Fish have a remarkably diverse array of head designs, from snail-crushing redear sunfish to dainty zebrafish that feed on plankton and wide-mouthed bewhiskered catfish, but they all have one thing in common: they all suck. Corrine Jacobs and Roi Holzman, from the University of Tel Aviv, Israel, explain that fish rapidly expand and open their mouths to slurp up water, sweeping in any tasty morsel within range, ‘yet it is unclear how variable suction flows are across species’, the duo says. Together, Jacobs and Holzman filmed water being sucked into the mouths of fish ranging from oscars, knifefish and goldfish to tetras and even an amphibian (the tiger salamander) to find out how much their slurps differed, and they were amazed to find how little variation there was.
No matter how large or small the fish's mouth, they rarely slurped in water that was more than a mouth's width away and the suction always peaked at the instant when the fish's mouths were at their widest gape, although the fish with the largest mouths always produced the fastest gush of water. So, instead of adapting their suck to suit their diet, all fish – and probably other suction feeders – use pretty much the same style of slurp despite their vast array of head designs. And Jacobs and Holzman suggest that the reliability of a fish's slurp may have allowed them to experiment with other head designs as they evolved to vacuum up different dinners.
- © 2018. Published by The Company of Biologists Ltd
References
Article navigation
Related articles
Cited by...
More in this TOC section
Similar articles
Other journals from The Company of Biologists
Conversation – Philip Matthews
“You have to be able to build things, to troubleshoot, to solve little problems”
Philip Matthews is an Assistant Professor at the University of British Columbia, Canada, where he studies the respiratory adaptations of insects. He recently spoke to us about how he has always been a biology nerd, how ecophysiology combined everything that he was interested in and how researchers need to have a practical side.
Review – Rethinking the evolution of the human foot: insights from experimental research
Nicholas B. Holowka and Daniel E. Lieberman discuss how recent biomechanical models of human foot function and experimental locomotion data from great apes suggest that the human foot evolved to facilitate both bipedal walking and running.
Featured article – Decisive sea otters distinguish differences by touch
Photo credit: Ari Friedlander (permit no. USFWS MA186914-2)
Sea otters dine on shellfish dinners, but how do they locate these delicacies in the murky waters of Monterey Bay? Sarah McKay Strobel and colleagues have discovered that the animals’ paws and whiskers are remarkably sensitive (in both air and water) allowing them to identify objects with a single paw tap, raising the possibility that they are able to recognise morsels swiftly by touch while diving.
Commentary – Physiology, activity and costs of parental care in birds
Tony D. Williams explores how, contrary to expectation, parental care might not involve sustained, high-intensity activity; that is, it might not be ‘hard work’ and, consequently, costs of reproduction and physiological signatures of costs might rarely be experienced.
Meet the team
Are you going to the 2018 APS Comparative Physiology meeting in October? This meeting is supported by JEB and our Reviews Editor Charlotte Rutledge will be there - say hello!
preLights – Preprint highlights, selected by the biological community
Meet the preLighters! In the latest interview with our preLights community, the preLights team caught up with Heath MacMillan, Assistant Professor at Carleton University in Ottawa, to talk about his research, lab and preprints. His lab is studying the mechanisms of thermal tolerance in insects and aims to answer questions like ‘Why can one species survive a Canadian winter while the other cannot?’.