceans (Denton, 1990). The visual systems of deep-sea fish show numerous adaptations to this photon-limited visual environment, including the loss of cone photoreceptors to give a rod-only retina, an unusually high amount of visual pigment in the photoreceptors (Denton and Warren, 1957; Partridge et al., 1988; Partridge et al., 1989), large photoreceptor size (Munk, 1966), and the wavelength of maximal absorbance of visual pigments shortwave (SW)-shifted from around 500 nm of the majority of rod visual pigments to around 480 nm to match the wavelength of maximal spectral transmission of oceanic waters (Denton and Warren, 1957; Muntz, 1958). This SW-shifted sensitivity also correlates well with the blue bioluminescence emitted by photophores present on many species of deep-sea fish (Nicol, 1969; Herring, 1983; Douglas et al., 1998b).

Vertebrate visual pigments are composed of an opsin protein of approx. 350 amino acid residues that forms seven α-helical transmembrane regions connected by cytoplasmic and luminal loops (Dratz and Hargrave, 1983; Findlay and Pappin, 1986), covalently attached via a protonated Schiff-base linkage to a chromophore. Each visual pigment shows a peak of maximal absorbance (λmax), the precise location depending on interactions between the chromophore and specific amino acid residues of the opsin protein. In a previous study of visual pigments in four species of deep-sea fish with rod-only retinas containing visual pigments with λmax values ranging from 483 nm to 468 nm (Hope et al., 1997), a number of candidate amino acid substitutions for spectral tuning were identified. However, the small number of species studied precluded a more detailed analysis of the mechanism of spectral tuning. A feature of deep-sea fish rod pigments is that their λmax values tend to cluster at particular points in the spectrum rather than forming a continuous distribution (Bridges, 1965; Dartnall and Lythgoe, 1965; Partridge et al., 1989). The molecular basis for this phenomenon is unknown but could clearly be dependent on a common set of amino acid replacements, where each discrete shift in λmax is achieved in all species by the same amino acid substitution.

In order to examine this and to determine whether the mechanism of spectral tuning proposed by Hope et al. (Hope et al., 1997) is of general applicability to the rod visual pigments of deep-sea fish, we have now extended the analysis to a much larger group of species drawn from seven different Orders of the Euteleostei, the Aulopiformes, Beryciformes, Gadiformes, Myctophiformes, Ophidiiformes, Osmeriformes and Stomiiformes. With only two exceptions, all the species studied possess only a single rhodopsin pigment in the retina (Ali and Anctil, 1976; Fröhlich et al., 1995; Partridge et al., 1988; Partridge et al., 1989; Douglas et al., 1995), indicating that only a single rod opsin gene is expressed in the photoreceptors. The exceptions are two species of dragon fish, Aristostomias tittmanni and Malacosteus niger. These species emit bioluminescent light with maxima beyond 700 nm (Widder et al., 1984), in addition to the more usual blue light. M. niger possesses a rhodopsin/porphyropsin pigment pair with λmax values of 517 nm and 550 nm, respectively. These pigments are based on a single rod opsin gene but with retinal or 3,4-dehydroretinal, respectively, as chromophore (Bowmaker et al., 1988; Douglas et al., 1998b). In addition, however, M. niger uses a remarkable photosensitizer based on a mixture of defarnesylated and demetallated derivatives of bacteriochlorophylls c and d in the retina to enhance the sensitivity of the ‘pigment pair’ to its own longwave (LW) radiation (Bowmaker et al., 1988; Douglas et al., 1999a). The closely related species, A. tittmanni, lacks the photosensitizer. Instead, as well as possessing a rhodopsin/porphyropsin ‘pigment pair’ with λmax values of 523 nm and 551 nm, it has a third pigment with a λmax of 581 nm, based most probably on a second opsin protein.

Materials and methods

Collection of samples

Deep-sea fish were caught from the NERC research ship RRS Challenger during cruises 113 in 1994 and 122 in 1995, by deep trawling with either a semi-balloon otter trawl (Merrett and Marshall, 1981) or a rectangular midwater trawl combination net, from depths between 600 m and 5000 m, in the area of the Porcupine Sea Bight abyssal slope region (49°27′N, 11°29′W to 49°59′N, 13°12′W) or the Tagus and Horseshoe abyssal plains (31°15′, 17°00′ to 38°45′, 12°10′) of the North Eastern Atlantic. Fish were also collected from the western Atlantic in the region of the Bahamas and South Coast of South Carolina, using a similar midwater trawl on two cruises of the R/V Edwin Link (Harbor Branch Oceanographic Institute, Florida, USA). All fish were dead when brought to the surface. Dissected tissue samples or whole fish were either rapidly cooled to –80°C for storage or placed in absolute ethanol prior to storage at –20°C.

Sequencing of the rod opsin gene

The region of the rod opsin gene that encodes the seven α-helices and associated cytoplasmic and luminal loops was amplified by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and sequenced. Genomic DNA was extracted from liver or whole body samples by a standard phenol/chloroform extraction protocol. The first-round PCR amplifications utilised an oligonucleotide primer pair Frho91F (5′-CATATGAATACCCTCAGTACTACC-3′) and Frho956R (5′-CCATTACCCATGTAAATGCAATTCCTG-3′) that amplifies a fragment from nucleotides 91 to 956. Where an amplified product was not visible on an agarose gel, a second nested PCR was carried out using primer pair Frho173F (5′-TGTAAAACGACGGCCAGTCTTCCCYRTCAACTTCCTCAC-3′) and Frho913R (5′-CAGGAAACAGCTATGACCTGCTTGTTCAWGCAGATGTAG-3′). The 5′ region of the gene was amplified using primer pair Frho16F (5′-WWWWWATGAACGGYACRGAGG-3′) and Frho229R (5′-AGAGGTYRGCMACNGCCAGGTTSAG-3′).

Each PCR contained approximately 100 ng of template DNA, 12.5 μmol l–1 of each primer, 0.2 mmol l–1 each of dATP, dCTP, dGTP and dTTP, 4 mmol l–1 Mg2Cl, 0.5 unit of Taq polymerase and 5 μl of reaction buffer in a final volume of 50 μl. Following an initial denaturation for 3 min at 94°C, 35 cycles were used with an annealing temperature of 56°C, an elongation temperature of 72°C and a denaturing temperature of 94°C. PCR products were passed through a Centricon 100 column (Princeton Scientific, Inc.) prior to direct sequencing with the Prism FS dye-deoxy Taq terminator kit, and the Prism Dyeprimer FS M13 forward and reverse kits. An ABI Model 373a sequencer was employed to generate the sequence. For each specimen, at least three independent PCR fragments were sequenced.

The rod opsin cDNA sequence was obtained for one species, Gonostoma elongatum. mRNA was isolated from eye tissue using the QuickPrep mRNA purification kit (Pharmacia) and cDNA synthesised using Superscript II reverse transcriptase, RNase H, and oligo-dT primer. The 5′ and 3′ ends of the coding sequence were then amplified by the RACE system (Gibco BRL) and the resulting products sequenced as described above.

Phylogenetic analysis

Neighbour-joining (Saitou and Nei, 1987) was used to construct a phylogenetic tree from the opsin gene sequences. The degree of support for internal branching was assessed by bootstrapping with 500 replicates. All computations were carried out with the MEGA computer package (Kumar et al., 1993).

Results

Fish species

Table 1 lists the 28 species of deep-sea fish examined in this study, together with the λmax values of their visual pigments. Three of these species, Cataetyx laticeps, Gonostoma elongatum and Hoplostethus mediteranus, were the subject of a previous study (Hope et al., 1997). By far the largest group of species is from the Stomiiformes, reflecting their relative abundance in the area of the north eastern Atlantic where sampling took place.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table 1.

Identity of opsin gene sequence

As shown in Fig. 1, the amplified sequences form a single clade with the rod opsins of other species that is quite separate from the rod-like brain opsin identified in Fugu (Philp et al., 2000), the rod-like green cone opsins, and the other cone opsins, confirming therefore that it is the rod opsin gene that has been amplified. Some of the bootstrap values for branches in this tree are low, although the key branch that separates the teleost rod opsins from the remaining sequences has a significant value of 97. Additional confirmation comes from the observation that in each case, the amplified gene completely lacked introns, a feature that is limited amongst vertebrate opsins to the teleost rod opsin gene (Fitzgibbon et al., 1995; Hope et al., 1997).

   Fig. 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 1.

Phylogenetic tree of opsin gene sequences. The tree was generated by the neighbour-joining method (Saitou and Nei, 1987). The bootstrap confidence values are shown for each branch. The scale bar is calibrated at 0.02 substitutions per site. GenBank accession numbers: Fugu rod-line brain AF201472, Goldfish rod L11863, blue cone L11864, green cone l11865 and red cone L11867; chicken rod D00702, violet cone M92039, blue cone M92057, green cone M92038 and red cone X57490, and Drosophila Rh3 M17718.

Amino acid sequence of rod opsin

With the exception of the three species from the Gadiformes discussed below, the sequenced region of the gene included the coding region for all seven α-helical regions. The deduced amino acid sequences are shown in Fig. 2. In order to confirm that these genomic sequences correspond to the expressed sequence in the retina, the complete cDNA sequence of one species, Gonostoma elongatum, was determined. This sequence is also shown in Fig. 2 and is identical to that obtained previously (Hope et al., 1997) from genomic DNA.

   Fig. 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 2.

Deduced amino acid sequences of deep-sea fish. The seven α-helical regions as determined from the crystal structure of bovine rhodopsin (Palczewski et al., 2000) are boxed. Identical residues are indicated by a dot, missing data by a dash.

A number of functionally important residues identified by previous studies are conserved across all species. Among these are the Lys296 chromophore attachment site (Dratz and Hargrave, 1983), the Glu113 Schiff base counterion (Sakmar et al., 1989), sites of disulphide bond formation at Cys110 and Cys187 (Karnik and Khorana, 1990), and Trp126 and Trp265 (Nakayama and Khorana, 1990; Nakayama et al., 1998) involved in conformational changes during chromophore isomerisation and formation of the retinal binding pocket. A conserved tripeptide at the cytoplasmic boundary of helix 3 has been shown to be important in transducin binding (Franke et al., 1990). In mammals and birds, this tripeptide is generally Asp/Glu134, Arg135 and Tyr136. In fish, however, Trp is frequently substituted for Tyr at site 136 (Johnson et al., 1993; Hope et al., 1997) and this is seen in five of the six Orders examined here. The exception is the stomiiforms, where Tyr136 is generally present but is replaced by Phe in Malacosteus niger and by Trp in Vinciguerria nimbaria.

Candidate sites for spectral tuning

Except for species from the same genus, the amino acid divergence between the rod opsin sequences of these deep-sea fish species is generally >20 %, reflecting the diversity of species examined in this study. In order therefore to identify candidate sites for spectral tuning, two overlapping approaches were used. The sequences were mapped on to a model based on conserved residues across >500 G-protein-linked receptor proteins (Baldwin, 1993; Baldwin et al., 1997). This model not only identifies the seven helices but, together with the three-dimensional map of frog rhodopsin determined by electron cryo-microscopy (Schertler and Hargrave, 1995), also provides a framework for orientating each helix with respect to the exterior lipid membrane and the central hydrophilic retinal-binding pocket. Only substitutions that result in a change in either charge or polarity (Nathans, 1990; Nakayama and Khorana, 1991) in residues that are located in the transmembrane helical regions and are either adjacent to this pocket or face another helix appear to be important for the spectral tuning of the resulting pigment (Merbs and Nathans, 1993; Asenjo et al., 1994; Hope et al., 1997; Hunt et al., 1996). The number of candidate tuning sites was then extended to include additional sites identified from the crystal structure of bovine rhodopsin (Palczewski et al., 2000) that are again either adjacent to the retinal binding pocket or the Schiff base. These include part of extracellular loop 2 between helices 4 and 5 that folds deeply into the centre of the molecule, with residues 186–190 contributing to the chromophore-binding pocket. Finally, site 181 was also included, since a Glu181Gln substitution has been shown to result in a 10 nm LW-shift in bovine rhodopsin (Terakita et al., 2000). The Glu at this site is, however, totally conserved across all the deep-sea fish species.

The identity of these residues and their relative position in the helices/loop regions is shown in Table 2. The following analysis of the amino acid sequences of deep-sea fish rod opsins focuses on changes at these sites.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table 2.

Species from the Order Stomiiformes

Aristostomias tittmani, Malacosteus niger and Photostomias guernei are all members of the sub-family Malacosteinae (loosejaws). They differ in that A. tittmani and M. niger are the only species amongst those studied with λmax values >500 nm. M. niger possesses a rhodopsin/porphyropsin pigment pair based on a single opsin gene (Bowmaker et al., 1988; Douglas et al., 1999). Comparing the sequence of the M. niger gene with that of P. guernei (pigment λmax of 483 nm), three substitutions at potential tuning sites are apparent: Phe208Tyr in helix 5, Phe261Tyr in helix 6, and Ser292Ile in helix 7. Of these, only the latter two sites have been previously implicated in the tuning of natural pigments. The equivalent of Phe261Tyr is responsible for 6–10 nm of the shift between the primate red and green cone pigments (Asenjo et al., 1994) and Phe261Tyr generated by site-directed mutagenesis resulted in a LW shift of λ nm in the rod pigment of the cave fish, Astyanax fasciatus (Yokoyama et al., 1995). Ser292Ala resulted in a shift of 10 nm and 12 nm, respectively, in the rod opsins of bovine (Sun et al., 1997) and the dolphin (Fasick and Robinson, 1998). Both sites have been implicated in the tuning of rod opsins in Baikal cottoids (Hunt et al., 1996).

In contrast to M. niger, A. tittmani probably possesses two opsin genes. Phylogenetic analysis indicates that the sequence we have obtained is the rod opsin orthologue (see Fig. 1), and a comparison of the deduced amino acid sequence with that of M. niger suggests that it would generate a pigment with λmax of not more than 520 nm. The key features are the presence of Tyr261 and Ile292 in both species and the absence of any other modifications such as a chloride-ion binding site (Wang et al., 1993) that would indicate a LW shift to 581 nm. It also lacks Phe208Tyr, identified above as a potential candidate for the LW shift of the M. niger pigment, indicating that substitutions at 261 and 292 may together be sufficient to shift the λmax of the pigment in both species to approx. 520 nm, with the substitution at 208 responsible for the 5 nm SW shift of the M. niger pigment compared with the A. tittmani pigment.

Eight of the stomiiforms, including P. guernei, fall into a group with λmax values ranging from 489 nm to 481 nm. Potential tuning substitutions amongst this group are present at sites 51, 160, 186 and 294, but there is no consistent pattern of substitution that would account for the spectral shifts; it is unlikely therefore that any of these substitutions have an effect on spectral tuning. In contrast, species with λmax values <480 nm all possess Glu122Gln. This substitution in bovine and human rod opsins is known to result in a 15–20 nm shortwave shift (Sakmar et al., 1989; Nakayama and Khorana, 1990; Imai et al., 1997), sufficient therefore to account for the shift from 489 nm to 477 nm present in the two Argyropelecus sp. and in Vinciguerria nimbaria. The latter species differs from the former two at two other sites, 51 and 264, although the identical λmax values of these three species would seem to rule out a role for the substitutions at these sites.

How do these amino acid substitutions fit in with the classification of the Stomiiformes? For the loosejaws A. tittmani, M. niger and P. guernei, the most parsimonious sequence of events is that the Phe261Tyr and Ser292Ile substitutions in the LW-shifted pigments of A. tittmani and M. niger occurred after the separation of the lineage leading to P. guernei, and this is supported by the phylogenetic analysis shown in Fig. 1. The acquisition of the Glu122Gln substitution is a little more complicated. It is present in A. aculeatus and A. gigas from the family Sternoptychidae, but in only one of the two members of the family Photoichthyidae (V. nimbaria). All three species have a λmax at 477 nm. This tuning substitution therefore either occurred separately in the two families, or was lost in the other member of the Photoichthyidae. Phylogenetic analysis of the pattern of substitutions supports the former explanation (Fig. 1).

Species from the Order Myctophiformes

The five myctophid species examined have similar λmax values to the mid-range stomiiforms, that is the group with λmax values of 489–481 nm. They differ from this group, however, at three potential tuning sites, possessing Gln rather than Glu at 122, Ser rather than Ala at 132, and Ala rather than Ser at 292. The substitutions at sites 122 and 292 would be expected to have opposite tuning effects and would account therefore for the positioning of the λmax values of these species in the mid-range. The effect if any of Ser132 is difficult to gauge. Lampanyctus alatus differs from the other four myctophid species at site 83; this substitution may account therefore for the small SW shift of L. alatus compared to the other myctophid species. There are also differences at site 51 and 264 but, as found for the stomiiforms, these substitutions are found in species with very similar or identical λmax values and are unlikely to be involved in tuning.

Species from the Order Gadiformes

The gadiforms are represented by two species, Phycis blennoides and Coryphaenoides guntheri. Unfortunately, it proved impossible to extend the 3′ end of the rod opsin sequences in these species up to the end of the transmembrane region of helix 7. The sequence of this region therefore falls short of two candidate sites, 306 and 307 (Fig. 2). These sites are completely invariant, however, in all other species and unlikely therefore to be involved in tuning.

The λmax values for C. guntheri is SW-shifted by 15 nm compared to that of P. blennoides. These rod opsin gene sequences differ at three candidate tuning sites, 122 where C. guntheri uniquely possesses Val, 207 where Met in C. guntheri is replaced by Ile in P. blennoides, and 292 where Ser in C. guntheri is replaced by Ala in P. blennoides. This latter substitution is capable of generating a 15 nm shift by itself and may account therefore for the spectral location of the P. blennoides pigment at 494 nm. In support of this, a Glu122Ile substitution generated in chicken rod opsin was without effect on spectral tuning (Imai et al., 1997), so it is probable that the similar Glu122Val substitution is also without effect. The effect of the Met207Ile substitution remains uncertain. Finally, the rod opsins of gadiforms differ from those of the stomiiforms in possessing Asp rather than Asn at site 83. In this regard, they are similar to the majority of the myctophids.

Species from the Order Ophidiiformes

The two ophidiiforms are Bassozetus compresis and Cataetyx laticeps; the rod opsin gene sequence for the latter species was originally reported by Hope et al. (Hope et al., 1997). Both species have SW-shifted λmax values at 476 nm and 468 nm, respectively. In fact, C. laticeps has the shortest λmax of any species examined in this study. Both species possess Ser292, which would account for much of the SW shift, and they also possess Ser124. The additional SW shift of λ nm in C. laticeps pigment may be accounted for by the Thr300Ile substitution.

Species from the Order Osmeriformes

The λmax values of the rod pigment in the two osmeriform species, Conocara salmonea and Alepocephalus bairdii, are 480 nm and 476 nm respectively. Both possess Ser292, which would account for the SW shift of both pigments. They differ at two potential tuning sites, 132 and 168. Site 168 is, however, without effect when substituted in bovine rod opsin (Phyllis Robinson, personal communication); the 4 nm SW shift in the rod opsin of A. bairdii is probably therefore the result of the replacement of polar Ser132 by Val.

Species from the Order Beryciformes

The rod visual pigments in two species of beryciforms, Anoplogaster cornuta and Hoplostethus mediteranus, have λmax values of 485 nm and 479 nm, respectively. The latter species was first studied by Hope et al. (Hope et al., 1997). Ser292 is again present in both species but they differ at site 299, where polar Ser rather than Ala is present in the opsin of A. cornuta with the slightly longer λmax.

Species from the Order Aulopiformes

The aulopiforms are represented by two species from the same genus, Bathysaurus ferox and B. mollis, with similar λmax values of 481 nm and 479 nm, respectively. Both species again possess Ser124 and Ser292, plus Thr rather than Ala at 299.

Evolution of rod opsins

Overall, therefore, substitutions at only nine sites effectively account for the spectral differences seen in the different species, although the involvement of other sites with small effects cannot be discounted and the mechanism of tuning between 489 nm and 480 nm in the stomiiforms remains to be established. These nine sites are shown in Fig. 3, where they have been placed on to a phylogeny based on a classical cladistic analysis (Nelson, 1995). Of the Superorders examined in this study, the most basal is the Protoacanthopterygii, followed by the Stenopterygii, Cyclosquamata, Scopelomorpha, Paracanthopterygii and Acanthopterygii. The species have been grouped according to family or sub-family divisions as appropriate (Table 1). Where more than two members of a sub-family are present, they have been grouped according to the neighbour-joining (Saitou and Nei, 1987) analysis of the nucleotide sequence of the rod opsin gene presented in Fig. 1.

   Fig. 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 3.

Phylogeny of deep-sea fish species. The amino acid residues at each of the nine candidate tuning sites are identified and the deduced position within the tree of each substitution is shown.

This phylogenetic analysis allows certain predictions to be made about the amino acid composition of rod opsin in the ancestral species. For five sites, Ala124, Phe208, Phe261, Ser292 and Ala299, an unequivocal assignment can be made, as shown in Fig. 3, whereas for each of the remaining four sites, it is not possible to distinguish between the two alternative residues since the immediate descendants differ at each site. In total, 27 changes are required to generate the pattern of substitutions seen in these species, with many sites undergoing forward and reverse changes on a number of different occasions.

Discussion

The visual systems of deep-sea fish are adapted to the perception of down-welling day light that is spectrally filtered to a narrow band of radiation of between 470 and 480 nm (Kirk, 1983), and to bioluminescent light, which generally peaks around 475 nm (Herring, 1983; Widder et al., 1983; Douglas et al., 1998b). Of the 28 species examined here, all but one express a single rod opsin in the retina, and the amplification of only a single rod opsin gene in each species is consistent with this observation. The exception is the stomiid A. tittmani, where at least two retinal visual pigments based on different opsins have been identified spectrophotometrically with λmax values at 523 nm and 581 nm for the A1-based pigments (Partridge and Douglas, 1995). Here again, the sequence that was amplified in this species is clearly also from a rod opsin gene which, on the basis of sequence identity with its most closely related species M. niger, would most probably encode the more SW-sensitive pigment.

Candidate spectral tuning sites have been identified by mapping the amino acid sequence of each fish rod opsin onto a three-dimensional model (Baldwin, 1993; Schertler and Hargrave, 1995; Baldwin et al., 1997). Potential tuning sites are identified as those that either point into the chromophore-binding pocket or face other helices. This set of sites was then extended to include all sites shown by Palczewski et al. (Palczewski et al., 2000) to be in close proximity to the chromophore or Schiff base. The stomiiforms form the largest group studied, comprising 13 species with λmax values for their rod opsins that range from 522 nm to 477 nm. Two substitutions, Phe261Tyr and Ser292Ile, appear largely responsible for the shift from the more typical λmax values of between 489 nm and 483 nm to the longer wavelengths of A. tittmani and M. niger at around 520 nm. The additional shift to below 480 nm can be accounted for by the replacement of charged Glu by uncharged Gln at site 122. What remains unclear from this data set is the mechanism of the smaller shifts in the 489–481 nm region.

When the rod opsin sequences of the fish from the other six Orders of Euteleostei are included alongside the stomiiforms, a further six candidate tuning sites can be identified, making a total of nine sites (Fig. 3). Of these however, only four at residues 83, 122, 124 and 292 are commonly substituted in the different species. Asp83Asn was originally proposed by Hope et al. (Hope et al., 1997) to be one of the main substitutions for the tuning of the rod opsins of deep-sea fish to λmax values of <490 nm, and site 292, which is commonly occupied by polar Ser or Thr, is responsible in most species for a substantial part of the SW shift. The major exception is in the myctophids, where Ala292 is present; in this group, the SW shift is achieved instead by polar Gln122. The SW-shifted pigments of stomiiforms and osmeriforms, with λmax values of 480 nm and below, possess both Gln122 and Ser292. In contrast, similar SW shifts seen in the aulopiforms are achieved by Ser124, rather than Gln122, paired with Ser292.

Dartnall and Lythgoe (Dartnall and Lythgoe, 1965) and Bridges (Bridges, 1965) were the first to note that the λmax values of vertebrate visual pigments cluster around certain points in the spectrum. This is particularly apparent in primate M and L cone pigments, with each spectral location attributable to a particular combination of amino acid residues at three main sites (Neitz et al., 1991; Williams et al., 1992; Hunt et al., 1998; Dulai et al., 1999). The same phenomenon is seen in the rod pigments of deep-sea fish (Partridge et al., 1989; Partridge et al., 1992) and a similar explanation has been advanced, namely that the spectral location of pigments belonging to the same cluster group arises from a common set of amino acid substitutions (Douglas et al., 1998b). The pattern of substitutions across the 28 species included in this study indicates, however, that for the four most commonly used sites, this is only true for species from the same Order. In general, therefore, the presence of cluster points in deep-sea fish rod opsins cannot be attributed to the selection of a particular set of amino acid substitutions. Rather, it is achieved by different combinations of amino acids at these sites that produce the same net spectral shift. This is summarised in Table 3, where representative species from different Orders with the same or very similar λmax values are listed. For each cluster group, there are at least two different combinations of residues at the four sites.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table 3.

The phylogenetic distribution of amino acid substitutions indicates that the rod opsin of the ancestral species would have possessed Ser292 and that the resulting pigment would have been SW-shifted to around 485 nm or 480 nm, depending on whether Glu or Gln was present at site 122. This implies that species with SW-shifted rod visual pigments were present at or near the base of the Euteleost lineage, adapted therefore to the same visual environment as present-day deep-sea fish.

The λmax of a visual pigment depends on at least two factors. Firstly, the strength of the electrostatic interaction between the Glu113 counterion and the protonated Schiff base is critical; substitutions that increase the strength of this interaction and thereby stabilise the ground state will result in a SW shift, whereas those that reduce it will produce a LW shift (Blatz et al., 1971; Kakitani et al., 1985). Secondly, photoexcitation of the chromophore induces a significant increase in π electron delocalization and a corresponding change in dipole moment, with a shift of net positive charge towards the β-ionone ring upon excitation (Kropf and Hubbard, 1958; Mathies and Stryer, 1976). Interactions with charged, polar or polarizable residues that alter delocalization will lead to a change in the energy difference between ground and excited states. An increase in delocalization will result in a LW shift in the absorbance spectrum, and a decrease in a SW shift. Sites 83, 292, 299 and 300 cluster around the protonated Schiff base and negative counterion. Asp83 in bovine rhodopsin, although not directly involved in interactions with the Schiff base, is important in constraining the position of helices 2, 3 and 4 via links with other residues (Palczewski et al., 2000). The Asp83Asn substitution in deep sea fish involves a charge change and may have a consequential effect, therefore, on helix positioning in relation to the chromophore, thereby resulting in a stabilisation of the Schiff base counterion. Ala299 is also involved in an inter-helical constraint to the kinked region of helix 6 that may be disrupted on photoactivation (Palczewski et al., 2000). The other two substitutions (Ser292Ala, Ile/Leu300Thr) will both result in a change in the polar environment of the Schiff base. Sites 122, 124, 132 and 261 are all close to the polyene chain of retinal. The residue at site 122 is involved in the interaction between helix 3 and the β-ionone ring of retinal and is one of only three sites that form the cytoplasmic aspect of the retinal binding pocket (Palczewski et al., 2000). The other two are 261 and 265. Substitutions at site 261 are known to cause spectral shifts in primate red and green pigments (Merbs and Nathans, 1993; Asenjo et al., 1994) and are implicated in this study, whereas Trp265 is totally conserved across all deep-sea fish species. Finally, site 208 is in helix 5, in a position to interact via a change in polar group with the β-ionone ring of the chromophore.

The residue at site 122 is known to be important in determining the rate metarhodopsin II decay; in site-directed mutagenesis of chicken rod opsin, Glu122Gln or Glu122Ile produced pigments that decay at a significantly faster rate than wild type (Imai et al., 1997). If this feature extends to deep-sea fish, in addition to its effect on spectral tuning, the Glu122Gln substitution present in the three most SW-shifted stomiiform species, in all five species of mytophids, and in two species of osmeriforms, will also result in a more rapid decay of metarhodopsin II and thereby reduce the amplification of the phototransduction cascade. The Glu122Val substitution present in gadiforms, although lacking an effect on λmax, may also have this effect on phototransduction.

A number of the sites identified in this study have been shown to be involved in the tuning of visual pigments in other species. In particular, substitutions at site 261 play a major role in the tuning of primate MW and LW pigments (Neitz et al., 1991; Williams et al., 1992; Merbs and Nathans, 1992; Asenjo et al., 1994), and substitutions at sites 83 and 292 have been implicated in the SW shifts of rod pigments in different species of cottoid fish in Lake Baikal (Hunt et al., 1996), in bovine (Sun et al., 1997) and in the dolphin (Fasick et al., 1998). Such substitutions are clearly separate events and are examples therefore of convergent evolution, a common feature of opsin gene evolution (Hunt et al., 1998), which must reflect the relatively limited number of sites that can change to give the required spectral shift and still result in a fully functional pigment. Convergent evolution must also be the explanation for the occurrence of repeat substitutions at certain of the key sites identified in the deep-sea rod opsins examined in this study.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank the Masters, officers and crew of RRS Challenger and R/V Edwin Link, Professor I. G. Priede for his invitation to join cruise 113, and Drs E. Widder and T. Frank for their invitation to join Harbor Branch cruises on the R/V Edwin Link. The work was supported by project and sea-time grants from the Natural Environment Research Council.

  • © The Company of Biologists Limited 2001

References

  1. ↵
    Ali, M. A. and Anctil, M. (1976). Retinas of Fishes: An Atlas. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
  2. ↵
    Asenjo, A. B., Rim, J. and Oprian, D. D. (1994). Molecular determinants of human red/green color discrimination. Neuron 12, 1131–1138.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  3. ↵
    Baldwin, J. M. (1993). The probable arrangement of the helices in G protein-coupled receptors. EMBO J. 12, 1693–1703.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  4. ↵
    Baldwin, J. M., Schertler, G. F. X. and Unger, V. M. (1997). An alpha-carbon template for the transmembrane helices in the rhodopsin family of G-protein-coupled receptors. J. Mol. Biol. 272, 144–164.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  5. ↵
    Blatz, P. E., Baumgartner, N., Balasubramaniyan, V., Balasubramaniyan, P. and Stedman, E. (1971). Wavelength regulation in visual pigment chromophore. Large induced bathochromic shifts in retinol and related polyenes. Photochem. Photobiol. 14, 531–549.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  6. ↵
    Bowmaker, J. K., Dartnall, H. J. A. and Herring, P. J. (1988). Longwave-sensitive visual pigments in some deep-sea fishes: segregation of ‘paired’ rhodopsins and porphyropsins. J. Comp. Physiol. A 163, 685–698.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  7. ↵
    Bridges, C. D. B. (1965). The grouping of visual pigments about preferred positions in the spectrum. Vision Res. 5, 223–238.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  8. ↵
    Dartnall, H. J. A. and Lythgoe, J. N. (1965). The spectral clustering of visual pigments. Vision Res. 5, 81–100.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    Denton, E. J. and Warren, F. J. (1957). The photosensitive pigments in the retinae of deep sea fish. J. Mar. Biol. Assn. UK 36, 651–662.
    OpenUrl
  10. ↵
    Denton, E. J. (1990). Light and vision at depths greater than 200 m. In Light and Life in the Sea (ed. P. J. Herring, A. K. Campbell, M. Whitfield and L. Maddock), pp. 127–148. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  11. Douglas, R. H. and Partridge, J. C. (1997). On the visual pigments of deep-sea fish. J. Fish Biol. 50, 68–85.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  12. ↵
    Douglas, R. H., Partridge, J. C. and Hope, A. J. (1995). Visual and lenticular pigments in the eyes of demersal deep-sea fishes. J. Comp. Physiol. A 177, 111–122.
    OpenUrl
  13. ↵
    Douglas, R. H., Partridge, J. C., Dulai, K. S., Hunt, D. M., Mullineaux, C. W. and Hynninen, P. H. (1999). Enhanced retinal longwave sensitivity using a chlorophyll-derived photosensitiser in Malacosteus niger, a deep-sea dragon fish with far-red bioluminescence. Vision Res. 39, 2817–2832.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. Douglas, R. H., Partridge, J. C., Dulai, K. S., Hunt, D. M., Mullineaux, C., Tauber, A. Y. and Hynninen, P. H. (1998a). Dragon fish see using chlorophyll. Nature 393, 423–424.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  15. ↵
    Douglas, R. H., Partridge, J. C. and Marshall, N. J. (1998b). The eyes of deep-sea fish I. Lens pigmentation, tapeta and visual pigments. Prog. Ret. Eye Res. 17, 597–636.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  16. ↵
    Dratz, E. A. and Hargrave, P. A. (1983). The structure of rhodopsin and the outer segment disc membrane. Trends Biochem. Sci. 8, 128–131.
  17. ↵
    Dulai, K. S., von Dornum, M., Mollon, J. D. and Hunt, D. M. (1999). The evolution of trichromatic colour vision by opsin gene duplication in New World and Old World primates. Genome Res. 9, 629–638.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. ↵
    Fasick, J. I. and Robinson, P. R. (1998). Mechanism of spectral tuning in the dolphin visual pigments. Biochemistry 37, 433–438.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. ↵
    Findlay, J. B. and Pappin, D. J. (1986). The opsin family of proteins. Biochem. J. 238, 625–642.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  20. ↵
    Fitzgibbon, J., Hope, A. J., Slobodyanyuk, S. J., Bellingham, J., Bowmaker, J. K. and Hunt, D. M. (1995). The rhodopsin-encoding gene of bony fish lacks introns. Gene 164, 273–277.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  21. ↵
    Franke, R. R., König, B., Sakmar, T. P., Khorana, H. G. and Hofmann, K. P. (1990). Rhodopsin mutants that bind but fail to activate transducin. Science 250, 123–125.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  22. ↵
    Fröhlich, E., Negishi, K. and Wagner, H.-J. (1995). The occurrence of dopaminergic interplexiform cells correlate with the presence of cones in the retinae of fish. Visual Neurosci. 12, 359–369.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  23. ↵
    Herring, P. J. (1983). The spectral characteristics of luminous marine organisms. Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B 220, 183–217.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  24. ↵
    Hope, A. J., Partridge, J. C., Dulai, K. S. and Hunt, D. M. (1997). Mechanisms of wavelength tuning in the rod opsins of deep-sea fishes. Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B 264, 155–163.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. ↵
    Hunt, D. M., Dulai, K. S., Cowing, J. A., Julliot, C., Mollon, J. D., Bowmaker, J. K., Li, W-H. and Hewett-Emmett, D. (1998). Molecular evolution of trichromacy in primates. Vision Res. 38, 3299–3306.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  26. ↵
    Hunt, D. M., Fitzgibbon, J., Slobodyanyuk, S. J. and Bowmaker, J. K. (1996). Spectral tuning and molecular evolution of rod visual pigments in the species flock of Cottoid fish in Lake Baikal. Vision Res. 36, 1217–1224.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  27. ↵
    Imai, H., Kojima, D., Oura, T., Tachibanaki, S., Terakita, A. and Shichida, Y. (1997). Single amino acid residue as a functional determinant of rod and cone visual pigments. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94, 2322–2326.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  28. ↵
    Johnson, R. L., Grant, K. B., Zankel, T. C., Boehm, M. F., Merbs, S. L., Nathans, J. and Nakanishi, K. (1993). Cloning and expression of goldfish opsin sequences. Biochemistry 32, 208–214.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. ↵
    Kakitani, H., Kakitani, T., Rodman, H. and Honig, B. (1985). On the mechanism of wavelength regulation in visual pigments. Photochem. Photobiol. 41, 471–479.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  30. ↵
    Karnik, S. S. and Khorana, G. H. (1990). Assembly of functional rhodopsin requires a disulfide bond between cysteine residues 110 and 187. J. Biol. Chem. 265, 17520–17524.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  31. ↵
    Kirk, J. T. O. (1983). Light and Photosynthesis in Aquatic Eco-systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  32. ↵
    Kropf, A. and Hubbard, R. (1958). The mechanism of bleaching rhodopsin. Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 74, 266–280.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  33. ↵
    Kumar, S., Tamura, K. and Nei, M. (1993). MEGA: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis, version 1.01. Pennsylvania: Pennsylvania State University.
  34. ↵
    Marshall, N. B. (1979). Developments in Deep Sea Biology. Dorset: Blandford.
  35. ↵
    Mathies, R. and Stryer, L. (1976). Retinal has a highly dipolar vertically excited singlet state: implications for vision. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 7, 2169–2173.
  36. ↵
    Merrett, N. R. and Marshall, N. B. (1981). Observations on the ecology of deep-sea bottom-living fishes collected off northwest Africa (08 –27 N). Prog. Oceanog. 9, 185–244.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  37. ↵
    Merbs, S. L. and Nathans, J. (1993). Role of hydroxyl-bearing amino acids in differentially tuning the absorption spectra of the human red and green cone pigments. Photochem. Photobiol. 58, 706–710.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  38. ↵
    Munk, O. (1966). Ocular anatomy of some deep-sea teleosts. In Dana report No. 70, pp. 1–62. Copenhagen: Clarksburg Foundation.
  39. ↵
    Munz, F. W. (1958). Photosensitive pigments from the retinae of certain deep-sea fishes. J. Physiol. 140, 220–235.
  40. ↵
    Nakayama, T. A. and Khorana, H. G. (1990). Orientation of retinal in bovine rhodopsin determined by cross-linking using a photoactivatable analog of 11-cis-retinal. J. Biol. Chem. 265, 15762–15769..
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  41. ↵
    Nakayama, T. A. and Khorana, H. G. (1991). Mapping of the amino acids in membrane-embedded helices that interact with the retinal chromophore in the bovine rhodopsin. J. Biol. Chem. 266, 4269–4275.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  42. ↵
    Nakayama, T. A., Zhang, W., Cowan, A. and Kung, M. (1998). Mutagenesis studies of human red opsin: trp-281 is essential for proper folding and protein-retinal interactions. Biochemistry 37, 17487–17494.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  43. ↵
    Nathans, J. (1990). Determinants of visual pigment absorbance: role of charged amino acids in the putative transmembrane segments. Biochemistry 29, 937–942
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  44. ↵
    Neitz, M., Neitz, J. and Jacobs, G. H. (1991). Spectral tuning of pigments underlying red-green color vision. Science 252, 971–974
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  45. ↵
    Nelson, J. S. (1995). Fishes of the World. Third Edition. New York: John Wiley.
  46. ↵
    Nicol, J. A. C. (1969). Bioluminescence. In Fish Physiology (ed. W. S. Hoar and D. J. Randall), pp. 355–400, Vol. III. Academic Press, New York.
  47. ↵
    Palczewski, K., Kumasaka, T., Hori, T., Behnke, C. A., Motoshima, H., Fox, B. A., Le Trong, I., Teller, D. C., Okada, T., Stenkamp, R. E., Yamamoto, M. and Miyano, M. (2000). Crystal structure of rhodopsin: A G protein-coupled receptor. Science 289, 739–745.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  48. Partridge, J. C. (1989). The visual pigments of deep-sea fishes: Ecophysiology and molecular biology. Prog. Underwater Sci. 14, 17–31.
  49. ↵
    Partridge, J. C., Archer, S. N. and Lythgoe, J. N. (1988). Visual pigments in the individual rods of deep-sea fishes. J. Comp. Physiol. A 162, 543–550.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  50. ↵
    Partridge, J. C. and Douglas, R. H. (1995). Far-red sensitivity in the deep-sea dragon fish Aristostomias titmanni. Nature 375, 21–22.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  51. ↵
    Partridge, J. C., Shand, J., Archer, S. N., Lythgoe, J. N., and van Groningen-Luyben, W. A. H. M. (1989). Interspecific variation in the visual pigments of deep-sea fishes. J. Comp. Physiol. A 164, 513–529.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  52. ↵
    Partridge, J. C., Archer, S. N. and van Oostrum, J. (1992). Single and multiple visual pigments in deep-sea fishes. J. Mar. Biol. Assn. UK 72, 113–130.
  53. ↵
    Philp, A. R., Bellingham, J., Garcia-Fernandez, J. and Foster, R. G. (2000). A novel rod-like opsin isolated from the extra-retinal photoreceptors of teleost fish. FEBS Lett. 468, 181–188.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  54. ↵
    Saitou, N. and Nei, M. (1987). The neighbor-joining method: A new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol. Biol. Evol. 4, 406–425.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  55. ↵
    Sakmar, T. P., Franke, R. R. and Khorana, G. H. (1989). Glutamic acid-113 serves as the retinylidene Schiff base counterion in bovine rhodopsin. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 86, 8309–8313.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  56. ↵
    Schertler, G. F. and Hargrave, P. A. (1995). Projection structure of frog rhodopsin in two crystal forms. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 92, 11578–11582.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  57. ↵
    Sun, H., Macke, J. P. and Nathans, J. (1997). Mechanisms of spectral tuning in the mouse green cone pigment. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94, 8860–8865.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  58. ↵
    Terakita, A., Yamashita, T. and Shichida, Y. (2000). Highly conserved glutamic acid in the extracellular IV-V loop in rhodopsins acts as the counterion in retinochrome, a member of the rhodopsin family. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97, 14263–14267.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  59. ↵
    Wang, Z., Asenjo, A. B. and Oprian, D. D. (1993). Identification of the Cl(–)-binding site in the human red and green color vision pigments. Biochemistry 32, 2125–2130.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  60. ↵
    Widder, E. A., Latz, M. F. and Case, J. F. (1983). Marine bioluminesence spectra measured with an optical multichannel detection system. Biol Bull. 165, 719–810.
    OpenUrl
  61. ↵
    Widder, E. A., Latz, M. F., Herring, P. J. and Case, J. F. (1984). Far-red bioluminescence from two deep-sea species. Science 225, 512–514.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  62. ↵
    Williams, A. J., Hunt, D. M., Bowmaker, J. K., and Mollon, J. D. (1992). The polymorphic photopigments of the marmoset: spectral tuning and genetic basis. EMBO J. 11, 2039–2045.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  63. ↵
    Yokoyama, R., Knox, B. E. and Yokoyama, S. (1995). Rhodopsin from the fish, Astyanax: Role of tyrosine 261 in the red shift. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 36, 939–945.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
View Abstract
Previous ArticleNext Article
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

This Issue

 Download PDF

Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Experimental Biology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The molecular basis for spectral tuning of rod visual pigments in deep-sea fish
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Experimental Biology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Experimental Biology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Research Article
The molecular basis for spectral tuning of rod visual pigments in deep-sea fish
David M. Hunt, Kanwaljit S. Dulai, Julian C. Partridge, Phillippa Cottrill, James K. Bowmaker
Journal of Experimental Biology 2001 204: 3333-3344;
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Research Article
The molecular basis for spectral tuning of rod visual pigments in deep-sea fish
David M. Hunt, Kanwaljit S. Dulai, Julian C. Partridge, Phillippa Cottrill, James K. Bowmaker
Journal of Experimental Biology 2001 204: 3333-3344;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Alerts

Please log in to add an alert for this article.

Sign in to email alerts with your email address

Article navigation

  • Top
  • Article
    • SUMMARY
    • Introduction
    • Materials and methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
    • References
  • Figures & tables
  • Info & metrics
  • PDF

Related articles

Cited by...

More in this TOC section

  • Departures from isotropy: the kinematics of a larval snail in response to food
  • Trunk and leg kinematics of grounded and aerial running in bipedal macaques
  • The visual ecology of Holocentridae, a nocturnal coral reef fish family with a deep-sea-like multibank retina
Show more RESEARCH ARTICLE

Similar articles

Other journals from The Company of Biologists

Development

Journal of Cell Science

Disease Models & Mechanisms

Biology Open

Advertisement

Meet the Editors at SICB Virtual 2021

Reserve your place to join some of the journal editors, including Editor-in-Chief Craig Franklin, at our Meet the Editor session on 17 February at 2pm (EST). Don’t forget to view our SICB Subject Collection, featuring relevant JEB papers relating to some of the symposia sessions.


2020 at The Company of Biologists

Despite 2020's challenges, we were able to bring a number of long-term projects and new ventures to fruition. As we enter a new year, join us as we reflect on the triumphs of the last 12 months.


Critical temperature window sends migratory black-headed buntings on their travels

The spring rise in temperature at black-headed bunting overwintering sites is essential for triggering the physical changes that they undergo before embarking on their spring migration – read more.


Developmental and reproductive physiology of small mammals at high altitude

Cayleih Robertson and Kathryn Wilsterman focus on high-altitude populations of the North American deer mouse in their review of the challenges and evolutionary innovations of pregnant and nursing small mammals at high altitude.


Read & Publish participation extends worldwide

“Being able to publish Open Access articles free of charge means that my article gets maximum exposure and has maximum impact, and that all my peers can read it regardless of the agreements that their universities have with publishers.”

Professor Roi Holzman (Tel Aviv University) shares his experience of publishing Open Access as part of our growing Read & Publish initiative. We now have over 60 institutions in 12 countries taking part – find out more and view our full list of participating institutions.

Articles

  • Accepted manuscripts
  • Issue in progress
  • Latest complete issue
  • Issue archive
  • Archive by article type
  • Special issues
  • Subject collections
  • Interviews
  • Sign up for alerts

About us

  • About JEB
  • Editors and Board
  • Editor biographies
  • Travelling Fellowships
  • Grants and funding
  • Journal Meetings
  • Workshops
  • The Company of Biologists
  • Journal news

For Authors

  • Submit a manuscript
  • Aims and scope
  • Presubmission enquiries
  • Article types
  • Manuscript preparation
  • Cover suggestions
  • Editorial process
  • Promoting your paper
  • Open Access
  • Outstanding paper prize
  • Biology Open transfer

Journal Info

  • Journal policies
  • Rights and permissions
  • Media policies
  • Reviewer guide
  • Sign up for alerts

Contact

  • Contact JEB
  • Subscriptions
  • Advertising
  • Feedback

 Twitter   YouTube   LinkedIn

© 2021   The Company of Biologists Ltd   Registered Charity 277992