Advertisement
Journal Articles
Blocking and the detection of odor components in blends
J.S. Hosler, B.H. Smith
Journal of Experimental Biology 2000 203: 2797-2806;

Summary

Recent studies of olfactory blocking have revealed that binary odorant mixtures are not always processed as though they give rise to mixture-unique configural properties. When animals are conditioned to one odorant (A) and then conditioned to a mixture of that odorant with a second (X), the ability to learn or express the association of X with reinforcement appears to be reduced relative to animals that were not preconditioned to A. A recent model of odor-based response patterns in the insect antennal lobe predicts that the strength of the blocking effect will be related to the perceptual similarity between the two odorants, i.e. greater similarity should increase the blocking effect. Here, we test that model in the honeybee Apis mellifera by first establishing a generalization matrix for three odorants and then testing for blocking between all possible combinations of them. We confirm earlier findings demonstrating the occurrence of the blocking effect in olfactory learning of compound stimuli. We show that the occurrence and the strength of the blocking effect depend on the odorants used in the experiment. In addition, we find very good agreement between our results and the model, and less agreement between our results and an alternative model recently proposed to explain the effect.

REFERENCES

    1. Boeckh, J.,
    2. Ernst, K. D.,
    3. Saaa, H. and
    4. Waldow, U.
    (1984). Anatomical and physiological characteristics of individual neurones in the central antennal pathway of insects. J. Insect Physiol 30, 15–.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
    1. Buck, L. B.
    (1996). Information coding in the vertebrate olfactory system. Annu. Rev. Neurosci 19, 517–.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Chandra, S. and
    2. Smith, B. H.
    (1998). An analysis of synthetic processing of odor mixtures in the honeybee (Apis mellifera). J. Exp. Biol 201, 3113–.
    OpenUrlAbstract
    1. Christensen, T. A.,
    2. Mustaparta, H. and
    3. Hildebrand, J. G.
    (1989). Discrimination of sex pheromone blends in the olfactory system of the moth. Chem. Senses 14, 463–.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Couvillon, P. A.,
    2. Arakaki, L. and
    3. Bitterman, M. E.
    (1997). Intramodal blocking in honeybees. Anim. Learn. Behav 25, 277–.
    OpenUrl
    1. Couvillon, P. A.,
    2. Mateo, E. T. and
    3. Bitterman, M. E.
    (1996). Reward learning in honeybees: Analysis of an overshadowing effect. Anim. Learn. Behav 24, 19–.
    1. Funayama, E. E.,
    2. Couvillon, P. A. and
    3. Bitterman, M. E.
    (1995). Compound conditioning in honeybees: Blocking tests of the independence assumptions. Anim. Learn. Behav 23, 429–.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
    1. Gerber, B. and
    2. Ullrich, J.
    (1999). No evidence for olfactory blocking in honeybee classical conditioning. J. Exp. Biol 202, 1839–.
    OpenUrlAbstract
    1. Getchell, T. V.
    (1986). Functional properties of vertebrate olfactory receptor neurons. Physiol. Rev 66, 772–.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Hammer, M.
    (1993). An unidentified neuron mediates the unconditioned stimulus in associative olfactory learning in honeybees. Nature 366, 59–.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
    1. Hammer, M. and
    2. Menzel, R.
    (1995). Learning and memory in the honeybee. J. Neurosci 15, 1617–.
    OpenUrlAbstract
    1. Hildebrand, J. G.
    (1995). Analysis of chemical signals by nervous systems. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 92, 67–.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Hildebrand, J. G. and
    2. Shepherd, G. M.
    (1997). Mechanisms of olfactory discrimination: Converging evidence for common principles across phyla. Annu. Rev. Neurosci 20, 595–.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Joerges, J.,
    2. Kuttner, A.,
    3. Galizia, C. G. and
    4. Menzel, R.
    (1997). Representations of odours and odour mixtures visualized in the honeybee brain. Nature 387, 285–.
    1. Kehoe, E. J.,
    2. Horne, A. J.,
    3. Horne, P. S. and
    4. Macrae, M.
    (1994). Summation and configuration between and within sensory modalities in classical conditioning of the rabbit. Anim. Learn. Behav 22, 19–.
    1. Knudsen, J. T.,
    2. Tollsten, L. and
    3. Bergstrom, L. G.
    (1993). Floral scents — a checklist of volatile compounds isolated by headspace techniques. Phytochem 33, 253–.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
    1. Laing, D. C. and
    2. Glemarec, A.
    (1992). Selective attention and the perceptual analysis of odor mixtures. Physiol. Behav 52, 1047–.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Lancet, D.
    (1986). Vertebrate olfactory reception. Annu. Rev. Neurosci 9, 329–.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Linster, C. and
    2. Smith, B. H.
    (1997). A computational model of the response of honey bee antennal lobe circuitry to odor blends: Overshadowing, blocking and unblocking can arise from lateral inhibition. Behav. Brain Res 87, 1–.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Masson, C. and
    2. Mustaparta, H.
    (1990). Chemical information processing in the olfactory system in insects. Physiol. Rev 70, 199–.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
    1. Pearce, J. M.
    (1994). Similarity and discrimination: A selective review and a connectionist model. Psychol. Rev 101, 587–.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Rescorla, R. A.
    (1973). Evidence for the ‘unique stimulus’ account of configural learning. J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol 85, 331–.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
    1. Sahley, C. L.,
    2. Rudy, J. W. and
    3. Gelperin, A.
    (1981). An analysis of associative learning in a terrestrial mollusc. I. Higher-order conditioning, blocking and a transient US pre-exposure effect. J. Comp. Psychol 144, 1–.
    OpenUrl
    1. Shephard, R. N.
    (1987). Toward a universal law of generalization for psychological science. Science 237, 1317–.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Smith, B. H.
    (1991). The olfactory memory of the honey bee, Apis mellifera. I. Odorant modulation of short-and intermediate-term memory after single trial conditioning. J. Exp. Biol 161, 367–.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Smith, B. H.
    (1996). The role of attention in learning about odorants. Biol. Bull 191, 76–.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Smith, B. H.
    (1997). An analysis of blocking in binary odorant mixtures: An increase but not a decrease in intensity of reinforcement produces unblocking. Behav. Neurosci 11, 57–.
    1. Smith, B. H.
    (1998). An analysis of interaction in binary mixtures. Physiol. Behav 65, 397–.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Smith, B. H. and
    2. Cobey, S.
    (1994). The olfactory memory of the honeybee Apis mellifera. II. Blocking between odorants in binary mixtures. J. Exp. Biol 195, 91–.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Staubli, U.,
    2. Fraser, D.,
    3. Faraday, R. and
    4. Lynch, G.
    (1987). Olfaction and the ‘data’ memory system in rats. Behav. Neurosci 101, 757–.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Stopfer, M.,
    2. Bhagavan, S.,
    3. Smith, B. H. and
    4. Laurent, G.
    (1997). Impaired odour discrimination on desynchronization of odour-encoding neural assemblies. Nature 390, 70–.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Thorn, R. S. and
    2. Smith, B. H.
    (1997). The olfactory memory of the honeybee Apis mellifera. III. Bilateral sensory input is necessary for the induction and expression of olfactory blocking. J. Exp. Biol 200, 2045–.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
Back to top

 Download PDF

Email
Journal Articles
Blocking and the detection of odor components in blends
J.S. Hosler, B.H. Smith
Journal of Experimental Biology 2000 203: 2797-2806;
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Alerts

Article navigation

Other journals from The Company of Biologists

Advertisement

Meet the Editors at SICB Virtual 2021

Reserve your place to join some of the journal editors, including Editor-in-Chief Craig Franklin, at our Meet the Editor session on 17 February at 2pm (EST). Don’t forget to view our SICB Subject Collection, featuring relevant JEB papers relating to some of the symposia sessions.

2020 at The Company of Biologists

Despite 2020's challenges, we were able to bring a number of long-term projects and new ventures to fruition. As we enter a new year, join us as we reflect on the triumphs of the last 12 months.

Critical temperature window sends migratory black-headed buntings on their travels

The spring rise in temperature at black-headed bunting overwintering sites is essential for triggering the physical changes that they undergo before embarking on their spring migration – read more.

Developmental and reproductive physiology of small mammals at high altitude

Cayleih Robertson and Kathryn Wilsterman focus on high-altitude populations of the North American deer mouse in their review of the challenges and evolutionary innovations of pregnant and nursing small mammals at high altitude.

Read & Publish participation extends worldwide

“Being able to publish Open Access articles free of charge means that my article gets maximum exposure and has maximum impact, and that all my peers can read it regardless of the agreements that their universities have with publishers.”

Professor Roi Holzman (Tel Aviv University) shares his experience of publishing Open Access as part of our growing Read & Publish initiative. We now have over 60 institutions in 12 countries taking part – find out more and view our full list of participating institutions.