Abstract
For honeybees, foraging is energetically demanding. Here we examined whether stressors, which increase metabolic demands, can impair foraging performance. A controlled non-pathogenic stressor (immune challenge) resulted in a change in foraging preferences of bees. It reduced pollen foraging, and increased the duration of trips in pollen foragers. Stress also reduced the amount of octopamine in the brain of pollen foragers (a biogenic amine involved in the regulation of foraging and flight behaviour in insects). According to the literature, flight metabolic rate is higher during pollen foraging than nectar foraging, and nectar gives a higher energetic return relative to the foraging effort when compared to pollen. We thus propose that stress might be particularly detrimental to the performance of pollen foragers, and stressed bees prefer the energy-rich resource of nectar. In conclusion, stress, even at low levels, could have consequences on both bee foraging behaviour and thereby the nutritional balance of the colony.
- Received October 2, 2017.
- Accepted January 2, 2018.
- © 2018. Published by The Company of Biologists Ltd
Article navigation
Related articles
Cited by...
More in this TOC section
Similar articles
Other journals from The Company of Biologists
Conversation – Philip Matthews
“You have to be able to build things, to troubleshoot, to solve little problems”
Philip Matthews is an Assistant Professor at the University of British Columbia, Canada, where he studies the respiratory adaptations of insects. He recently spoke to us about how he has always been a biology nerd, how ecophysiology combined everything that he was interested in and how researchers need to have a practical side.
Review – Rethinking the evolution of the human foot: insights from experimental research
Nicholas B. Holowka and Daniel E. Lieberman discuss how recent biomechanical models of human foot function and experimental locomotion data from great apes suggest that the human foot evolved to facilitate both bipedal walking and running.
Featured article – Decisive sea otters distinguish differences by touch
Photo credit: Ari Friedlander (permit no. USFWS MA186914-2)
Sea otters dine on shellfish dinners, but how do they locate these delicacies in the murky waters of Monterey Bay? Sarah McKay Strobel and colleagues have discovered that the animals’ paws and whiskers are remarkably sensitive (in both air and water) allowing them to identify objects with a single paw tap, raising the possibility that they are able to recognise morsels swiftly by touch while diving.
Commentary – Physiology, activity and costs of parental care in birds
Tony D. Williams explores how, contrary to expectation, parental care might not involve sustained, high-intensity activity; that is, it might not be ‘hard work’ and, consequently, costs of reproduction and physiological signatures of costs might rarely be experienced.
Meet the team
Are you going to the 2018 APS Comparative Physiology meeting in October? This meeting is supported by JEB and our Reviews Editor Charlotte Rutledge will be there - say hello!
preLights – Preprint highlights, selected by the biological community
Meet the preLighters! In the latest interview with our preLights community, the preLights team caught up with Heath MacMillan, Assistant Professor at Carleton University in Ottawa, to talk about his research, lab and preprints. His lab is studying the mechanisms of thermal tolerance in insects and aims to answer questions like ‘Why can one species survive a Canadian winter while the other cannot?’.