Head of a peacock (Pavo cristatus). Photo credit: G. Askew.
Peacocks are in a league of their own when it comes to performing for the ladies, strutting about with their ostentatious fanned trains; what female could resist? Graham Askew from the University of Leeds, UK, explains that males from many branches of the animal kingdom advertise themselves with elaborate ornaments, but these extravagant displays come at a price. ‘It is thought that such sexual traits have a negative effect on an individual's performance…but that more elaborate ornaments indicate superior genetic quality’, says Askew. In the case of the peacock, he suspected that the train could restrict their flight – possibly costing them their lives in the event of an impaired escape bid – yet no one had ever measured the impact of the peacock train on the bird's ability to take-off. ‘Trying to measure the effect that it [the train] had on performance seemed like a worthwhile effort’, says Askew, who decided to investigate how much an escaping peacock is incapacitated by his feather burden (p. 3237).
Selecting five Indian peacocks with intact feather trains, Askew startled the birds into take-offs as he filmed them in 3D with two high-speed video cameras. He then relieved the birds of their elaborate plumage, mimicking the natural loss of their trains at the end of the breeding season, and filmed their now unencumbered take-offs. Analysing the birds' trajectories over the first three wing beats, Askew calculated the position of each bird's centre of mass, their wing motions and the movement of the train. Then, he calculated how the loss of the train had altered the birds' take-off and was amazed to see that it had little impact on their escape performance. The amount of power used by the birds to accelerate and gain height over the first two wing beats was essentially the same (~200 W kg−1), regardless of the presence or absence of the train.
‘Intuitively, you expect that the train would affect flight performance and so not finding a detectable effect was a bit surprising’, admits Askew. Puzzled, he investigated how much the train affected drag on the birds during take-off. Mounting a detached train in a wind tunnel and measuring the drag on the feathers, he found that the drag increased by 200%, doubling the amount of power that the birds have to produce. However, the power that the birds have to produce to overcome drag is only 0.1% of their total aerodynamic power. So, the impact of the train on their overall take-off performance is negligible, allowing birds with and without trains to invest the same amount of power in the ascent, rather than having to divert some of it to overcome the effects of drag on the extravagant feathers.
Having shown that the train does not affect the peacock's take-off, Askew says, ‘These results do not necessarily mean there are no costs associated with possessing an ornate train’. He points out that there is a range of other aspects of peacock performance that the train could affect, such as flight stability, running and the shear cost of producing such an impressive ornament – the peacocks invest 3% of their basic daily metabolic budget in train growth – and he suspects that all of these factors could contribute to some extent to the price that proud peacocks pay to lure in the ladies.
- © 2014. Published by The Company of Biologists Ltd
References
Article navigation
Related articles
Cited by...
More in this TOC section
Similar articles
Other journals from The Company of Biologists
Welcome to our new Editorial Advisory Board members
Shelley A. Adamo (Dalhousie University, Canada)
Michael Berenbrink (University of Liverpool, UK)
Suzanne Currie (Mount Allison University, Canada)
Martin Grosell (University of Miami, USA)
Alison Mercer (University of Otago, New Zealand)
Jeffrey Richards (The University of British Columbia, Canada)
Sanjay Sane (National Center for Biological Sciences, India)
Holly Shiels (The University of Manchester, UK)
Commentary – Developmental phenotypic plasticity helps bridge stochastic weather events associated with climate change
Warren Burggren explores how unpredictable environmental phenomena associated with climate change can be challenging to developing organisms, but developmental phenotypic plasticity may be key to their survival.
Editors’ choice – Cuticular gas exchange by Antarctic sea spiders
Photo credit: Bret Tobalske.
Most animals that depend on absorbing oxygen across their skin are thin, have a large surface area and are NOT covered in a tough shell; so how do gigantic Antarctic sea spiders that lack gills absorb oxygen through their armour? In our latest Editors' choice article from H. Arthur Woods and colleagues, it turns out that conical pores in the animals' shells allow them to absorb oxygen without weakening the shell too badly.
This article was featured in a story in the New York Times.
Review – Passive water collection with the integument: mechanisms and their biomimetic potential
Skin water collection has evolved in several animal genera, enabling access to differing water sources. Philipp Comanns reviews six such mechanisms and discusses their innovation potential for technical applications.
Featured article – Lower spine curvature is an essential shock absorber for runners
Photo credit: The Center for Brain Science Neuroimaging Facility, Harvard University
While all modern humans have an S-shaped spine to balance our upright weight stably as we stride along, runners and soccer players tend to have more curved lumbar spines than swimmers. Now, a Research Article from Eric R. Castillo and Daniel E. Lieberman reveals that this curvature is a crucial shock absorber that protects us from injury while running.
JEB symposium 2017 – The biology of fat
Delegates at the 2017 Journal of Experimental Biology symposium ‘The biology of fat’ share their experiences and highlights of the meeting. We have also recently published a special issue featuring review articles based on the talks at this meeting.