Advertisement
Journal Articles
Neuroethology of the katydid T-cell. I. Tuning and responses to pure tones
P.A. Faure, R.R. Hoy
Journal of Experimental Biology 2000 203: 3225-3242;

Summary

The tuning and pure-tone physiology of the T-cell prothoracic auditory interneuron were investigated in the nocturnal katydid Neoconocephalus ensiger. The T-cell is extremely sensitive and broadly tuned, particularly to high-frequency ultrasound (>20 kHz). Adult thresholds were lowest and showed their least variability for frequencies ranging from 25 to 80 kHz. The average best threshold of the T-cell in N. ensiger ranged from 28 to 38 dB SPL and the best frequency from 20 to 27 kHz. In females, the T-cell is slightly more sensitive to the range of frequencies encompassing the spectrum of male song. Tuning of the T-cell in non-volant nymphs was comparable with that of adults, and this precocious ultrasound sensitivity supports the view that it has a role in the detection of terrestrial sources of predaceous ultrasound. In adults, T-cell tuning is narrower than that of the whole auditory (tympanic) organ, but only at audio frequencies. Superthreshold physiological experiments revealed that T-cell responses were ultrasound-biased, with intensity/response functions steeper and spike latencies shorter at 20, 30 and 40 kHz than at 5, 10 and 15 kHz. The same was also true for T-cell stimulation at 90 degrees compared with stimulation at 0 degrees within a frequency, which supports early T-cell research showing that excitation of the contralateral ear inhibits ipsilateral T-cell responses. In a temporal summation experiment, the integration time of the T-cell at 40 kHz (integration time constant tau =6.1 ms) was less than half that measured at 15 kHz (tau =15.0 ms). Moreover, T-cell spiking in response to short-duration pure-tone trains mimicking calling conspecifics (15 kHz) and bat echolocation hunting sequences (40 kHz) revealed that temporal pattern-copying was superior for ultrasonic stimulation. Apparently, T-cell responses are reduced or inhibited by stimulation with audio frequencies, which leads to the prediction that the T-cell will encode conspecific song less well than bat-like frequency-modulated sweeps during acoustic playback. The fact that the T-cell is one of the most sensitive ultrasound neurons in tympanate insects is most consistent with it serving an alarm, warning or escape function in both volant and non-volant katydids (nymphs and adults).

REFERENCES

    1. Alexander, R. D.
    (1967). Acoustical communication in arthropods. Annu. Rev. Ent 12, 495–.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
    1. Atkins, G. and
    2. Pollack, G. S.
    (1987). Correlations between structure, topographic arrangement and spectral sensitivity of sound-sensitive interneurons in crickets. J. Comp. Neurol 266, 398–.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Belwood, J. J. and
    2. Morris, G. K.
    (1987). Bat predation and its influence on calling behavior in neotropical katydids. Science 238, 64–.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Bentley, D. R. and
    2. Hoy, R. R.
    (1970). Postembryonic development of adult motor patterns in crickets: a neural analysis. Science 170, 1409–.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Counter, S. A. and
    2. Henke, W.
    (1977). Commensal auditory communication in two species of Neoconocephalus (Orthoptera). J. Insect Physiol 23, 817–.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
    1. Faure, P. A. and
    2. Hoy, R. R.
    (2000). Auditory symmetry analysis. J. Exp. Biol 203, 3209–.
    OpenUrlAbstract
    1. Faure, P. A. and
    2. Hoy, R. R.
    (2000). Neuroethology of the katydid T-cell. II. Responses to acoustic playback of conspecific and predatory signals. J. Exp. Biol 203, 3243–.
    OpenUrlAbstract
    1. Fenton, M. B. and
    2. Bell, G. P.
    (1981). Recognition of species of insectivorous bats by their echolocation calls. J. Mammal 62, 233–.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
    1. Forrest, T. G.,
    2. Farris, H. E. and
    3. Hoy, R. R.
    (1995). Ultrasound acoustic startle response in scarab beetles. J. Exp. Biol 198, 2593–.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Frings, H. and
    2. Frings, M.
    (1957). The effects of temperature on chirp-rate of male cone-headed grasshoppers, Neoconocephalus ensiger. J. Exp. Zool 134, 411–.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Fullard, J. H.,
    2. Simmons, J. A. and
    3. Saillant, P. A.
    (1994). Jamming bat echolocation: the dogbane tiger moth Cycnia tenera times its clicks to the terminal attack calls of the big brown bat Eptesicus fuscus. J. Exp. Biol 194, 285–.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Gwynne, D. T.
    (1977). Mating behavior of Neoconocephalusensiger (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae) with notes on the calling song. Can. Ent 109, 237–.
    OpenUrl
    1. Heinrich, R.,
    2. Jatho, M. and
    3. Kalmring, K.
    (1993). Acoustic transmission characteristics of the tympanal tracheae of bushcrickets (Tettigoniidae). II. Comparative studies of the tracheae of seven species. J. Acoust. Soc. Am 93, 3481–.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
    1. Webster, D. B.,
    2. Fay, R. R. and
    3. Popper, A. N.
    1. Hoy, R. R.
    (1992). The evolution of hearing in insects as an adaptation to predation from bats. In The Evolutionary Biology of Hearing (ed. Webster, D. B., Fay, R. R. and Popper, A. N.)., pp. 115–129.
    1. Hoy, R.,
    2. Nolen, T. and
    3. Brodfuehrer, P.
    (1989). The neuroethology of acoustic startle and escape in flying insects. J. Exp. Biol 146, 287–.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
    1. Kalko, E. K. V.
    (1995). Insect pursuit, prey capture and echolocation in pipistrelle bats (Microchiroptera). Anim. Behav 50, 861–.
    1. Kalmring, K.,
    2. Lewis, B. and
    3. Eichendorf, A.
    (1978). The physiological characteristics of the primary sensory neurons of the complex tibial organ of Decticus verrucivorus L. (Orthoptera, Tettigonioidae). J. Comp. Physiol 127, 109–.
    OpenUrl
    1. Kalmring, K.,
    2. Rehbein, H.-G. and
    3. Kuhne, R.
    (1979). An auditory giant neuron in the ventral cord of Decticus verrucivorus (Tettigoniidae). J. Comp. Physiol 132, 225–.
    OpenUrlAbstract
    1. Kick, S. A. and
    2. Simmons, J. A.
    (1984). Automatic gain control in the bat's sonar receiver and the neuroethology of echolocation. J. Neurosci 4, 2725–.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Lesser, H. D.,
    2. O'Neill, W. E.,
    3. Frisina, R. D. and
    4. Emerson, R. C.
    (1990). ON—OFF units in the mustached bat inferior colliculus are selective for transients resembling ‘acoustic glint’ from fluttering insect targets. Exp. Brain Res 82, 137–.
    1. Mason, A. C.,
    2. Forrest, T. G. and
    3. Hoy, R. R.
    (1998). Hearing in mole crickets (Orthoptera: Gryllotalpidae) at sonic and ultrasonic frequencies. J. Exp. Biol 201, 1967–.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. McKay, J. M.
    (1969). The auditory system of Homorocoryphus (Tettigonioidea, Orthoptera). J. Exp. Biol 51, 787–.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. McKay, J. M.
    (1970). Central control of an insect sensory interneurone. J. Exp. Biol 53, 137–.
    OpenUrl
    1. Miller, L. A. and
    2. Olesen, J.
    (1979). Avoidance behavior in green lacewings. I. Behavior of free flying green lacewings to hunting bats and ultrasound. J. Comp. Physiol 131, 113–.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Moiseff, A.,
    2. Pollack, G. S. and
    3. Hoy, R. R.
    (1978). Steering responses of flying crickets to sound and ultrasound: mate attraction and predator avoidance. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 75, 4052–.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
    1. Mörchen, A.
    (1980). Spike count and response latency. Two basic parameters encoding sound direction in the CNS of insects. Naturwissenschaften 67, 469–.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
    1. Mörchen, A.,
    2. Rheinlaender, J. and
    3. Schwartzkopff, J.
    (1978). Latency shift in insect auditory nerve fibers. Naturwissenschaften 65, 656–.
    OpenUrl
    1. O'Donnell, S.
    (1993). Interactions of predaceous katydids (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae) with neotropical social wasps (Hymenoptera: Vespidae): are wasps a defense mechanism or prey?. Ent. News 104, 39–.
    OpenUrl
    1. Oldfield, B. P. and
    2. Hill, K. G.
    (1983). The physiology of ascending auditory interneurons in the tettigoniid Caediciasimplex (Orthoptera: Ensifera): response properties and a model of integration in the afferent auditory pathway. J. Comp. Physiol 152, 495–.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
    1. Plomp, R. and
    2. Bouman, M. A.
    (1959). Relation between hearing threshold and duration for tone pulses. J. Acoust. Soc. Am 31, 749–.
    OpenUrl
    1. Rheinlaender, J.
    (1975). Transmission of acoustic information at three neuronal levels in the auditory system of Decticus verrucivorus (Tettigoniidae, Orthoptera). J. Comp. Physiol 97, 1–.
    OpenUrl
    1. Rheinlaender, J.,
    2. Hardt, M. and
    3. Robinson, D.
    (1986). The directional sensitivity of a bush cricket ear: a behavioural and neurophysiological study of Leptophyes punctatissima. Physiol. Ent 11, 309–.
    OpenUrl
    1. Rheinlaender, J.,
    2. Kalmring, K. and
    3. Römer, H.
    (1972). Akustische Neuronen mit T-Struktur im Bauchmark von Tettigoniiden. J. Comp. Physiol 77, 208–.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
    1. Rheinlaender, J. and
    2. Mörchen, A.
    (1979). ‘Time—intensity trading’ in locust auditory interneurons. Nature 281, 672–.
    OpenUrl
    1. Rheinlaender, J. and
    2. Römer, H.
    (1980). Bilateral coding of sound direction in the CNS of the bushcricket Tettigoniaviridissima L. (Orthoptera, Tettigoniidae). J. Comp. Physiol 140, 101–.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Robert, D.
    (1989). The auditory behaviour of flying locusts. J. Exp. Biol 147, 279–.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
    1. Roeder, K. D.
    (1962). The behavior of free flying moths in the presence of artificial ultrasonic pulses. Anim. Behav 10, 300–.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Roeder, K. D.
    (1966). Acoustic sensitivity of the noctuid tympanic organ and its range for the cries of bats. J. Insect Physiol 12, 843–.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Römer, H.,
    2. Marquart, V. and
    3. Hardt, M.
    (1988). Organization of a sensory neuropile in the auditory pathway of two groups of Orthoptera. J. Comp. Neurol 275, 201–.
    OpenUrl
    1. Schiolten, P.,
    2. Larsen, O. N. and
    3. Michelsen, A.
    (1981). Mechanical time resolution in some insect ears. I. Impulse responses and time constants. J. Comp. Physiol 143, 289–.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Schul, J.,
    2. Holderied, M.,
    3. von Helversen, D. and
    4. von Helversen, O.
    (1999). Directional hearing in grasshoppers: neurophysiological testing of a bioacoustic model. J. Exp. Biol 202, 121–.
    OpenUrlAbstract
    1. Selverston, A. I.,
    2. Kleindienst, H.-U. and
    3. Huber, F.
    (1985). Synaptic connectivity between cricket auditory interneurons as studied by selective photoinactivation. J. Neurosci 5, 1283–.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
    1. Shapiro, S. S. and
    2. Wilk, M. B.
    (1965). An analysis of variance test for normality (complete samples). Biometrika 52, 591–.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Shen, J.-X.
    (1993). Morphology and physiology of auditory interneurons of the bushcricket Gampsocleis gratiosa. Jap. J. Physiol 43, 239–.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Simmons, J. A.,
    2. Fenton, M. B. and
    3. O'Farrell, M. J.
    (1979). Echolocation and pursuit of prey by bats. Science 203, 16–.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Stapells, D. R.,
    2. Picton, T. W. and
    3. Smith, A. D.
    (1982). Normal hearing thresholds for clicks. J. Acoust. Soc. Am 72, 74–.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Stumpner, A.
    (1997). An auditory interneurone tuned to the male song frequency in the duetting bushcricket Ancistrura nigrovittata (Orthoptera, Phaneropteridae). J. Exp. Biol 200, 1089–.
    1. Stumpner, A. and
    2. Heller, K.-G.
    (1992). Morphological and physiological differences of the auditory system in three related bushcrickets (Orthoptera: Phaneropteridae, Poecilimon). Physiol. Ent 17, 73–.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
    1. Suga, N.
    (1963). Central mechanism of hearing and sound localization in insects. J. Insect Physiol 9, 867–.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Suga, N.
    (1966). Ultrasonic production and its reception in some neotropical Tettigoniidae. J. Insect Physiol 12, 1039–.
    OpenUrlAbstract
    1. Suga, N. and
    2. Katsuki, Y.
    (1961). Central mechanism of hearing in insects. J. Exp. Biol 38, 545–.
    OpenUrlAbstract
    1. Suga, N. and
    2. Katsuki, Y.
    (1961). Pharmacological studies on the auditory synapses in a grasshopper. J. Exp. Biol 38, 759–.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
    1. Surlykke, A. and
    2. Fullard, J. H.
    (1989). Hearing of the Australian whistling moth, Hecatesia thyridion. Naturwissenschaften 76, 132–.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Viemeister, N. F.
    (1979). Temporal modulation transfer functions based upon modulation thresholds. J. Acoust. Soc. Am 66, 1364–.
    OpenUrl
    1. Walker, T. J.
    (1964). Experimental demonstration of a cat locating orthopteran prey by the prey's calling song. Florida Ent 47, 163–.
    OpenUrlAbstract
    1. Wyttenbach, R. A.,
    2. May, M. L. and
    3. Hoy, R. R.
    (1996). Categorical perception of sound frequency by crickets. Science 273, 1542–.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Yager, D. D.,
    2. May, M. L. and
    3. Fenton, M. B.
    (1990). Ultrasound-triggered, flight-gated evasive maneuvers in the praying mantis Parasphendale agrionina. I. Free flight. J. Exp. Biol 152, 17–.
    OpenUrlAbstract
    1. Yager, D. D. and
    2. Spangler, H. G.
    (1997). Behavioral response to ultrasound by the tiger beetle Cicindela marutha Dow combines aerodynamic changes and sound production. J. Exp. Biol 200, 649–.
Back to top

 Download PDF

Email
Journal Articles
Neuroethology of the katydid T-cell. I. Tuning and responses to pure tones
P.A. Faure, R.R. Hoy
Journal of Experimental Biology 2000 203: 3225-3242;
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Alerts

Article navigation

Other journals from The Company of Biologists

Advertisement

Meet the Editors at SICB Virtual 2021

Reserve your place to join some of the journal editors, including Editor-in-Chief Craig Franklin, at our Meet the Editor session on 17 February at 2pm (EST). Don’t forget to view our SICB Subject Collection, featuring relevant JEB papers relating to some of the symposia sessions.

2020 at The Company of Biologists

Despite 2020's challenges, we were able to bring a number of long-term projects and new ventures to fruition. As we enter a new year, join us as we reflect on the triumphs of the last 12 months.

The Big Biology podcast

JEB author Christine Cooper talks to Big Biology about her research. In this fascinating JEB sponsored podcast she tells us how tough zebra finches adjust their physiology to cope with extreme climate events. 

Developmental and reproductive physiology of small mammals at high altitude

Cayleih Robertson and Kathryn Wilsterman focus on high-altitude populations of the North American deer mouse in their review of the challenges and evolutionary innovations of pregnant and nursing small mammals at high altitude.

Read & Publish participation extends worldwide

“Being able to publish Open Access articles free of charge means that my article gets maximum exposure and has maximum impact, and that all my peers can read it regardless of the agreements that their universities have with publishers.”

Professor Roi Holzman (Tel Aviv University) shares his experience of publishing Open Access as part of our growing Read & Publish initiative. We now have over 60 institutions in 12 countries taking part – find out more and view our full list of participating institutions.