Advertisement
Journal Articles
Acoustic identification of twelve species of echolocating bat by discriminant function analysis and artificial neural networks
S. Parsons, G. Jones
Journal of Experimental Biology 2000 203: 2641-2656;

Summary

We recorded echolocation calls from 14 sympatric species of bat in Britain. Once digitised, one temporal and four spectral features were measured from each call. The frequency-time course of each call was approximated by fitting eight mathematical functions, and the goodness of fit, represented by the mean-squared error, was calculated. Measurements were taken using an automated process that extracted a single call from background noise and measured all variables without intervention. Two species of Rhinolophus were easily identified from call duration and spectral measurements. For the remaining 12 species, discriminant function analysis and multilayer back-propagation perceptrons were used to classify calls to species level. Analyses were carried out with and without the inclusion of curve-fitting data to evaluate its usefulness in distinguishing among species. Discriminant function analysis achieved an overall correct classification rate of 79% with curve-fitting data included, while an artificial neural network achieved 87%. The removal of curve-fitting data improved the performance of the discriminant function analysis by 2 %, while the performance of a perceptron decreased by 2 %. However, an increase in correct identification rates when curve-fitting information was included was not found for all species. The use of a hierarchical classification system, whereby calls were first classified to genus level and then to species level, had little effect on correct classification rates by discriminant function analysis but did improve rates achieved by perceptrons. This is the first published study to use artificial neural networks to classify the echolocation calls of bats to species level. Our findings are discussed in terms of recent advances in recording and analysis technologies, and are related to factors causing convergence and divergence of echolocation call design in bats.

REFERENCES

    1. Au, W. W. L.
    (1994). Comparison of sonar discrimination — dolphin and an artificial neural-network. J. Acoust. Soc. Am 95, 2728–.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Au, W. W. L.,
    2. Andersen, L. N.,
    3. Rasmussen, A. R.,
    4. Roitblat, H. L. and
    5. Nachtigall, P. E.
    (1995). Neural network modeling of a dolphin's sonar discrimination capabilities. J. Acoust. Soc. Am 98, 43–.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Britton, A. R. C. and
    2. Jones, G.
    (1999). Echolocation behaviour and prey-capture success in foraging bats: laboratory and field experiments on Myotis daubentonii. J. Exp. Biol 202, 1793–.
    OpenUrlAbstract
    1. Burnett, S. C. and
    2. Masters, W. M.
    (1999). The use of neural networks to classify echolocation calls of bats. J. Acoust. Soc. Am 106, 2189–.
    OpenUrl
    1. Deecke, V. B.,
    2. Ford, J. K. B. and
    3. Spong, P.
    (1999). Quantifying complex patterns of bioacoustic variation: use of a neural network to compare killer whale (Orcinus orca) dialects. J. Acoust. Soc. Am 105, 2499–.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Entwistle, A. C.,
    2. Racey, P. A. and
    3. Speakman, J. R.
    (1996). Habitat exploitation by a gleaning bat, Plecotus auritus. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 351, 921–.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
    1. Fenton, M. B.
    (1997). Science and the conservation of bats. J. Mammal 78, 1–.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
    1. Fenton, M. B. and
    2. Bell, G. P.
    (1981). Recognition of species of insectivorous bats by their echolocation calls. J. Mammal 62, 233–.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
    1. Griffin, D. R.,
    2. Webster, F. A. and
    3. Michael, C. R.
    (1960). The echolocation of flying insects by bats. Anim. Behav 8, 141–.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
    1. Jones, G.
    (1999). Scaling of echolocation call parameters in bats. J. Exp. Biol 202, 3359–.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Jones, G.,
    2. Gordon, T. and
    3. Nightingale, J.
    (1992). Sex and age-differences in the echolocation calls of the lesser horseshoe bat, Rhinolophus hipposideros. Mammalia 56, 189–.
    OpenUrl
    1. Jones, G. and
    2. Kokurewicz, T.
    (1994). Sex and age variation in echolocation calls and flight morphology of Daubenton's bats Myotis daubentonii. Mammalia 58, 41–.
    1. Jones, G. and
    2. van Parijs, S. M.
    (1993). Bimodal echolocation in pipistrelle bats — are cryptic species present?. Proc. R. Soc. B 251, 119–.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
    1. Kalko, E. K. V.
    (1995). Insect pursuit, prey capture and echolocation in pipistrelle bats (Microchiroptera). Anim. Behav 50, 861–.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
    1. Konstantinov, A. I. and
    2. Makarov, A. K.
    (1981). Bioacoustic characteristics of the echolocation system of the European wide eared bat Barbastella barbastellus. Biofizika 26, 1090–.
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Lawrence, B. D. and
    2. Simmons, J. A.
    (1982). Measurement of atmospheric attenuation at ultrasonic frequencies and thesignificance for echolocation by bat. J. Acoust. Soc. Am 71, 585–.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Masters, W. M.,
    2. Jacobs, S. C. and
    3. Simmons, J. A.
    (1991). The structure of echolocation sounds used by the big brown bat Eptesicus fuscus — some consequences for echo processing. J. Acoust. Soc. Am 89, 1402–.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
    1. Masters, W. M. and
    2. Raver, K. A. S.
    (2000). Range discrimination by big brown bats (Eptesicus fuscus) using altered model echoes: Implications for signal processing. J. Acoust. Soc. Am 107, 625–.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Masters, W. M.,
    2. Raver, K. A. S. and
    3. Kazial, K. A.
    (1995). Sonar signals of big brown bats, Eptesicus fuscus, contain information about individual identity, age and family affiliation. Anim. Behav 50, 1243–.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
    1. Murray, S. O.,
    2. Mercado, E. and
    3. Roitblat, H. L.
    (1998). The neural network classification of false killer whale (Pseudorca crassidens) vocalizations. J. Acoust. Soc. Am 104, 3626–.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Parsons, S.
    (1997). Search-phase echolocation calls of the New Zealand lesser short-tailed bat (Mystacina tuberculata) and long-tailed bat (Chalinolobus tuberculatus). Can. J. Zool 75, 1487–.
    OpenUrl
    1. Parsons, S.,
    2. Thorpe, C. W. and
    3. Dawson, S. M.
    (1997). Echolocation calls of the long-tailed bat — A quantitative analysis of types of call. J. Mammal 78, 964–.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
    1. Rumelhart, D. E. G.,
    2. Hinton, G. E. and
    3. Williams, R. J.
    (1986). Learning internal representations by back-propagation errors. Nature 323, 533–.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
    1. Simmons, J. A.,
    2. Fenton, M. B. and
    3. O'Farrell, M. J.
    (1979). Echolocation and the pursuit of prey by bats. Science 203, 16–.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Vogl, T. P.,
    2. Mangis, J. K.,
    3. Ziegler, A. K. and
    4. Alkon, D. L.
    (1988). Accelerating the learning and convergence of the backpropogation method. Biol. Cybern 59, 257–.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
    1. Waters, D. A. and
    2. Jones, G.
    (1995). Echolocation call structure and intensity in five species of insectivorous bats. J. Exp. Biol 198, 475–.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Wotton, J. M. and
    2. Jenison, R. L.
    (1997). A backpropagation network model of the monaural localization information available in the bat echolocation system. J. Acoust. Soc. Am 101, 2964–.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Zbinden, K.
    (1989). Field observations on the flexibility of the acoustic behaviour of the European bat Nyctalus noctula (Schreber, 1774). Rev. Suisse Zool 96, 335–.
    OpenUrl
    1. Zingg, P. E.
    (1990). Acoustics species identification of bats (Mammalia: Chiroptera) in Switzerland. Rev. Suisse Zool 97, 263–.
    OpenUrl
Back to top

 Download PDF

Email
Journal Articles
Acoustic identification of twelve species of echolocating bat by discriminant function analysis and artificial neural networks
S. Parsons, G. Jones
Journal of Experimental Biology 2000 203: 2641-2656;
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Alerts

Article navigation

Other journals from The Company of Biologists

Advertisement

Meet the Editors at SICB Virtual 2021

Reserve your place to join some of the journal editors, including Editor-in-Chief Craig Franklin, at our Meet the Editor session on 17 February at 2pm (EST). Don’t forget to view our SICB Subject Collection, featuring relevant JEB papers relating to some of the symposia sessions.

2020 at The Company of Biologists

Despite 2020's challenges, we were able to bring a number of long-term projects and new ventures to fruition. As we enter a new year, join us as we reflect on the triumphs of the last 12 months.

Critical temperature window sends migratory black-headed buntings on their travels

The spring rise in temperature at black-headed bunting overwintering sites is essential for triggering the physical changes that they undergo before embarking on their spring migration – read more.

Developmental and reproductive physiology of small mammals at high altitude

Cayleih Robertson and Kathryn Wilsterman focus on high-altitude populations of the North American deer mouse in their review of the challenges and evolutionary innovations of pregnant and nursing small mammals at high altitude.

Read & Publish participation extends worldwide

“Being able to publish Open Access articles free of charge means that my article gets maximum exposure and has maximum impact, and that all my peers can read it regardless of the agreements that their universities have with publishers.”

Professor Roi Holzman (Tel Aviv University) shares his experience of publishing Open Access as part of our growing Read & Publish initiative. We now have over 60 institutions in 12 countries taking part – find out more and view our full list of participating institutions.