Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Accepted manuscripts
    • Issue in progress
    • Latest complete issue
    • Issue archive
    • Archive by article type
    • Special issues
    • Subject collections
    • Interviews
    • Sign up for alerts
  • About us
    • About JEB
    • Editors and Board
    • Editor biographies
    • Travelling Fellowships
    • Grants and funding
    • Journal Meetings
    • Workshops
    • The Company of Biologists
    • Journal news
  • For authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Aims and scope
    • Presubmission enquiries
    • Article types
    • Manuscript preparation
    • Cover suggestions
    • Editorial process
    • Promoting your paper
    • Open Access
    • Outstanding paper prize
    • Biology Open transfer
  • Journal info
    • Journal policies
    • Rights and permissions
    • Media policies
    • Reviewer guide
    • Sign up for alerts
  • Contacts
    • Contact JEB
    • Subscriptions
    • Advertising
    • Feedback
    • Institutional usage stats (logged-in users only)
  • COB
    • About The Company of Biologists
    • Development
    • Journal of Cell Science
    • Journal of Experimental Biology
    • Disease Models & Mechanisms
    • Biology Open

User menu

  • Log in
  • Log out

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Experimental Biology
  • COB
    • About The Company of Biologists
    • Development
    • Journal of Cell Science
    • Journal of Experimental Biology
    • Disease Models & Mechanisms
    • Biology Open

supporting biologistsinspiring biology

Journal of Experimental Biology

  • Log in
Advanced search

RSS  Twitter  Facebook  YouTube  

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Accepted manuscripts
    • Issue in progress
    • Latest complete issue
    • Issue archive
    • Archive by article type
    • Special issues
    • Subject collections
    • Interviews
    • Sign up for alerts
  • About us
    • About JEB
    • Editors and Board
    • Editor biographies
    • Travelling Fellowships
    • Grants and funding
    • Journal Meetings
    • Workshops
    • The Company of Biologists
    • Journal news
  • For authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Aims and scope
    • Presubmission enquiries
    • Article types
    • Manuscript preparation
    • Cover suggestions
    • Editorial process
    • Promoting your paper
    • Open Access
    • Outstanding paper prize
    • Biology Open transfer
  • Journal info
    • Journal policies
    • Rights and permissions
    • Media policies
    • Reviewer guide
    • Sign up for alerts
  • Contacts
    • Contact JEB
    • Subscriptions
    • Advertising
    • Feedback
    • Institutional usage stats (logged-in users only)
Journal Articles
Effects of body size on take-off flight performance in the Phasianidae (Aves)
B.W. Tobalske, K.P. Dial
Journal of Experimental Biology 2000 203: 3319-3332;
B.W. Tobalske
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
K.P. Dial
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Summary

To evaluate the mechanisms responsible for relationships between body mass and maximum take-off performance in birds, we studied four species in the Phasianidae: northern bobwhite (Colinus virginianus), chukar (Alectoris chukar), ring-necked pheasant (Phasianus colchicus) and wild turkey (Meleagris gallopavo). These species vary in body mass from 0.2 to 5.3 kg, and they use flight almost solely to escape predators. During take-off, all the species used a similar wingbeat style that appeared to be a vortex-ring gait with a tip reversal during the upstroke. The tip reversal is unusual for birds with rounded wings; it may offer an aerodynamic advantage during rapid acceleration. Flight anatomy generally scaled geometrically, except for average wing chord and wing area, which increased more than expected as body mass (m) increased. Pectoralis strain varied from 19.1 to 35.2 % and scaled in proportion to m(0.23). This positive scaling is not consistent with the widely held assumption that muscle strain is independent of body mass among geometrically similar species. The anatomy of the species precluded measurements of in vivo pectoralis force using the strain-gauge technique that has been employed successfully in other bird species, so we could not directly test in vivo pectoralis force-velocity relationships. However, whole-body kinematics revealed that take-off power (P(ta)), the excess power available for climbing and accelerating in flight, scaled in proportion to m(0.75) and that pectoralis mass-specific P(ta) decreased in proportion to m(−)(0.26) and was directly proportional to wingbeat frequency. These trends suggest that mass-specific pectoralis work did not vary with body mass and that pectoralis stress and strain were inversely proportional, as expected from classical force-velocity models for skeletal muscle. Our observations of P(ta) were consistent with evidence from other species engaged in escape flight and, therefore, appear to contradict evidence from studies of take-off or hovering with an added payload.

  • © 2000 by Company of Biologists

REFERENCES

    1. Askew, G. N. and
    2. Marsh, R. L.
    (1997). The effects of length trajectory on the mechanical power output of mouse skeletal muscles. J. Exp. Biol 200, 3119–.
    OpenUrlAbstract
    1. Askew, G. N. and
    2. Marsh, R. L.
    (1998). Optimal shortening velocity (V / V max) of skeletal muscle during cyclical contractions: length—force effects and velocity-dependent activation and deactivation. J. Exp. Biol 201, 1527–.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Biewener, A. A.,
    2. Corning, W. R. and
    3. Tobalske, B. W.
    (1998). In 3332 vivo pectoralis muscle force—length behavior during level flight in pigeons (Columba livia). J. Exp. Biol 201, 3293–.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Biewener, A. A.,
    2. Dial, K. P. and
    3. Goslow, G. E. Jr..
    (1992). Pectoralis muscle force and power output during flight in the starling. J. Exp. Biol 164, 1–.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Biewener, A. A.,
    2. Koneczynski, D. D. and
    3. Baudinette, R. V.
    (1998). In vivo muscle force—length behavior during steady-speed hopping in tammar wallabies. J. Exp. Biol 201, 1681–.
    OpenUrlAbstract
    1. Bosdyk, A. K. and
    2. Tobalske, B. W.
    (1998). Muscle composition and maximum power for flight in doves and pigeons (Columbiformes). Am. Zool 38, 126–.
    OpenUrl
    1. Brown, R. H. J.
    (1963). The flight of birds. Biol. Rev 38, 460–.
    OpenUrl
    1. Chai, P. and
    2. Millard, D.
    (1997). Flight and size constraints: hovering performance of large hummingbirds under maximal loading. J. Exp. Biol 200, 2757–.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Corning, W. R. and
    2. Biewener, A. A.
    (1998). In vivo strains in pigeon flight feather shafts: implications for structural design. J. Exp. Biol 201, 3057–.
    OpenUrlAbstract
    1. Dial, K. P. and
    2. Biewener, A. A.
    (1993). Pectoralis muscle force and power output during different modes of flight in pigeons (Columba livia). J. Exp. Biol 176, 31–.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Dial, K. P.,
    2. Biewener, A. A.,
    3. Tobalske, B. W. and
    4. Warrick, D. R.
    (1997). Mechanical power output of bird flight. Nature 390, 67–.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
    1. Earls, K. D.
    (2000). Kinematics and mechanics of ground take-off in the starling Sturnus vulgaris and the quail Coturnix coturnix. J. Exp. Biol 203, 725–.
    OpenUrlAbstract
    1. Ellington, C. P.
    (1991). Limitations on animal flight performance. J. Exp. Biol 160, 71–.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Garland, T. Jr..,
    2. Harvey, P. H. and
    3. Ives, A. R.
    (1992). Procedures for the analysis of comparative data using phylogenetically independent contrasts. Syst. Biol 41, 18–.
    OpenUrl
    1. Gatesy, S. M. and
    2. Dial, K. P.
    (1996). From frond to fan: Archaeopteryx and the evolution of short-tailed birds. Evolution 50, 2037–.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
    1. Goldman, D. E. and
    2. Heuter, T. F.
    (1956). Tabular data of the velocity and absorption of high frequency sound in mammalian tissues. J. Acoust. Soc. Am 28, 35–.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
    1. Goldman, D. E. and
    2. Richards, J.
    (1954). Measurements of high-frequency sound velocity in mammalian soft tissue. J. Acoust. Soc. Am 26, 981–.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
    1. Helm-Bychowski, K. M. and
    2. Wilson, A. C.
    (1986). Rates of nuclear DNA evolution in pheasant-like birds: Evidence from restriction maps. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 83, 688–.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Hill, A. V.
    (1950). The dimensions of animals and their muscular dynamics. Sci. Prog 38, 209–.
    OpenUrl
    1. Kiessling, K.-H.
    (1997). Muscle structure and function in the goose, quail, pheasant, guinea hen and chicken. Comp. Biochem. Physiol 57, 287–.
    OpenUrl
    1. Marden, J.
    (1994). From damselflies to pterosaurs: how burst and sustainable flight performance scale with size. Am J. Physiol 266, 1077–.
    OpenUrl
    1. Pennycuick, C. J.,
    2. Fuller, M. R. and
    3. Mcallister, L.
    (1989). Climbing performance of Harris' hawks (Parabuteo unicinctus) with added load: implications for muscle mechanics and for radiotracking. J. Exp. Biol 142, 17–.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Rayner, J. M. V.
    (1979). A new approach to animal flight mechanics. J. Exp. Biol 80, 17–.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Rayner, J. M. V.
    (1991). On the aerodynamics of animal flight in ground effect. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 334, 119–.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
    1. Rosser, B. W. C. and
    2. George, J. C.
    (1986). The avian pectoralis: histochemical characterization and distribution of muscle fiber types. Can. J. Zool 64, 1174–.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
    1. Spedding, G. R.
    (1986). The wake of a jackdaw (Corvus moedulu s) in slow flight. J. Exp. Biol 125, 287–.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Spedding, G. R.,
    2. Rayner, J. M. V. and
    3. Pennycuick, C. J.
    (1984). Momentum and energy in the wake of a pigeon (Columba livia) in slow flight. J. Exp. Biol 111, 81–.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Tobalske, B. W. and
    2. Dial, K. P.
    (1996). Flight kinematics of black-billed magpies and pigeons over a wide range of speeds. J. Exp. Biol 199, 263–.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Tobalske, B. W.,
    2. Peacock, W. L. and
    3. Dial, K. P.
    (1999). Kinematics of flap-bounding flight in the zebra finch over a wide range of speeds. J. Exp. Biol 202, 1725–.
    OpenUrlAbstract
    1. Warrick, D. R.
    (1998). The turning-and linear-maneuvering performance of birds: the cost of efficiency for coursing insectivores. Can. J. Zool 76, 1063–.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
    1. Warrick, D. R. and
    2. Dial, K. P.
    (1998). Kinematic, aerodynamic and anatomical mechanisms in the slow, maneuvering flight of pigeons. J. Exp. Biol 201, 655–.
Previous ArticleNext Article
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

This Issue

 Download PDF

Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Experimental Biology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Effects of body size on take-off flight performance in the Phasianidae (Aves)
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Experimental Biology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Experimental Biology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Journal Articles
Effects of body size on take-off flight performance in the Phasianidae (Aves)
B.W. Tobalske, K.P. Dial
Journal of Experimental Biology 2000 203: 3319-3332;
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Journal Articles
Effects of body size on take-off flight performance in the Phasianidae (Aves)
B.W. Tobalske, K.P. Dial
Journal of Experimental Biology 2000 203: 3319-3332;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Alerts

Please log in to add an alert for this article.

Sign in to email alerts with your email address

Article navigation

  • Top
  • Article
  • Info & metrics
  • PDF

Related articles

Cited by...

More in this TOC section

  • A novel mechanism of body mass regulation
  • Lift-based paddling in diving grebe
  • A maxi Cl(−) channel in cultured pavement cells from the gills of the freshwater rainbow trout Oncorhynchus mykiss
Show more Journal Articles

Similar articles

Other journals from The Company of Biologists

Development

Journal of Cell Science

Disease Models & Mechanisms

Biology Open

Advertisement

Welcome to JEB’s new Editor Monica Daley

We are pleased to welcome Monica Daley to JEB’s Editorial team. Monica has had a long association with JEB before taking up her new role, overseeing peer review of neuromuscular physiology, terrestrial biomechanics and integrative physiology of locomotion.


In the field with Robyn Hetem

Continuing our fieldwork series, Robyn Hetem reflects on working with species ranging from aardvark to zebra, and the impact COVID-19 has had on fieldwork.


Read & Publish participation continues to grow

“It is particularly encouraging for early career researchers, as it allows them to display their research globally without the need to find costs to cover the open access option.”

Professor Fernando Montealegre-Z (University of Lincoln) shares his experience of publishing Open Access as part of our growing Read & Publish initiative. We now have over 150 institutions in 15 countries and four library consortia taking part – find out more and view our full list of participating institutions.


Nocturnal reef residents have deep-sea-like eyes

Fanny de Busserolles and colleagues from The University of Queensland have discovered that the eyes of nocturnal reef fish have multibank retinas, layers of photoreceptors, similar to the eyes of deep-sea fish that live in dim light conditions.


Mechanisms underlying gut microbiota–host interactions in insects

In their Review, Konstantin Schmidt and Philipp Engel summarise recent findings about the mechanisms involved in gut colonisation and the provisioning of beneficial effects in gut microbiota–insect symbiosis.

Articles

  • Accepted manuscripts
  • Issue in progress
  • Latest complete issue
  • Issue archive
  • Archive by article type
  • Special issues
  • Subject collections
  • Interviews
  • Sign up for alerts

About us

  • About JEB
  • Editors and Board
  • Editor biographies
  • Travelling Fellowships
  • Grants and funding
  • Journal Meetings
  • Workshops
  • The Company of Biologists
  • Journal news

For Authors

  • Submit a manuscript
  • Aims and scope
  • Presubmission enquiries
  • Article types
  • Manuscript preparation
  • Cover suggestions
  • Editorial process
  • Promoting your paper
  • Open Access
  • Outstanding paper prize
  • Biology Open transfer

Journal Info

  • Journal policies
  • Rights and permissions
  • Media policies
  • Reviewer guide
  • Sign up for alerts

Contact

  • Contact JEB
  • Subscriptions
  • Advertising
  • Feedback

 Twitter   YouTube   LinkedIn

© 2021   The Company of Biologists Ltd   Registered Charity 277992