Advertisement
Journal Articles
The behavioral detection of binary mixtures of amino acids and their individual components by catfish
T. Valentincic, J. Kralj, M. Stenovec, A. Koce, J. Caprio
Journal of Experimental Biology 2000 203: 3307-3317;

Summary

The question of whether a binary mixture of amino acids is detected by fish as a unique odor or whether the qualities of the individual components are retained within the mixture was investigated in channel (Ictalurus punctatus) and brown bullhead (Ameiurus nebulosus) catfish, species that are highly similar in their olfactory receptor and behavioral responses to amino acid odorants. Catfish respond with greater appetitive food-searching (swimming) behavior to amino-acid-conditioned olfactory stimuli than to non-conditioned amino acids. In the present study, appetitive food-searching behavior was measured by counting the number of turns of the fish greater than 90 degrees within 90 s of stimulus onset and, in some tests, by video tracking. The two methods yielded highly correlated results. Channel catfish conditioned to a binary mixture composed of equimolar amino acids responded with searching behavior to the amino acid that produced the larger-amplitude electro-olfactogram (EOG) response as they did to the conditioned stimulus. In further studies, bullhead catfish were conditioned either to a binary mixture or to a single amino acid and tested to determine whether a binary mixture was detected as the component evoking the larger EOG response. In all initial tests (trials 1–3), the more stimulatory component of a binary mixture was not discriminated from the binary mixture; however, the less stimulatory component and all other amino acids tested were discriminated from the mixture. By increasing the concentration of the originally less potent component in a binary mixture, making it the more stimulatory compound, it was now detected as not significantly different from the binary mixture; however, the original more potent component (i.e. now the less potent stimulus) was detected as significantly different from the mixture. However, with 5–10 additional discrimination training trials, the less stimulatory component in a binary mixture influenced the perception of the binary mixture because the binary mixture was no longer detected only as its more stimulatory component. The data suggest that a two-step learning process occurs within the olfactory bulb and possibly higher-order telencephalic nuclei.

REFERENCES

    1. Bruch, R. C. and
    2. Rulli, R. D.
    (1988). Ligand binding specificity of a neutral L-amino acid olfactory receptor. Comp. Biochem. Physiol 91, 535–.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
    1. Buck, L. B.
    (1996). Information coding in the vertebrate olfactory system. Annu. Rev. Neurosci 19, 517–.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Byrd, R. P. and
    2. Caprio, J.
    (1982). Comparison of olfactory receptor (EOG) and bulbar (EEG) responses to amino acids in the catfish, Ictalurus punctatus. Brain Res 249, 73–.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Caprio, J.
    (1980). Similarity of olfactory receptor responses (EOG) of freshwater and marine catfish to amino acids. Can. J. Zool 58, 1778–.
    OpenUrl
    1. Chang, Q. H. and
    2. Caprio, J.
    (1996). Electrophysiological evidence for the broad distribution of specific odorant receptor molecules across the olfactory organ of the channel catfish. Chem. Senses 21, 519–.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Derby, C. D.,
    2. Hutson, M.,
    3. Livermore, B. A. and
    4. Lynn, W. H.
    (1996). Generalization among related complex odorant mixtures and their components: Analysis of olfactory perception in the spiny lobster. Physiol. Behav 60, 87–.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Friedrich, R. W. and
    2. Korsching, S. I.
    (1997). Combinatorial and chemotopic odorant coding in the zebrafish olfactory bulb visualized by optical imaging. Neuron 18, 737–.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Getz, M. W. and
    2. Smith, B. H.
    (1990). Odorant moiety and odor mixture perception in free flying honeybees (Apis mellifera). Chem. Senses 15, 111–.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Hara, T. J. and
    2. Zhang, C.
    (1998). Topographic bulbar projections and dual neural pathways of the primary olfactory neurons in salmonid fishes. Neuroscience 82, 301–.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Johnson, B. A.,
    2. Woo, C. C. and
    3. Leon, M.
    (1998). Spatial coding of odorant features in the glomerular layer of the rat olfactory bulb. J. Comp. Neurol 393, 457–.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Laing, D. G. and
    2. Francis, G. W.
    (1989). The capacity of humans to identify odors in mixtures. Physiol. Behav 33, 809–.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
    1. Laing, D. G. and
    2. Glemarec, A.
    (1992). Selective attention and the perceptual analysis of odor mixtures. Physiol. Behav 52, 1047–.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Laing, D. G. and
    2. Willcox, M. E.
    (1983). Perception of components in binary odor mixtures. Chem. Senses 7, 249–.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Laska, M.,
    2. Galizia, C. G.,
    3. Giurfa, M. and
    4. Menzel, R.
    (1999). Olfactory discrimination ability and odor structure—activity relationships in honeybees. Chem. Senses 24, 429–.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Linster, C. and
    2. Smith, B. H.
    (1999). Generalization between binary odor mixtures and their components in the rat. Physiol. Behav 66, 701–.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Livermore, A. and
    2. Laing, D. G.
    (1996). Influence of training and experience on the perception of multicomponent odor mixtures. J. Exp. Psychol 22, 267–.
    OpenUrl
    1. Ngai, J.,
    2. Chess, A.,
    3. Dowling, M. M.,
    4. Necles, N.,
    5. Macagno, E. R. and
    6. Axel, R.
    (1993). Coding of olfactory information: topography of odorant receptor expression in the catfish epithelium. Cell 72, 667–.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Ngai, J.,
    2. Dowling, M. M.,
    3. Buck, L.,
    4. Axel, R. and
    5. Chess, A.
    (1993). The family of genes encoding odorant receptors in the channel catfish. Cell 72, 657–.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Rabin, M. D. and
    2. Cain, W. S.
    (1984). Odor recognition: familiarity, identifiability and encoding consistency. J. Exp. Psych 10, 316–.
    OpenUrlWeb of Science
    1. Rescorla, R. A.,
    2. Grau, J. W. and
    3. Durlach, P. J.
    (1985). Analysis of the unique cue in configural discrimination. J. Exp. Psychol. Anim. Behav. Proc 11, 356–.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Ressler, K. J.,
    2. Sullivan, S. L. and
    3. Buck, L. B.
    (1994). A molecular dissection of spatial patterning in olfactory system. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol 4, 588–.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Rubin, B. D. and
    2. Katz, L. C.
    (1999). Optical imaging of odorrepresentations in the mammalian olfactory bulb. Neuron 23, 499–.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Smith, B. H.
    (1996). The role of attention in learning about odorants. Biol. Bull 191, 76–.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Smith, B. H. and
    2. Cobey, S.
    (1994). The olfactory memory of the honeybee Apis mellifera. II. Blocking between odorants in binary mixture. J. Exp. Biol 195, 91–.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Sutherland, N. S. and
    2. Macintosh, J.
    (1964). Discrimination learning: nonadditivity of cues. Nature 201, 528–.
    OpenUrlGeoRefPubMed
    1. Valentincčicč, T. and
    2. Caprio, J.
    (1994). Chemical and visual control of feeding and escape behaviors in channel catfish Ictalurus punctatus. Physiol. Behav 55, 845–.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Valentincčicč, T.,
    2. Metelko, J.,
    3. Ota, D.,
    4. Pirc, V. and
    5. Blejec, A.
    (2000). Olfactory discrimination of amino acids in brown bullhead catfish. Chem. Senses 25, 21–.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Valentincčicč, T.,
    2. Wegert, S. and
    3. Caprio, J.
    (1994). Learned olfactory discrimination versus innate taste responses to amino acids in channel catfish. Physiol. Behav 55, 865–.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
Back to top

 Download PDF

Email
Journal Articles
The behavioral detection of binary mixtures of amino acids and their individual components by catfish
T. Valentincic, J. Kralj, M. Stenovec, A. Koce, J. Caprio
Journal of Experimental Biology 2000 203: 3307-3317;
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Alerts

Article navigation

Other journals from The Company of Biologists

Advertisement

Meet the Editors at SICB Virtual 2021

Reserve your place to join some of the journal editors, including Editor-in-Chief Craig Franklin, at our Meet the Editor session on 17 February at 2pm (EST). Don’t forget to view our SICB Subject Collection, featuring relevant JEB papers relating to some of the symposia sessions.

2020 at The Company of Biologists

Despite 2020's challenges, we were able to bring a number of long-term projects and new ventures to fruition. As we enter a new year, join us as we reflect on the triumphs of the last 12 months.

The Big Biology podcast

JEB author Christine Cooper talks to Big Biology about her research. In this fascinating JEB sponsored podcast she tells us how tough zebra finches adjust their physiology to cope with extreme climate events. 

Developmental and reproductive physiology of small mammals at high altitude

Cayleih Robertson and Kathryn Wilsterman focus on high-altitude populations of the North American deer mouse in their review of the challenges and evolutionary innovations of pregnant and nursing small mammals at high altitude.

Read & Publish participation extends worldwide

“Being able to publish Open Access articles free of charge means that my article gets maximum exposure and has maximum impact, and that all my peers can read it regardless of the agreements that their universities have with publishers.”

Professor Roi Holzman (Tel Aviv University) shares his experience of publishing Open Access as part of our growing Read & Publish initiative. We now have over 60 institutions in 12 countries taking part – find out more and view our full list of participating institutions.