Advertisement
Journal Articles
Auditory symmetry analysis
P.A. Faure, R.R. Hoy
Journal of Experimental Biology 2000 203: 3209-3223;

Summary

The study of biological symmetry continues to be an important and active area of research, yet in the hearing sciences there are no established quantitative methods for measuring auditory asymmetries and dissimilarities in threshold tuning curves (i.e. audiograms). Using a paired design and adopting methods from the analysis of fluctuating asymmetry, we describe methods for auditory researchers interested in delineating auditory asymmetries and comparing tuning curves, behavioral or neural. We illustrate the methods using audiograms of the prothoracic T-cell interneuron in a nocturnal katydid (Neoconocephalus ensiger). The results show that 87–92 % of T-cells had right-minus-left threshold asymmetries no larger than expected from measurement error alone. Thus, apart from small random fluctuating asymmetries, T-cell pairs in N. ensiger showed no sensory bias and were bilaterally symmetrical from 5 to 100 kHz. The sensitivity of the methods for detecting tuning curve dissimilarities was confirmed in a sound lateralization paradigm by comparing the ‘symmetry’ (i.e. similarity) of T-cell tuning curves measured at 0 degrees stimulation with tuning curves measured at 90 degrees stimulation for the same T-cell. The results show that T-cell thresholds measured frontally (0 degrees) were significantly higher than those measured laterally (90 degrees), particularly for ultrasonic frequencies. Statistically, the directional shift (increase) in auditory thresholds was detected as a directional asymmetry in T-cell tuning, whose origin and functional significance to an insect behaving normally are discussed. The paper discusses practical considerations for detecting auditory asymmetries and tuning curve dissimilarities in general, and closes by questioning the relevance of auditory symmetry for sound localization in both vertebrates and insects.

REFERENCES

    1. Bailey, W. J. and
    2. Thomson, P.
    (1977). Acoustic orientation in the cricket Teleogryllus oceanicus (Le Guillou). J. Exp. Biol 67, 61–.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Boyan, G. S.
    (1979). Directional responses to sound in the central nervous system of the cricket Teleogryllus commodus (Orthoptera: Gryllidae). I. Ascending interneurons. J. Comp. Physiol 130, 137–.
    OpenUrl
    1. Brodfuehrer, P. D. and
    2. Hoy, R. R.
    (1988). Effect of auditory deafferentation on the synaptic connectivity of a pair of identifiedinterneurons in adult field crickets. J. Neurobiol 19, 17–.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Cranford, T. W.
    (1992). Directional asymmetry in the odontocete forehead. Am. Zool 32, 140–.
    OpenUrl
    1. Denton, E. J. and
    2. Warren, F. J.
    (1968). Eyes of the Histioteuthidae. Nature 219, 400–.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Faure, P. A. and
    2. Hoy, R. R.
    (2000). Neuroethology of the katydid T-cell. I. Tuning and responses to pure tones. J. Exp. Biol 203, 3225–.
    OpenUrlAbstract
    1. Faure, P. A. and
    2. Hoy, R. R.
    (2000). Neuroethology of the katydid T-cell. II. Responses to acoustic playback of conspecific and predatory signals. J. Exp. Biol 203, 3243–.
    OpenUrlAbstract
    1. Florentine, M.
    (1976). Relation between lateralization and loudness in asymmetrical hearing losses. J. Am. Aud. Soc 1, 243–.
    1. Fonseca, P. J. and
    2. Bennet-Clark, H. C.
    (1998). Asymmetry of tymbal action and structure in a cicada: a possible role in the production of complex songs. J. Exp. Biol 201, 717–.
    1. Fuzessery, Z. M.
    (1986). Speculations on the role of frequency in sound localization. Brain Behav. Evol 28, 95–.
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. King, A. J.,
    2. Hutchings, M. E.,
    3. Moore, D. R. and
    4. Blakemore, C.
    (1988). Developmental plasticity in the visual and auditory representations in the mammalian superior colliculus. Nature 332, 73–.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Knudsen, E. I.
    (1985). Experience alters the spatial tuning of auditory units in the optic tectum during a sensitive period in the barn owl. J. Neurosci 5, 3094–.
    OpenUrlAbstract
    1. Knudsen, E. I.,
    2. Esterly, S. D. and
    3. Knudsen, P. F.
    (1984). Monaural occlusion alters sound localization during a sensitive period in the barn owl. J. Neurosci 4, 1001–.
    OpenUrlAbstract
    1. Knudsen, E. I.,
    2. Esterly, S. D. and
    3. Olsen, J. F.
    (1994). Adaptiveplasticity of the auditory space map in the optic tectum of adult and baby barn owls in response to external ear modification. J. Neurophysiol 71, 79–.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Knudsen, E. I.,
    2. Knudsen, P. F. and
    3. Esterly, S. D.
    (1982). Early auditory experience modifies sound localization in barn owls. Nature 295, 238–.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
    1. Mason, A. C.,
    2. Forrest, T. G. and
    3. Hoy, R. R.
    (1998). Hearing in mole crickets (Orthoptera: Gryllotalpidae) at sonic and ultrasonic frequencies. J. Exp. Biol 201, 1967–.
    1. McKay, J. M.
    (1969). The auditory system of Homorocoryphus (Tettigonioidea, Orthoptera). J. Exp. Biol 51, 787–.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Merilä, J. and
    2. Björklund, M.
    (1995). Fluctuating asymmetry and measurement error. Syst. Biol 44, 97–.
    OpenUrl
    1. Mörchen, A.
    (1980). Spike count and response latency. Two basic parameters encoding sound direction in the CNS of insects. Naturwissenschaften 67, 469–.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
    1. Murphey, R. K. and
    2. Zaretsky, M. D.
    (1972). Orientation to calling song by female crickets, Scapsipedus marginatus (Gryllidae). J. Exp. Biol 56, 335–.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Norberg, R. Å
    (1977). Occurrence and independent evolution of bilateral ear asymmetry in owls and implications on owl taxonomy. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 280, 375–.
    OpenUrl
    1. Oldfield, B. P.
    (1988). Tonotopic organization of the insect auditory pathway. Trends Neurosci 11, 267–.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Pallas, S. L. and
    2. Hoy, R. R.
    (1986). Regeneration of normal afferent input does not eliminate aberrant synaptic connections of an identified auditory interneuron in the cricket, Teleogryllus oceanicus. J. Comp. Neurol 248, 348–.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Palmer, A. R.
    (1996). Waltzing with asymmetry. Bioscience 46, 518–.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
    1. Payne, R. S.
    (1971). Acoustic localization of prey by barn owls. J. Exp. Biol 54, 535–.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Prager, J.
    (1976). Das mesothorakale Tympanalorgan von Corixa punctata. III. (Heteroptera, Corixidae). J. Comp. Physiol 110, 33–.
    OpenUrl
    1. Prager, J. and
    2. Larsen, O. N.
    (1981). Asymmetrical hearing in the water bug Corixa punctata observed with laser vibrometry. Naturwissenschaften 68, 579–.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
    1. Prager, J. and
    2. Streng, R.
    (1981). Schallrezeption und ihre Anpassung an die aquatile Lebensweise bei Corixiden. Mitt. Dt. Ges. Allg. Angew. Ent. 3, 239–242.
    OpenUrl
    1. Prager, J. and
    2. Streng, R.
    (1982). The resonance properties of the physical gill of Corixa punctata and their significance in sound reception. J. Comp. Physiol 148, 323–.
    OpenUrl
    1. Rheinlaender, J.,
    2. Hardt, M. and
    3. Robinson, D.
    (1986). The directional sensitivity of a bush cricket ear: a behavioural and neurophysiological study of Leptophyes punctatissima. Physiol. Ent 11, 309–.
    OpenUrl
    1. Rheinlaender, J. and
    2. Römer, H.
    (1980). Bilateral coding of sound direction in the CNS of the bushcricket Tettigoniaviridissima L. (Orthoptera, Tettigoniidae). J. Comp. Physiol 140, 101–.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
    1. Rice, W. R.
    (1989). Analyzing tables of statistical tests. Evolution 43, 223–.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Römer, H.,
    2. Marquart, V. and
    3. Hardt, M.
    (1988). Organization of a sensory neuropile in the auditory pathway of two groups of Orthoptera. J. Comp. Neurol 275, 201–.
    1. Ryan, A. K.,
    2. Blumberg, B.,
    3. Rodriguez-Esteban, C.,
    4. Yonei-Tamura, S.,
    5. Tamura, K.,
    6. Tsukui, T.,
    7. Peña, J. D. L.,
    8. Sabbagh, W.,
    9. Greenwald, J.,
    10. Choe, S.,
    11. Norris, D. P.,
    12. Robertson, E. J.,
    13. Evans, R. M.,
    14. Rosenfeld, M. G. and
    15. Belmonte, J. C. I.
    (1999). Pitx2 determines left—right asymmetry of internal organs in vertebrates. Nature 394, 545–.
    OpenUrl
    1. Schmitz, B.,
    2. Scharstein, H. and
    3. Wendler, G.
    (1983). Phonotaxis in Gryllus campestris L. (Orthoptera, Gryllidae). II. Acoustic orientation of female crickets after occlusion of single sound entrances. J. Comp. Physiol 152, 257–.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Schwartz, J. J. and
    2. Gerhardt, H. C.
    (1998). The neuroethology of frequency preferences in the spring peeper. Anim. Behav 56, 55–.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
    1. Shapiro, S. S. and
    2. Wilk, M. B.
    (1965). An analysis of variance test for normality (complete samples). Biometrika 52, 591–.
    OpenUrl
    1. Simmons, L. W. and
    2. Ritchie, M. G.
    (1996). Symmetry in the songs of crickets. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 263, 305–.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Simon, H. J. and
    2. Aleksandrovsky, I.
    (1997). Perceived lateral position of narrow-band noise in hearing-impaired and normal-hearing listeners under conditions of equal sensation level and sound-pressure level. J. Acoust. Soc. Am 102, 1821–.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Simon, H. J.,
    2. Collins, C. C.,
    3. Jampolsky, A.,
    4. Morledge, D. E. and
    5. Yu, J.
    (1994). The measurement of the lateralization of narrow bands of noise using an acoustic pointing paradigm: the effect of sound-pressure level. J. Acoust. Soc. Am 95, 1534–.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Stapells, D. R.,
    2. Picton, T. W. and
    3. Smith, A. D.
    (1982). Normal hearing thresholds for clicks. J. Acoust. Soc. Am 72, 74–.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
    1. Suga, N.
    (1963). Central mechanism of hearing and sound localization in insects. J. Insect Physiol 9, 867–.
    OpenUrlAbstract
    1. Suga, N. and
    2. Katsuki, Y.
    (1961). Central mechanism of hearing in insects. J. Exp. Biol 38, 545–.
    OpenUrlAbstract
    1. Suga, N. and
    2. Katsuki, Y.
    (1961). Pharmacological studies on the auditory synapses in a grasshopper. J. Exp. Biol 38, 759–.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
    1. Swaddle, J. P.,
    2. Witter, M. S. and
    3. Cuthill, I. C.
    (1994). The analysis of fluctuating asymmetry. Anim. Behav 48, 986–.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
    1. Swaddle, J. P.,
    2. Witter, M. S. and
    3. Cuthill, I. C.
    (1995). Museum studies measure FA. Anim. Behav 49, 1700–.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
    1. Thorson, J.,
    2. Weber, T. and
    3. Huber, F.
    (1982). Auditory behavior of the cricket. II. Simplicity of calling-song recognition in Gryllus and anomalous phonotaxis at abnormal carrier frequencies. J. Comp. Physiol 146, 361–.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Van Dongen, S.
    (1998). How repeatable is the estimation of developmental stability by fluctuating asymmetry?. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 265, 1423–.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
    1. Van Valen, L.
    (1962). A study of fluctuating asymmetry. Evolution 16, 125–.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
    1. Wendler, G.,
    2. Dambach, M.,
    3. Schmitz, B. and
    4. Scharstein, H.
    (1980). Analysis of the acoustic orientation behavior in crickets (Gryllus campestris L.). Naturwissenschaften 67, 99–.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Whitlock, M.
    (1998). The repeatability of fluctuating asymmetry: a revision and extension. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 265, 1429–.
Back to top

 Download PDF

Email
Journal Articles
Auditory symmetry analysis
P.A. Faure, R.R. Hoy
Journal of Experimental Biology 2000 203: 3209-3223;
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Alerts

Article navigation

Other journals from The Company of Biologists

Advertisement

Meet the Editors at SICB Virtual 2021

Reserve your place to join some of the journal editors, including Editor-in-Chief Craig Franklin, at our Meet the Editor session on 17 February at 2pm (EST). Don’t forget to view our SICB Subject Collection, featuring relevant JEB papers relating to some of the symposia sessions.

2020 at The Company of Biologists

Despite 2020's challenges, we were able to bring a number of long-term projects and new ventures to fruition. As we enter a new year, join us as we reflect on the triumphs of the last 12 months.

Critical temperature window sends migratory black-headed buntings on their travels

The spring rise in temperature at black-headed bunting overwintering sites is essential for triggering the physical changes that they undergo before embarking on their spring migration – read more.

Developmental and reproductive physiology of small mammals at high altitude

Cayleih Robertson and Kathryn Wilsterman focus on high-altitude populations of the North American deer mouse in their review of the challenges and evolutionary innovations of pregnant and nursing small mammals at high altitude.

Read & Publish participation extends worldwide

“Being able to publish Open Access articles free of charge means that my article gets maximum exposure and has maximum impact, and that all my peers can read it regardless of the agreements that their universities have with publishers.”

Professor Roi Holzman (Tel Aviv University) shares his experience of publishing Open Access as part of our growing Read & Publish initiative. We now have over 60 institutions in 12 countries taking part – find out more and view our full list of participating institutions.